Interactive analysis

EXPLORE THE GAME

Every shot, every lead change, every rotation — visualized.

Lead over time · win-probability overlay
LEAD TRACKER
OKC lead NOP lead Win %
Every shot · colored by difficulty
SHOT CHART
Click shooters to compare their shots on the court
NOP 2P — 3P —
OKC 2P — 3P —
Tough make Easy make Blown miss Tough miss 164 attempts

NOP NOP Shot-making Δ

Williamson Open 7/14 -1.9
Murphy III Hard 7/13 +5.8
Fears Hard 6/13 +3.0
Poole Hard 2/11 -5.8
Jones Hard 4/6 +4.9
Peavy Hard 1/4 -0.4
Missi Open 2/4 -1.1
Bey Hard 1/4 -2.2
Alvarado Hard 1/3 -0.1
Looney 1/3 -1.6

OKC OKC Shot-making Δ

Gilgeous-Alexander 8/14 +1.7
Joe Hard 5/12 +0.4
Wiggins 6/11 +2.1
Williams Hard 4/9 +2.5
Carlson 5/8 +1.9
Mitchell 2/8 -4.5
Hartenstein Open 6/7 +2.7
Wallace Hard 4/5 +5.6
Caruso Hard 3/5 +2.9
Youngblood Hard 2/3 +3.1
How the game was played
BY THE NUMBERS
NOP
OKC
35/80 Field Goals 47/84
43.8% Field Goal % 56.0%
16/40 3-Pointers 20/48
40.0% 3-Point % 41.7%
20/32 Free Throws 23/26
62.5% Free Throw % 88.5%
56.3% True Shooting % 71.8%
51 Total Rebounds 47
12 Offensive 8
26 Defensive 34
26 Assists 33
1.53 Assist/TO Ratio 2.54
16 Turnovers 11
6 Steals 12
3 Blocks 5
22 Fouls 22
38 Points in Paint 48
10 Fast Break Pts 18
21 Points off TOs 25
8 Second Chance Pts 17
32 Bench Points 53
3 Largest Lead 36
Biggest contributors
TOP NET IMPACT
1
Shai Gilgeous-Alexander
30 PTS · 2 REB · 7 AST · 30.0 MIN
+24.74
2
Cason Wallace
13 PTS · 0 REB · 1 AST · 26.1 MIN
+21.88
3
Isaiah Hartenstein
14 PTS · 14 REB · 8 AST · 25.8 MIN
+20.57
4
Trey Murphy III
19 PTS · 5 REB · 2 AST · 32.1 MIN
+14.9
5
Jaylin Williams
12 PTS · 3 REB · 4 AST · 22.9 MIN
+12.98
6
Herbert Jones
12 PTS · 1 REB · 3 AST · 24.1 MIN
+12.74
7
Aaron Wiggins
15 PTS · 1 REB · 1 AST · 26.5 MIN
+11.01
8
Yves Missi
7 PTS · 6 REB · 0 AST · 21.9 MIN
+10.15
9
Zion Williamson
20 PTS · 9 REB · 6 AST · 28.1 MIN
+9.35
10
Isaiah Joe
13 PTS · 5 REB · 1 AST · 27.0 MIN
+9.15
Play-by-play (most recent first)
PLAY FEED
Q4 0:11 OKC shot clock Team TURNOVER 106–137
Q4 0:36 I. Joe defensive goaltending VIOLATION 106–137
Q4 0:36 K. Matković running DUNK (4 PTS) (B. McGowens 2 AST) 106–137
Q4 0:40 D. Queen REBOUND (Off:1 Def:1) 104–137
Q4 0:43 MISS I. Joe 28' pullup 3PT 104–137
Q4 1:01 B. McGowens Free Throw 2 of 2 (2 PTS) 104–137
Q4 1:01 B. McGowens Free Throw 1 of 2 (1 PTS) 103–137
Q4 1:01 I. Joe shooting personal FOUL (4 PF) (McGowens 2 FT) 102–137
Q4 1:17 B. Carlson cutting Layup (11 PTS) (A. Mitchell 8 AST) 102–137
Q4 1:36 D. Queen driving Layup (4 PTS) 102–135
Q4 1:40 B. Barnhizer running finger roll Layup (2 PTS) 100–135
Q4 1:43 B. Barnhizer REBOUND (Off:1 Def:2) 100–133
Q4 1:45 MISS D. Queen driving Layup 100–133
Q4 1:50 D. Queen REBOUND (Off:1 Def:0) 100–133
Q4 1:53 MISS M. Peavy 14' turnaround fadeaway Shot 100–133

GAME ANALYSIS

KEEP READING

Create a free account and follow your team to get the full analysis every morning.

