Interactive analysis

EXPLORE THE GAME

Every shot, every lead change, every rotation — visualized.

Lead over time · win-probability overlay
LEAD TRACKER
OKC lead SAS lead Win %
Every shot · colored by difficulty
SHOT CHART
Click shooters to compare their shots on the court
SAS 2P — 3P —
OKC 2P — 3P —
Tough make Easy make Blown miss Tough miss 178 attempts

SAS SAS Shot-making Δ

Castle 10/17 +1.5
Wembanyama 8/16 +1.7
Vassell Hard 7/14 +6.1
Johnson Open 4/12 -5.5
Harper Open 5/10 -1.8
Champagnie Hard 2/8 -3.4
McLaughlin Hard 2/3 +3.2
Kornet Open 2/2 +1.2
Barnes Hard 1/2 +0.8

OKC OKC Shot-making Δ

Gilgeous-Alexander 12/24 +1.3
McCain Hard 4/14 -4.4
Holmgren 5/10 -1.4
Hartenstein 4/8 +0.2
Mitchell 4/8 -0.5
Caruso Hard 5/7 +5.9
Wallace Hard 4/6 +5.5
Williams Hard 2/6 -0.7
Dort Hard 3/4 +3.1
Williams 2/4 +0.1
How the game was played
BY THE NUMBERS
SAS
OKC
41/84 Field Goals 45/94
48.8% Field Goal % 47.9%
16/40 3-Pointers 13/36
40.0% 3-Point % 36.1%
15/17 Free Throws 19/24
88.2% Free Throw % 79.2%
61.8% True Shooting % 58.3%
49 Total Rebounds 50
16 Offensive 17
29 Defensive 24
22 Assists 34
1.05 Assist/TO Ratio 3.40
21 Turnovers 9
5 Steals 14
6 Blocks 3
21 Fouls 21
46 Points in Paint 42
10 Fast Break Pts 8
10 Points off TOs 27
22 Second Chance Pts 17
25 Bench Points 57
5 Largest Lead 13
Biggest contributors
TOP NET IMPACT
1
Shai Gilgeous-Alexander
30 PTS · 4 REB · 9 AST · 38.3 MIN
+24.42
2
Victor Wembanyama
21 PTS · 17 REB · 6 AST · 37.3 MIN
+23.14
3
Cason Wallace
12 PTS · 4 REB · 4 AST · 24.8 MIN
+22.12
4
Alex Caruso
17 PTS · 3 REB · 5 AST · 25.4 MIN
+21.26
5
Jared McCain
12 PTS · 6 REB · 3 AST · 25.8 MIN
+14.38
6
Devin Vassell
22 PTS · 4 REB · 1 AST · 37.6 MIN
+13.62
7
Ajay Mitchell
10 PTS · 0 REB · 2 AST · 28.2 MIN
+11.93
8
Isaiah Hartenstein
10 PTS · 13 REB · 3 AST · 27.3 MIN
+9.13
9
Stephon Castle
25 PTS · 5 REB · 8 AST · 38.3 MIN
+8.99
10
Chet Holmgren
13 PTS · 4 REB · 2 AST · 27.0 MIN
+7.61
Play-by-play (most recent first)
PLAY FEED
Q4 0:13 C. Wallace REBOUND (Off:1 Def:3) 113–122
Q4 0:16 MISS D. Vassell 26' 3PT 113–122
Q4 0:19 A. Caruso driving Layup (17 PTS) (C. Wallace 4 AST) 113–122
Q4 0:28 I. Hartenstein REBOUND (Off:8 Def:5) 113–120
Q4 0:32 MISS S. Castle 3PT 113–120
Q4 0:42 S. Gilgeous-Alexander 18' step back Jump Shot (30 PTS) (J. McCain 3 AST) 113–120
Q4 1:01 S. Castle bad pass out-of-bounds TURNOVER (9 TO) 113–118
Q4 1:03 K. Johnson REBOUND (Off:5 Def:0) 113–118
Q4 1:06 MISS D. Vassell 3PT 113–118
Q4 1:15 S. Gilgeous-Alexander offensive foul TURNOVER (1 TO) 113–118
Q4 1:15 S. Gilgeous-Alexander offensive FOUL (5 PF) 113–118
Q4 1:25 V. Wembanyama driving Layup (21 PTS) (S. Castle 8 AST) 113–118
Q4 1:37 V. Wembanyama REBOUND (Off:5 Def:12) 111–118
Q4 1:37 MISS S. Gilgeous-Alexander 18' pullup Shot 111–118
Q4 1:56 D. Vassell 25' 3PT pullup (22 PTS) (S. Castle 7 AST) 111–118

