Interactive analysis

EXPLORE THE GAME

Every shot, every lead change, every rotation — visualized.

Lead over time · win-probability overlay
LEAD TRACKER
OKC lead SAS lead Win %
Every shot · colored by difficulty
SHOT CHART
Click shooters to compare their shots on the court
SAS 2P — 3P —
OKC 2P — 3P —
Tough make Easy make Blown miss Tough miss 171 attempts

SAS SAS Shot-making Δ

Wembanyama 7/15 +1.4
Castle Open 7/15 -4.7
Vassell 4/14 -5.5
Fox 6/12 +1.8
Champagnie Hard 6/11 +7.0
Harper 5/8 +2.9
Johnson 4/8 +0.5
Kornet Open 0/3 -4.2
Bryant Open 1/1 +0.6
Barnes Hard 0/1 -1.1

OKC OKC Shot-making Δ

Gilgeous-Alexander 12/21 +5.8
Caruso 3/14 -7.8
McCain Hard 5/12 -0.6
Wallace Hard 6/10 +6.7
Williams Hard 5/9 +2.3
Hartenstein 3/7 -1.6
Dort Hard 1/4 -1.1
Williams 1/4 -2.5
Holmgren Hard 1/2 +0.3
How the game was played
BY THE NUMBERS
SAS
OKC
40/88 Field Goals 37/83
45.5% Field Goal % 44.6%
17/40 3-Pointers 12/35
42.5% 3-Point % 34.3%
14/19 Free Throws 17/22
73.7% Free Throw % 77.3%
57.6% True Shooting % 55.6%
50 Total Rebounds 56
15 Offensive 10
25 Defensive 28
21 Assists 23
1.75 Assist/TO Ratio 1.64
12 Turnovers 13
9 Steals 9
2 Blocks 5
18 Fouls 16
34 Points in Paint 32
19 Fast Break Pts 7
19 Points off TOs 9
17 Second Chance Pts 20
27 Bench Points 37
14 Largest Lead 4
Biggest contributors
TOP NET IMPACT
1
Shai Gilgeous-Alexander
35 PTS · 4 REB · 9 AST · 43.0 MIN
+33.54
2
Cason Wallace
17 PTS · 7 REB · 4 AST · 36.2 MIN
+19.63
3
Julian Champagnie
20 PTS · 6 REB · 1 AST · 37.5 MIN
+16.83
4
Victor Wembanyama
22 PTS · 7 REB · 2 AST · 41.9 MIN
+15.11
5
De'Aaron Fox
15 PTS · 0 REB · 5 AST · 35.7 MIN
+13.94
6
Jaylin Williams
11 PTS · 10 REB · 4 AST · 25.6 MIN
+12.58
7
Dylan Harper
12 PTS · 7 REB · 3 AST · 27.0 MIN
+11.4
8
Devin Vassell
11 PTS · 6 REB · 3 AST · 33.4 MIN
+10.82
9
Keldon Johnson
11 PTS · 3 REB · 1 AST · 16.2 MIN
+9.97
10
Jared McCain
12 PTS · 1 REB · 0 AST · 23.1 MIN
+5.21
Play-by-play (most recent first)
PLAY FEED
Q4 0:04 D. Vassell running DUNK (11 PTS) (D. Fox 5 AST) 111–103
Q4 0:08 J. Champagnie REBOUND (Off:1 Def:5) 109–103
Q4 0:12 MISS C. Wallace 29' 3PT 109–103
Q4 0:17 TEAM offensive REBOUND 109–103
Q4 0:18 MISS A. Caruso 26' pullup 3PT 109–103
Q4 0:22 D. Fox personal FOUL (2 PF) 109–103
Q4 0:22 S. Gilgeous-Alexander STEAL (3 STL) 109–103
Q4 0:22 S. Castle lost ball TURNOVER (6 TO) 109–103
Q4 0:22 S. Castle REBOUND (Off:4 Def:2) 109–103
Q4 0:28 MISS K. Williams 3PT 109–103
Q4 0:40 C. Wallace STEAL (2 STL) 109–103
Q4 0:40 S. Castle bad pass TURNOVER (5 TO) 109–103
Q4 0:52 C. Wallace driving Layup (17 PTS) 109–103
Q4 0:59 S. Castle putback Layup (16 PTS) 109–101
Q4 0:59 S. Castle REBOUND (Off:4 Def:1) 107–101

GAME ANALYSIS

KEEP READING

Create a free account and follow your team to get the full analysis every morning.