Create Free Account

Already have an account? Log in

Why this game is worth arguing about
game swinger
Shai Gilgeous-Alexander actually won the night
30 points, 2 boards, 7 assists was the line. The lift came from scoring (+25.5), shot-making (+4.2), and creation (+4.1), pushing Net Impact to +26.4.
Scoring +25.5
Points, shot value, and miss penalties.
Shot-making +4.2
Makes above expected shot difficulty.
Creation +4.1
Assist credit weighted by shot quality created.
Check the tape
hidden value
Cason Wallace's value was hiding in plain sight
13 points, 0 boards, 1 assist undersells it. scoring (+12.2), defense (+8.4), and shot-making (+3.0) pushed his Net Impact to +16.4.
Scoring +12.2
Points, shot value, and miss penalties.
Defense +8.4
Steals, blocks, fouls, and defensive events.
Shot-making +3.0
Makes above expected shot difficulty.
Check the tape
box score lie
The box score sold Jeremiah Fears too hard
16 points, 4 boards, 4 assists was already a rough line. The real damage was turnovers (-11.8) and defense (-1.9), pulling Net Impact down to -6.2.
Turnovers -11.8
Possessions destroyed by giveaways.
Defense -1.9
Steals, blocks, fouls, and defensive events.
Creation +0.9
Assist credit weighted by shot quality created.
Check the tape
box score lie
The box score sold Ajay Mitchell too hard
10 points, 5 boards, 8 assists was already a rough line. The real damage was turnovers (-4.7), pulling Net Impact down to -0.1.
Turnovers -4.7
Possessions destroyed by giveaways.
Defense +0.8
Steals, blocks, fouls, and defensive events.
Shot-making +0.9
Makes above expected shot difficulty.
Check the tape

PLAYER PERFORMANCE

OKC Oklahoma City Thunder
30
pts
2
reb
7
ast
Impact
+26.4

Relentless downhill pressure forced the defense into constant rotation and generated a parade to the free-throw line. His methodical isolation scoring dictated the game's tempo, anchoring a highly efficient offensive attack.

Shooting
FG 8/14 (57.1%)
3PT 1/5 (20.0%)
FT 13/13 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 76.1%
USG% 34.3%
Net Rtg +39.8
+/- +24
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 30.0m
Scoring +25.5
Creation +4.1
Shot Making +4.2
Hustle +0.6
Defense +2.1
Turnovers -5.9
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 9
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 55.6%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 3
S Aaron Wiggins 26.5m
15
pts
1
reb
1
ast
Impact
+3.9

Poured in points at an efficient clip, but gave back the gains through poor defensive rotations and late closeouts. His inability to stay connected to shooters off the ball allowed the opposition to match his scoring output.

Shooting
FG 6/11 (54.5%)
3PT 3/6 (50.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 68.2%
USG% 18.0%
Net Rtg +35.8
+/- +19
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 26.5m
Scoring +11.2
Creation +1.4
Shot Making +3.4
Hustle +0.3
Defense -2.6
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 7
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 57.1%
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 0
S Cason Wallace 26.1m
13
pts
0
reb
1
ast
Impact
+16.4

Suffocating point-of-attack defense completely derailed the opponent's primary actions. Paired this lockdown perimeter coverage with flawless spot-up execution to deliver a masterclass in role-player efficiency.

Shooting
FG 4/5 (80.0%)
3PT 3/4 (75.0%)
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 110.5%
USG% 10.2%
Net Rtg +33.3
+/- +18
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 26.1m
Scoring +12.2
Creation +1.6
Shot Making +3.0
Hustle +0.0
Defense +8.4
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 8
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 5
BLK 0
TO 0
14
pts
14
reb
8
ast
Impact
+16.7

Completely dominated the interior through elite rim-running and surgical high-post passing. His ability to anchor the drop coverage while simultaneously orchestrating from the elbow drove a massively profitable two-way performance.

