Interactive analysis

EXPLORE THE GAME

Every shot, every lead change, every rotation — visualized.

Lead over time · win-probability overlay
LEAD TRACKER
OKC lead LAL lead Win %
Every shot · colored by difficulty
SHOT CHART
Click shooters to compare their shots on the court
LAL 2P — 3P —
OKC 2P — 3P —
Tough make Easy make Blown miss Tough miss 159 attempts

LAL LAL Shot-making Δ

James 9/18 -0.6
Reaves 10/16 +5.9
Smart 4/13 -5.0
Hachimura Hard 6/10 +6.1
Ayton Open 1/7 -6.5
Kennard 4/5 +4.0
Hayes Open 3/3 +2.3
Smith Jr. 1/3 -1.3
LaRavia 0/2 -2.1
Knecht Open 1/1 +0.6

OKC OKC Shot-making Δ

Gilgeous-Alexander 7/13 +0.2
Mitchell 7/12 +1.3
McCain Hard 7/11 +7.0
Holmgren 7/11 +5.2
Wallace 4/7 +1.7
Hartenstein 5/6 +3.8
Caruso Hard 2/6 -1.4
Dort Hard 1/6 -3.2
Williams Hard 2/4 +1.8
Joe Hard 2/3 +1.3
How the game was played
BY THE NUMBERS
LAL
OKC
39/78 Field Goals 45/81
50.0% Field Goal % 55.6%
11/29 3-Pointers 14/36
37.9% 3-Point % 38.9%
18/21 Free Throws 21/26
85.7% Free Throw % 80.8%
61.3% True Shooting % 67.6%
37 Total Rebounds 46
10 Offensive 9
20 Defensive 23
24 Assists 26
1.14 Assist/TO Ratio 1.86
20 Turnovers 12
7 Steals 12
0 Blocks 5
26 Fouls 21
52 Points in Paint 46
4 Fast Break Pts 14
14 Points off TOs 26
6 Second Chance Pts 17
20 Bench Points 48
5 Largest Lead 20
Biggest contributors
TOP NET IMPACT
1
Chet Holmgren
22 PTS · 9 REB · 3 AST · 32.5 MIN
+28.63
2
LeBron James
23 PTS · 2 REB · 6 AST · 37.8 MIN
+20.54
3
Isaiah Hartenstein
10 PTS · 9 REB · 1 AST · 26.8 MIN
+19.22
4
Ajay Mitchell
20 PTS · 3 REB · 6 AST · 30.2 MIN
+14.27
5
Austin Reaves
31 PTS · 2 REB · 6 AST · 38.4 MIN
+14.13
6
Cason Wallace
12 PTS · 2 REB · 4 AST · 30.9 MIN
+14.07
7
Rui Hachimura
16 PTS · 4 REB · 2 AST · 38.8 MIN
+11.69
8
Jared McCain
18 PTS · 0 REB · 0 AST · 17.7 MIN
+10.57
9
Shai Gilgeous-Alexander
22 PTS · 2 REB · 2 AST · 27.9 MIN
+10.17
10
Luke Kennard
10 PTS · 1 REB · 0 AST · 26.0 MIN
+7.93
Play-by-play (most recent first)
PLAY FEED
Q4 0:01 A. Wiggins STEAL (1 STL) 107–125
Q4 0:01 A. Thiero lost ball TURNOVER (1 TO) 107–125
Q4 0:01 A. Thiero REBOUND (Off:1 Def:2) 107–125
Q4 0:03 MISS N. Smith Jr. cutting Layup 107–125
Q4 0:09 OKC shot clock Team TURNOVER 107–125
Q4 0:33 D. Knecht driving Layup (2 PTS) (N. Smith Jr. 1 AST) 107–125
Q4 0:57 N. Topić driving finger roll Layup (2 PTS) (I. Joe 3 AST) 105–125
Q4 1:17 D. Knecht bad pass out-of-bounds TURNOVER (1 TO) 105–123
Q4 1:18 D. Knecht REBOUND (Off:0 Def:1) 105–123
Q4 1:21 MISS K. Williams 3PT 105–123
Q4 1:35 A. Mitchell REBOUND (Off:1 Def:2) 105–123
Q4 1:39 MISS N. Smith Jr. 25' 3PT 105–123
Q4 1:46 J. McCain 3PT (18 PTS) (A. Mitchell 6 AST) 105–123
Q4 2:09 N. Smith Jr. 13' step back Jump Shot (2 PTS) (B. James 1 AST) 105–120
Q4 2:14 OKC 8-second-violation Team TURNOVER 103–120

GAME ANALYSIS

KEEP READING

Create a free account and follow your team to get the full analysis every morning.