Create Free Account

Already have an account? Log in

PLAYER PERFORMANCE

OKC Oklahoma City Thunder
35
pts
4
reb
9
ast
Impact
+29.4

He completely orchestrated the offense, generating a massive +28.9 offensive credit through 35.0 points and 9.0 assists on efficient 12/21 shooting. His defensive contributions were also immense, adding 3.0 steals and a +10.6 defensive credit to cap a dominant two-way performance.

Shooting
FG 12/21 (57.1%)
3PT 2/5 (40.0%)
FT 9/11 (81.8%)
Advanced
TS% 67.7%
USG% 28.4%
Net Rtg -9.5
+/- -7
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 43.0m
Scoring +27.6
Creation +3.0
Shot Making +7.4
Hustle +3.1
Defense +6.0
Turnovers -7.1
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 18
FGM Against 7
Opp FG% 38.9%
STL 3
BLK 1
TO 3
S Cason Wallace 36.2m
17
pts
7
reb
4
ast
Impact
+16.1

A stellar two-way performance was driven by a hot shooting hand, as he connected on 5/9 from three-point range for 17 points. His offensive explosion (+14.1) was complemented by a strong defensive showing that earned a +6.9 credit.

Shooting
FG 6/10 (60.0%)
3PT 5/9 (55.6%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 85.0%
USG% 14.5%
Net Rtg -6.0
+/- -3
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 36.2m
Scoring +13.9
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +5.4
Hustle +8.9
Defense +3.4
Turnovers -4.7
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 19
FGM Against 9
Opp FG% 47.4%
STL 2
BLK 1
TO 2
S Chet Holmgren 32.8m
4
pts
4
reb
0
ast
Impact
-4.4

His offensive game was completely dormant, scoring just 4.0 points on two shot attempts, but he made his presence felt entirely on the defensive end. He generated a massive +10.9 defensive credit, bolstered by 12 contests and 2.0 blocks.

Shooting
FG 1/2 (50.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 2/4 (50.0%)
Advanced
TS% 53.2%
USG% 8.3%
Net Rtg -4.9
+/- -3
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 32.8m
Scoring +2.4
Creation +0.4
Shot Making +0.5
Hustle +5.1
Defense +2.6
Turnovers -4.7
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 10
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 40.0%
STL 2
BLK 2
TO 2
7
pts
5
reb
0
ast
Impact
-4.2

While his box score production was down across the board, his defensive presence was the key to his performance. He held opponents to 4/12 shooting (33%) when guarding them, anchoring a +4.9 defensive credit for his team.

Shooting
FG 3/7 (42.9%)
3PT 0/0
FT 1/1 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 47.0%
USG% 18.0%
Net Rtg -33.3
+/- -14
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 20.6m
Scoring +3.6
Creation +0.2
Shot Making +1.2
Hustle +4.4
Defense +1.8
Turnovers -4.7
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 12
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 33.3%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 2
S Luguentz Dort 15.8m
3
pts
1
reb
2
ast
Impact
-9.9

His trademark defensive intensity was absent, as opponents shot 3/4 (75%) when he was the primary defender, contributing to a -0.6 defensive credit. Offensively, he was a non-factor, attempting just 4 shots in 15:50 of play.

Shooting
FG 1/4 (25.0%)
3PT 1/3 (33.3%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 37.5%
USG% 10.0%
Net Rtg -30.9
+/- -9
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 15.8m
Scoring +0.8
Creation +0.5
Shot Making +1.0
Hustle +0.3
Defense -1.9
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 4
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 75.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
Alex Caruso 38.6m
12
pts
5
reb
4
ast
Impact
-11.8

A rough shooting night (3/14 FG) and uncharacteristic carelessness with the ball defined his outing. His 3.0 turnovers were a significant spike from his 0.9 average, contributing to a negative offensive credit (-0.3) despite getting to the free-throw line for 6 attempts.