Shooting
FG 6/7 (85.7%)
3PT 0/0
FT 2/3 (66.7%)
Advanced
TS% 84.1%
USG% 16.4%
Net Rtg +24.1
+/- +13
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 25.8m
Scoring +12.8
Creation +0.8
Shot Making +1.7
Hustle +17.8
Defense -1.8
Turnovers -5.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 14
FGM Against 7
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 1
BLK 1
TO 2
S Jaylin Williams 22.9m
12
pts
3
reb
4
ast
Impact
+6.7

An absolute menace in the margins, generating massive value through drawn charges and relentless loose-ball recoveries. Spacing the floor as a trail big opened up driving lanes, compounding his elite defensive positioning.

Shooting
FG 4/9 (44.4%)
3PT 4/9 (44.4%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 66.7%
USG% 17.6%
Net Rtg +31.9
+/- +15
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 22.9m
Scoring +7.9
Creation +0.4
Shot Making +3.8
Hustle +0.9
Defense +2.6
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 16
FGM Against 6
Opp FG% 37.5%
STL 1
BLK 1
TO 0
10
pts
5
reb
8
ast
Impact
-0.1

Playmaking vision was overshadowed by an inability to break down his primary defender, leading to stagnant, late-clock heaves. The lack of scoring threat allowed defenders to play the passing lanes, resulting in a highly negative offensive shift.

Shooting
FG 2/8 (25.0%)
3PT 0/3 (0.0%)
FT 6/8 (75.0%)
Advanced
TS% 43.4%
USG% 18.3%
Net Rtg +31.2
+/- +19
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 30.2m
Scoring +4.6
Creation +2.3
Shot Making +0.9
Hustle +4.4
Defense +0.8
Turnovers -4.7
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 11
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 9.1%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 2
Isaiah Joe 27.0m
13
pts
5
reb
1
ast
Impact
+7.9

High-volume perimeter chucking yielded mixed results, as streaky execution stalled out several halfcourt sets. While his shooting gravity bent the defense, the sheer number of empty possessions capped his overall effectiveness.

Shooting
FG 5/12 (41.7%)
3PT 3/10 (30.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 54.2%
USG% 19.4%
Net Rtg +34.2
+/- +18
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 27.0m
Scoring +7.5
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +3.9
Hustle +6.3
Defense -0.1
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 7
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 42.9%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 0
11
pts
5
reb
1
ast
Impact
+2.3

Found soft spots in the defense for easy finishes, but struggled to anchor the glass or protect the paint on the other end. The scoring burst was a pleasant surprise, yet defensive bleeding kept his overall impact hovering near neutral.

Shooting
FG 5/8 (62.5%)
3PT 1/4 (25.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 68.8%
USG% 23.3%
Net Rtg +47.3
+/- +17
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 19.7m
Scoring +8.6
Creation +0.5
Shot Making +2.2
Hustle +6.3
Defense -1.6
Turnovers -4.7
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 13
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 30.8%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 2
Alex Caruso 12.2m
8
pts
2
reb
0
ast
Impact
+0.7

Delivered a textbook two-way spark by blowing up dribble hand-offs and converting transition opportunities. His disruptive hands and timely cuts optimized a highly effective, albeit brief, rotation stint.

Shooting
FG 3/5 (60.0%)
3PT 2/3 (66.7%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 80.0%
USG% 20.7%
Net Rtg +49.3
+/- +12
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 12.2m
Scoring +6.6
Creation +0.5
Shot Making +2.1
Hustle +0.6
Defense +2.6
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 6
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 1
BLK 1
TO 1
2
pts
3
reb
1
ast
Impact
-2.8

Made the most of a late-game cameo by crashing the glass and securing extra possessions. High-energy activity in low-leverage minutes yielded a tidy positive return.

Shooting
FG 1/1 (100.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 100.0%
USG% 7.1%
Net Rtg +1.1
+/- -1
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 6.8m
Scoring +2.0
Creation +0.4
Shot Making +0.2
Hustle +2.8
Defense +0.8
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 2
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 0
6
pts
1
reb
0
ast
Impact
-2.0

Capitalized on garbage-time spacing by decisively stepping into his perimeter looks. Avoided defensive lapses, allowing his efficient shooting to translate directly into positive marginal value.

Shooting
FG 2/3 (66.7%)
3PT 2/3 (66.7%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 100.0%
USG% 21.4%
Net Rtg +1.1
+/- -1
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 6.8m
Scoring +5.2
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +1.9
Hustle +0.3
Defense -0.3
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 4
FGM Against 2
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
3
pts
1
reb
1
ast
Impact
-8.7

Faded into the background during his minutes, failing to assert himself offensively or disrupt actions defensively. A passive approach kept him from making any meaningful dent in the game's momentum.

