Interactive analysis

EXPLORE THE GAME

Every shot, every lead change, every rotation — visualized.

Lead over time · win-probability overlay
LEAD TRACKER
OKC lead BKN lead Win %
Every shot · colored by difficulty
SHOT CHART
Click shooters to compare their shots on the court
BKN 2P — 3P —
OKC 2P — 3P —
Tough make Easy make Blown miss Tough miss 162 attempts

BKN BKN Shot-making Δ

Porter Jr. 6/16 -4.2
Wolf 4/12 -6.7
Traore 5/11 -1.1
Dëmin Hard 1/10 -6.7
Clowney 3/9 -3.1
Sharpe Open 6/8 +1.3
Agbaji Hard 1/6 -2.7
Mann Hard 1/3 -0.1
Wilson Hard 1/2 +0.7
Powell 1/2 -0.5

OKC OKC Shot-making Δ

Wallace 4/13 -6.3
McCain Hard 7/12 +4.6
Wiggins 3/11 -5.4
Dort Hard 3/9 -1.4
Topić 4/6 +2.3
Joe Hard 3/6 +2.1
Holmgren 3/6 +1.9
Hartenstein Open 4/6 +0.2
Williams 2/5 -0.9
Caruso 0/5 -5.6
How the game was played
BY THE NUMBERS
BKN
OKC
29/79 Field Goals 35/83
36.7% Field Goal % 42.2%
7/41 3-Pointers 13/35
17.1% 3-Point % 37.1%
21/26 Free Throws 22/25
80.8% Free Throw % 88.0%
47.5% True Shooting % 55.9%
48 Total Rebounds 58
10 Offensive 13
30 Defensive 34
19 Assists 22
0.90 Assist/TO Ratio 1.16
20 Turnovers 18
11 Steals 11
7 Blocks 4
23 Fouls 19
38 Points in Paint 40
11 Fast Break Pts 16
22 Points off TOs 15
8 Second Chance Pts 13
24 Bench Points 55
6 Largest Lead 20
Biggest contributors
TOP NET IMPACT
1
Jared McCain
21 PTS · 4 REB · 0 AST · 22.7 MIN
+18.57
2
Michael Porter Jr.
22 PTS · 9 REB · 5 AST · 37.8 MIN
+17.98
3
Isaiah Hartenstein
10 PTS · 8 REB · 4 AST · 24.2 MIN
+16.52
4
Isaiah Joe
11 PTS · 7 REB · 1 AST · 21.7 MIN
+15.7
5
Day'Ron Sharpe
12 PTS · 8 REB · 2 AST · 27.1 MIN
+12.36
6
Nolan Traore
17 PTS · 1 REB · 3 AST · 26.9 MIN
+11.53
7
Chet Holmgren
15 PTS · 7 REB · 2 AST · 25.9 MIN
+7.2
8
Luguentz Dort
10 PTS · 2 REB · 2 AST · 28.8 MIN
+5.94
9
Cason Wallace
8 PTS · 4 REB · 6 AST · 29.5 MIN
+5.77
10
Jalen Wilson
5 PTS · 2 REB · 0 AST · 15.6 MIN
+4.89
Play-by-play (most recent first)
PLAY FEED
Q4 0:15 TEAM defensive REBOUND 86–105
Q4 0:18 MISS D. Powell 25' 3PT 86–105
Q4 0:34 J. McCain 25' 3PT pullup (21 PTS) (N. Topić 2 AST) 86–105
Q4 0:48 J. Wilson Free Throw 2 of 2 (5 PTS) 86–102
Q4 0:48 J. Wilson Free Throw 1 of 2 (4 PTS) 85–102
Q4 0:48 B. Boeheim shooting personal FOUL (1 PF) (Wilson 2 FT) 84–102
Q4 0:50 J. Wilson STEAL (2 STL) 84–102
Q4 0:50 J. McCain bad pass TURNOVER (1 TO) 84–102
Q4 1:08 B. Barnhizer REBOUND (Off:0 Def:2) 84–102
Q4 1:12 MISS J. Wilson 3PT 84–102
Q4 1:24 K. Williams Free Throw 2 of 2 (7 PTS) 84–102
Q4 1:24 K. Williams Free Throw 1 of 2 (6 PTS) 84–101
Q4 1:24 E. Dëmin shooting personal FOUL (2 PF) (Williams 2 FT) 84–100
Q4 1:29 B. Barnhizer REBOUND (Off:0 Def:1) 84–100
Q4 1:31 MISS N. Traore driving Layup 84–100