Create Free Account

Already have an account? Log in

PLAYER PERFORMANCE

OKC Oklahoma City Thunder
S Chet Holmgren 32.5m
22
pts
9
reb
3
ast
Impact
+26.8

Chet Holmgren was an absolute two-way terror, pairing hyper-efficient scoring (7-of-11 shooting, +19.9 Offense credit) with dominant rim protection and active hands. His 4 steals (↑) and 2 blocks fueled a massive +12.4 Defense credit, while holding his matchups to just 45% shooting.

Shooting
FG 7/11 (63.6%)
3PT 3/5 (60.0%)
FT 5/7 (71.4%)
Advanced
TS% 78.1%
USG% 20.8%
Net Rtg +25.2
+/- +19
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 32.5m
Scoring +18.2
Creation +1.3
Shot Making +4.3
Hustle +8.5
Defense +7.0
Turnovers -4.7
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 11
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 45.5%
STL 4
BLK 2
TO 2
S Ajay Mitchell 30.2m
20
pts
3
reb
6
ast
Impact
+9.2

Ajay Mitchell thrived as a high-leverage combo guard, slashing his way to 20 points and 6 assists (↑) to generate a robust +16.7 Offense credit. He compensated for a cold night from deep (0-of-3) by aggressively attacking the paint and drawing fouls (6-of-7 FT), though his defensive matchups did find success (55% shooting).

Shooting
FG 7/12 (58.3%)
3PT 0/3 (0.0%)
FT 6/7 (85.7%)
Advanced
TS% 66.3%
USG% 24.6%
Net Rtg +31.3
+/- +18
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 30.2m
Scoring +15.8
Creation +2.1
Shot Making +3.3
Hustle +3.8
Defense -3.1
Turnovers -4.7
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 11
FGM Against 6
Opp FG% 54.5%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 2
22
pts
2
reb
2
ast
Impact
+9.2

Shai Gilgeous-Alexander's scoring volume dipped below his lofty standards (22 points), and his playmaking was unusually quiet with just 2 assists (↓). However, he remained highly efficient from the floor (54%) and played stifling isolation defense, completely locking down his matchups to the tune of 1-of-6 shooting (17%).

Shooting
FG 7/13 (53.8%)
3PT 1/3 (33.3%)
FT 7/9 (77.8%)
Advanced
TS% 64.9%
USG% 31.3%
Net Rtg +8.8
+/- +5
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 27.9m
Scoring +16.6
Creation +1.5
Shot Making +3.5
Hustle +0.6
Defense +1.5
Turnovers -6.6
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 6
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 16.7%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 3
10
pts
9
reb
1
ast
Impact
+16.2

Isaiah Hartenstein bullied the interior with ruthless efficiency, converting 5-of-6 shots to drive a +13.1 Offense credit. He was equally disruptive on the other end, racking up 9 contests, 4 deflections, and 2 blocks (↑) to anchor a stout defensive showing (+8.0 Defense credit).

Shooting
FG 5/6 (83.3%)
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 83.3%
USG% 11.3%
Net Rtg -0.3
+/- +1
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 26.8m
Scoring +9.3
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +2.6
Hustle +9.5
Defense +5.1
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 11
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 45.5%
STL 2
BLK 2
TO 1
S Luguentz Dort 22.8m
3
pts
1
reb
2
ast
Impact
-12.1

An agonizing perimeter shooting slump defined Luguentz Dort's night, as he bricked 5 of his 6 three-point attempts, dragging his Offense credit down to -4.3. While he chipped in 2 deflections, his defensive impact was muted by opponents shooting 5-of-9 against him.