Shooting
FG 1/1 (100.0%)
3PT 1/1 (100.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 150.0%
USG% 14.3%
Net Rtg +28.0
+/- +2
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 6.0m
Scoring +3.0
Creation +0.3
Shot Making +1.0
Hustle +0.3
Defense -1.1
Turnovers -3.1
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 2
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 1
NOP New Orleans Pelicans
S Trey Murphy III 32.1m
19
pts
5
reb
2
ast
Impact
+12.0

Elite perimeter shot-making fueled a strong offensive rating, but his overall impact was dragged down to neutral. He struggled to contain dribble penetration, bleeding points on the defensive end to offset his scoring gravity.

Shooting
FG 7/13 (53.8%)
3PT 5/10 (50.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 73.1%
USG% 16.5%
Net Rtg -38.5
+/- -22
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 32.1m
Scoring +14.7
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +5.3
Hustle +1.5
Defense -1.6
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 13
FGM Against 8
Opp FG% 61.5%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 0
S Zion Williamson 28.1m
20
pts
9
reb
6
ast
Impact
+8.1

Inefficient finishing around the rim compared to his usual dominant standards capped his offensive ceiling tonight. Despite generating solid defensive events and showing high-motor activity in the paint, uncharacteristic misses in traffic pushed his net value into the red.

Shooting
FG 7/14 (50.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 6/12 (50.0%)
Advanced
TS% 51.9%
USG% 35.4%
Net Rtg -29.8
+/- -17
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 28.1m
Scoring +12.0
Creation +1.3
Shot Making +2.8
Hustle +10.5
Defense +0.8
Turnovers -10.9
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 8
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 37.5%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 4
S Jeremiah Fears 25.6m
16
pts
4
reb
4
ast
Impact
-6.2

Hemorrhaged value through poor decision-making and live-ball turnovers that ignited opponent transition attacks. While the perimeter stroke looked fluid, his inability to orchestrate without coughing up possession completely cratered his floor impact.

Shooting
FG 6/13 (46.2%)
3PT 4/8 (50.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 61.5%
USG% 27.7%
Net Rtg -33.8
+/- -15
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 25.6m
Scoring +11.3
Creation +0.9
Shot Making +4.7
Hustle +1.2
Defense -1.9
Turnovers -11.8
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 7
FGM Against 6
Opp FG% 85.7%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 5
S Herbert Jones 24.1m
12
pts
1
reb
3
ast
Impact
+6.0

Capitalized on defensive breakdowns by burying spot-up triples from the corners. His signature point-of-attack pressure disrupted opposing sets, driving a positive two-way performance that far exceeded his recent offensive baseline.

Shooting
FG 4/6 (66.7%)
3PT 3/4 (75.0%)
FT 1/2 (50.0%)
Advanced
TS% 87.2%
USG% 11.5%
Net Rtg -35.3
+/- -18
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 24.1m
Scoring +10.0
Creation +1.0
Shot Making +3.5
Hustle +0.3
Defense +1.0
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 9
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 44.4%
STL 2
BLK 0
TO 0
S Yves Missi 21.9m
7
pts
6
reb
0
ast
Impact
-3.2

A low-usage offensive role kept his overall footprint minimal despite converting efficiently when targeted. His value primarily stemmed from rim-deterrence and vertical spacing, though defensive miscommunications likely prevented a larger positive swing.

Shooting
FG 2/4 (50.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 3/4 (75.0%)
Advanced
TS% 60.8%
USG% 12.5%
Net Rtg -34.5
+/- -14
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 21.9m
Scoring +0.6
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.9
Hustle +7.6
Defense -0.6
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 7
FGM Against 6
Opp FG% 85.7%
STL 0
BLK 2
TO 1
Jordan Poole 24.1m
11
pts
1
reb
3
ast
Impact
-4.2

Shot selection was abysmal, repeatedly settling for heavily contested pull-ups early in the shot clock. This brick-heavy volume actively killed offensive momentum, negating any marginal gains from his off-ball defensive activity.