GAME ANALYSIS

KEEP READING

Create a free account and follow your team to get the full analysis every morning.

Create Free Account

Already have an account? Log in

PLAYER PERFORMANCE

OKC Oklahoma City Thunder
30
pts
4
reb
9
ast
Impact
+16.5

Gilgeous-Alexander delivered an absolute masterclass in offensive orchestration, pouring in 30 points while dishing out 9 assists (↑ vs 7.3 avg). This flawless blend of scoring and playmaking drove a massive +25.7 offensive credit, while his 2 blocks highlighted his two-way engagement.

Shooting
FG 12/24 (50.0%)
3PT 0/3 (0.0%)
FT 6/6 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 56.3%
USG% 28.1%
Net Rtg +14.8
+/- +14
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 38.3m
Scoring +21.6
Creation +2.0
Shot Making +6.1
Hustle +1.2
Defense -0.4
Turnovers -3.1
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 14
FGM Against 7
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 1
BLK 2
TO 1
10
pts
13
reb
3
ast
Impact
+3.4

Hartenstein imposed his will on the glass, pulling down 13 rebounds (↑ vs 8.5 avg) to anchor the interior. His +12.4 offensive credit highlights his value as a connective hub, though 3 turnovers slightly dampened an otherwise robust performance.

Shooting
FG 4/8 (50.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 2/4 (50.0%)
Advanced
TS% 51.2%
USG% 19.4%
Net Rtg +5.9
+/- +2
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 27.3m
Scoring +6.1
Creation +0.7
Shot Making +1.7
Hustle +14.6
Defense -0.9
Turnovers -7.8
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 16
FGM Against 9
Opp FG% 56.2%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 3
S Chet Holmgren 27.0m
13
pts
4
reb
2
ast
Impact
+0.7

Holmgren's elite rim deterrence was the defining feature of his night, suffocating opponents into a dismal 11% shooting (1-of-9) as the primary defender. While his rebounding (4 boards, ↓ vs 8.9 avg) was uncharacteristically light, his +9.1 offensive credit shows he still found ways to contribute efficiently on the other end.

Shooting
FG 5/10 (50.0%)
3PT 0/2 (0.0%)
FT 3/4 (75.0%)
Advanced
TS% 55.3%
USG% 19.7%
Net Rtg +17.7
+/- +6
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 27.0m
Scoring +8.5
Creation +1.4
Shot Making +1.9
Hustle +4.1
Defense -1.9
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 9
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 11.1%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1
S Luguentz Dort 16.1m
8
pts
3
reb
3
ast
Impact
-3.4

Dort provided highly efficient, low-volume scoring, converting 3 of his 4 field goal attempts to generate a +8.6 offensive credit. Despite his defensive reputation, his impact on that end was surprisingly muted (-0.8 defensive credit), as he failed to register a steal or block.

Shooting
FG 3/4 (75.0%)
3PT 1/2 (50.0%)
FT 1/2 (50.0%)
Advanced
TS% 82.0%
USG% 17.6%
Net Rtg -24.2
+/- -10
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 16.1m
Scoring +6.7
Creation +0.2
Shot Making +2.0
Hustle +2.8
Defense -1.9
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 4
FGM Against 2
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1
4
pts
1
reb
0
ast
Impact
-2.5

Williams was marginalized offensively in his brief 7 minutes, scoring just 4 points (↓↓ vs 17.4 avg) and failing to record a single assist. However, he salvaged his appearance with active hands, swiping 2 steals (↑ vs 1.0 avg) to drive a solid +5.2 defensive credit.