Shooting
FG 1/6 (16.7%)
3PT 1/6 (16.7%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 25.0%
USG% 14.8%
Net Rtg -4.5
+/- -1
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 22.8m
Scoring -1.1
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +1.0
Hustle +0.3
Defense +0.5
Turnovers -4.7
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 9
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 55.6%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 2
12
pts
2
reb
4
ast
Impact
+6.8

Cason Wallace provided a vital two-way spark, burying 2-of-3 from beyond the arc to fuel an efficient 12-point outing (+13.9 Offense credit). His relentless motor was on full display defensively, where he tallied 4 deflections and forced his matchups into a tough 7-of-16 shooting night.

Shooting
FG 4/7 (57.1%)
3PT 2/3 (66.7%)
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 76.1%
USG% 11.0%
Net Rtg +26.6
+/- +17
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 30.9m
Scoring +9.4
Creation +0.5
Shot Making +3.0
Hustle +2.5
Defense -0.6
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 16
FGM Against 7
Opp FG% 43.8%
STL 1
BLK 1
TO 0
Alex Caruso 22.4m
5
pts
4
reb
4
ast
Impact
-0.7

Alex Caruso's jumper completely abandoned him (1-of-5 from deep), severely capping his +1.6 Offense credit. He compensated by being an absolute menace in the passing lanes, racking up a massive 7 deflections and 2 steals (↑) to drive a stellar +6.8 Defense credit.

Shooting
FG 2/6 (33.3%)
3PT 1/5 (20.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 41.7%
USG% 13.7%
Net Rtg +33.8
+/- +17
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 22.4m
Scoring +1.8
Creation +0.8
Shot Making +1.4
Hustle +1.2
Defense +4.4
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 7
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 57.1%
STL 2
BLK 0
TO 1
Jared McCain 17.7m
18
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
+9.2

Jared McCain caught absolute fire as a microwave scorer, drilling 4-of-5 from beyond the arc to pour in 18 points (+162% vs avg) and generate a +13.1 Offense credit. His performance was entirely one-dimensional, however, as he failed to record a single rebound or assist while offering zero resistance defensively.

Shooting
FG 7/11 (63.6%)
3PT 4/5 (80.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 81.8%
USG% 29.3%
Net Rtg -3.8
+/- +1
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 17.7m
Scoring +15.1
Creation +0.1
Shot Making +5.3
Hustle +0.0
Defense -2.2
Turnovers -1.1
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 2
FGM Against 2
Opp FG% 100.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1
7
pts
2
reb
1
ast
Impact
-1.7

Jaylin Williams operated effectively as a stretch big, hitting 2-of-4 from deep to secure a +6.3 Offense credit in just 14 minutes. While his rebounding (2 boards) was below average, he chipped in with 4 contests and drew a charge to bolster his defensive utility.

Shooting
FG 2/4 (50.0%)
3PT 2/4 (50.0%)
FT 1/1 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 78.8%
USG% 12.1%
Net Rtg +38.7
+/- +12
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 14.5m
Scoring +5.4
Creation +0.2
Shot Making +1.9
Hustle +0.6
Defense -1.9
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 9
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 44.4%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
Isaiah Joe 8.5m
4
pts
0
reb
3
ast
Impact
-3.5

Isaiah Joe's typical perimeter barrage was absent, as he attempted just one three-pointer and finished with a quiet 4 points. He managed to facilitate a bit with 3 assists (↑), but his overall impact was severely limited during his brief 9-minute stint.

Shooting
FG 2/3 (66.7%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 66.7%
USG% 15.8%
Net Rtg +0.6
+/- -1
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 8.5m
Scoring +3.2
Creation +0.2
Shot Making +1.1
Hustle +0.0
Defense +0.0
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 5
FGM Against 2
Opp FG% 40.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
0
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
-5.6

Aaron Wiggins was virtually invisible during his two minutes of mop-up duty, failing to attempt a shot or grab a rebound. He did manage to record a steal and a deflection, but his overall contribution was negligible.

Shooting
FG 0/0
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
USG% 0.0%
Net Rtg +20.0
+/- +1
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 2.2m
Scoring +0.0
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +0.0
Defense +2.4
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 2
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 0
0
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
-8.7

Kenrich Williams logged just two empty minutes, missing his only shot attempt from deep. He offered no tangible production outside of a single screen assist.

