Interactive analysis

EXPLORE THE GAME

Every shot, every lead change, every rotation — visualized.

Lead over time · win-probability overlay
LEAD TRACKER
LAL lead OKC lead Win %
Every shot · colored by difficulty
SHOT CHART
Click shooters to compare their shots on the court
OKC 2P — 3P —
LAL 2P — 3P —
Tough make Easy make Blown miss Tough miss 175 attempts

OKC OKC Shot-making Δ

Gilgeous-Alexander Hard 7/20 -1.8
Mitchell 10/17 +3.9
Holmgren 9/14 +1.6
Wallace Hard 6/10 +5.9
Joe Hard 4/7 +5.8
Hartenstein Open 6/7 +3.0
Caruso 3/6 -0.7
Dort Hard 4/5 +5.1
Wiggins Open 2/2 +1.8
Williams Hard 1/2 +1.0

LAL LAL Shot-making Δ

James 7/19 -2.9
Hachimura Hard 7/14 +5.7
Reaves 5/13 -2.6
Kennard Hard 7/10 +9.5
Ayton Open 5/9 -1.3
Smart 3/7 -0.6
Thiero Open 1/3 -1.9
Smith Jr. Hard 2/2 +3.3
Knecht Hard 0/2 -1.9
James Open 1/1 +0.6
How the game was played
BY THE NUMBERS
OKC
LAL
53/94 Field Goals 38/81
56.4% Field Goal % 46.9%
17/38 3-Pointers 14/30
44.7% 3-Point % 46.7%
8/10 Free Throws 18/25
80.0% Free Throw % 72.0%
66.6% True Shooting % 58.7%
49 Total Rebounds 44
12 Offensive 14
31 Defensive 23
30 Assists 31
3.00 Assist/TO Ratio 1.82
9 Turnovers 16
12 Steals 6
3 Blocks 1
22 Fouls 16
64 Points in Paint 44
19 Fast Break Pts 9
30 Points off TOs 11
14 Second Chance Pts 21
44 Bench Points 31
27 Largest Lead 5
Biggest contributors
TOP NET IMPACT
1
Ajay Mitchell
24 PTS · 4 REB · 10 AST · 29.8 MIN
+30.11
2
Rui Hachimura
21 PTS · 5 REB · 4 AST · 38.7 MIN
+19.31
3
Luke Kennard
18 PTS · 2 REB · 2 AST · 29.3 MIN
+18.62
4
Shai Gilgeous-Alexander
23 PTS · 4 REB · 9 AST · 33.4 MIN
+18.53
5
Chet Holmgren
18 PTS · 9 REB · 1 AST · 31.3 MIN
+17.05
6
Deandre Ayton
10 PTS · 6 REB · 0 AST · 23.5 MIN
+14.43
7
Isaiah Joe
12 PTS · 5 REB · 2 AST · 18.2 MIN
+13.95
8
Cason Wallace
16 PTS · 1 REB · 1 AST · 24.7 MIN
+12.55
9
Isaiah Hartenstein
12 PTS · 9 REB · 2 AST · 30.8 MIN
+10.59
10
Luguentz Dort
10 PTS · 3 REB · 0 AST · 20.1 MIN
+10.38
Play-by-play (most recent first)
PLAY FEED
Q4 0:19 N. Smith Jr. 12' turnaround fadeaway Jump Shot (6 PTS) (D. Knecht 3 AST) 131–108
Q4 0:31 D. Knecht REBOUND (Off:0 Def:1) 131–106
Q4 0:35 MISS K. Williams 27' 3PT 131–106
Q4 0:37 I. Joe REBOUND (Off:2 Def:3) 131–106
Q4 0:40 MISS K. Williams 27' running 3PT 131–106
Q4 0:44 N. Topić REBOUND (Off:0 Def:2) 131–106
Q4 0:46 MISS M. Kleber alley-oop Layup 131–106
Q4 0:54 A. Thiero REBOUND (Off:3 Def:5) 131–106
Q4 0:57 MISS N. Topić 24' 3PT 131–106
Q4 1:12 N. Topić REBOUND (Off:0 Def:1) 131–106
Q4 1:15 MISS N. Smith Jr. Free Throw 2 of 2 131–106
Q4 1:15 N. Smith Jr. Free Throw 1 of 2 (4 PTS) 131–106
Q4 1:15 I. Joe shooting personal FOUL (3 PF) (Smith Jr. 2 FT) 131–105
Q4 1:19 N. Smith Jr. STEAL (1 STL) 131–105
Q4 1:19 N. Topić bad pass TURNOVER (1 TO) 131–105

GAME ANALYSIS

KEEP READING

Create a free account and follow your team to get the full analysis every morning.

