Interactive analysis

EXPLORE THE GAME

Every shot, every lead change, every rotation — visualized.

Lead over time · win-probability overlay
LEAD TRACKER
LAL lead OKC lead Win %
Every shot · colored by difficulty
SHOT CHART
Click shooters to compare their shots on the court
OKC 2P — 3P —
LAL 2P — 3P —
Tough make Easy make Blown miss Tough miss 156 attempts

OKC OKC Shot-making Δ

Gilgeous-Alexander Hard 11/22 +3.6
Mitchell 12/19 +4.4
McCain Hard 5/10 +3.1
Holmgren Open 6/9 +0.9
Caruso 3/7 +1.2
Dort Hard 2/6 +0.1
Hartenstein Open 2/4 -0.6
Wallace Hard 1/2 +1.1
Joe Hard 0/2 -2.2

LAL LAL Shot-making Δ

James 8/18 +0.1
Reaves 8/16 +2.6
Hachimura Hard 9/15 +6.8
Hayes Open 6/8 +0.8
Smart Hard 2/8 -4.4
Kennard Hard 2/5 +0.1
Ayton Open 3/3 +2.0
Thiero Hard 0/1 -1.1
Vanderbilt Open 0/1 -1.4
How the game was played
BY THE NUMBERS
OKC
LAL
42/81 Field Goals 38/75
51.9% Field Goal % 50.7%
11/31 3-Pointers 10/28
35.5% 3-Point % 35.7%
20/24 Free Throws 24/27
83.3% Free Throw % 88.9%
62.8% True Shooting % 63.3%
37 Total Rebounds 46
6 Offensive 7
28 Defensive 30
19 Assists 18
1.58 Assist/TO Ratio 0.95
11 Turnovers 19
12 Steals 3
0 Blocks 5
24 Fouls 22
44 Points in Paint 46
11 Fast Break Pts 8
22 Points off TOs 9
10 Second Chance Pts 12
25 Bench Points 23
12 Largest Lead 5
Biggest contributors
TOP NET IMPACT
1
Ajay Mitchell
28 PTS · 3 REB · 4 AST · 33.0 MIN
+31.86
2
Shai Gilgeous-Alexander
35 PTS · 1 REB · 8 AST · 39.3 MIN
+23.11
3
Rui Hachimura
25 PTS · 5 REB · 2 AST · 43.2 MIN
+20.55
4
Jaxson Hayes
18 PTS · 5 REB · 1 AST · 27.0 MIN
+18.77
5
Chet Holmgren
16 PTS · 9 REB · 0 AST · 35.2 MIN
+15.98
6
LeBron James
24 PTS · 12 REB · 3 AST · 40.4 MIN
+11.25
7
Jared McCain
13 PTS · 2 REB · 0 AST · 15.9 MIN
+10.19
8
Isaiah Hartenstein
5 PTS · 10 REB · 5 AST · 28.0 MIN
+8.12
9
Austin Reaves
27 PTS · 7 REB · 6 AST · 43.0 MIN
+7.88
10
Deandre Ayton
6 PTS · 3 REB · 1 AST · 20.8 MIN
+6.86
Play-by-play (most recent first)
PLAY FEED
Q4 0:00 C. Holmgren REBOUND (Off:1 Def:8) 115–110
Q4 0:01 MISS A. Reaves tip Layup 115–110
Q4 0:01 A. Reaves REBOUND (Off:1 Def:6) 115–110
Q4 0:03 MISS M. Smart 3PT 115–110
Q4 0:06 A. Mitchell Free Throw 2 of 2 (28 PTS) 115–110
Q4 0:06 A. Mitchell Free Throw 1 of 2 (27 PTS) 114–110
Q4 0:06 R. Hachimura take personal FOUL (5 PF) (Mitchell 2 FT) 113–110
Q4 0:07 A. Caruso REBOUND (Off:0 Def:4) 113–110
Q4 0:08 MISS A. Reaves 26' pullup 3PT 113–110
Q4 0:12 S. Gilgeous-Alexander Free Throw 2 of 2 (35 PTS) 113–110
Q4 0:12 S. Gilgeous-Alexander Free Throw 1 of 2 (34 PTS) 112–110
Q4 0:12 A. Reaves take personal FOUL (5 PF) (Gilgeous-Alexander 2 FT) 111–110
Q4 0:17 I. Hartenstein REBOUND (Off:3 Def:7) 111–110
Q4 0:20 MISS L. James driving floating bank Shot 111–110
Q4 0:32 C. Holmgren DUNK (16 PTS) (I. Hartenstein 5 AST) 111–110

GAME ANALYSIS

KEEP READING

Create a free account and follow your team to get the full analysis every morning.