Shooting
FG 3/14 (21.4%)
3PT 1/6 (16.7%)
FT 5/6 (83.3%)
Advanced
TS% 36.1%
USG% 22.2%
Net Rtg -8.1
+/- -5
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 38.6m
Scoring +2.6
Creation +1.1
Shot Making +1.8
Hustle +1.5
Defense -1.1
Turnovers -7.1
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 12
FGM Against 6
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 3
11
pts
10
reb
4
ast
Impact
+9.8

He shattered his season averages with a surprising double-double, posting 11.0 points and 10.0 rebounds in a highly effective performance. This well-rounded effort, which also included 4.0 assists, was driven by a +14.3 offensive credit and zero turnovers.

Shooting
FG 5/9 (55.6%)
3PT 1/3 (33.3%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 61.1%
USG% 14.8%
Net Rtg +13.9
+/- +10
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 25.6m
Scoring +8.1
Creation +0.2
Shot Making +2.9
Hustle +11.7
Defense -2.5
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 12
FGM Against 6
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
Jared McCain 23.1m
12
pts
1
reb
0
ast
Impact
-2.6

He served as a bench scorer, putting up 12.0 points, but did so on inefficient volume (5/12 FG, 2/7 3P). While he generated a positive offensive credit (+4.4), his primary contribution was simply hunting for his own shot.

Shooting
FG 5/12 (41.7%)
3PT 2/7 (28.6%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 50.0%
USG% 21.7%
Net Rtg -17.0
+/- -8
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 23.1m
Scoring +6.5
Creation +0.2
Shot Making +3.3
Hustle +0.3
Defense +0.8
Turnovers -3.1
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 6
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 66.7%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 1
2
pts
1
reb
0
ast
Impact
-9.1

In a brief 4:20 stint, he struggled to find his shot, going 1/4 from the field and 0/2 from deep. He was unable to make a notable impact in his limited playing time.

Shooting
FG 1/4 (25.0%)
3PT 0/2 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 25.0%
USG% 26.7%
Net Rtg -21.7
+/- -1
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 4.3m
Scoring -0.3
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.5
Hustle +1.3
Defense +0.0
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 1
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 100.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
SAS San Antonio Spurs
22
pts
7
reb
2
ast
Impact
+7.8

While his rebounding (7.0) and block (1.0) totals were well below his season averages, he anchored the offense with efficient scoring. He posted a +18.0 offensive credit, fueled by 7/15 shooting overall and a sharp 3/5 from deep.

Shooting
FG 7/15 (46.7%)
3PT 3/5 (60.0%)
FT 5/7 (71.4%)
Advanced
TS% 60.8%
USG% 20.7%
Net Rtg +10.0
+/- +7
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 41.9m
Scoring +15.2
Creation +1.2
Shot Making +4.2
Hustle +3.1
Defense -2.1
Turnovers -3.1
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 21
FGM Against 9
Opp FG% 42.9%
STL 1
BLK 1
TO 1
20
pts
6
reb
1
ast
Impact
+17.2

A blistering night from beyond the arc defined his performance, as he drained 6/10 three-pointers on his way to 20 points. This offensive explosion (+15.4) was crucial, though it came with defensive concessions where opponents shot 14/24 (58%) when he was the nearest defender.

Shooting
FG 6/11 (54.5%)
3PT 6/10 (60.0%)
FT 2/3 (66.7%)
Advanced
TS% 81.2%
USG% 16.3%
Net Rtg +20.7
+/- +16
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 37.5m
Scoring +15.8
Creation +0.6
Shot Making +5.8
Hustle +7.6
Defense +0.5
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 24
FGM Against 14
Opp FG% 58.3%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 1
S Stephon Castle 35.7m
16
pts
6
reb
6
ast
Impact
-5.0

His playmaking was completely undone by turnovers, as his 6.0 assists were matched by 6.0 giveaways, a significant jump from his 3.9 average. While he generated positive value creating for others (+6.2 Offense), the high volume of turnovers ultimately erased his positive contributions.

Shooting
FG 7/15 (46.7%)
3PT 0/3 (0.0%)
FT 2/3 (66.7%)
Advanced
TS% 49.0%
USG% 28.6%
Net Rtg +6.3
+/- +1
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 35.7m
Scoring +9.1
Creation +2.1
Shot Making +2.9
Hustle +7.6
Defense -1.1
Turnovers -14.9
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 8
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 6
S De'Aaron Fox 35.7m
15
pts
0
reb
5
ast
Impact
+6.5

He provided a spark on both ends, pairing efficient 50% shooting with disruptive defense that included 3.0 steals (↑). His +6.8 defensive credit highlights his impact, though he was a complete non-factor on the glass, failing to record a single rebound against his season average of 4.0.

