Interactive analysis

EXPLORE THE GAME

Every shot, every lead change, every rotation — visualized.

Lead over time · win-probability overlay
LEAD TRACKER
OKC lead WAS lead Win %
Every shot · colored by difficulty
SHOT CHART
Click shooters to compare their shots on the court
WAS 2P — 3P —
OKC 2P — 3P —
Tough make Easy make Blown miss Tough miss 182 attempts

WAS WAS Shot-making Δ

Coulibaly 6/12 +0.9
Sarr 5/11 -1.1
McCollum Hard 6/10 +6.2
Whitmore Open 3/9 -3.7
George Hard 4/8 +3.6
Johnson Hard 3/7 +1.7
Middleton 3/6 +0.4
Kispert Hard 2/6 -0.7
Carrington Hard 1/5 -2.9
Bagley III Open 3/4 +1.9

OKC OKC Shot-making Δ

Gilgeous-Alexander 11/20 +4.5
Mitchell 6/15 -3.6
Joe Hard 7/12 +6.2
Hartenstein Open 7/11 0.0
Wiggins 3/11 -6.8
Wallace Hard 3/7 +0.8
Dort 3/7 -1.3
Williams Hard 2/6 -0.2
Caruso 0/5 -5.6
Dieng Hard 1/2 0.0
How the game was played
BY THE NUMBERS
WAS
OKC
38/84 Field Goals 44/98
45.2% Field Goal % 44.9%
17/40 3-Pointers 16/49
42.5% 3-Point % 32.7%
15/17 Free Throws 23/28
88.2% Free Throw % 82.1%
59.0% True Shooting % 57.6%
52 Total Rebounds 55
12 Offensive 14
37 Defensive 33
25 Assists 29
1.09 Assist/TO Ratio 4.83
22 Turnovers 6
3 Steals 16
6 Blocks 8
26 Fouls 15
36 Points in Paint 50
10 Fast Break Pts 14
5 Points off TOs 26
10 Second Chance Pts 12
41 Bench Points 52
5 Largest Lead 24
Biggest contributors
TOP NET IMPACT
1
Shai Gilgeous-Alexander
31 PTS · 3 REB · 7 AST · 29.0 MIN
+28.22
2
Cason Wallace
12 PTS · 5 REB · 3 AST · 27.3 MIN
+22.15
3
Isaiah Hartenstein
17 PTS · 8 REB · 5 AST · 25.7 MIN
+19.83
4
Isaiah Joe
20 PTS · 6 REB · 1 AST · 24.1 MIN
+18.78
5
Ajay Mitchell
20 PTS · 1 REB · 2 AST · 30.1 MIN
+16.14
6
Luguentz Dort
7 PTS · 6 REB · 1 AST · 25.8 MIN
+15.22
7
Bilal Coulibaly
16 PTS · 8 REB · 4 AST · 24.4 MIN
+13.41
8
CJ McCollum
19 PTS · 2 REB · 1 AST · 24.0 MIN
+13.24
9
Alex Sarr
14 PTS · 8 REB · 2 AST · 26.0 MIN
+12.25
10
Jaylin Williams
7 PTS · 9 REB · 4 AST · 22.2 MIN
+11.63
Play-by-play (most recent first)
PLAY FEED
Q4 0:20 T. Johnson 15' floating Jump Shot (10 PTS) 108–127
Q4 0:34 T. Vukcevic REBOUND (Off:0 Def:1) 106–127
Q4 0:37 MISS C. Youngblood 3PT 106–127
Q4 0:52 B. Carlson REBOUND (Off:0 Def:2) 106–127
Q4 0:54 MISS J. Champagnie 25' 3PT 106–127
Q4 0:59 J. Champagnie REBOUND (Off:1 Def:0) 106–127
Q4 1:03 MISS T. Johnson 27' 3PT 106–127
Q4 1:10 TEAM offensive REBOUND 106–127
Q4 1:10 O. Dieng BLOCK (2 BLK) 106–127
Q4 1:10 MISS A. Johnson driving Layup - blocked 106–127
Q4 1:22 O. Dieng 8' fadeaway Jump Shot (2 PTS) 106–127
Q4 1:37 B. Carlson REBOUND (Off:0 Def:1) 106–125
Q4 1:39 O. Dieng BLOCK (1 BLK) 106–125
Q4 1:39 MISS T. Vukcevic Layup - blocked 106–125
Q4 1:57 J. Williams 26' 3PT (7 PTS) (B. Carlson 1 AST) 106–125