Shooting
FG 0/1 (0.0%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 20.0%
Net Rtg +20.0
+/- +1
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 2.2m
Scoring -0.8
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +0.0
Defense +0.0
Turnovers +0.0
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
2
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
-5.6

Nikola Topić saw barely over a minute of garbage time, converting his lone field goal attempt for 2 points. His brief cameo provided no opportunity to impact the game in any meaningful way.

Shooting
FG 1/1 (100.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 100.0%
USG% 33.3%
Net Rtg -33.3
+/- 0
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 1.3m
Scoring +2.0
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.3
Hustle +0.0
Defense +0.0
Turnovers +0.0
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
LAL Los Angeles Lakers
S Rui Hachimura 38.8m
16
pts
4
reb
2
ast
Impact
+7.8

Rui Hachimura continued his scorching shooting stretch, burying 4-of-7 from deep to fuel a solid +10.0 Offense credit. However, he struggled to contain his matchup on the other end, allowing opponents to shoot a blistering 11-of-20 (55%) when he was the primary defender.

Shooting
FG 6/10 (60.0%)
3PT 4/7 (57.1%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 80.0%
USG% 14.1%
Net Rtg -22.7
+/- -19
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 38.8m
Scoring +13.0
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +4.9
Hustle +1.2
Defense +2.1
Turnovers -5.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 20
FGM Against 11
Opp FG% 55.0%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 2
S Austin Reaves 38.4m
31
pts
2
reb
6
ast
Impact
+9.0

Austin Reaves erupted as a primary scoring engine, pouring in 31 points on hyper-efficient 10-of-16 shooting to generate a massive +19.5 Offense credit. Despite the offensive fireworks, his value was undercut by 5 turnovers (↓) and a porous defensive showing where his matchups torched him for 11-of-15 (73%) shooting.

Shooting
FG 10/16 (62.5%)
3PT 3/6 (50.0%)
FT 8/10 (80.0%)
Advanced
TS% 76.0%
USG% 27.4%
Net Rtg -24.2
+/- -20
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 38.4m
Scoring +25.4
Creation +3.0
Shot Making +6.4
Hustle +0.6
Defense -6.5
Turnovers -11.8
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 15
FGM Against 11
Opp FG% 73.3%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 5
S LeBron James 37.8m
23
pts
2
reb
6
ast
Impact
+15.2

LeBron James's offensive orchestration (+15.6 Offense credit) remained efficient on 9-of-18 shooting, though his rebounding (2, well below his 6.5 average) and playmaking volume dipped. He compensated with active hands on the other end, generating 4 deflections and 3 steals (↑) to drive a strong +7.2 Defense credit.

Shooting
FG 9/18 (50.0%)
3PT 1/4 (25.0%)
FT 4/4 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 58.2%
USG% 26.7%
Net Rtg -11.7
+/- -9
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 37.8m
Scoring +16.3
Creation +1.9
Shot Making +4.1
Hustle +1.6
Defense +7.1
Turnovers -7.8
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 9
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 44.4%
STL 3
BLK 0
TO 3
S Marcus Smart 34.2m
14
pts
4
reb
5
ast
Impact
+1.6

Marcus Smart's brutal perimeter shooting (1-of-7 from deep) bogged down his offensive utility, though he still managed to chip in 14 points. His trademark grit was present via 4 deflections (+3.6 Hustle credit), but opponents found too much success against him, shooting 60% when he was the nearest defender.

Shooting
FG 4/13 (30.8%)
3PT 1/7 (14.3%)
FT 5/5 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 46.1%
USG% 23.7%
Net Rtg +6.3
+/- +2
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 34.2m
Scoring +7.0
Creation +1.7
Shot Making +2.4
Hustle +5.1
Defense +1.2
Turnovers -7.8
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 10
FGM Against 6
Opp FG% 60.0%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 3
S Deandre Ayton 26.6m
3
pts
10
reb
0
ast
Impact
-6.1

Deandre Ayton's scoring completely evaporated (1-of-7 shooting for just 3 points), severely limiting his offensive value (+2.3 Offense credit). He salvaged some utility through sheer physical presence, grabbing 10 rebounds (↑) and setting 7 screen assists, but his inability to convert inside crippled his overall impact.