Create Free Account

Already have an account? Log in

PLAYER PERFORMANCE

LAL Los Angeles Lakers
S Austin Reaves 39.0m
17
pts
3
reb
9
ast
Impact
-6.9

Reaves struggled to find his shooting rhythm, bricking 4 of his 5 three-point attempts en route to a 38% shooting night. His 9 assists highlighted his playmaking vision, but his 5 turnovers (avg 3.6) dragged his offensive credit down to +6.1.

Shooting
FG 5/13 (38.5%)
3PT 1/5 (20.0%)
FT 6/8 (75.0%)
Advanced
TS% 51.5%
USG% 24.7%
Net Rtg -27.9
+/- -24
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 39.0m
Scoring +9.9
Creation +2.7
Shot Making +2.3
Hustle +1.9
Defense -1.9
Turnovers -11.8
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 5
S Rui Hachimura 38.7m
21
pts
5
reb
4
ast
Impact
+18.6

Hachimura was a lethal perimeter weapon, draining 5-of-8 from beyond the arc to power a massive +17.0 offensive credit. He complemented his scoring punch with active interior defense, logging 8 shot contests to round out a highly effective two-way performance.

Shooting
FG 7/14 (50.0%)
3PT 5/8 (62.5%)
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 70.6%
USG% 18.4%
Net Rtg -27.8
+/- -25
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 38.7m
Scoring +16.3
Creation +1.2
Shot Making +5.4
Hustle +6.3
Defense +2.4
Turnovers -3.1
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 1
S LeBron James 36.9m
19
pts
6
reb
8
ast
Impact
+1.4

James suffered through a sluggish shooting night, converting just 37% of his 19 attempts, which capped his offensive credit at +7.3. While his playmaking remained steady with 8 assists, his inability to finish efficiently severely limited his ability to dictate the game's flow.

Shooting
FG 7/19 (36.8%)
3PT 2/6 (33.3%)
FT 3/4 (75.0%)
Advanced
TS% 45.8%
USG% 29.6%
Net Rtg -30.6
+/- -25
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 36.9m
Scoring +9.1
Creation +1.2
Shot Making +4.4
Hustle +1.8
Defense +2.1
Turnovers -7.1
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 3
S Marcus Smart 32.5m
10
pts
3
reb
3
ast
Impact
-2.8

Smart played a relatively subdued offensive role, taking only 7 shots while generating a modest +7.1 offensive credit. He remained a physical presence defensively, logging 6 shot contests and 2 deflections, though his playmaking (3 assists) was unusually quiet.

Shooting
FG 3/7 (42.9%)
3PT 1/2 (50.0%)
FT 3/4 (75.0%)
Advanced
TS% 57.1%
USG% 14.1%
Net Rtg -30.5
+/- -23
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 32.5m
Scoring +6.4
Creation +1.1
Shot Making +2.0
Hustle +2.8
Defense -0.4
Turnovers -4.7
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 2
S Deandre Ayton 23.5m
10
pts
6
reb
0
ast
Impact
+7.1

Ayton operated with quiet efficiency, hitting 5-of-9 shots to secure a +13.8 offensive credit without turning the ball over. His rim protection was solid, registering 8 shot contests and a block, though his rebounding (6 boards) fell slightly below his typical standard.