GAME ANALYSIS

KEEP READING

Create a free account and follow your team to get the full analysis every morning.

Create Free Account

Already have an account? Log in

Why this game is worth arguing about
game swinger
Shai Gilgeous-Alexander actually won the night
31 points, 3 boards, 7 assists was the line. The lift came from scoring (+24.1), shot-making (+7.1), and creation (+2.3), pushing Net Impact to +28.9.
Scoring +24.1
Points, shot value, and miss penalties.
Shot-making +7.1
Makes above expected shot difficulty.
Creation +2.3
Assist credit weighted by shot quality created.
Check the tape
hidden value
Cason Wallace's value was hiding in plain sight
12 points, 5 boards, 3 assists undersells it. scoring (+9.2), defense (+7.3), and hustle (+6.3) pushed his Net Impact to +19.0.
Scoring +9.2
Points, shot value, and miss penalties.
Defense +7.3
Steals, blocks, fouls, and defensive events.
Hustle +6.3
Rebounding and extra-possession work.
Check the tape
box score lie
The box score sold Kyshawn George too hard
12 points, 7 boards, 6 assists was already a rough line. The real damage was turnovers (-12.6) and defense (-4.5), pulling Net Impact down to -7.7.
Turnovers -12.6
Possessions destroyed by giveaways.
Defense -4.5
Steals, blocks, fouls, and defensive events.
Creation +1.1
Assist credit weighted by shot quality created.
Check the tape
hidden value
Luguentz Dort's value was hiding in plain sight
7 points, 6 boards, 1 assist undersells it. hustle (+7.6), defense (+4.7), and scoring (+3.7) pushed his Net Impact to +7.7.
Hustle +7.6
Rebounding and extra-possession work.
Defense +4.7
Steals, blocks, fouls, and defensive events.
Scoring +3.7
Points, shot value, and miss penalties.
Check the tape

PLAYER PERFORMANCE

OKC Oklahoma City Thunder
31
pts
3
reb
7
ast
Impact
+28.9

Surgical precision in the midrange and an ability to consistently collapse the defense drove a sky-high offensive rating. He manipulated pick-and-roll coverages effortlessly, forcing the defense into impossible decisions all night. His steady two-way execution continues to be the undisputed engine of the team's success.

Shooting
FG 11/20 (55.0%)
3PT 3/6 (50.0%)
FT 6/6 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 68.5%
USG% 29.7%
Net Rtg +13.1
+/- +8
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 29.0m
Scoring +24.1
Creation +2.3
Shot Making +7.1
Hustle +0.9
Defense -1.1
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 10
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 0
S Cason Wallace 27.3m
12
pts
5
reb
3
ast
Impact
+19.0

Smothering perimeter defense completely short-circuited the opponent's transition game and generated multiple live-ball turnovers. He perfectly complemented his defensive masterclass with timely, opportunistic cuts to the basket. The combination of elite hustle and flawless role execution resulted in a massive net positive.

Shooting
FG 3/7 (42.9%)
3PT 2/4 (50.0%)
FT 4/4 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 68.5%
USG% 12.9%
Net Rtg +22.4
+/- +14
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 27.3m
Scoring +9.2
Creation +2.6
Shot Making +2.5
Hustle +6.3
Defense +7.3
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 12
FGM Against 6
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 4
BLK 2
TO 0
S Luguentz Dort 25.8m
7
pts
6
reb
1
ast
Impact
+7.7

Relentless screen navigation and physical point-of-attack defense completely smothered his primary assignment. His elite hustle metrics reflect multiple loose-ball recoveries that extended critical possessions. The defensive dominance far outweighed his continued struggles to connect from the perimeter.

