Interactive analysis

EXPLORE THE GAME

Every shot, every lead change, every rotation — visualized.

Lead over time · win-probability overlay
LEAD TRACKER
SAS lead OKC lead Win %
Every shot · colored by difficulty
SHOT CHART
Click shooters to compare their shots on the court
OKC 2P — 3P —
SAS 2P — 3P —
Tough make Easy make Blown miss Tough miss 181 attempts

OKC OKC Shot-making Δ

Gilgeous-Alexander 6/15 -2.5
Hartenstein 6/11 +0.9
Wiggins 2/11 -7.5
McCain 1/10 -9.0
Joe Hard 4/9 -0.1
Holmgren Open 3/8 -3.8
Wallace Open 2/8 -5.4
Williams 3/7 -0.1
Williams Hard 1/7 -4.7
Dort Hard 1/2 +0.1

SAS SAS Shot-making Δ

Wembanyama 11/22 +0.3
Fox 5/13 -1.7
Johnson 3/12 -8.4
Castle 5/11 -2.1
Vassell Hard 3/7 +1.1
Champagnie 1/7 -6.3
Kornet Open 3/4 +0.6
Harper Open 2/4 -1.0
Barnes 0/4 -4.8
Olynyk Hard 1/3 0.0
How the game was played
BY THE NUMBERS
OKC
SAS
30/91 Field Goals 35/90
33.0% Field Goal % 38.9%
6/33 3-Pointers 9/33
18.2% 3-Point % 27.3%
16/18 Free Throws 24/32
88.9% Free Throw % 75.0%
41.4% True Shooting % 49.5%
61 Total Rebounds 66
11 Offensive 14
36 Defensive 38
22 Assists 25
1.10 Assist/TO Ratio 1.92
17 Turnovers 12
9 Steals 11
5 Blocks 10
25 Fouls 20
36 Points in Paint 50
7 Fast Break Pts 18
13 Points off TOs 25
14 Second Chance Pts 17
34 Bench Points 30
1 Largest Lead 25
Biggest contributors
TOP NET IMPACT
1
Victor Wembanyama
33 PTS · 8 REB · 5 AST · 31.0 MIN
+28.81
2
De'Aaron Fox
12 PTS · 10 REB · 5 AST · 30.9 MIN
+14.02
3
Devin Vassell
13 PTS · 6 REB · 3 AST · 33.0 MIN
+13.23
4
Isaiah Joe
11 PTS · 5 REB · 2 AST · 18.8 MIN
+12.68
5
Stephon Castle
13 PTS · 3 REB · 6 AST · 29.9 MIN
+11.44
6
Shai Gilgeous-Alexander
19 PTS · 4 REB · 7 AST · 31.2 MIN
+11.1
7
Luke Kornet
6 PTS · 7 REB · 0 AST · 13.4 MIN
+10.29
8
Isaiah Hartenstein
12 PTS · 7 REB · 3 AST · 17.9 MIN
+9.41
9
Kelly Olynyk
3 PTS · 1 REB · 0 AST · 3.5 MIN
+8.54
10
Cason Wallace
5 PTS · 4 REB · 1 AST · 20.8 MIN
+7.59
Play-by-play (most recent first)
PLAY FEED
Q4 0:04 SAS shot clock Team TURNOVER 82–103
Q4 0:28 K. Williams cutting Layup (10 PTS) (N. Topić 2 AST) 82–103
Q4 0:38 K. Olynyk 25' 3PT (3 PTS) (L. Waters III 1 AST) 80–103
Q4 0:55 N. Topić running Layup (2 PTS) (K. Williams 3 AST) 80–100
Q4 0:58 A. Wiggins REBOUND (Off:0 Def:2) 78–100
Q4 1:01 MISS J. McLaughlin 25' pullup 3PT 78–100
Q4 1:13 I. Joe 3PT step back (11 PTS) 78–100
Q4 1:30 J. Williams REBOUND (Off:1 Def:2) 75–100
Q4 1:30 MISS K. Johnson 25' running 3PT 75–100
Q4 1:38 K. Olynyk STEAL (3 STL) 75–100
Q4 1:38 K. Williams lost ball TURNOVER (1 TO) 75–100
Q4 1:54 J. McLaughlin 3PT running (3 PTS) (C. Bryant 1 AST) 75–100
Q4 1:58 K. Olynyk STEAL (2 STL) 75–97
Q4 1:58 N. Topić lost ball TURNOVER (1 TO) 75–97
Q4 2:11 K. Johnson driving Layup (6 PTS) 75–97

GAME ANALYSIS

KEEP READING

Create a free account and follow your team to get the full analysis every morning.