Shooting
FG 5/9 (55.6%)
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 55.6%
USG% 16.4%
Net Rtg -14.7
+/- -8
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 23.5m
Scoring +6.6
Creation +0.7
Shot Making +1.5
Hustle +7.6
Defense +0.7
Turnovers +0.0
STL 1
BLK 1
TO 0
Luke Kennard 29.3m
18
pts
2
reb
2
ast
Impact
+14.0

Kennard was an absolute flamethrower off the bench, burying 4-of-6 triples to anchor a stellar +16.5 offensive credit. His flawless decision-making (zero turnovers) allowed his hyper-efficient 70% shooting to completely maximize his rotation minutes.

Shooting
FG 7/10 (70.0%)
3PT 4/6 (66.7%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 90.0%
USG% 14.5%
Net Rtg -13.8
+/- -9
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 29.3m
Scoring +15.8
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +5.5
Hustle +0.6
Defense +2.1
Turnovers +0.0
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 0
Adou Thiero 13.2m
4
pts
8
reb
1
ast
Impact
-4.1

Thiero brought chaotic energy to the glass, pulling down an impressive 8 rebounds (avg 1.8) in just 13 minutes. His relentless motor was evident in his 4 loose-ball recoveries and 3 deflections, which drove a massive +5.2 hustle credit despite his offensive limitations.

Shooting
FG 1/3 (33.3%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 2/3 (66.7%)
Advanced
TS% 46.3%
USG% 17.6%
Net Rtg -4.6
+/- +1
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 13.2m
Scoring +1.4
Creation +0.4
Shot Making +0.3
Hustle +9.2
Defense +0.0
Turnovers -5.4
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 2
1
pts
2
reb
0
ast
Impact
-9.8

Hayes was entirely invisible on offense, failing to attempt a single field goal during his 8 minutes on the floor. His 3 shot contests provided minimal defensive resistance, resulting in a hollow stint that yielded a negative defensive credit (-0.9).

Shooting
FG 0/0
3PT 0/0
FT 1/2 (50.0%)
Advanced
TS% 56.8%
USG% 4.8%
Net Rtg -35.0
+/- -5
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 8.5m
Scoring +0.5
Creation +0.2
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +2.5
Defense -3.1
Turnovers +0.0
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
0
pts
1
reb
1
ast
Impact
-14.8

Kleber's offensive disappearing act continued, as he went scoreless and committed 2 turnovers to generate a -2.6 offensive credit. Aside from a pair of shot contests, he offered virtually nothing to justify his rotation minutes.

Shooting
FG 0/1 (0.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 18.8%
Net Rtg -6.7
+/- 0
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 7.5m
Scoring -1.0
Creation +0.3
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +1.3
Defense +0.0
Turnovers -5.4
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 2
0
pts
1
reb
3
ast
Impact
-10.9

Knecht failed to score during his brief cameo, missing both of his field goal attempts. However, he did manage to dish out 3 assists (avg 0.7) in under four minutes, slightly mitigating his shooting woes to salvage a -0.2 offensive credit.

Shooting
FG 0/2 (0.0%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 22.2%
Net Rtg 0.0
+/- +1
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 3.6m
Scoring -1.4
Creation +0.2
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +0.3
Defense +0.0
Turnovers +0.0
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
2
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
-9.9

James logged a quiet garbage-time stint, converting his only shot attempt for 2 points. A single turnover kept his offensive credit at a marginal +0.1, reflecting his minimal impact on the game.

Shooting
FG 1/1 (100.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 100.0%
USG% 22.2%
Net Rtg 0.0
+/- +1
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 3.6m
Scoring +2.0
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.5
Hustle +0.0
Defense +0.0
Turnovers -2.4
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1
6
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
-0.5

Smith Jr. provided an instant scoring spark in his 3 minutes, hitting both of his shots, including a three-pointer, to earn a +5.4 offensive credit. He also chipped in with a steal, maximizing his brief time on the floor to generate a +2.6 defensive score.

