OKC

2025-26 Season

BROOKS BARNHIZER

Oklahoma City Thunder | Guard | 6-5
Brooks Barnhizer
1.7PPG
1.9RPG
0.6APG
8.7MPG
-7.4 Impact

Barnhizer produces at an poor rate for a 9-minute workload.

·
Embed this player card

Copy & paste this HTML into any page:

The widget updates automatically whenever our data does.

IMPACT BREAKDOWN
Every stat, every credit, every cost — per game average
-7.4
Scoring +1.3
Points Scored 1.7 PPG = +1.7
Missed Shots difficulty-adjusted = -0.8
Shot Making above expected FG% = +0.4
Creation +0.1
Assists & Self-Creation 0.6 AST/g + self-creation = +0.1
Turnovers -0.7
Turnovers 0.2/g (live + dead blend) = -0.7
Hustle & Effort +1.5
Rebounds 1.9 RPG (OREB + DREB) = +1.0
Contested Shots 1.1/g = +0.2
Deflections 0.5/g = +0.3
Charges Drawn 0.0/g = +0.0
Loose Balls 0.1/g = +0.0
Screen Assists 0.1/g = +0.0
Raw Impact +2.2
Baseline (game-average expected) −9.6
Net Impact
-7.4
4th pctl vs Guards

PBP Credit: Every play is analyzed from play-by-play data. Scorers get difficulty-adjusted credit, assisters get creation value based on the shot opportunity they created, and turnovers are classified by type. Shot difficulty is derived from 1M+ shots across 4 seasons. Full methodology

SKILL DNA

Percentile rank vs 246 Guards with 10+ games

Scoring 1th
2.4 PPG
Efficiency 1th
38.0% TS
Playmaking 5th
0.8 APG
Rebounding 43th
2.6 RPG
Defense 24th
+5.2/g
Hustle 68th
+10.5/g
Creation 19th
+1.71/g
Shot Making 17th
+4.30/g
TO Discipline 94th
0.03/min

THE SEASON SO FAR

Brooks Barnhizer spent the opening weeks of the 2025-26 season fighting just to stay on the floor, enduring a brutal stretch defined by empty stat lines and fleeting garbage-time cameos. When thrown into the fire on 11/08 vs SAC, he was practically invisible. He logged zero points and two rebounds in four minutes, posting a dismal Impact: -12.3 because he simply could not keep up with the offensive pace. He finally found a spark on 11/12 vs GSW during a season-high 16 minutes of action. Despite scoring just four points, Barnhizer managed an Impact: +0.3 by crashing the glass for three rebounds and playing highly disruptive perimeter defense to keep the second unit afloat. He tried to replicate that blue-collar effort on 11/16 vs CHA, pulling down five rebounds in 12 minutes. However, his complete inability to threaten the basket—missing his only shot and finishing with zero points—dragged his overall rating down to an Impact: -7.4. If Barnhizer wants to graduate from the deep bench, he desperately needs to find a consistent way to influence the game when he isn't scoring.

Brooks Barnhizer’s midseason stretch was defined by sheer offensive invisibility and bleeding value in brief cameos. During a 16-minute run on 12/23 vs MEM, he attempted just two shots and went scoreless, resulting in a brutal -10.3 Impact score. Things bottomed out completely on 01/24 vs IND, where he logged six minutes of pure cardio to record zero points, zero rebounds, and zero assists, yielding a staggering -14.2 Impact score. His abysmal metrics stem directly from this total refusal to attack the basket, essentially forcing his team to play four-on-five. Even when he managed to find the hoop, like his five-point outing on 11/24 vs POR, his -3.8 Impact score revealed the hidden costs of his rotation minutes. Despite hitting two of his three shots in that contest, his extreme passivity allowed opponents to ignore him entirely off the ball to trap primary scorers. He is simply taking up space on the hardwood right now.

This stretch of the season was defined by brutal offensive invisibility, as Brooks Barnhizer spent weeks looking completely lost on the floor before a sudden late-season awakening. Even when he managed to put up points, like his 14-point outing on 02/04 vs SAS, terrible shot selection dragged him down. He bricked ten shots overall in that contest, resulting in a miserable -7.7 Impact score because his empty volume came at the expense of offensive flow. The absolute nadir arrived on 02/25 vs DET. Barnhizer wandered the hardwood for 22 minutes without scoring a single point, posting a catastrophic -12.4 Impact score as his inability to space the floor crippled the second unit. Yet, just as he seemed destined to fall out of the rotation entirely, he flipped the script on 04/10 vs DEN. Given an unexpected 33 minutes of run, he crashed the glass relentlessly for 9 rebounds and shot an efficient 5-for-10 from the field. That gritty effort translated to a stellar +9.8 Impact score, reminding everyone he can actually contribute when he stops forcing bad looks and focuses on the dirty work.

IMPACT TIMELINE

Game-by-game performance vs average. Green = above average, red = below.

PATTERNS

Struggling. Barnhizer has posted negative impact in 95% of games this season. The production rarely outweighs the cost.

Average defender. Barnhizer doesn't hurt you defensively, but he's not making opponents uncomfortable either.

Flat trajectory all season — first-half impact -7.5, second-half -7.2. No major shifts, which fits with the overall steadiness.

Tends to go on runs. Longest hot streak: 1 games. Longest cold streak: 28 games.

MATCHUP HISTORY ⚠ Updated 46 days ago

Based on 44 games with tracking data. Shows who guarded this player on offense and who he guarded on defense, with their shooting stats in those matchups.

ON OFFENSE: WHO GUARDED HIM

His shooting stats against each primary defender this season

L. Kornet 15.8 poss
FG% 37.5%
3P% 40.0%
PPP 0.51
PTS 8
S. Aldama 14.0 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
P. Siakam 12.6 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
J. Jackson Jr. 12.3 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
C. LeVert 11.5 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
P. Spencer 10.1 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
K. Huerter 10.1 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
B. Podziemski 9.9 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.2
PTS 2
B. Mathurin 9.3 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.22
PTS 2
J. LaRavia 9.2 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.22
PTS 2

ON DEFENSE: WHO HE GUARDED

How opponents shot when he was the primary defender. Lower FG% = better defense.

S. Aldama 15.3 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.2
PTS 3
C. Bryant 13.2 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.15
PTS 2
K. Johnson 12.1 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.25
PTS 3
J. Wells 11.5 poss
FG% 75.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.52
PTS 6
B. Mathurin 10.8 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.56
PTS 6
J. LaRavia 10.8 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
N. Traore 10.1 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
M. Kleber 9.7 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
D. Carter 9.2 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.43
PTS 4
P. Spencer 8.5 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0

SEASON STATS

40
Games
1.7
PPG
1.9
RPG
0.6
APG
0.3
SPG
0.1
BPG
38.0
FG%
29.2
3P%
70.0
FT%
8.7
MPG

GAME LOG

40 games played