Create Free Account

Already have an account? Log in

PLAYER PERFORMANCE

LAL Los Angeles Lakers
S Rui Hachimura 43.2m
25
pts
5
reb
2
ast
Impact
+16.7

Hachimura erupted as a hyper-efficient scoring weapon, burying 4 triples en route to 25 points and a massive +23.2 offensive credit. He paired this offensive outburst with disciplined defense, contesting 5 shots and holding his direct matchups to a respectable 46% conversion rate.

Shooting
FG 9/15 (60.0%)
3PT 4/8 (50.0%)
FT 3/3 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 76.6%
USG% 17.0%
Net Rtg -1.0
+/- -2
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 43.2m
Scoring +20.4
Creation +0.7
Shot Making +6.4
Hustle +2.5
Defense -3.5
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 13
FGM Against 6
Opp FG% 46.2%
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 0
S Austin Reaves 43.0m
27
pts
7
reb
6
ast
Impact
+0.5

Reaves carried a massive offensive burden, scoring 27 points to drive a +10.0 offensive credit, but his decision-making was disastrous. He bled value via 8 turnovers and struggled to contain his matchups, allowing 9-of-16 shooting as the primary defender.

Shooting
FG 8/16 (50.0%)
3PT 3/7 (42.9%)
FT 8/9 (88.9%)
Advanced
TS% 67.6%
USG% 28.3%
Net Rtg -8.0
+/- -6
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 43.0m
Scoring +20.4
Creation +3.3
Shot Making +5.4
Hustle +3.1
Defense -3.0
Turnovers -19.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 16
FGM Against 9
Opp FG% 56.2%
STL 0
BLK 2
TO 8
S LeBron James 40.4m
24
pts
12
reb
3
ast
Impact
+6.8

James shifted his focus to dominating the glass, pulling down 12 rebounds while still providing a solid 24 points. However, his playmaking took a backseat (just 3 assists) and his point-of-attack defense was leaky, allowing opponents to shoot 60% when he was the primary defender.

Shooting
FG 8/18 (44.4%)
3PT 2/6 (33.3%)
FT 6/8 (75.0%)
Advanced
TS% 55.8%
USG% 28.6%
Net Rtg -19.2
+/- -17
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 40.4m
Scoring +15.4
Creation +2.0
Shot Making +4.7
Hustle +3.6
Defense +0.2
Turnovers -9.5
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 10
FGM Against 6
Opp FG% 60.0%
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 4
S Marcus Smart 35.6m
5
pts
2
reb
3
ast
Impact
-20.9

Smart's offensive identity crisis was on full display, as he bricked all four of his three-point attempts and coughed up 6 turnovers to generate a brutal -9.7 offensive credit. His usually reliable point-of-attack defense also collapsed, with opponents torching him for 7-of-9 shooting when he was the nearest defender.

Shooting
FG 2/8 (25.0%)
3PT 0/4 (0.0%)
FT 1/1 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 29.6%
USG% 16.9%
Net Rtg +5.1
+/- +5
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 35.6m
Scoring +0.4
Creation +0.7
Shot Making +1.0
Hustle +0.6
Defense +1.0
Turnovers -14.9
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 9
FGM Against 7
Opp FG% 77.8%
STL 2
BLK 0
TO 6
S Deandre Ayton 20.8m
6
pts
3
reb
1
ast
Impact
+1.1

Ayton was completely marginalized on offense, attempting just three shots and finishing well below his season averages in both points and rebounds. Despite his passive offensive role, he remained engaged as a rim deterrent, contesting 8 shots and holding opponents to 40% shooting when targeted.

Shooting
FG 3/3 (100.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 100.0%
USG% 7.0%
Net Rtg -7.8
+/- -2
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 20.8m
Scoring +6.0
Creation +0.3
Shot Making +1.2
Hustle +3.8
Defense -0.6
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 10
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 40.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
Jaxson Hayes 27.0m
18
pts
5
reb
1
ast
Impact
+12.6

Hayes was an unstoppable rim-running force, converting 6-of-8 from the floor and drawing fouls to rack up 18 points and a towering +20.7 offensive credit. He anchored his highly efficient scoring with stout interior defense, contesting 6 shots and holding opponents to a frigid 36% conversion rate.

