May 28, 2026
EXPLORE THE GAME
Every shot, every lead change, every rotation — visualized.
OKC
2P —
3P —
SAS
2P —
3P —
OKC
SAS
OKC
PLAYER PERFORMANCE
San Antonio Spurs
Elite playmaking without the usual turnover cost powered his game, as he racked up 9 assists against only 1 turnover (avg 3.9). This masterful floor game, combined with getting to the line for 8 free throws, generated a massive +19.2 offensive credit.
Wembanyama dominated both ends of the floor, pairing efficient three-level scoring (28 points on 4-of-9 from deep) with suffocating defense. His impact is clear in the component breakdown, with a staggering +21.2 offensive credit and a +11.5 defensive credit fueled by 12 contests and holding opponents to just 4-of-17 shooting.
Lethal outside shooting and lockdown defense drove his stellar performance. He was automatic from deep, hitting 4-of-7 threes, while also blocking 2 shots and holding opponents to just 3-of-10 shooting (30%) to earn a +7.4 defensive credit.
A disastrous shooting performance (1-of-9 from the field) completely erased his scoring value, which was well below his 16.1 PPG average. He salvaged his night by shifting into a pure facilitator role, dishing out 7 assists against 0 turnovers to generate a positive offensive credit (+1.8).
Efficient scoring and disruptive rim protection defined his two-way impact. He shot 4-of-8 from the field and tallied 2 blocks (↑ avg 0.5), contributing to a +6.8 offensive credit and a +5.3 defensive credit.
Hyper-efficient scoring drove his performance, as he poured in 18 points on just 9 shots (6-of-9 FG) for a +17.0 offensive credit. He was just as impactful on the other end, locking down his assignments and allowing only 1-of-9 shooting as the nearest defender.
He provided a spark of efficient scoring in his bench role, putting up 9 points on an effective 4-of-7 from the field. This clean offensive performance, which included just one turnover, was the primary driver of his +5.8 offensive credit.
A timely shooting spark off the bench defined his brief appearance, as he knocked down 2-of-4 from three-point range for 6 points in 13 minutes. This was a notable improvement over his recent 26% FG average and drove his +3.6 offensive credit.
His value came from doing the little things on offense in limited minutes, primarily setting screens (2 screen assists) to free up teammates. While his individual stats were minimal, this hustle helped him generate a +3.3 offensive credit.
His contribution came on the glass, where he grabbed 4 rebounds in just under 8 minutes, more than double his 1.8 season average. His offense was a non-factor, as he went 1-of-3 from the field for a -1.4 offensive credit.
Despite not scoring a point on 0-of-2 shooting, he found other ways to contribute in his 7 minutes of action. He was active on the glass with 4 rebounds (↑ avg 0.9) and dished 2 assists, showcasing his ability to impact the game without scoring.
His impact was exclusively on the defensive end during his 5 minutes of play. Despite being a complete non-factor on offense (0 points on 0-of-1 shooting), he contested 2 shots and held his matchups to 1-of-5 shooting, earning a +1.6 defensive credit.
Defensive activity defined his very limited minutes, as he registered 4 contests in just under 5 minutes of court time. This interior presence helped hold opponents to 1-of-4 shooting when he was the nearest defender, though he offered no offensive production.
Oklahoma City Thunder
An uncharacteristically quiet and inefficient night saw him score just 15 points on 6-of-18 shooting, well below his season average of 27.6. His playmaking was also muted with only 4 assists (avg 7.9), resulting in a modest +4.2 offensive credit that pales in comparison to his usual standard.
A significant role shift toward playmaking defined his night, as he dished out 6 assists—a massive jump from his 1.0 season average. He paired this newfound creation with disruptive defense, logging 2 steals and holding opponents to 2-of-6 shooting to earn a +5.2 defensive credit.
Holmgren's value came from two-way efficiency, not high-volume scoring, as he posted a +13.1 offensive credit on just 8 shots. He paired his efficient 10 points with 11 rebounds (↑ avg 8.2) and anchored the defense with 9 contests, contributing to a +7.4 defensive mark.
A brutal shooting night defined this outing, as he went just 2-of-11 from the field and 1-of-9 from three, generating a -4.7 offensive credit. He salvaged some value on the other end, holding opponents to 3-of-8 shooting as the primary defender to earn a +3.5 defensive credit.
Offensive efficiency drove his line, as he scored 10 points on 5-of-10 shooting for a +11.7 offensive credit. However, this was completely undermined on defense, where opponents shot a blistering 6-of-8 (75%) when he was the nearest defender, contributing to his team-worst -25 plus/minus.
His impact came entirely from hustle and defense, not scoring, as he went 0-for-4 from three-point range. He grabbed 9 rebounds (↑ avg 4.1) and was a menace defensively, logging 11 contests and holding opponents to 5-of-14 shooting (36%) to generate a +2.0 defensive credit.
While his box score was nearly empty with 0 rebounds and 0 assists, he made his presence felt with defensive activity. His 3 deflections and 5 contests fueled a positive defensive credit of +2.9, salvaging value on a night where his offense was secondary.
A hyper-efficient two-way performance drove his value in just 20 minutes of play. He scored 11 points on 4-of-6 shooting (+7.8 Offense) and was a terror on defense, using 3 steals and 3 deflections to rack up a +7.3 defensive credit.
His primary value came from rebounding, as he grabbed 4 boards, a notable increase over his 1.4 average. His trademark shooting was absent (1-of-4 from three), but he added 2 assists and avoided major mistakes to contribute positively on offense (+3.2).
Inefficient shooting (2-of-8 FG) was offset by his work on the glass and as a facilitator. He pulled down 6 rebounds, well above his 2.9 average, and added 2 assists to help generate a +3.1 offensive credit despite his poor shooting splits.
An efficient scoring burst in just 7 minutes of action defined his brief cameo. He scored 5 points on 2-of-3 shooting, including a three-pointer, providing instant offense off the bench and earning a +2.3 offensive credit.
He was a non-factor in his 6 minutes on the floor, failing to score or record an assist while missing his only shot attempt. While he avoided turnovers, his main contribution was a single steal that helped produce a +1.9 defensive credit.