Shooting
FG 2/11 (18.2%)
3PT 2/9 (22.2%)
FT 5/6 (83.3%)
Advanced
TS% 40.3%
USG% 25.8%
Net Rtg -51.7
+/- -26
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 24.1m
Scoring +3.5
Creation +1.5
Shot Making +1.9
Hustle +0.3
Defense +2.4
Turnovers -4.7
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 16
FGM Against 10
Opp FG% 62.5%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 2
Saddiq Bey 19.0m
2
pts
2
reb
0
ast
Impact
-10.2

A complete offensive disappearing act where forced, contested jumpers derailed the team's halfcourt rhythm. Without his typical scoring punch to rely on, his lateral limitations on defense were glaringly exposed in space.

Shooting
FG 1/4 (25.0%)
3PT 0/3 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 25.0%
USG% 10.0%
Net Rtg -54.7
+/- -22
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 19.0m
Scoring -0.3
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.3
Hustle +2.5
Defense -1.6
Turnovers -3.1
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 4
FGM Against 2
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1
3
pts
2
reb
2
ast
Impact
-7.3

Brought his trademark chaotic energy and backcourt harassment, but it wasn't enough to overcome a stagnant offensive shift. Failed to bend the defense on drives, stalling out possessions when forced to operate as the primary initiator.

Shooting
FG 1/3 (33.3%)
3PT 1/2 (50.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 50.0%
USG% 7.0%
Net Rtg -30.8
+/- -12
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 18.2m
Scoring +1.5
Creation +0.2
Shot Making +1.0
Hustle +0.6
Defense -0.8
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 3
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 33.3%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 0
Kevon Looney 16.5m
3
pts
3
reb
2
ast
Impact
-10.9

Struggled to anchor the second unit as a lack of offensive gravity allowed defenders to pack the paint. Failed to generate his usual second-chance opportunities via the offensive glass, rendering his minutes highly unprofitable on both ends.

Shooting
FG 1/3 (33.3%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 1/2 (50.0%)
Advanced
TS% 38.7%
USG% 14.6%
Net Rtg -43.8
+/- -15
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 16.5m
Scoring +0.8
Creation +0.4
Shot Making +0.5
Hustle +2.8
Defense -1.7
Turnovers -4.7
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 7
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 57.1%
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 2
0
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
-9.9

Completely invisible during a brief rotation stint, failing to leverage his movement shooting to create gravity. The lack of offensive involvement made it impossible to offset defensive mismatches on the perimeter.

Shooting
FG 0/1 (0.0%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 6.3%
Net Rtg -1.1
+/- +1
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 6.8m
Scoring -0.8
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +0.0
Defense +0.0
Turnovers +0.0
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
3
pts
1
reb
2
ast
Impact
-10.7

Burned brief rotation minutes with rushed attempts and poor spacing. Could not establish a rhythm within the flow of the offense, resulting in empty possessions during his short stint.

Shooting
FG 1/4 (25.0%)
3PT 1/2 (50.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 37.5%
USG% 31.3%
Net Rtg -1.1
+/- +1
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 6.8m
Scoring +0.9
Creation +0.2
Shot Making +1.0
Hustle +0.3
Defense +0.0
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 1
FGM Against 0
Opp FG% 0.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1
4
pts
2
reb
0
ast
Impact
-3.9

Maximized a short leash by executing perfectly as a roll man and finishing his limited looks. Provided a quick burst of rim protection that kept the bench unit stabilized.

Shooting
FG 2/2 (100.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 0/2 (0.0%)
Advanced
TS% 69.4%
USG% 18.8%
Net Rtg -1.1
+/- +1
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 6.8m
Scoring +3.0
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.4
Hustle +2.5
Defense +0.0
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 6
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
4
pts
2
reb
0
ast
Impact
-2.8

Chipped in functional garbage-time minutes by holding his ground in the post. Avoided costly mistakes, keeping the underlying metrics slightly positive during his brief run.

Shooting
FG 1/2 (50.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 69.4%
USG% 18.8%
Net Rtg -1.1
+/- +1
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 6.8m
Scoring +3.2
Creation +0.4
Shot Making +0.5
Hustle +2.5
Defense +0.0
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 1
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 100.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
2
pts
0
reb
2
ast
Impact
-5.9

Kept the ball moving and avoided forcing the issue during a fleeting appearance. His quick-decision passing generated a pair of high-value looks to edge his impact into the green.

Shooting
FG 0/0
3PT 0/0
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 113.6%
USG% 12.5%
Net Rtg +11.9
+/- +2
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 3.1m
Scoring +2.0
Creation +1.2
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +0.0
Defense +0.0
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 3
FGM Against 2
Opp FG% 66.7%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0