Shooting
FG 6/8 (75.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 6/6 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 84.6%
USG% 19.7%
Net Rtg +2.6
+/- -1
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 27.0m
Scoring +16.4
Creation +1.8
Shot Making +1.4
Hustle +6.3
Defense -1.4
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 11
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 36.4%
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 1
Luke Kennard 24.3m
5
pts
2
reb
2
ast
Impact
-3.0

Kennard reverted to a passive bench shooter, attempting just five shots and finishing far below his season scoring average. While he avoided mistakes with zero turnovers, his inability to contain dribble penetration allowed opponents to shoot 54% against him, neutralizing his overall value.

Shooting
FG 2/5 (40.0%)
3PT 1/2 (50.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 50.0%
USG% 8.6%
Net Rtg +27.1
+/- +15
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 24.3m
Scoring +3.0
Creation +0.9
Shot Making +1.4
Hustle +0.6
Defense +0.8
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 13
FGM Against 7
Opp FG% 53.8%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 0
0
pts
1
reb
0
ast
Impact
-9.1

Vanderbilt saw less than three minutes of action, failing to make any tangible impact. His brief cameo yielded just a single rebound and a missed shot before he was pulled from the rotation.

Shooting
FG 0/1 (0.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 14.3%
Net Rtg -150.0
+/- -12
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 2.8m
Scoring -0.7
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +1.3
Defense +0.0
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 1
FGM Against 0
Opp FG% 0.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
0
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
-10.8

Thiero was relegated to a fleeting mop-up role, logging under three minutes of floor time. He offered nothing but empty cardio, failing to register a single counting stat aside from a missed three-pointer.

Shooting
FG 0/1 (0.0%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 16.7%
Net Rtg -135.0
+/- -5
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 2.8m
Scoring -0.8
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +0.0
Defense -0.3
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 1
FGM Against 0
Opp FG% 0.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
0
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
-0.0

Kleber stepped onto the floor for a mere five seconds. He accumulated zero stats during this momentary appearance.

Shooting
FG 0/0
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 0.0%
Net Rtg 0.0
+/- 0
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 0.1m
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
OKC Oklahoma City Thunder
35
pts
1
reb
8
ast
Impact
+20.8

Gilgeous-Alexander put on an absolute offensive masterclass, combining high-volume scoring (35 points) with elite orchestration (8 assists) to drive a +24.9 offensive credit. He was just as surgical on the other end, suffocating his primary matchups and holding them to a mere 3-of-8 from the floor.

Shooting
FG 11/22 (50.0%)
3PT 1/4 (25.0%)
FT 12/15 (80.0%)
Advanced
TS% 61.2%
USG% 37.2%
Net Rtg -10.0
+/- -7
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 39.3m
Scoring +26.2
Creation +4.0
Shot Making +6.3
Hustle +0.3
Defense +0.8
Turnovers -7.1
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 8
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 37.5%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 3
S Chet Holmgren 35.2m
16
pts
9
reb
0
ast
Impact
+10.5

Holmgren remained a ruthlessly efficient offensive hub, sinking 6-of-9 shots to drive a +13.7 offensive credit. However, his interior defense faltered significantly, as opponents shot a blistering 11-of-17 (65%) when he was the primary defender despite his 8 contests.

Shooting
FG 6/9 (66.7%)
3PT 0/2 (0.0%)
FT 4/4 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 74.3%
USG% 14.5%
Net Rtg -3.3
+/- +1
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 35.2m
Scoring +13.8
Creation +1.4
Shot Making +1.3
Hustle +5.6
Defense -0.8
Turnovers -1.1
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 17
FGM Against 11
Opp FG% 64.7%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 1
S Ajay Mitchell 33.0m
28
pts
3
reb
4
ast
Impact
+27.3

Mitchell exploded as a devastating offensive engine, pouring in 28 points on 12-of-19 shooting to generate a massive +24.2 offensive credit. His relentless two-way motor was equally apparent off the ball, where 5 deflections and 4 steals helped offset the fact that opponents shot 73% against him directly.

Shooting
FG 12/19 (63.2%)
3PT 1/4 (25.0%)
FT 3/3 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 68.9%
USG% 27.6%
Net Rtg +20.2
+/- +17
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 33.0m
Scoring +22.6
Creation +1.0
Shot Making +6.2
Hustle +1.9
Defense +7.6
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 11
FGM Against 8
Opp FG% 72.7%
STL 4
BLK 0
TO 1
S Luguentz Dort 31.1m
6
pts
2
reb
0
ast
Impact
-6.3

Dort struggled to find his offensive rhythm, finishing below his season average in scoring while failing to register a single assist. His defensive effort remained steady with 3 deflections and holding his matchup to 3-of-7 shooting, but his overall offensive passivity limited his impact.