Shooting
FG 3/7 (42.9%)
3PT 1/5 (20.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 50.0%
USG% 10.9%
Net Rtg +28.1
+/- +16
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 25.8m
Scoring +3.7
Creation +0.2
Shot Making +1.4
Hustle +7.6
Defense +4.7
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 7
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 71.4%
STL 2
BLK 0
TO 0
17
pts
8
reb
5
ast
Impact
+15.2

Dominating the interior with punishing screens and elite rim protection set the physical tone for the entire game. He shattered his recent scoring averages by aggressively rolling to the basket and punishing late rotations. This was a masterclass in generating high-value impact through sheer paint dominance.

Shooting
FG 7/11 (63.6%)
3PT 0/0
FT 3/4 (75.0%)
Advanced
TS% 66.6%
USG% 24.6%
Net Rtg +25.9
+/- +15
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 25.7m
Scoring +13.3
Creation +1.6
Shot Making +1.5
Hustle +10.2
Defense +4.4
Turnovers -6.6
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 8
FGM Against 0
Opp FG% 0.0%
STL 2
BLK 0
TO 3
S Aaron Wiggins 24.3m
8
pts
4
reb
3
ast
Impact
-8.1

A brutal perimeter shooting slump destroyed his offensive gravity and allowed defenders to pack the paint. Forcing contested jumpers early in the clock consistently derailed the team's offensive flow. Even solid defensive execution couldn't salvage the massive deficit created by his empty possessions.

Shooting
FG 3/11 (27.3%)
3PT 0/6 (0.0%)
FT 2/4 (50.0%)
Advanced
TS% 31.3%
USG% 24.6%
Net Rtg +3.7
+/- +3
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 24.3m
Scoring +0.3
Creation +1.8
Shot Making +1.1
Hustle +1.2
Defense +1.0
Turnovers -3.5
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 13
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 38.5%
STL 0
BLK 2
TO 2
20
pts
1
reb
2
ast
Impact
+13.0

Relentless downhill attacking forced the defense into constant rotation, generating high-value opportunities despite his own inefficient finishing. He made up for the missed jumpers by crashing the glass and fighting through screens. The sheer volume of offensive pressure he applied ultimately yielded a positive net result.

Shooting
FG 6/15 (40.0%)
3PT 2/7 (28.6%)
FT 6/6 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 56.7%
USG% 23.4%
Net Rtg +15.0
+/- +9
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 30.1m
Scoring +13.0
Creation +2.0
Shot Making +3.7
Hustle +0.3
Defense +2.6
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 10
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 2
BLK 0
TO 0
Isaiah Joe 24.1m
20
pts
6
reb
1
ast
Impact
+16.4

Lethal off-ball movement and lightning-quick releases punished every defensive lapse on the perimeter. His gravity as a spacer completely opened up the driving lanes for his teammates. Adding active hands in passing lanes elevated this from a mere shooting exhibition to a highly impactful two-way performance.

Shooting
FG 7/12 (58.3%)
3PT 5/9 (55.6%)
FT 1/2 (50.0%)
Advanced
TS% 77.6%
USG% 21.7%
Net Rtg +21.2
+/- +11
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 24.1m
Scoring +15.7
Creation +0.2
Shot Making +5.5
Hustle +5.7
Defense -0.8
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 11
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 27.3%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 0
7
pts
9
reb
4
ast
Impact
+6.2

Elite positional awareness on the defensive end, including perfectly timed charges, anchored the second unit's success. Spacing the floor from the top of the arc drew opposing bigs out of the paint, even when his shots weren't falling. The high defensive IQ easily masked a subpar shooting night.

