Interactive analysis

EXPLORE THE GAME

Every shot, every lead change, every rotation — visualized.

Lead over time · win-probability overlay
LEAD TRACKER
OKC lead SAS lead Win %
Every shot · colored by difficulty
SHOT CHART
Click shooters to compare their shots on the court
SAS 2P — 3P —
OKC 2P — 3P —
Tough make Easy make Blown miss Tough miss 197 attempts

SAS SAS Shot-making Δ

Wembanyama Open 14/25 -1.6
Harper 8/20 -5.6
Castle 5/14 -3.1
Vassell Hard 5/12 +1.0
Champagnie Hard 4/12 -1.6
Johnson 4/9 +0.5
Bryant Hard 1/2 +1.0
Barnes Open 0/1 -1.2
Kornet Open 0/1 -1.4

OKC OKC Shot-making Δ

Williams 11/25 -4.7
Gilgeous-Alexander 7/23 -6.7
Caruso 11/19 +7.8
Holmgren 2/7 -1.9
Wallace Hard 3/6 +1.4
McCain 3/6 +0.1
Dort Hard 2/6 -1.7
Mitchell 2/5 -0.8
Wiggins Hard 0/3 -3.4
Hartenstein Hard 0/1 -0.9
How the game was played
BY THE NUMBERS
SAS
OKC
41/96 Field Goals 41/101
42.7% Field Goal % 40.6%
13/43 3-Pointers 17/45
30.2% 3-Point % 37.8%
27/29 Free Throws 16/19
93.1% Free Throw % 84.2%
56.1% True Shooting % 52.6%
70 Total Rebounds 50
15 Offensive 9
46 Defensive 31
25 Assists 25
1.09 Assist/TO Ratio 1.67
21 Turnovers 14
11 Steals 14
7 Blocks 8
19 Fouls 26
52 Points in Paint 38
7 Fast Break Pts 16
17 Points off TOs 28
13 Second Chance Pts 8
16 Bench Points 50
10 Largest Lead 3
Biggest contributors
TOP NET IMPACT
1
Victor Wembanyama
41 PTS · 24 REB · 3 AST · 48.7 MIN
+44.81
2
Dylan Harper
24 PTS · 11 REB · 6 AST · 47.0 MIN
+33.22
3
Alex Caruso
31 PTS · 2 REB · 1 AST · 31.7 MIN
+23.54
4
Shai Gilgeous-Alexander
24 PTS · 3 REB · 12 AST · 51.3 MIN
+19.26
5
Jalen Williams
26 PTS · 7 REB · 3 AST · 37.3 MIN
+19.14
6
Cason Wallace
8 PTS · 6 REB · 0 AST · 28.2 MIN
+12.72
7
Julian Champagnie
11 PTS · 9 REB · 1 AST · 44.1 MIN
+9.04
8
Chet Holmgren
8 PTS · 8 REB · 0 AST · 40.9 MIN
+8.13
9
Devin Vassell
13 PTS · 6 REB · 2 AST · 50.7 MIN
+7.49
10
Ajay Mitchell
4 PTS · 4 REB · 5 AST · 33.6 MIN
+6.11
Play-by-play (most recent first)
PLAY FEED
Q6 0:06 V. Wembanyama REBOUND (Off:9 Def:15) 122–115
Q6 0:09 MISS A. Caruso Free Throw 3 of 3 122–115
Q6 0:09 TEAM offensive REBOUND 122–115
Q6 0:09 MISS A. Caruso Free Throw 2 of 3 122–115
Q6 0:09 A. Caruso Free Throw 1 of 3 (31 PTS) 122–115
Q6 0:09 J. Champagnie shooting personal FOUL (3 PF) (Caruso 3 FT) 122–114
Q6 0:14 D. Harper Free Throw 2 of 2 (24 PTS) 122–114
Q6 0:14 D. Harper Free Throw 1 of 2 (23 PTS) 121–114
Q6 0:14 J. McCain personal FOUL (3 PF) (Harper 2 FT) 120–114
Q6 0:15 V. Wembanyama REBOUND (Off:9 Def:14) 120–114
Q6 0:17 V. Wembanyama BLOCK (3 BLK) 120–114
Q6 0:17 MISS J. Williams driving finger roll Layup - blocked 120–114
Q6 0:22 V. Wembanyama alley-oop DUNK (41 PTS) (S. Castle 11 AST) 120–114
Q6 0:37 D. Harper REBOUND (Off:1 Def:10) 118–114
Q6 0:39 MISS J. Williams putback Layup 118–114

GAME ANALYSIS

KEEP READING

Create a free account and follow your team to get the full analysis every morning.