GAME ANALYSIS

KEEP READING

Create a free account and follow your team to get the full analysis every morning.

Create Free Account

Already have an account? Log in

PLAYER PERFORMANCE

OKC Oklahoma City Thunder
S Cason Wallace 29.5m
8
pts
4
reb
6
ast
Impact
-0.1

An icy shooting night from the perimeter threatened to ruin his impact profile entirely. He managed to claw his way back to a neutral rating by being an absolute menace in passing lanes and generating extra possessions through sheer hustle.

Shooting
FG 4/13 (30.8%)
3PT 0/5 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 30.8%
USG% 22.4%
Net Rtg +22.6
+/- +16
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 29.5m
Scoring +1.3
Creation +0.6
Shot Making +1.5
Hustle +5.1
Defense +7.6
Turnovers -10.2
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 10
FGM Against 2
Opp FG% 20.0%
STL 4
BLK 0
TO 4
S Luguentz Dort 28.8m
10
pts
2
reb
2
ast
Impact
-0.2

Trigger-happy tendencies from beyond the arc resulted in several wasted possessions that hurt the team's offensive flow. His physical point-of-attack defense provided its usual baseline of value, but the clunky shot selection ultimately dragged his score into the red.

Shooting
FG 3/9 (33.3%)
3PT 2/6 (33.3%)
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 50.6%
USG% 13.2%
Net Rtg +0.2
+/- -2
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 28.8m
Scoring +5.6
Creation +1.0
Shot Making +2.3
Hustle +0.6
Defense -2.6
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 14
FGM Against 6
Opp FG% 42.9%
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 0
S Aaron Wiggins 27.9m
7
pts
4
reb
0
ast
Impact
-2.7

A sudden regression in shot-making snapped a highly efficient stretch, dragging his overall rating into negative territory. While his on-ball defensive pressure remained intact, the sheer number of clanked mid-range pull-ups stalled out several offensive sets.

Shooting
FG 3/11 (27.3%)
3PT 1/4 (25.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 31.8%
USG% 17.9%
Net Rtg +20.3
+/- +12
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 27.9m
Scoring +0.8
Creation +0.1
Shot Making +1.9
Hustle +3.1
Defense +0.8
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 8
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 1
S Chet Holmgren 25.9m
15
pts
7
reb
2
ast
Impact
+4.8

Despite pristine shooting splits, a surprisingly low volume of field goal attempts limited his overall offensive footprint. Opposing bigs successfully pushed him out of his preferred spots, muting his usual rim-protecting gravity and keeping his net score slightly negative.

Shooting
FG 3/6 (50.0%)
3PT 2/2 (100.0%)
FT 7/7 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 82.6%
USG% 21.0%
Net Rtg +24.2
+/- +14
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 25.9m
Scoring +13.2
Creation +1.8
Shot Making +2.1
Hustle +2.1
Defense +0.0
Turnovers -10.2
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 10
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 40.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 4
10
pts
8
reb
4
ast
Impact
+9.0

Masterful positioning around the basket and elite screen-setting anchored a dominant statistical showing. He completely controlled the interior through physical box-outs and timely rim-runs, generating massive value without demanding the ball.