Shooting
FG 2/6 (33.3%)
3PT 2/5 (40.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 50.0%
USG% 9.2%
Net Rtg +7.5
+/- -1
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 31.1m
Scoring +3.0
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +1.9
Hustle +0.6
Defense -2.2
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 7
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 42.9%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
5
pts
10
reb
5
ast
Impact
+1.8

Hartenstein eschewed his own scoring (5 points) to operate as a high-level facilitator and defensive disruptor. His elite playmaking (5 assists) and active hands (3 steals, 3 deflections) fueled a strong +6.5 defensive credit, proving he can impact winning without hunting shots.

Shooting
FG 2/4 (50.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 1/2 (50.0%)
Advanced
TS% 51.2%
USG% 12.7%
Net Rtg +50.3
+/- +30
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 28.0m
Scoring +2.2
Creation +1.9
Shot Making +0.9
Hustle +8.8
Defense +5.0
Turnovers -7.3
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 10
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 3
BLK 0
TO 3
Alex Caruso 21.8m
9
pts
4
reb
1
ast
Impact
-3.0

Caruso provided a vital two-way spark off the bench, knocking down 3-of-5 from deep to eclipse his season scoring average. His trademark defensive grit was on full display, as he racked up 3 deflections and 2 steals to disrupt the opponent's offensive flow and secure a +2.0 defensive credit.

Shooting
FG 3/7 (42.9%)
3PT 3/5 (60.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 64.3%
USG% 16.3%
Net Rtg +22.0
+/- +7
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 21.8m
Scoring +5.5
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +2.9
Hustle +1.2
Defense -0.5
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 9
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 44.4%
STL 2
BLK 0
TO 1
3
pts
2
reb
0
ast
Impact
-6.8

Wallace was virtually invisible on the offensive end, attempting just two shots and finishing well below his season scoring average. However, he salvaged his minutes with a grinding defensive motor, stifling his assignments and holding them to a frigid 4-of-11 shooting mark to earn a +2.3 defensive credit.

Shooting
FG 1/2 (50.0%)
3PT 1/1 (100.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 75.0%
USG% 7.1%
Net Rtg -53.0
+/- -24
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 19.3m
Scoring +2.3
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +1.0
Hustle +0.6
Defense +2.1
Turnovers -3.1
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 11
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 36.4%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 1
Jared McCain 15.9m
13
pts
2
reb
0
ast
Impact
+5.5

McCain operated as a lethal microwave scorer, pouring in 13 points on 50% shooting to nearly double his season average. His confident shot-making fueled a +9.9 offensive credit, while he quietly held his own defensively by limiting his matchups to 1-of-3 from the floor.

Shooting
FG 5/10 (50.0%)
3PT 3/8 (37.5%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 65.0%
USG% 26.3%
Net Rtg +78.6
+/- +27
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 15.9m
Scoring +9.0
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +3.6
Hustle +2.5
Defense +0.0
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 3
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 33.3%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
0
pts
1
reb
0
ast
Impact
-10.9

Williams was a complete non-factor during his brief 8-minute stint, failing to attempt a single shot or register an assist. His defensive presence was similarly hollow, yielding a 67% conversion rate to his matchups while generating a -0.5 defensive credit.

Shooting
FG 0/0
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 0.0%
Net Rtg -68.3
+/- -13
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 8.7m
Scoring +0.0
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +0.3
Defense -1.6
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 3
FGM Against 2
Opp FG% 66.7%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
Isaiah Joe 7.5m
0
pts
0
reb
1
ast
Impact
-16.0

Joe endured a catastrophic offensive outing, failing to score a single point and missing both of his perimeter attempts to generate a -3.2 offensive credit. His struggles bled into his defense, where he offered little resistance and allowed opponents to convert 2-of-3 shots against him.

Shooting
FG 0/2 (0.0%)
3PT 0/2 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 18.8%
Net Rtg -59.0
+/- -12
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 7.5m
Scoring -1.4
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +0.0
Defense -1.9
Turnovers -3.1
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 3
FGM Against 2
Opp FG% 66.7%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1
0
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
-0.1

Wiggins saw just 18 seconds of floor time, functioning entirely as a brief placeholder. He logged zero counting stats across the board in his fleeting cameo.

Shooting
FG 0/0
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 0.0%
Net Rtg 0.0
+/- 0
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 0.3m
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0