Shooting
FG 2/6 (33.3%)
3PT 2/6 (33.3%)
FT 1/2 (50.0%)
Advanced
TS% 50.9%
USG% 12.7%
Net Rtg +8.3
+/- +4
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 22.2m
Scoring +3.4
Creation +0.2
Shot Making +1.9
Hustle +9.5
Defense +0.2
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 13
FGM Against 7
Opp FG% 53.8%
STL 2
BLK 1
TO 0
Alex Caruso 16.7m
0
pts
2
reb
2
ast
Impact
-7.8

A complete offensive zero whose inability to hit open looks allowed defenders to blatantly double-team elsewhere. While his point-of-attack defense remained typically disruptive, the spacing issues he caused on the other end were simply too severe. The offensive liability ultimately dragged his overall rating firmly into the red.

Shooting
FG 0/5 (0.0%)
3PT 0/3 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 13.3%
Net Rtg +29.7
+/- +11
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 16.7m
Scoring -3.7
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +0.6
Defense +7.1
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 6
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 66.7%
STL 3
BLK 0
TO 1
0
pts
1
reb
0
ast
Impact
-9.8

A failure to quickly adapt to the game's pace left him completely marginalized during his brief rotation. He was caught out of position defensively multiple times, leading to easy opponent scores. The inability to make a decisive read stalled the offense and earned him a quick hook.

Shooting
FG 0/1 (0.0%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 7.7%
Net Rtg +57.6
+/- +8
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 5.7m
Scoring -0.8
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +0.3
Defense +0.0
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 3
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 33.3%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
2
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
-8.2

Provided a brief but stable defensive presence, utilizing his length to disrupt a few passing lanes. He never asserted himself offensively, acting merely as a ball-mover on the perimeter. The limited run prevented him from building on his recent high-scoring momentum.

Shooting
FG 1/2 (50.0%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 50.0%
USG% 18.2%
Net Rtg -27.3
+/- -3
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 5.4m
Scoring +1.1
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.6
Hustle +0.0
Defense -0.6
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 5
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 20.0%
STL 0
BLK 2
TO 0
3
pts
2
reb
1
ast
Impact
-4.7

Maximized a tiny rotational window by immediately capitalizing on a perimeter breakdown for a clean look. He executed his defensive assignments without error during the brief stint. It was a perfectly efficient, albeit microscopic, contribution to the rotation.

Shooting
FG 1/1 (100.0%)
3PT 1/1 (100.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 150.0%
USG% 14.3%
Net Rtg -14.3
+/- -1
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 3.7m
Scoring +3.0
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +1.0
Hustle +0.6
Defense +0.0
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 2
FGM Against 2
Opp FG% 100.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
WAS Washington Wizards
S Kyshawn George 30.5m
12
pts
7
reb
6
ast
Impact
-7.7

A highly deceptive performance where efficient perimeter shooting was completely negated by costly mistakes in the margins. Hidden negatives like poorly timed turnovers and defensive breakdowns in transition cratered his overall rating. He gave back every advantage he created on the offensive end.

Shooting
FG 4/8 (50.0%)
3PT 3/5 (60.0%)
FT 1/1 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 71.1%
USG% 18.1%
Net Rtg -18.1
+/- -14
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 30.5m
Scoring +9.1
Creation +1.1
Shot Making +3.4
Hustle +5.0
Defense -4.5
Turnovers -12.6
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 16
FGM Against 8
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 5
S Alex Sarr 26.0m
14
pts
8
reb
2
ast
Impact
+7.2

Anchoring the interior yielded a massive defensive rating that kept his team afloat during crucial stretches. He finally broke out of a recent scoring slump by finding high-percentage looks around the rim rather than settling. His rim-protection presence dictated the opponent's shot selection all night.