Shooting
FG 2/4 (50.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 50.0%
USG% 26.7%
Net Rtg +20.0
+/- +2
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 7.3m
Scoring +2.7
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.7
Hustle +0.3
Defense +4.7
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 2
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 2
BLK 0
TO 0
10
pts
0
reb
2
ast
Impact
+1.2

Mitchell was an absolute menace in the passing lanes, racking up 4 steals (↑ vs 1.2 avg) and 5 deflections to completely disrupt the opposing offense. This relentless perimeter pressure, combined with holding his matchups to 33% shooting, resulted in a massive +13.2 defensive credit.

Shooting
FG 4/8 (50.0%)
3PT 0/2 (0.0%)
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 56.3%
USG% 17.6%
Net Rtg +18.6
+/- +11
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 28.2m
Scoring +7.0
Creation +0.4
Shot Making +1.9
Hustle +0.0
Defense +10.0
Turnovers -7.1
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 12
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 33.3%
STL 4
BLK 1
TO 3
Jared McCain 25.8m
12
pts
6
reb
3
ast
Impact
+8.6

McCain struggled mightily with his shooting efficiency (4-of-14 FG), but salvaged his offensive value (+9.9 credit) by taking care of the ball and hitting 3 triples. He also crashed the glass exceptionally well for a guard, pulling down 6 rebounds (↑ vs 1.3 avg) to round out a gritty performance.

Shooting
FG 4/14 (28.6%)
3PT 3/9 (33.3%)
FT 1/2 (50.0%)
Advanced
TS% 40.3%
USG% 23.1%
Net Rtg +14.1
+/- +9
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 25.8m
Scoring +3.0
Creation +0.9
Shot Making +3.3
Hustle +7.6
Defense +4.7
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 9
FGM Against 6
Opp FG% 66.7%
STL 2
BLK 0
TO 0
Alex Caruso 25.4m
17
pts
3
reb
5
ast
Impact
+15.2

Caruso was a two-way terror, erupting for a highly efficient 17 points (↑ vs 8.0 avg) while suffocating his matchups into 30% shooting (3-of-10). His flawless perimeter execution (3-of-4 from deep) and sharp playmaking (5 assists, 0 turnovers) fueled a staggering +20.3 offensive credit.

Shooting
FG 5/7 (71.4%)
3PT 3/4 (75.0%)
FT 4/4 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 97.0%
USG% 13.8%
Net Rtg +29.1
+/- +18
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 25.4m
Scoring +15.2
Creation +2.5
Shot Making +3.8
Hustle +3.8
Defense +0.8
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 10
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 30.0%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 0
12
pts
4
reb
4
ast
Impact
+14.9

Wallace put on a defensive clinic, generating a staggering 10 deflections and 4 steals (↑ vs 1.5 avg) to completely hijack the opposing offense. He paired this elite disruption (+10.8 hustle credit) with flawless perimeter shooting, draining 4-of-6 from deep to drive a +13.5 offensive credit.

Shooting
FG 4/6 (66.7%)
3PT 4/6 (66.7%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 100.0%
USG% 9.1%
Net Rtg -5.8
+/- -3
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 24.8m
Scoring +10.4
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +3.8
Hustle +4.1
Defense +7.6
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 8
FGM Against 7
Opp FG% 87.5%
STL 4
BLK 0
TO 0
6
pts
3
reb
2
ast
Impact
-7.3

Williams operated strictly as a perimeter spacer, taking all 6 of his shots from beyond the arc and converting two of them for a +3.8 offensive credit. However, his interior defense was a glaring weakness, as opponents shot a blistering 62% (5-of-8) when he was the nearest defender.