Create Free Account

Already have an account? Log in

PLAYER PERFORMANCE

SAS San Antonio Spurs
S Devin Vassell 33.0m
13
pts
6
reb
3
ast
Impact
+9.3

An absolutely suffocating defensive performance drove his value, as he held opponents to just 1/10 (10%) shooting when he was the nearest defender. This lockdown effort powered a +6.7 Defense credit and was the clear highlight of his game.

Shooting
FG 3/7 (42.9%)
3PT 2/4 (50.0%)
FT 5/6 (83.3%)
Advanced
TS% 67.4%
USG% 13.6%
Net Rtg +38.6
+/- +27
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 33.0m
Scoring +9.4
Creation +1.9
Shot Making +2.4
Hustle +1.8
Defense +2.9
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 10
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 10.0%
STL 1
BLK 1
TO 1
33
pts
8
reb
5
ast
Impact
+28.9

A dominant offensive takeover defined his night, as he poured in 33 points and dished out 5 assists, both well above his averages. This offensive masterclass was the primary driver of his performance, generating a massive +24.3 Offense component.

Shooting
FG 11/22 (50.0%)
3PT 3/7 (42.9%)
FT 8/9 (88.9%)
Advanced
TS% 63.6%
USG% 38.5%
Net Rtg +44.6
+/- +29
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 31.0m
Scoring +24.6
Creation +1.8
Shot Making +5.1
Hustle +9.2
Defense +4.3
Turnovers -9.5
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 26
FGM Against 11
Opp FG% 42.3%
STL 2
BLK 3
TO 4
S De'Aaron Fox 30.9m
12
pts
10
reb
5
ast
Impact
+16.5

He flipped his usual script, driving value through elite defense and rebounding rather than high-volume scoring. While his 12 points were below average, he grabbed 10 boards, committed 0 turnovers, and held opponents to 2/8 (25%) shooting.

Shooting
FG 5/13 (38.5%)
3PT 1/2 (50.0%)
FT 1/1 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 44.6%
USG% 16.5%
Net Rtg -8.6
+/- -3
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 30.9m
Scoring +6.5
Creation +1.6
Shot Making +3.0
Hustle +12.7
Defense -0.6
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 8
FGM Against 2
Opp FG% 25.0%
STL 1
BLK 1
TO 0
S Stephon Castle 29.9m
13
pts
3
reb
6
ast
Impact
+7.3

Poised and efficient playmaking drove his performance, as he orchestrated the offense with 6 assists against only 1 turnover, well below his 3.9 average. This, combined with solid defense where he held opponents to 5/15 shooting, led to a strong +13.3 Offense credit.

Shooting
FG 5/11 (45.5%)
3PT 1/3 (33.3%)
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 54.7%
USG% 17.6%
Net Rtg +40.3
+/- +25
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 29.9m
Scoring +8.1
Creation +2.9
Shot Making +2.4
Hustle +2.8
Defense +0.1
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 15
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 33.3%
STL 1
BLK 1
TO 1
2
pts
4
reb
2
ast
Impact
-7.7

His jumper completely abandoned him in a 2-point, 1/7 shooting performance that was a stark departure from his recent hot streak. He managed to provide some value through defensive effort, holding matchups to 5/14 (36%) shooting and generating a +3.2 Defense credit.

Shooting
FG 1/7 (14.3%)
3PT 0/5 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 14.3%
USG% 9.9%
Net Rtg 0.0
+/- 0
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 29.4m
Scoring -2.9
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.5
Hustle +1.2
Defense +0.2
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 14
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 35.7%
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 0
Dylan Harper 20.6m
7
pts
5
reb
2
ast

He played a low-usage role, taking only 4 shots in 21 minutes and scoring 7 points, well below his 13.6 point average. While he didn't make a major statistical splash, he was efficient in his limited touches and avoided major mistakes aside from 2 turnovers.