Shooting
FG 2/2 (100.0%)
3PT 1/1 (100.0%)
FT 1/2 (50.0%)
Advanced
TS% 104.2%
USG% 33.3%
Net Rtg 0.0
+/- +1
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 3.6m
Scoring +5.5
Creation +0.2
Shot Making +1.4
Hustle +0.0
Defense +2.4
Turnovers +0.0
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 0
OKC Oklahoma City Thunder
23
pts
4
reb
9
ast
Impact
+13.6

Despite a brutal shooting night (7-of-20 from the floor), Gilgeous-Alexander salvaged his +16.1 offensive credit through elite playmaking (9 assists) and frequent trips to the charity stripe. He also made his presence felt on the other end, swatting 2 shots (avg 0.7) to help generate a +4.7 defensive score.

Shooting
FG 7/20 (35.0%)
3PT 3/7 (42.9%)
FT 6/7 (85.7%)
Advanced
TS% 49.8%
USG% 32.5%
Net Rtg +34.3
+/- +24
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 33.4m
Scoring +13.0
Creation +4.3
Shot Making +5.1
Hustle +4.1
Defense +1.8
Turnovers -4.7
STL 1
BLK 2
TO 2
S Chet Holmgren 31.3m
18
pts
9
reb
1
ast
Impact
+16.2

Holmgren punished the interior with ruthless efficiency, converting 9-of-14 from the floor despite completely missing the mark from beyond the arc (0-of-4). His +15.7 offensive credit was anchored by his ability to dominate inside, while his 7 shot contests ensured he remained a steady deterrent in the paint.

Shooting
FG 9/14 (64.3%)
3PT 0/4 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 64.3%
USG% 21.7%
Net Rtg +33.1
+/- +18
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 31.3m
Scoring +14.2
Creation +0.2
Shot Making +2.6
Hustle +11.4
Defense -1.1
Turnovers -1.1
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 1
12
pts
9
reb
2
ast
Impact
+5.4

Hartenstein was an absolute force around the rim, converting 6-of-7 shots while anchoring the paint with 10 shot contests to earn a +4.3 defensive credit. However, his value was somewhat mitigated by sloppy decision-making, as he coughed up 4 turnovers (well above his 1.4 average).

Shooting
FG 6/7 (85.7%)
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 85.7%
USG% 14.9%
Net Rtg +39.0
+/- +26
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 30.8m
Scoring +11.3
Creation +0.9
Shot Making +1.4
Hustle +10.5
Defense +0.8
Turnovers -9.5
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 4
S Ajay Mitchell 29.8m
24
pts
4
reb
10
ast
Impact
+25.3

Mitchell orchestrated a masterful two-way performance, shredding the defense for 24 points and 10 assists without committing a single turnover. His staggering +25.5 offensive credit was perfectly complemented by his disruptive hands, racking up 5 deflections and 3 steals (avg 0.8) to fuel a +5.2 defensive mark.

Shooting
FG 10/17 (58.8%)
3PT 2/4 (50.0%)
FT 2/3 (66.7%)
Advanced
TS% 65.5%
USG% 26.9%
Net Rtg +22.3
+/- +14
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 29.8m
Scoring +18.5
Creation +3.0
Shot Making +5.9
Hustle +4.1
Defense +3.7
Turnovers +0.0
STL 3
BLK 0
TO 0
S Luguentz Dort 20.1m
10
pts
3
reb
0
ast
Impact
+6.1

Dort broke out of his recent slump with a highly efficient scoring night, burying all of his perimeter looks (2-of-2 from deep) to generate a +10.8 offensive credit. He didn't force the issue offensively, taking just five shots, which allowed his flawless shooting to maximize his value in a complementary role.

Shooting
FG 4/5 (80.0%)
3PT 2/2 (100.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 100.0%
USG% 10.9%
Net Rtg +53.8
+/- +21
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 20.1m
Scoring +9.1
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +3.0
Hustle +2.8
Defense +1.2
Turnovers +0.0
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 0
16
pts
1
reb
1
ast
Impact
+5.2

Wallace provided a massive scoring punch off the bench, torching the nets with 4-of-6 shooting from beyond the arc to drive a +12.5 offensive credit. He paired his perimeter marksmanship with active hands on defense, generating 4 deflections to disrupt the opponent's rhythm.