Shooting
FG 6/12 (50.0%)
3PT 3/7 (42.9%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 62.5%
USG% 17.3%
Net Rtg +5.9
+/- +3
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 35.7m
Scoring +10.4
Creation +1.6
Shot Making +4.6
Hustle +0.0
Defense +5.2
Turnovers -4.7
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 16
FGM Against 8
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 3
BLK 0
TO 2
S Devin Vassell 33.4m
11
pts
6
reb
3
ast
Impact
+2.1

His offensive contributions were muted by poor shooting (4/14 FG), but he generated significant value on the other end of the floor. A +6.8 defensive credit, anchored by holding his matchups to just 3/10 shooting, offset his scoring struggles. He also protected the ball well, finishing with 0.0 turnovers against a 1.1 season average.

Shooting
FG 4/14 (28.6%)
3PT 1/6 (16.7%)
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 37.0%
USG% 18.5%
Net Rtg 0.0
+/- 0
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 33.4m
Scoring +3.3
Creation +0.4
Shot Making +2.1
Hustle +3.7
Defense +3.2
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 10
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 30.0%
STL 2
BLK 0
TO 0
Dylan Harper 27.1m
12
pts
7
reb
3
ast
Impact
+3.4

Hyper-efficient shooting (5/8 FG) and stout point-of-attack defense drove his positive outing in limited minutes. He generated a +10.9 offensive credit on low volume while holding his defensive assignments to just 2/9 shooting (22%).

Shooting
FG 5/8 (62.5%)
3PT 2/3 (66.7%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 75.0%
USG% 15.2%
Net Rtg +16.7
+/- +9
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 27.1m
Scoring +8.8
Creation +0.2
Shot Making +3.4
Hustle +7.9
Defense -1.6
Turnovers -4.7
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 9
FGM Against 2
Opp FG% 22.2%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 2
11
pts
3
reb
1
ast
Impact
+5.0

He provided an efficient scoring punch in his 16:12 of action, posting a +10.1 offensive credit on 4/8 shooting. This performance was a clean, low-turnover (0.0) effort that maximized his limited minutes off the bench.

Shooting
FG 4/8 (50.0%)
3PT 2/5 (40.0%)
FT 1/2 (50.0%)
Advanced
TS% 61.9%
USG% 20.0%
Net Rtg +10.9
+/- +6
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 16.2m
Scoring +7.3
Creation +0.7
Shot Making +2.4
Hustle +3.8
Defense +1.5
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 2
FGM Against 0
Opp FG% 0.0%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 0
2
pts
4
reb
0
ast
Impact
-5.8

In his brief 6:06 on the floor, he was active but ineffective offensively, failing to connect on a field goal (0/3 FG). He made his presence felt with 4 contests and 4.0 rebounds, getting all his points from the free-throw line.

Shooting
FG 0/3 (0.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 25.8%
USG% 21.1%
Net Rtg -1.1
+/- +1
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 6.1m
Scoring -0.1
Creation +0.4
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +4.1
Defense +0.5
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 3
FGM Against 2
Opp FG% 66.7%
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 0
0
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
-11.5

He was a non-factor in 3:25 of playing time, missing his only shot attempt and failing to record any other statistics. His brief appearance resulted in a -0.9 offensive credit.

Shooting
FG 0/1 (0.0%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 20.0%
Net Rtg -48.6
+/- -5
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 3.4m
Scoring -0.8
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +0.0
Defense +0.0
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 1
FGM Against 0
Opp FG% 0.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
2
pts
1
reb
0
ast
Impact
-8.0

He made the most of his 3:02 on the court, converting his only field goal attempt and securing 1 loose-ball recovery. His short stint was efficient and mistake-free.

Shooting
FG 1/1 (100.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 100.0%
USG% 14.3%
Net Rtg +28.6
+/- +2
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 3.0m
Scoring +2.0
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.4
Hustle +0.3
Defense +0.0
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 2
FGM Against 2
Opp FG% 100.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0