Create Free Account

Already have an account? Log in

PLAYER PERFORMANCE

OKC Oklahoma City Thunder
24
pts
3
reb
12
ast
Impact
+8.5

Gilgeous-Alexander endured a brutal shooting night (7-of-23 FG) but compensated by orchestrating the offense with 12 assists (↑). His defensive activity was the true standout, as 5 steals (↑) and 4 deflections powered a massive +14.5 defensive credit.

Shooting
FG 7/23 (30.4%)
3PT 2/7 (28.6%)
FT 8/9 (88.9%)
Advanced
TS% 44.5%
USG% 28.2%
Net Rtg -13.1
+/- -15
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 51.3m
Scoring +12.4
Creation +2.7
Shot Making +4.0
Hustle +0.9
Defense +8.9
Turnovers -9.5
STL 5
BLK 1
TO 4
S Chet Holmgren 40.9m
8
pts
8
reb
0
ast
Impact
+1.5

Holmgren's offensive rhythm completely evaporated, as he managed just 8 points (↓) on a passive 2-of-7 shooting night. However, he remained a massive deterrent around the rim, using 15 contests and 2 blocks (↑) to anchor a solid +6.6 defensive credit.

Shooting
FG 2/7 (28.6%)
3PT 2/4 (50.0%)
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 50.8%
USG% 9.9%
Net Rtg -4.9
+/- -7
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 40.9m
Scoring +4.1
Creation +0.4
Shot Making +1.9
Hustle +7.2
Defense -0.1
Turnovers -1.1
STL 1
BLK 2
TO 1
S Jalen Williams 37.3m
26
pts
7
reb
3
ast
Impact
+13.7

Williams carried a heavy scoring burden, racking up 26 points (↑) to drive a robust +17.6 offensive credit. Though his playmaking was slightly muted (3 assists, ↓), his aggressive interior attacking—evidenced by 25 field goal attempts—kept the defense constantly on its heels.

Shooting
FG 11/25 (44.0%)
3PT 1/3 (33.3%)
FT 3/3 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 49.4%
USG% 32.6%
Net Rtg -2.5
+/- -3
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 37.3m
Scoring +15.4
Creation +1.4
Shot Making +4.6
Hustle +7.0
Defense +1.0
Turnovers -4.7
STL 1
BLK 1
TO 2
S Luguentz Dort 22.1m
5
pts
3
reb
1
ast
Impact
-7.8

Dort struggled to find the mark from the perimeter, sinking just 1 of his 5 three-point attempts in a quiet 5-point (↓) outing. His typically stout point-of-attack presence also wavered, reflected in a rare negative defensive credit (-1.4) and zero steals.

Shooting
FG 2/6 (33.3%)
3PT 1/5 (20.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 41.7%
USG% 13.0%
Net Rtg -14.0
+/- -6
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 22.1m
Scoring +1.8
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +1.1
Hustle +2.8
Defense -2.5
Turnovers +0.0
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
2
pts
2
reb
2
ast
Impact
-9.0

Hartenstein was virtually invisible as a scorer, attempting just one field goal and finishing with 2 points (↓). He managed to salvage some utility through his physical presence, using 3 screen assists and 2 blocks (↑) to generate a +4.6 defensive credit.

Shooting
FG 0/1 (0.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 53.2%
USG% 10.3%
Net Rtg +13.3
+/- +2
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 12.2m
Scoring +1.3
Creation +1.3
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +0.6
Defense +1.8
Turnovers -3.1
STL 1
BLK 2
TO 1
4
pts
4
reb
5
ast
Impact
-4.5

Mitchell took a massive step back as a scorer, attempting just five shots to finish with 4 points (↓). Instead, he leaned into a connective role, leaning on 5 assists (↑) and 4 deflections to generate modest value across his component credits.

Shooting
FG 2/5 (40.0%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 40.0%
USG% 6.8%
Net Rtg +13.1
+/- +7
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 33.6m
Scoring +1.6
Creation +1.7
Shot Making +1.2
Hustle +1.2
Defense +0.7
Turnovers +0.0
STL 2
BLK 0
TO 0
Alex Caruso 31.7m
31
pts
2
reb
1
ast
Impact
+19.9

Caruso erupted for a stunning 31 points (+374% vs avg), torching the nets with 8 made three-pointers to drive a massive +20.5 offensive credit. He paired this unexpected scoring barrage with his signature grit, securing 3 loose balls and 5 deflections to bolster a +7.8 defensive mark.