Shooting
FG 6/10 (60.0%)
3PT 4/6 (66.7%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 80.0%
USG% 18.6%
Net Rtg +25.0
+/- +13
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 24.7m
Scoring +13.3
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +4.4
Hustle +1.3
Defense -0.8
Turnovers -3.1
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 1
Alex Caruso 20.2m
6
pts
2
reb
2
ast
Impact
+0.4

Caruso's jumper completely abandoned him (0-of-3 from deep), but he more than compensated by terrorizing the passing lanes. His 4 deflections and 3 steals (avg 1.0) fueled a massive +6.3 defensive credit, proving his utility doesn't rely on scoring.

Shooting
FG 3/6 (50.0%)
3PT 0/3 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 50.0%
USG% 12.8%
Net Rtg +24.9
+/- +11
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 20.2m
Scoring +3.6
Creation +0.2
Shot Making +1.0
Hustle +0.6
Defense +5.0
Turnovers +0.0
STL 3
BLK 0
TO 0
Isaiah Joe 18.2m
12
pts
5
reb
2
ast
Impact
+5.8

Joe operated as a lethal floor-spacer, burying 4-of-6 triples to anchor a robust +13.0 offensive credit. He supplemented his sharpshooting with surprising activity on the glass, pulling down 5 rebounds (well above his 1.4 average) without committing a single turnover.

Shooting
FG 4/7 (57.1%)
3PT 4/6 (66.7%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 85.7%
USG% 14.0%
Net Rtg -1.8
+/- -2
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 18.2m
Scoring +9.8
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +3.9
Hustle +4.4
Defense -2.3
Turnovers +0.0
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 0
3
pts
4
reb
2
ast
Impact
-6.8

Williams operated as a low-usage connector during his 12 minutes, taking just two shots but hitting a timely three-pointer for a +3.1 offensive credit. His primary contribution came through physical interior defense, logging 7 shot contests to stabilize the second unit.

Shooting
FG 1/2 (50.0%)
3PT 1/2 (50.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 75.0%
USG% 7.1%
Net Rtg 0.0
+/- 0
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 12.6m
Scoring +2.2
Creation +0.8
Shot Making +0.9
Hustle +1.2
Defense -1.9
Turnovers +0.0
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
3
pts
0
reb
1
ast
Impact
-6.0

McCain saw limited action in his 9 minutes but capitalized on his lone opportunity, draining his only three-point attempt. He played a clean, mistake-free stint with no turnovers, yielding a modest +3.8 offensive credit.

Shooting
FG 1/1 (100.0%)
3PT 1/1 (100.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 150.0%
USG% 4.2%
Net Rtg -37.6
+/- -6
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 9.6m
Scoring +3.0
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.9
Hustle +0.0
Defense +0.0
Turnovers +0.0
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
0
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
-13.2

Williams was completely invisible during his brief 3-minute cameo, missing both of his perimeter attempts to post a -1.4 offensive credit. He failed to register a single rebound, assist, or defensive hustle stat, rendering his stint entirely empty.

Shooting
FG 0/2 (0.0%)
3PT 0/2 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 22.2%
Net Rtg -32.1
+/- -1
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 3.4m
Scoring -1.6
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +0.0
Defense -1.6
Turnovers +0.0
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
4
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
-5.0

Wiggins made the most of his brief 3-minute appearance, converting both of his field goal attempts to secure a +4.0 offensive credit. However, his lack of peripheral production left his overall footprint relatively small.

Shooting
FG 2/2 (100.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 100.0%
USG% 22.2%
Net Rtg -32.1
+/- -1
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 3.4m
Scoring +4.0
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +1.0
Hustle +0.0
Defense +0.0
Turnovers +0.0
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
0
pts
2
reb
0
ast
Impact
-10.2

Topić struggled offensively in his fleeting minutes, missing his only shot and committing a turnover to drag his offensive credit down to -2.8. He did manage to salvage some value on the other end, grabbing a steal and a deflection to boost his defensive metric to +2.9.

Shooting
FG 0/1 (0.0%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 25.0%
Net Rtg -50.0
+/- -2
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 2.6m
Scoring -0.8
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +0.6
Defense +2.4
Turnovers -2.4
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 1