Shooting
FG 5/11 (45.5%)
3PT 2/3 (66.7%)
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 58.9%
USG% 23.3%
Net Rtg -12.4
+/- -8
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 26.0m
Scoring +9.6
Creation +0.7
Shot Making +3.0
Hustle +9.2
Defense +1.8
Turnovers -7.8
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 16
FGM Against 9
Opp FG% 56.2%
STL 1
BLK 2
TO 3
S Bilal Coulibaly 24.4m
16
pts
8
reb
4
ast
Impact
+9.0

Elite point-of-attack defense defined this outing, completely disrupting the opponent's primary actions. He capitalized on transition opportunities generated by his own stops, showing a much more aggressive offensive mentality than in recent games. The two-way synergy resulted in a highly positive floor impact.

Shooting
FG 6/12 (50.0%)
3PT 2/7 (28.6%)
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 62.1%
USG% 30.4%
Net Rtg -21.3
+/- -12
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 24.4m
Scoring +11.4
Creation +2.0
Shot Making +2.9
Hustle +6.3
Defense +3.8
Turnovers -8.2
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 9
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 11.1%
STL 1
BLK 3
TO 4
S CJ McCollum 24.0m
19
pts
2
reb
1
ast
Impact
+10.7

Perimeter shot-making heavily inflated his box score metrics, masking a performance that was otherwise pedestrian in the margins. His inability to contain dribble penetration limited his overall net positive. The scoring punch was essential, but he bled points on the other end.

Shooting
FG 6/10 (60.0%)
3PT 5/8 (62.5%)
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 87.3%
USG% 20.7%
Net Rtg -16.8
+/- -5
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 24.0m
Scoring +16.0
Creation +0.4
Shot Making +5.2
Hustle +0.6
Defense -1.9
Turnovers -1.1
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 11
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 45.5%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1
S Khris Middleton 19.6m
6
pts
1
reb
2
ast
Impact
-11.1

Defensive liabilities severely dragged down his overall impact despite a few solid hustle plays. He remains mired in a passive offensive stretch, struggling to generate meaningful separation or create advantages. The lack of perimeter gravity allowed defenders to easily sag off him.

Shooting
FG 3/6 (50.0%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 50.0%
USG% 18.6%
Net Rtg -45.5
+/- -19
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 19.6m
Scoring +4.0
Creation +0.1
Shot Making +1.2
Hustle +1.3
Defense -2.2
Turnovers -5.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 7
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 71.4%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 2
Tre Johnson 26.7m
10
pts
3
reb
2
ast
Impact
-7.6

Defensive lapses and poor rotational awareness heavily penalized his overall rating. While he found a few clean looks from deep, he was consistently targeted in pick-and-roll actions on the other end. Those defensive breakdowns completely erased his modest offensive contributions.

Shooting
FG 3/7 (42.9%)
3PT 2/5 (40.0%)
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 63.5%
USG% 13.6%
Net Rtg -3.4
+/- -2
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 26.7m
Scoring +7.0
Creation +0.4
Shot Making +2.5
Hustle +0.9
Defense -5.0
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 8
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 62.5%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1
3
pts
4
reb
1
ast
Impact
-18.7

An abysmal offensive showing was punctuated by forced perimeter jumpers early in the shot clock. Failing to generate any downhill pressure, his inability to collapse the defense stalled the entire unit. The resulting empty possessions fueled a massive negative swing whenever he was on the floor.

Shooting
FG 1/5 (20.0%)
3PT 0/4 (0.0%)
FT 1/2 (50.0%)
Advanced
TS% 25.5%
USG% 16.4%
Net Rtg -24.7
+/- -11
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 21.9m
Scoring -0.6
Creation +0.2
Shot Making +0.5
Hustle +1.2
Defense -2.5
Turnovers -7.1
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 7
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 14.3%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 3
8
pts
6
reb
2
ast
Impact
-1.4

A lack of off-ball movement made him easy to guard and neutralized his primary weapon as a floor spacer. Settling for heavily contested looks rather than moving the ball led to empty trips that hurt the team's momentum. He offered virtually no resistance or secondary playmaking to offset the cold shooting.

