TOR

2025-26 Season

JAKOB POELTL

Toronto Raptors | Center | 7-0
Jakob Poeltl
10.8 PPG
7.5 RPG
2.1 APG
25.6 MPG
+5.7 Impact

Poeltl produces at an elite rate for a 26-minute workload.

NET IMPACT BREAKDOWN
Every stat, every credit, every cost — per game average
+5.7
Scoring +8.4
Points 10.8 PPG × +1.00 = +10.8
Missed 2PT 2.0/g × -0.78 = -1.6
Missed 3PT 0.0/g × -0.87 = -0.0
Missed FT 0.8/g × -1.00 = -0.8
Creation +3.5
Assists 2.1/g × +0.50 = +1.1
Off. Rebounds 1.9/g × +1.26 = +2.4
Turnovers -2.3
Turnovers 1.2/g × -1.95 = -2.3
Defense +2.2
Steals 0.8/g × +2.30 = +1.8
Blocks 0.7/g × +0.90 = +0.6
Def. Rebounds 5.6/g × +0.30 = +1.7
Fouls Committed 2.5/g × -0.75 = -1.9
Hustle & Effort +4.7
Contested Shots 6.7/g × +0.20 = +1.3
Deflections 2.6/g × +0.65 = +1.7
Charges Drawn 0.1/g × +2.70 = +0.3
Loose Balls 0.5/g × +0.60 = +0.3
Screen Assists 3.3/g × +0.30 = +1.0
Off. Fouls Drawn 0.0/g uncredited × +2.70 = +0.1
Raw Impact +16.5
Baseline (game-average expected) −10.8
Net Impact
+5.7
77th pctl vs Centers

About this model: Net Impact can't measure floor spacing, help defense rotations, or playmaking gravity — so wings and guards are slightly undervalued vs bigs. How Net Impact works

SKILL DNA

Percentile rank vs 92 Centers with 10+ games

Scoring 58th
10.8 PPG
Efficiency 91th
68.7% TS
Playmaking 71th
2.1 APG
Rebounding 67th
7.5 RPG
Rim Protection 33th
0.17/min
Hustle 85th
0.14/min
Shot Creation 50th
0% pullup
TO Discipline 61th
0.05/min

THE SEASON SO FAR

Jakob Poeltl’s early season was defined by ruthless interior efficiency and defensive anchoring. He morphed into an advanced-metrics juggernaut when operating strictly around the basket. On 11/13 vs CLE, he dropped 20 points on 7/10 shooting, generating a massive +18.1 impact score through highly disciplined shot selection and clinical finishing. Even when his scoring vanished, his non-scoring value kept his team afloat. During the 11/29 vs CHA matchup, he managed just 8 points but still posted a +8.1 impact because he dictated the game with 11 rebounds and elite post playmaking that yielded 9 assists. However, his heavy-footed drop coverage occasionally became a glaring liability. On 10/24 vs MIL, he was completely out-leveraged by quicker bigs in the pick-and-roll, resulting in a brutal -6.3 impact score. Ultimately, as long as he maintained his positional discipline, his sheer physical presence dictated the terms of engagement in the paint.

This twenty-game stretch transformed Jakob Poeltl from a passive bench piece into an irreplaceable interior anchor. Things actually started disastrously on 02/19 vs CHI, where he posted a miserable -8.4 impact score as a reserve due to complete invisibility on the glass and zero rim pressure. He quickly reclaimed his starting job and flipped the script, generating a massive +11.9 impact on 02/22 vs MIL despite scoring just six points. That immense value came entirely from flawless defensive anchoring and elite rim protection that completely suffocated the opposition. Conversely, raw scoring volume occasionally masked severe hidden costs. During a 23-point, 11-rebound outburst on 03/20 vs DEN, his overall impact settled at a modest +4.0 because his usually stout interior presence completely collapsed, yielding a disastrous -12.7 defensive score. When engaged, Poeltl was a hyper-efficient battering ram, but his true value always hinged strictly on his defensive discipline rather than his point totals.

IMPACT TIMELINE

Game-by-game performance vs average. Green = above average, red = below.

PATTERNS

Very consistent. Poeltl posts positive impact in 78% of games — you almost always get a productive night. Scoring varies by ~6 points, but the overall contribution stays positive.

Reliable shooter — hits 45%+ from the field in 91% of games. You can count on efficient nights more often than not.

Defensive difference-maker. Poeltl consistently forces tough shots and protects the rim — opponents shoot worse when he's guarding them.

Slight upward trend. First-half impact: +4.5, second-half: +6.9. Modest improvement — possibly settling into a rhythm.

Hot right now — 4 straight games with positive impact. Longest positive run this season: 15 games.

MATCHUP HISTORY

Based on 41 games with tracking data. Shows who guarded this player on offense and who he guarded on defense, with their shooting stats in those matchups.

ON OFFENSE: WHO GUARDED HIM

His shooting stats against each primary defender this season

R. Kalkbrenner 102.3 poss
FG% 68.8%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.22
PTS 23
J. Duren 83.5 poss
FG% 66.7%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.2
PTS 17
K. Porziņģis 65.1 poss
FG% 87.5%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.22
PTS 14
M. Turner 62.7 poss
FG% 75.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.1
PTS 6
K. Towns 56.9 poss
FG% 57.1%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.14
PTS 8
I. Jackson 49.1 poss
FG% 57.1%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.16
PTS 8
A. Drummond 45.1 poss
FG% 75.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.27
PTS 12
R. Gobert 38.3 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.18
PTS 7
V. Wembanyama 37.1 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.22
PTS 8
N. Queta 36.1 poss
FG% 57.1%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.22
PTS 8

ON DEFENSE: WHO HE GUARDED

How opponents shot when he was the primary defender. Lower FG% = better defense.

R. Kalkbrenner 106.9 poss
FG% 57.1%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.11
PTS 12
J. Duren 72.2 poss
FG% 75.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.3
PTS 22
K. Porziņģis 60.9 poss
FG% 31.2%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.25
PTS 15
M. Turner 56.2 poss
FG% 45.5%
3P% 20.0%
PPP 0.23
PTS 13
A. Drummond 46.2 poss
FG% 25.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.04
PTS 2
I. Jackson 44.9 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.13
PTS 6
K. Towns 42.4 poss
FG% 58.3%
3P% 33.3%
PPP 0.4
PTS 17
B. Adebayo 37.3 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.16
PTS 6
N. Claxton 37.0 poss
FG% 55.6%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.3
PTS 11
V. Wembanyama 34.5 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.12
PTS 4

SEASON STATS

40
Games
10.8
PPG
7.5
RPG
2.1
APG
0.8
SPG
0.7
BPG
69.5
FG%
0.0
3P%
63.6
FT%
25.6
MPG

GAME LOG

40 games played