Shooting
FG 2/4 (50.0%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 3/6 (50.0%)
Advanced
TS% 52.7%
USG% 16.4%
Net Rtg +53.1
+/- +25
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 20.6m
Scoring +4.1
Creation +2.1
Shot Making +0.5
Hustle +5.4
Defense -0.6
Turnovers -4.7
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 5
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 60.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 2
6
pts
3
reb
0
ast
Impact
-7.3

Inefficient volume shooting was the story of his night, as he scored just 6 points on a cold 3/12 from the field and missed all four of his three-point attempts. This poor shot selection led to a -5.2 Offense component that negated his solid defensive work.

Shooting
FG 3/12 (25.0%)
3PT 0/4 (0.0%)
FT 0/2 (0.0%)
Advanced
TS% 23.3%
USG% 30.6%
Net Rtg +19.9
+/- +7
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 18.1m
Scoring -2.1
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +1.4
Hustle +2.8
Defense +2.1
Turnovers -4.7
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 4
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 25.0%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 2
5
pts
3
reb
0
ast
Impact
-0.9

Unable to connect on a single field goal (0/4 FG), his entire scoring output came from the free-throw line where he went 5/6. His primary contribution came on the defensive end, where he held his matchups scoreless on 3 attempts, fueling a +2.9 Defense credit.

Shooting
FG 0/4 (0.0%)
3PT 0/2 (0.0%)
FT 5/6 (83.3%)
Advanced
TS% 37.7%
USG% 19.0%
Net Rtg +36.5
+/- +13
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 16.1m
Scoring +1.1
Creation +1.1
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +3.8
Defense +2.1
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 3
FGM Against 0
Opp FG% 0.0%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 1
Luke Kornet 13.4m
6
pts
7
reb
0
ast
Impact
+4.7

He made his presence felt as a rim protector in limited minutes, tallying 7 rebounds, 2 blocks, and 7 contests. This defensive intensity was his calling card, as he held opponents to just 3/11 (27%) shooting and generated a +6.4 Defense credit.

Shooting
FG 3/4 (75.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 75.0%
USG% 11.4%
Net Rtg -25.8
+/- -9
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 13.4m
Scoring +5.3
Creation +0.2
Shot Making +0.5
Hustle +6.0
Defense -0.6
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 11
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 27.3%
STL 0
BLK 2
TO 0
0
pts
1
reb
1
ast
Impact
-10.9

His brief stint on the floor was defined by foul trouble, as he racked up 4 personal fouls in just 6:45 of action. He was a non-factor offensively, failing to score on one shot attempt and turning the ball over once.

Shooting
FG 0/1 (0.0%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 12.5%
Net Rtg -46.2
+/- -10
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 6.8m
Scoring -0.8
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +0.3
Defense -0.6
Turnovers -3.1
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 1
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 100.0%
STL 1
BLK 1
TO 1
3
pts
1
reb
0
ast
Impact
-2.2

In a brief 3:45 appearance, he provided instant offense by knocking down a three-pointer on one of his two attempts. He was otherwise a non-factor, registering no other major statistics in his limited run.

Shooting
FG 1/2 (50.0%)
3PT 1/2 (50.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 75.0%
USG% 22.2%
Net Rtg 0.0
+/- -1
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 3.8m
Scoring +2.3
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.9
Hustle +1.3
Defense +0.0
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 2
FGM Against 2
Opp FG% 100.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
3
pts
1
reb
0
ast
Impact
+3.2

He created defensive chaos in just 3:32 of playing time, racking up an incredible 3 steals and 2 deflections. This flurry of activity was the sole driver of his performance, generating a massive +7.5 Defense credit in his brief cameo.