Shooting
FG 11/19 (57.9%)
3PT 8/14 (57.1%)
FT 1/3 (33.3%)
Advanced
TS% 76.3%
USG% 31.0%
Net Rtg +1.5
+/- 0
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 31.7m
Scoring +23.6
Creation +0.6
Shot Making +8.5
Hustle +0.6
Defense +2.3
Turnovers -4.7
STL 2
BLK 2
TO 2
8
pts
6
reb
0
ast
Impact
+5.1

Wallace's defensive motor was running hot, as he racked up 6 deflections and 2 steals (↑) to fuel a +5.8 defensive credit. He complemented this disruptive energy with an efficient 8 points and 6 rebounds (↑), proving highly effective despite zero assists.

Shooting
FG 3/6 (50.0%)
3PT 2/5 (40.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 66.7%
USG% 11.9%
Net Rtg -10.7
+/- -9
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 28.2m
Scoring +5.6
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +2.4
Hustle +5.7
Defense +4.7
Turnovers -2.4
STL 2
BLK 0
TO 1
Jared McCain 18.2m
7
pts
2
reb
1
ast
Impact
-10.2

McCain provided a brief but unspectacular spark, scoring 7 points on an efficient 3-of-6 from the floor. However, 2 turnovers (↓) and a lack of peripheral stats limited his offensive credit (+1.1), while a -1.2 defensive mark showed his struggles on the other end.

Shooting
FG 3/6 (50.0%)
3PT 1/3 (33.3%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 58.3%
USG% 18.6%
Net Rtg +15.5
+/- +9
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 18.2m
Scoring +4.8
Creation +0.7
Shot Making +1.5
Hustle +0.6
Defense -2.2
Turnovers -4.7
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 2
0
pts
3
reb
0
ast
Impact
-14.0

Williams failed to look at the rim during his 10 minutes, attempting zero shots and finishing scoreless (↓). His offensive passivity resulted in a -1.9 offense credit, with only 4 shot contests and 3 rebounds offering any resistance.

Shooting
FG 0/0
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 5.0%
Net Rtg -38.3
+/- -6
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 10.4m
Scoring +0.0
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +0.9
Defense -1.6
Turnovers -2.4
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1
0
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
-13.5

Wiggins completely misfired during his brief four-minute stint, bricking all three of his perimeter attempts to finish scoreless. His empty box score and -2.6 offensive credit highlight a cameo that actively disrupted the team's rhythm.

Shooting
FG 0/3 (0.0%)
3PT 0/3 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 42.9%
Net Rtg -100.0
+/- -7
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 4.0m
Scoring -2.5
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +0.0
Defense +0.0
Turnovers +0.0
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
Isaiah Joe 0.3m
0
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
-0.1

Joe barely broke a sweat, logging just 16 seconds of floor time without recording a single statistic. His flat component credits reflect a purely rotational placeholder appearance.

Shooting
FG 0/0
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 0.0%
Net Rtg 0.0
+/- 0
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 0.3m
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
SAS San Antonio Spurs
S Devin Vassell 50.7m
13
pts
6
reb
2
ast
Impact
-0.7

Vassell struggled to find his offensive rhythm, scoring 13 points on a shaky 5-of-12 from the floor while coughing up 3 turnovers (↑). However, his defensive engagement helped salvage his outing, as evidenced by his +6.1 defense credit and 8 contests.

Shooting
FG 5/12 (41.7%)
3PT 3/9 (33.3%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 54.2%
USG% 12.2%
Net Rtg -2.2
+/- +3
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 50.7m
Scoring +7.5
Creation +0.9
Shot Making +4.0
Hustle +2.8
Defense +3.0
Turnovers -7.8
STL 1
BLK 2
TO 3
S Stephon Castle 48.9m
17
pts
6
reb
11
ast
Impact
-16.2

Castle's playmaking vision was entirely overshadowed by catastrophic decision-making, as he leaked massive value through 11 turnovers (↑). The sloppy ball security dragged his offensive credit into the negative (-2.3), neutralizing the benefits of his 11 assists (↑) and 8 shot contests.