Shooting
FG 4/6 (66.7%)
3PT 0/0
FT 2/4 (50.0%)
Advanced
TS% 64.4%
USG% 14.1%
Net Rtg +9.6
+/- +5
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 24.2m
Scoring +7.3
Creation +0.6
Shot Making +2.1
Hustle +9.2
Defense -1.3
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 21
FGM Against 10
Opp FG% 47.6%
STL 1
BLK 2
TO 1
Jared McCain 22.7m
21
pts
4
reb
0
ast
Impact
+18.0

An unexpected offensive explosion completely tilted the game, driven by supreme confidence on catch-and-shoot opportunities. By punishing defensive lapses with blistering perimeter efficiency, he generated a massive positive swing in his minutes.

Shooting
FG 7/12 (58.3%)
3PT 3/6 (50.0%)
FT 4/4 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 76.3%
USG% 26.3%
Net Rtg +10.1
+/- +6
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 22.7m
Scoring +17.2
Creation +0.9
Shot Making +5.0
Hustle +4.1
Defense +0.8
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 6
FGM Against 2
Opp FG% 33.3%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 1
Isaiah Joe 21.7m
11
pts
7
reb
1
ast
Impact
+15.6

Lethal floor-spacing gravity opened up the paint for his teammates, compounding the value of his own efficient shot-making. He paired this offensive spark with disciplined closeouts on the perimeter to post a stellar two-way rating.

Shooting
FG 3/6 (50.0%)
3PT 2/3 (66.7%)
FT 3/4 (75.0%)
Advanced
TS% 70.9%
USG% 16.4%
Net Rtg +17.6
+/- +10
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 21.7m
Scoring +8.3
Creation +0.7
Shot Making +2.5
Hustle +8.9
Defense +4.7
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 4
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 25.0%
STL 2
BLK 0
TO 1
7
pts
4
reb
2
ast
Impact
-2.2

Smart, connective passing and timely spacing from the top of the key kept the offense humming during his shifts. He maximized his floor time by taking only high-value shots and executing defensive rotations flawlessly.

Shooting
FG 2/4 (50.0%)
3PT 1/2 (50.0%)
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 71.7%
USG% 14.3%
Net Rtg +6.0
+/- +4
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 18.4m
Scoring +5.6
Creation +0.5
Shot Making +1.2
Hustle +1.2
Defense -1.6
Turnovers -3.1
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 10
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 40.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1
7
pts
2
reb
0
ast
Impact
-2.4

Opportunistic cuts to the basket provided a minor scoring boost compared to his recent slump. However, a lack of secondary playmaking and minimal impact on the glass left his overall footprint perfectly neutral.

Shooting
FG 2/5 (40.0%)
3PT 1/2 (50.0%)
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 59.5%
USG% 18.4%
Net Rtg -2.6
+/- 0
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 14.7m
Scoring +4.5
Creation +0.4
Shot Making +1.3
Hustle +0.6
Defense -0.6
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 5
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 20.0%
STL 1
BLK 1
TO 1
9
pts
3
reb
2
ast
Impact
-1.4

Flashes of brilliant downhill penetration resulted in a highly efficient scoring burst off the bench. Unfortunately, defensive miscommunications and struggles navigating screens gave back those points on the other end, resulting in a slight negative rating.

Shooting
FG 4/6 (66.7%)
3PT 1/2 (50.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 75.0%
USG% 33.3%
Net Rtg +45.1
+/- +12
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 11.4m
Scoring +7.7
Creation +0.6
Shot Making +2.0
Hustle +0.9
Defense -0.3
Turnovers -5.9
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 3
Alex Caruso 10.8m
0
pts
0
reb
3
ast
Impact
-10.7

Blanking completely from the field severely hampered the second unit's offensive rhythm. While his trademark defensive instincts were still present, the string of empty shooting possessions proved too costly to overcome.