Shooting
FG 2/6 (33.3%)
3PT 2/6 (33.3%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 50.0%
USG% 25.0%
Net Rtg -23.8
+/- -5
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 9.8m
Scoring +2.8
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +1.9
Hustle +0.9
Defense -1.9
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 8
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 62.5%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
Isaiah Joe 9.8m
0
pts
0
reb
1
ast
Impact
-15.6

Joe suffered a complete offensive power outage, going scoreless (↓↓ vs 9.2 avg) and missing all three of his field goal attempts. His inability to stretch the floor or generate defensive stops (-1.7 defensive credit) rendered his 9 minutes highly ineffective.

Shooting
FG 0/3 (0.0%)
3PT 0/2 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 10.3%
Net Rtg -9.3
+/- +1
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 9.8m
Scoring -2.4
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +0.0
Defense -2.2
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 2
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
0
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
-0.1

Wiggins made a fleeting 11-second cameo, failing to record a single statistic. His brief appearance left no measurable footprint on the game.

Shooting
FG 0/0
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 0.0%
Net Rtg 0.0
+/- 0
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 0.2m
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
SAS San Antonio Spurs
S Stephon Castle 38.3m
25
pts
5
reb
8
ast
Impact
+1.4

Castle's performance was a chaotic tug-of-war between brilliant offensive orchestration and catastrophic decision-making. While he scored efficiently (10-of-17 FG) and dished out 8 assists to drive a +9.2 offensive credit, his staggering 9 turnovers (↑↑ vs 3.7 avg) severely undermined his playmaking value.

Shooting
FG 10/17 (58.8%)
3PT 1/6 (16.7%)
FT 4/4 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 66.6%
USG% 32.9%
Net Rtg -9.7
+/- -11
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 38.3m
Scoring +19.4
Creation +1.7
Shot Making +4.8
Hustle +6.3
Defense +0.2
Turnovers -20.1
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 18
FGM Against 9
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 9
S Devin Vassell 37.6m
22
pts
4
reb
1
ast
Impact
+6.6

Vassell's scorching perimeter shooting defined his night, as he poured in 22 points (↑ vs 12.4 avg) while draining 6-of-12 from deep. His massive +15.0 offensive credit reflects this lethal shot-making, though his playmaking (1 assist) took a backseat to pure scoring.

Shooting
FG 7/14 (50.0%)
3PT 6/12 (50.0%)
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 73.9%
USG% 17.8%
Net Rtg -7.5
+/- -7
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 37.6m
Scoring +16.5
Creation +0.4
Shot Making +6.3
Hustle +1.2
Defense -4.5
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 16
FGM Against 6
Opp FG% 37.5%
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 1
21
pts
17
reb
6
ast
Impact
+24.0

Wembanyama completely anchored the interior, contesting 15 shots and holding opponents to a stifling 38% (11-of-29) as the primary defender. This elite rim deterrence drove a massive +11.5 defensive credit, while his 17 rebounds (↑ vs 13.0 avg) and +17.4 offensive mark showcased his dominant two-way presence.

Shooting
FG 8/16 (50.0%)
3PT 3/7 (42.9%)
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 62.2%
USG% 24.1%
Net Rtg -1.9
+/- +1
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 37.3m
Scoring +14.9
Creation +1.9
Shot Making +5.2
Hustle +20.6
Defense +2.5
Turnovers -10.2
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 29
FGM Against 11
Opp FG% 37.9%
STL 1
BLK 4
TO 4
8
pts
5
reb
2
ast
Impact
-6.0

A brutal shooting slump derailed Champagnie's impact, as he bricked 6 of his 7 attempts from beyond the arc. His defensive struggles compounded the issue, allowing his primary matchups to shoot 56% (5-of-9) when he was the nearest defender.