Shooting
FG 5/14 (35.7%)
3PT 1/6 (16.7%)
FT 6/7 (85.7%)
Advanced
TS% 49.8%
USG% 23.7%
Net Rtg -7.5
+/- -1
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 48.9m
Scoring +10.2
Creation +4.1
Shot Making +2.6
Hustle +3.7
Defense -1.1
Turnovers -24.8
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 11
41
pts
24
reb
3
ast
Impact
+53.4

Wembanyama was an absolute terror on both ends of the floor, dominating the interior to the tune of 41 points and 24 rebounds (↑). His massive +42.1 offensive credit was fueled by relentless paint pressure and frequent trips to the charity stripe (12-of-13 FT), while 13 contests anchored a stout defensive showing (+10.5 defense).

Shooting
FG 14/25 (56.0%)
3PT 1/2 (50.0%)
FT 12/13 (92.3%)
Advanced
TS% 66.7%
USG% 29.6%
Net Rtg +12.5
+/- +16
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 48.7m
Scoring +32.1
Creation +2.8
Shot Making +5.1
Hustle +30.5
Defense +1.7
Turnovers -7.8
STL 1
BLK 3
TO 3
S Dylan Harper 47.0m
24
pts
11
reb
6
ast
Impact
+29.0

Harper's defensive disruption completely hijacked the game, generating 7 steals (↑) and 6 deflections to fuel a +17.3 defense credit. While his perimeter shot abandoned him (1-of-7 from deep), his aggressive downhill attacks yielded a perfect 7-of-7 at the line to boost his +18.7 offensive mark.

Shooting
FG 8/20 (40.0%)
3PT 1/7 (14.3%)
FT 7/7 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 52.0%
USG% 21.6%
Net Rtg +14.2
+/- +14
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 47.0m
Scoring +14.7
Creation +3.0
Shot Making +4.0
Hustle +6.2
Defense +14.4
Turnovers -2.4
STL 7
BLK 0
TO 1
11
pts
9
reb
1
ast
Impact
+1.7

A heavy reliance on the three-point shot defined Champagnie's night, as he hoisted 11 attempts from deep but connected on just three. Despite the inefficient shooting (4-of-12 overall), he contributed on the other end with a +6.3 defense credit and 9 rebounds (↑).

Shooting
FG 4/12 (33.3%)
3PT 3/11 (27.3%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 45.8%
USG% 12.4%
Net Rtg +5.9
+/- +8
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 44.1m
Scoring +4.5
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +3.4
Hustle +8.5
Defense -1.3
Turnovers -2.4
STL 1
BLK 2
TO 1
13
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
-1.3

Operating strictly as a microwave scorer, Johnson provided a narrow but effective offensive punch (+7.3 offense credit) by hitting half of his three-point attempts. However, his complete lack of peripheral production—registering zero rebounds, assists, steals, or blocks—limited his overall influence on the game.

Shooting
FG 4/9 (44.4%)
3PT 3/6 (50.0%)
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 65.8%
USG% 23.9%
Net Rtg +10.1
+/- +3
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 21.6m
Scoring +8.7
Creation +0.4
Shot Making +3.2
Hustle +0.0
Defense -1.6
Turnovers -1.1
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1
3
pts
2
reb
1
ast
Impact
-9.0

Bryant managed to stay out of the way during his 13 minutes, contributing a quiet 3 points on just two shot attempts. His +2.6 offensive credit reflects an efficient but incredibly low-volume role, supplemented slightly by 2 deflections on the hustle sheet.

Shooting
FG 1/2 (50.0%)
3PT 1/2 (50.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 75.0%
USG% 7.1%
Net Rtg +41.5
+/- +10
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 13.7m
Scoring +2.3
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +1.0
Hustle +0.6
Defense -1.9
Turnovers +0.0
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
0
pts
3
reb
1
ast
Impact
-15.1

Kornet was entirely invisible during his brief nine-minute stint, failing to register a single point (-100% vs avg) and attempting just one shot. His lack of offensive involvement (-2.2 offense credit) rendered him a complete non-factor in the rotation.

Shooting
FG 0/1 (0.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 8.7%
Net Rtg -37.4
+/- -9
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 9.5m
Scoring -1.0
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +0.9
Defense -1.6
Turnovers -2.4
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1
0
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
-11.8

Barnes offered absolutely nothing during his six minutes of floor time, posting a completely empty box score across all major categories. His offensive credit dipped into the negative (-0.8) after missing his lone field goal attempt, highlighting a completely ineffective cameo.

Shooting
FG 0/1 (0.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 7.1%
Net Rtg -57.7
+/- -9
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 5.9m
Scoring -0.9
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +0.0
Defense +0.0
Turnovers +0.0
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0