Shooting
FG 1/3 (33.3%)
3PT 1/2 (50.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 50.0%
USG% 33.3%
Net Rtg +12.5
+/- +1
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 3.5m
Scoring +1.6
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +1.0
Hustle +0.3
Defense +7.1
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 2
FGM Against 2
Opp FG% 100.0%
STL 3
BLK 0
TO 0
0
pts
0
reb
1
ast
Impact
-6.7

He was a complete non-factor in his 3:32 on the court, failing to attempt a single shot. His only statistical contribution was a single assist, making for an entirely invisible performance.

Shooting
FG 0/0
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 0.0%
Net Rtg +12.5
+/- +1
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 3.5m
Scoring +0.0
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +0.0
Defense +0.0
Turnovers +0.0
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
OKC Oklahoma City Thunder
19
pts
4
reb
7
ast
Impact
+5.2

This was an uncharacteristically inefficient and loose performance for him, defined by 4 turnovers and 6/15 shooting. While his +9.1 Offense credit shows he still created value with 7 assists, his scoring volume of 19 points was well below his 27.6 average.

Shooting
FG 6/15 (40.0%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 7/7 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 52.5%
USG% 28.6%
Net Rtg -28.5
+/- -18
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 31.2m
Scoring +13.2
Creation +2.9
Shot Making +2.8
Hustle +1.2
Defense +1.3
Turnovers -9.5
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 9
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 44.4%
STL 2
BLK 0
TO 4
S Chet Holmgren 25.6m
10
pts
9
reb
2
ast
Impact
+0.3

While he was a factor on the glass with 9 rebounds and held opponents to 6/15 shooting, his offensive game was a drag on his overall value. He struggled with inefficiency (3/8 FG) and ball security, committing 3 turnovers, which was well above his season average of 1.3.

Shooting
FG 3/8 (37.5%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 4/6 (66.7%)
Advanced
TS% 47.0%
USG% 20.6%
Net Rtg +3.6
+/- +2
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 25.6m
Scoring +5.0
Creation +0.9
Shot Making +1.1
Hustle +8.5
Defense -2.6
Turnovers -5.9
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 15
FGM Against 6
Opp FG% 40.0%
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 3
S Cason Wallace 20.8m
5
pts
4
reb
1
ast
Impact
+4.5

His defensive activity drove his value, as reflected by a +6.6 Defense credit and 5 deflections. Opponents shot just 3/8 (38%) when he was the nearest defender, but his own offensive contribution was minimal, scoring just 5 points on 2/8 shooting.

Shooting
FG 2/8 (25.0%)
3PT 1/3 (33.3%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 31.3%
USG% 14.3%
Net Rtg -18.6
+/- -10
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 20.8m
Scoring -0.3
Creation +0.7
Shot Making +1.3
Hustle +5.1
Defense +4.4
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 8
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 37.5%
STL 2
BLK 0
TO 0
12
pts
7
reb
3
ast
Impact
+6.3

Efficient scoring inside the arc defined his minutes, as he posted 12 points on 6/11 shooting to generate a +10.5 Offense credit. However, his defensive presence was limited, with opponents shooting 5/9 (56%) against him and his Defense component registering at just +0.4.

Shooting
FG 6/11 (54.5%)
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 54.5%
USG% 26.7%
Net Rtg -41.5
+/- -16
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 17.9m
Scoring +8.4
Creation +0.2
Shot Making +2.6
Hustle +5.0
Defense -0.9
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 9
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 55.6%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1
S Luguentz Dort 17.4m
2
pts
4
reb
0
ast
Impact
-1.9

His trademark defensive activity was present with 2 steals, but it came at the cost of 5 fouls in just 17 minutes of play. Offensively, he was a non-factor, attempting only two shots and scoring 2 points, well below his 5.5 average.

Shooting
FG 1/2 (50.0%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 50.0%
USG% 7.3%
Net Rtg -44.7
+/- -16
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 17.4m
Scoring +1.2
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.5
Hustle +5.1
Defense +1.0
Turnovers -3.1
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 7
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 57.1%
STL 2
BLK 0
TO 1
Jared McCain 23.9m
4
pts
2
reb
0
ast
Impact
-11.7

A brutal shooting performance defined his game, as he went 1/10 from the field and 0/5 from three-point range. This inefficiency, combined with 2 turnovers, resulted in a significant -5.7 Offense component despite holding his matchups to 2/7 shooting.