Shooting
FG 2/8 (25.0%)
3PT 1/7 (14.3%)
FT 3/4 (75.0%)
Advanced
TS% 41.0%
USG% 11.8%
Net Rtg +13.6
+/- +11
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 36.0m
Scoring +2.4
Creation +0.7
Shot Making +1.5
Hustle +1.5
Defense -1.1
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 9
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 55.6%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 0
S Dylan Harper 24.8m
12
pts
2
reb
3
ast
Impact
-3.2

Harper delivered an efficient but quiet scoring punch (5-of-10 FG) without attempting a single three-pointer. His +8.6 offensive credit highlights a steady offensive rhythm, though his lack of rebounding (2 boards, ↓ vs 5.2 avg) limited his overall footprint on the game.

Shooting
FG 5/10 (50.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 55.1%
USG% 19.7%
Net Rtg +7.3
+/- +6
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 24.8m
Scoring +8.1
Creation +1.0
Shot Making +1.9
Hustle +0.6
Defense -1.6
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 4
FGM Against 2
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1
10
pts
5
reb
1
ast
Impact
-4.7

Inefficient volume hampered Johnson's outing as he struggled to find his touch, converting just 4 of his 12 field goal attempts. A lack of defensive resistance (-1.7 defensive credit) further muted his impact, rendering him a net negative despite a decent +7.6 offensive mark.

Shooting
FG 4/12 (33.3%)
3PT 2/4 (50.0%)
FT 0/1 (0.0%)
Advanced
TS% 40.2%
USG% 20.3%
Net Rtg -21.3
+/- -14
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 26.2m
Scoring +3.0
Creation +0.2
Shot Making +2.7
Hustle +6.3
Defense -3.7
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 6
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1
5
pts
3
reb
0
ast
Impact
-9.0

Barnes drifted into the background during his 12 minutes of action, attempting only two shots and failing to register a single assist or defensive stat. His 2 turnovers (↑ vs 0.3 avg) further eroded his value, resulting in a muted +2.2 offensive credit.

Shooting
FG 1/2 (50.0%)
3PT 1/2 (50.0%)
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 86.8%
USG% 16.7%
Net Rtg -8.3
+/- -1
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 12.2m
Scoring +4.2
Creation +0.4
Shot Making +0.9
Hustle +1.9
Defense +0.0
Turnovers -5.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 5
FGM Against 2
Opp FG% 40.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 2
Luke Kornet 10.6m
4
pts
2
reb
0
ast
Impact
-4.0

Kornet maximized his brief 10-minute stint through flawless interior finishing (2-of-2 FG) and solid screening. His 3 screen assists helped grease the wheels for the offense, earning him a respectable +6.2 offensive credit in a highly specialized role.

Shooting
FG 2/2 (100.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 100.0%
USG% 6.5%
Net Rtg -53.4
+/- -10
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 10.6m
Scoring +4.0
Creation +0.2
Shot Making +0.4
Hustle +1.6
Defense +0.8
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 4
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 75.0%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 0
0
pts
1
reb
0
ast
Impact
-11.6

Bryant was completely invisible on the offensive end, failing to attempt a single shot and coughing up 2 turnovers in just 10 minutes. His defensive rotations were equally problematic, allowing opponents to shoot a blistering 71% (5-of-7) when he was the nearest defender.

Shooting
FG 0/0
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 7.4%
Net Rtg -35.2
+/- -10
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 10.1m
Scoring +0.0
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +1.3
Defense +2.9
Turnovers -4.7
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 7
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 71.4%
STL 1
BLK 1
TO 2
6
pts
1
reb
1
ast
Impact
-6.2

McLaughlin provided a brief but potent offensive spark during his 7 minutes on the floor, drilling both of his three-point attempts. This flawless perimeter execution drove a +5.3 offensive credit, offering a rare bright spot in his limited rotational cameo.

Shooting
FG 2/3 (66.7%)
3PT 2/2 (100.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 100.0%
USG% 20.0%
Net Rtg -69.5
+/- -10
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 7.0m
Scoring +5.5
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +1.9
Hustle +1.3
Defense -1.6
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 6
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 66.7%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1