SAC

2025-26 Season

DREW EUBANKS

Sacramento Kings | Forward-Center | 6-10
Drew Eubanks
5.2PPG
3.0RPG
0.5APG
13.1MPG
-5.0 Impact

Eubanks produces at an poor rate for a 13-minute workload.

·
Embed this player card

Copy & paste this HTML into any page:

The widget updates automatically whenever our data does.

IMPACT BREAKDOWN
Every stat, every credit, every cost — per game average
-5.0
Scoring +4.6
Points Scored 5.2 PPG = +5.2
Missed Shots difficulty-adjusted = -1.4
Shot Making above expected FG% = +0.8
Creation +0.3
Assists & Self-Creation 0.5 AST/g + self-creation = +0.3
Turnovers -1.7
Turnovers 0.7/g (live + dead blend) = -1.7
Defense -0.2
Steals 0.4/g = +0.9
Blocks 0.6/g = +0.5
Fouls + context committed fouls, matchup adj = -1.6
Hustle & Effort +2.7
Rebounds 3.0 RPG (OREB + DREB) = +0.7
Contested Shots 3.4/g = +0.7
Deflections 0.9/g = +0.6
Charges Drawn 0.0/g = +0.1
Loose Balls 0.1/g = +0.1
Screen Assists 1.7/g = +0.5
Raw Impact +5.7
Baseline (game-average expected) −10.7
Net Impact
-5.0
16th pctl vs Forwards

PBP Credit: Every play is analyzed from play-by-play data. Scorers get difficulty-adjusted credit, assisters get creation value based on the shot opportunity they created, and turnovers are classified by type. Shot difficulty is derived from 1M+ shots across 4 seasons. Full methodology

SKILL DNA

Percentile rank vs 235 Forwards with 10+ games

Scoring 21th
5.7 PPG
Efficiency 55th
56.9% TS
Playmaking 3th
0.5 APG
Rebounding 30th
3.3 RPG
Defense 23th
+5.1/g
Hustle 57th
+13.0/g
Creation 20th
+1.58/g
Shot Making 16th
+3.15/g
TO Discipline 33th
0.05/min

THE SEASON SO FAR

Drew Eubanks spent the first month of the season pinballing between spot starts and deep-bench irrelevance, struggling to find a stable role as an interior enforcer. His early minutes were defined by empty offensive trips. He completely bottomed out during the 10/24 vs UTA contest, bricking all five of his shots for zero points and a dismal -13.2 impact score. Even when Eubanks found the bottom of the net, his lack of rebounding frequently dragged down his overall value. Look no further than the 11/04 vs DEN matchup, where he scored 10 points on perfect 4/4 shooting but still posted a brutal -9.9 impact because he grabbed just two rebounds and offered zero resistance inside. He finally flipped the script in a rematch on 11/12 vs DEN. By racking up 19 points and seven boards on 8/9 shooting, he punished the interior and earned a massive +12.0 impact score. Unfortunately, that physical showing was a glaring outlier in a chaotic stretch where he mostly bled value on the margins.

This 14-game stretch was defined by a brutal demotion, as Drew Eubanks went from eating up frontcourt minutes as a starter to fighting for scraps at the end of the bench. Even when he scored reasonably well early on, his overall presence was a net negative. During a start on 11/21 vs MEM, he tallied a stretch-high 9 points and 5 rebounds in 26 minutes, but defensive passivity and a complete lack of playmaking dragged his impact score down to a bleak -6.6. Shortly after, he was banished to the second unit. Coming off the bench did little to revive his flatlining production, highlighted by a completely invisible outing on 12/12 vs DEN where he logged zeros across the board in four minutes for a -10.8 impact. He finally found a pulse in the final game of the window on 01/03 vs PHX. Despite playing just 10 minutes, his perfect 2-for-2 shooting from the floor and highly efficient offensive execution yielded a +1.2 impact score—his lone positive mark of the entire span.

Drew Eubanks spent this mid-season stretch fighting for scraps at the end of the rotation, largely failing to translate brief minutes into positive momentum. His lack of offensive rhythm was painfully obvious early on. A brutal 1-for-6 shooting performance on 01/12 vs HOU resulted in a dismal -10.9 Impact score, exposing his inability to anchor the second unit. Even when he managed to find the bottom of the net, his overall effectiveness often lagged behind his point totals. Take his outing on 03/01 vs LAL, where he tallied 10 points in 14 minutes but still posted a -4.4 Impact score because defensive lapses and minimal rebounding dragged down his net value. He did finally flash his ceiling as an energy big near the end of this stretch. Given an extended run on 03/05 vs NOP, Eubanks erupted for 15 points and 11 rebounds in 22 minutes, earning a massive +16.1 Impact score by dominating the glass and converting an ultra-efficient 7-of-9 from the floor.

IMPACT TIMELINE

Game-by-game performance vs average. Green = above average, red = below.

PATTERNS

Struggling. Eubanks has posted negative impact in 88% of games this season. The production rarely outweighs the cost.

Reliable shooter — hits 45%+ from the field in 79% of games. You can count on efficient nights more often than not.

Good defender on his best nights, but it comes and goes. Some games Eubanks locks in defensively, others he gets picked apart.

Tends to go on runs. Longest hot streak: 1 games. Longest cold streak: 16 games.

MATCHUP HISTORY ⚠ Updated 46 days ago

Based on 66 games with tracking data. Shows who guarded this player on offense and who he guarded on defense, with their shooting stats in those matchups.

ON OFFENSE: WHO GUARDED HIM

His shooting stats against each primary defender this season

I. Hartenstein 68.9 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.09
PTS 6
Z. Edey 64.3 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.06
PTS 4
N. Jokić 63.9 poss
FG% 83.3%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.33
PTS 21
O. Ighodaro 32.3 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.09
PTS 3
R. Gobert 32.2 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.06
PTS 2
M. Williams 30.3 poss
FG% 25.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.07
PTS 2
J. Valančiūnas 24.8 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.24
PTS 6
B. Portis 23.4 poss
FG% 40.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.17
PTS 4
J. Nurkić 22.8 poss
FG% 25.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.09
PTS 2
K. Matković 21.7 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0

ON DEFENSE: WHO HE GUARDED

How opponents shot when he was the primary defender. Lower FG% = better defense.

I. Hartenstein 61.2 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.1
PTS 6
Z. Edey 60.1 poss
FG% 77.8%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.25
PTS 15
N. Jokić 58.5 poss
FG% 66.7%
3P% 25.0%
PPP 0.39
PTS 23
R. Gobert 34.7 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.12
PTS 4
M. Williams 31.4 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.1
PTS 3
O. Ighodaro 28.0 poss
FG% 40.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.21
PTS 6
J. Valančiūnas 27.6 poss
FG% 37.5%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.22
PTS 6
J. Nurkić 24.9 poss
FG% 25.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.08
PTS 2
B. Portis 23.3 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.26
PTS 6
M. Potter 21.5 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.19
PTS 4

SEASON STATS

42
Games
5.2
PPG
3.0
RPG
0.5
APG
0.4
SPG
0.6
BPG
59.6
FG%
14.3
3P%
56.1
FT%
13.1
MPG

GAME LOG

42 games played