Shooting
FG 1/10 (10.0%)
3PT 0/5 (0.0%)
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 18.4%
USG% 21.0%
Net Rtg -28.2
+/- -13
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 23.9m
Scoring -2.9
Creation +0.4
Shot Making +0.3
Hustle +2.5
Defense -0.6
Turnovers -4.7
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 7
FGM Against 2
Opp FG% 28.6%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 2
10
pts
5
reb
3
ast
Impact
+2.4

A highly productive bench outing was driven by across-the-board contributions that exceeded his season norms in points (10), rebounds (5), and assists (3). This well-rounded effort was reflected in strong component scores for Offense (+8.0) and Defense (+2.7), where he held opponents to 4/11 shooting.

Shooting
FG 3/7 (42.9%)
3PT 2/4 (50.0%)
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 63.5%
USG% 15.0%
Net Rtg -9.4
+/- -4
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 23.1m
Scoring +7.0
Creation +0.9
Shot Making +2.1
Hustle +1.5
Defense -0.1
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 11
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 36.4%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 1
3
pts
3
reb
1
ast
Impact
-6.0

A brutal shooting night from deep (1/7 3P) tanked his offensive value, resulting in a -2.1 Offense credit. He salvaged his performance with pure effort, drawing 1 charge and logging 5 contests to generate a +5.0 Hustle component.

Shooting
FG 1/7 (14.3%)
3PT 1/7 (14.3%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 21.4%
USG% 13.3%
Net Rtg -31.0
+/- -11
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 22.6m
Scoring -1.9
Creation +0.2
Shot Making +1.0
Hustle +3.8
Defense +0.0
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 9
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 55.6%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1
4
pts
2
reb
0
ast
Impact
-13.9

His performance was defined by a massive chasm between his offense and defense, as opponents shot just 4/12 (33%) against him. That defensive value, which generated a +2.9 Defense credit, was completely erased by his offensive struggles where he shot 2/11 from the field.

Shooting
FG 2/11 (18.2%)
3PT 0/4 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 18.2%
USG% 24.1%
Net Rtg -8.9
+/- -4
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 20.9m
Scoring -3.2
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +1.1
Hustle +0.6
Defense -1.1
Turnovers -4.7
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 12
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 33.3%
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 2
Isaiah Joe 18.8m
11
pts
5
reb
2
ast
Impact
+7.8

A stellar two-way performance was the story, as he generated significant value on both ends of the floor. He was a lockdown defender, holding opponents to 2/9 (22%) shooting to fuel a +8.4 Defense credit, while also contributing 11 points and 2 steals.

Shooting
FG 4/9 (44.4%)
3PT 2/7 (28.6%)
FT 1/1 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 58.3%
USG% 19.2%
Net Rtg +10.1
+/- +6
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 18.8m
Scoring +7.3
Creation +0.3
Shot Making +2.7
Hustle +1.5
Defense +5.2
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 9
FGM Against 2
Opp FG% 22.2%
STL 2
BLK 1
TO 1
Alex Caruso 14.0m
0
pts
2
reb
1
ast
Impact
-10.7

He was a complete non-factor on offense, scoring 0 points on a single field goal attempt in 14 minutes. While he contributed 2 blocks and held matchups to 2/5 shooting, his offensive invisibility was the defining feature of his game.

Shooting
FG 0/1 (0.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 2.7%
Net Rtg -74.6
+/- -22
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 14.0m
Scoring -0.8
Creation +0.2
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +0.6
Defense -4.0
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 5
FGM Against 2
Opp FG% 40.0%
STL 0
BLK 2
TO 0
2
pts
0
reb
2
ast
Impact
-7.5

In just 3:45 of action, he had a quiet but efficient offensive cameo, scoring 2 points on 1/2 shooting and dishing 2 assists. A single turnover was the only blemish in his limited floor time.

Shooting
FG 1/2 (50.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 50.0%
USG% 33.3%
Net Rtg 0.0
+/- +1
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 3.8m
Scoring +1.2
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.4
Hustle +0.0
Defense +0.0
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 2
FGM Against 0
Opp FG% 0.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1