Shooting
FG 0/5 (0.0%)
3PT 0/3 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 24.0%
Net Rtg +49.6
+/- +12
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 10.8m
Scoring -3.8
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +0.0
Defense +2.1
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 3
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 33.3%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 1
0
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
-8.0

A quick cameo at the end of the rotation yielded a surprisingly negative score due to immediate defensive breakdowns. Opponents successfully targeted him in space during his brief time on the floor.

Shooting
FG 0/0
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 0.0%
Net Rtg +50.0
+/- +3
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 2.0m
Scoring +0.0
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +0.0
Defense -1.6
Turnovers +0.0
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
0
pts
2
reb
0
ast
Impact
-5.8

Brief garbage-time minutes limited any meaningful statistical accumulation. He stayed within the defensive scheme and avoided any glaring mistakes during his short stint.

Shooting
FG 0/0
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 0.0%
Net Rtg +50.0
+/- +3
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 2.0m
Scoring +0.0
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +0.6
Defense +0.0
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 1
FGM Against 0
Opp FG% 0.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
BKN Brooklyn Nets
22
pts
9
reb
5
ast
Impact
+21.9

Despite a brutal shooting night from beyond the arc, his defensive engagement kept his overall impact in the green. The sheer volume of missed perimeter looks capped his ceiling, but timely rotations and steady rebounding offset the poor efficiency.

Shooting
FG 6/16 (37.5%)
3PT 1/9 (11.1%)
FT 9/11 (81.8%)
Advanced
TS% 52.8%
USG% 24.7%
Net Rtg -3.8
+/- -3
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 37.8m
Scoring +13.6
Creation +2.8
Shot Making +3.1
Hustle +11.4
Defense +2.9
Turnovers -5.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 6
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 2
BLK 0
TO 2
S Egor Dëmin 28.4m
3
pts
5
reb
3
ast
Impact
-7.5

Offensive impact cratered due to a disastrous shot-selection profile heavily skewed toward contested threes. The resulting empty possessions completely overshadowed a surprisingly stout defensive effort where he consistently stayed in front of his man.

Shooting
FG 1/10 (10.0%)
3PT 1/8 (12.5%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 15.0%
USG% 15.6%
Net Rtg -16.8
+/- -11
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 28.4m
Scoring -3.8
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +1.0
Hustle +1.5
Defense +0.2
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 14
FGM Against 7
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 1
BLK 2
TO 0
S Day'Ron Sharpe 27.1m
12
pts
8
reb
2
ast
Impact
+9.4

Absolute dominance in the paint and elite hustle metrics fueled a massive positive impact. By strictly hunting high-percentage looks around the rim and generating second-chance opportunities, he maximized his minutes without wasting possessions.

Shooting
FG 6/8 (75.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 0/2 (0.0%)
Advanced
TS% 67.6%
USG% 17.7%
Net Rtg -24.8
+/- -12
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 27.1m
Scoring +9.3
Creation +0.6
Shot Making +2.4
Hustle +7.2
Defense +3.1
Turnovers -5.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 11
FGM Against 2
Opp FG% 18.2%
STL 2
BLK 1
TO 2
S Nolan Traore 26.9m
17
pts
1
reb
3
ast
Impact
+8.5

A sudden surge in downhill aggression yielded a massive scoring spike compared to recent outings. Even with some erratic perimeter attempts, his point-of-attack defense provided enough stability to keep his net rating slightly above water.

Shooting
FG 5/11 (45.5%)
3PT 1/4 (25.0%)
FT 6/6 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 62.3%
USG% 29.5%
Net Rtg -10.9
+/- -6
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 26.9m
Scoring +12.4
Creation +2.1
Shot Making +3.1
Hustle +0.3
Defense +5.2
Turnovers -8.2
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 7
FGM Against 2
Opp FG% 28.6%
STL 2
BLK 1
TO 4
S Noah Clowney 26.5m
8
pts
5
reb
1
ast
Impact
-3.1

A heavy dose of forced perimeter shots tanked his offensive value despite a noticeable uptick in scoring aggression. Relentless activity on the glass and deflections salvaged his defensive metrics, proving he can contribute even when his jumper is broken.