Shooting
FG 2/6 (33.3%)
3PT 1/4 (25.0%)
FT 3/3 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 54.6%
USG% 18.0%
Net Rtg -31.7
+/- -12
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 19.6m
Scoring +4.8
Creation +1.4
Shot Making +1.6
Hustle +7.6
Defense -1.6
Turnovers -4.7
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 8
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 37.5%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 2
8
pts
3
reb
2
ast
Impact
-2.8

A stark drop in offensive aggression limited his influence, snapping a recent streak of dominant interior play. He struggled to establish deep post position, allowing the defense to push him out of his comfort zone. Soft interior defense further muted his overall effectiveness.

Shooting
FG 3/4 (75.0%)
3PT 1/1 (100.0%)
FT 1/2 (50.0%)
Advanced
TS% 82.0%
USG% 14.3%
Net Rtg -22.1
+/- -7
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 16.2m
Scoring +6.7
Creation +0.9
Shot Making +1.4
Hustle +3.8
Defense -3.4
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 11
FGM Against 6
Opp FG% 54.5%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1
Cam Whitmore 15.1m
7
pts
5
reb
1
ast
Impact
+2.8

Tunnel vision on drives resulted in several forced attempts into heavy traffic, dragging down his offensive value. He failed to recognize open shooters when the defense collapsed on his slashes. A few timely defensive rotations kept his overall impact from completely cratering.

Shooting
FG 3/9 (33.3%)
3PT 1/1 (100.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 38.9%
USG% 25.0%
Net Rtg -24.2
+/- -8
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 15.1m
Scoring +2.0
Creation +0.1
Shot Making +1.6
Hustle +6.3
Defense +2.1
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 4
FGM Against 2
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 0
Will Riley 4.9m
2
pts
0
reb
1
ast
Impact
-9.0

Completely neutralized by early foul trouble or rotational decisions, halting his recent scoring tear. He never found the rhythm or spacing needed to operate in his usual spots. The zero-impact hustle metrics reflect a surprisingly passive approach in limited action.

Shooting
FG 1/2 (50.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 50.0%
USG% 18.2%
Net Rtg +14.4
+/- 0
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 4.9m
Scoring +1.3
Creation +0.1
Shot Making +0.6
Hustle +0.0
Defense +0.0
Turnovers +0.0
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
0
pts
1
reb
0
ast
Impact
-9.7

A brief and entirely invisible stint snapped a promising stretch of highly efficient play. He failed to register a single hustle play or defensive disruption during his minutes. The lack of energy in a short burst made him an easy target for quick substitutions.

Shooting
FG 0/1 (0.0%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 11.1%
Net Rtg +30.4
+/- +1
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 3.8m
Scoring -0.8
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +1.3
Defense +0.0
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 1
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 100.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
AJ Johnson 3.7m
0
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
-10.1

Struggled to initiate any meaningful offense during a disjointed rotational cameo. He was easily bumped off his driving lines, resulting in a stagnant half-court set. A slight defensive edge wasn't enough to rescue a thoroughly unproductive stint.

Shooting
FG 0/1 (0.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 11.1%
Net Rtg +14.3
+/- +1
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 3.7m
Scoring -0.8
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +0.0
Defense +0.0
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 3
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 33.3%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
3
pts
1
reb
1
ast
Impact
-6.3

Managed to squeeze out a net-positive rating through sheer offensive opportunism in a tiny window of playing time. He capitalized on a defensive breakdown for a quick score but otherwise floated on the perimeter. The sample size was too small to establish any real rhythm.

Shooting
FG 1/2 (50.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 1/1 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 61.5%
USG% 22.2%
Net Rtg +14.3
+/- +1
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 3.7m
Scoring +2.1
Creation +0.2
Shot Making +0.4
Hustle +0.3
Defense +0.0
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 1
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 100.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0