Shooting
FG 1/7 (14.3%)
3PT 0/0
FT 1/2 (50.0%)
Advanced
TS% 19.0%
USG% 16.9%
Net Rtg -7.7
+/- -4
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 26.6m
Scoring -2.4
Creation +0.4
Shot Making +0.3
Hustle +11.7
Defense -4.7
Turnovers -3.5
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 11
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 45.5%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 2
Luke Kennard 26.0m
10
pts
1
reb
0
ast
Impact
+2.3

Luke Kennard operated as a hyper-efficient floor spacer, draining 4-of-5 shots (including 2-of-3 from deep) to drive a +9.7 Offense credit. However, his one-dimensional role was evident as he failed to register a single assist or steal, and opponents shot a comfortable 56% against him.

Shooting
FG 4/5 (80.0%)
3PT 2/3 (66.7%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 100.0%
USG% 8.5%
Net Rtg -23.6
+/- -15
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 26.0m
Scoring +9.2
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +2.6
Hustle +0.3
Defense -1.9
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 9
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 55.6%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
Jaxson Hayes 15.4m
6
pts
3
reb
2
ast
Impact
-5.3

Jaxson Hayes provided a brief but flawless finishing spark off the bench, converting all three of his field goal attempts to secure a +4.7 Offense credit. His rim-running efficiency was solid, though his rebounding (3 boards) fell slightly below his season average during his 15 minutes of action.

Shooting
FG 3/3 (100.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 100.0%
USG% 13.9%
Net Rtg -33.3
+/- -11
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 15.4m
Scoring +6.0
Creation +0.3
Shot Making +0.9
Hustle +1.9
Defense -1.1
Turnovers -5.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 9
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 44.4%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 2
Jake LaRavia 10.0m
0
pts
0
reb
1
ast
Impact
-9.9

Jake LaRavia was completely invisible offensively during his 10 minutes, failing to score while posting a -3.1 Offense credit. He managed to generate some activity with 3 deflections, but his defensive matchups easily exploited him, converting 5-of-7 attempts.

Shooting
FG 0/2 (0.0%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 12.0%
Net Rtg -63.6
+/- -14
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 10.0m
Scoring -1.5
Creation +0.1
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +0.0
Defense +0.5
Turnovers -1.1
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 7
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 71.4%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 1
0
pts
3
reb
0
ast
Impact
-10.0

Adou Thiero's brief 6-minute cameo was defined by complete offensive passivity, as he failed to attempt a single shot. He did manage to grab 3 rebounds (↑) and record 2 deflections, salvaging a modest +1.3 Hustle credit in an otherwise empty stint.

Shooting
FG 0/0
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
USG% 6.3%
Net Rtg +6.0
+/- +3
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 6.2m
Scoring +0.0
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +1.9
Defense -1.6
Turnovers -2.4
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1
0
pts
0
reb
1
ast
Impact
-8.0

Relegated to just two minutes of garbage time, Bronny James was virtually invisible on the floor. He didn't attempt a shot or grab a rebound, serving merely as a warm body at the end of the rotation.

Shooting
FG 0/0
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
USG% 0.0%
Net Rtg -20.0
+/- -1
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 2.2m
Scoring +0.0
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +0.0
Defense +0.0
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 1
FGM Against 0
Opp FG% 0.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
2
pts
1
reb
0
ast
Impact
-7.6

Dalton Knecht saw only two minutes of mop-up duty, converting his lone field goal attempt for 2 points. His fleeting appearance offered no real opportunity to impact the game beyond a single screen assist.

Shooting
FG 1/1 (100.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 100.0%
USG% 33.3%
Net Rtg -20.0
+/- -1
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 2.2m
Scoring +2.0
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.5
Hustle +0.3
Defense +0.0
Turnovers -2.4
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1
2
pts
0
reb
1
ast
Impact
-7.2

Trapped in a deep-bench role, Nick Smith Jr. managed just 2 points on 1-of-3 shooting during his two minutes of action. He failed to register any hustle stats, resulting in a completely hollow performance.

Shooting
FG 1/3 (33.3%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 33.3%
USG% 50.0%
Net Rtg -20.0
+/- -1
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 2.2m
Scoring +0.2
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.5
Hustle +0.0
Defense +0.0
Turnovers +0.0
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0