Shooting
FG 3/9 (33.3%)
3PT 1/6 (16.7%)
FT 1/1 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 42.4%
USG% 17.2%
Net Rtg -15.7
+/- -8
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 26.5m
Scoring +3.0
Creation +0.2
Shot Making +1.6
Hustle +6.3
Defense -1.9
Turnovers -4.7
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 14
FGM Against 6
Opp FG% 42.9%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 2
Terance Mann 24.0m
3
pts
4
reb
2
ast
Impact
-6.9

Extreme passivity on the offensive end rendered him nearly invisible, severely limiting his overall value. He tried to compensate through high-energy closeouts and loose-ball recoveries, but the lack of scoring threat allowed the defense to ignore him.

Shooting
FG 1/3 (33.3%)
3PT 1/3 (33.3%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 50.0%
USG% 8.8%
Net Rtg -24.0
+/- -15
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 24.0m
Scoring +1.4
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +1.0
Hustle +2.2
Defense +0.4
Turnovers -4.7
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 9
FGM Against 2
Opp FG% 22.2%
STL 1
BLK 1
TO 2
Danny Wolf 22.6m
8
pts
3
reb
2
ast
Impact
-6.6

Settling for low-quality looks from deep drained his offensive efficiency and pushed his overall impact into the red. He managed to carve out some value as a rim-deterrent, but the sheer volume of wasted offensive possessions was too much to overcome.

Shooting
FG 4/12 (33.3%)
3PT 0/5 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 33.3%
USG% 23.6%
Net Rtg -20.1
+/- -13
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 22.6m
Scoring +1.5
Creation +1.1
Shot Making +1.4
Hustle +1.9
Defense -2.4
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 9
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 44.4%
STL 0
BLK 2
TO 1
Drake Powell 20.2m
4
pts
2
reb
1
ast
Impact
-10.6

Floating through the game without asserting himself led to a plummeting net score. A complete inability to generate offensive gravity or disrupt passing lanes meant he was essentially a non-factor during his shifts.

Shooting
FG 1/2 (50.0%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 69.4%
USG% 12.5%
Net Rtg -5.5
+/- -4
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 20.2m
Scoring +3.2
Creation +0.4
Shot Making +0.5
Hustle +0.6
Defense -0.3
Turnovers -7.1
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 7
FGM Against 2
Opp FG% 28.6%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 3
Jalen Wilson 15.7m
5
pts
2
reb
0
ast
Impact
-0.1

A sharp drop in offensive involvement compared to his recent stretch left his impact hovering near neutral. He played within the flow of the offense and offered solid weak-side help, but simply didn't command enough touches to move the needle.

Shooting
FG 1/2 (50.0%)
3PT 1/2 (50.0%)
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 86.8%
USG% 13.2%
Net Rtg -35.2
+/- -13
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 15.7m
Scoring +4.2
Creation +0.4
Shot Making +0.9
Hustle +2.5
Defense +1.6
Turnovers -3.5
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 6
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 83.3%
STL 2
BLK 0
TO 2
Ochai Agbaji 10.9m
4
pts
1
reb
0
ast
Impact
-11.2

Forcing up contested jumpers in limited action quickly torpedoed his analytical profile. Without any secondary playmaking or defensive play-generation to fall back on, those empty shooting possessions proved highly destructive.

Shooting
FG 1/6 (16.7%)
3PT 1/3 (33.3%)
FT 1/2 (50.0%)
Advanced
TS% 29.1%
USG% 34.6%
Net Rtg -39.3
+/- -10
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 10.9m
Scoring -0.1
Creation +0.2
Shot Making +1.0
Hustle +0.3
Defense +0.0
Turnovers -4.7
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 7
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 42.9%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 2