GSW

2025-26 Season

MOSES MOODY

Golden State Warriors | Guard | 6-5
Moses Moody
12.1 PPG
3.3 RPG
1.6 APG
25.7 MPG
-0.4 Impact

Moody produces at an average rate for a 26-minute workload.

NET IMPACT BREAKDOWN
Every stat, every credit, every cost — per game average
-0.4
Scoring +7.3
Points 12.1 PPG × +1.00 = +12.1
Missed 2PT 1.4/g × -0.78 = -1.1
Missed 3PT 3.8/g × -0.87 = -3.3
Missed FT 0.4/g × -1.00 = -0.4
Creation +1.8
Assists 1.6/g × +0.50 = +0.8
Off. Rebounds 0.8/g × +1.26 = +1.0
Turnovers -1.8
Turnovers 0.9/g × -1.95 = -1.8
Defense +1.7
Steals 1.0/g × +2.30 = +2.3
Blocks 0.6/g × +0.90 = +0.5
Def. Rebounds 2.5/g × +0.30 = +0.8
Fouls Committed 2.5/g × -0.75 = -1.9
Hustle & Effort +3.2
Contested Shots 3.6/g × +0.20 = +0.7
Deflections 2.4/g × +0.65 = +1.6
Charges Drawn 0.1/g × +2.70 = +0.3
Loose Balls 0.7/g × +0.60 = +0.4
Screen Assists 0.2/g × +0.30 = +0.1
Off. Fouls Drawn 0.0/g uncredited × +2.70 = +0.1
Raw Impact +12.2
Baseline (game-average expected) −12.6
Net Impact
-0.4
63th pctl vs Guards

About this model: Net Impact can't measure floor spacing, help defense rotations, or playmaking gravity — so wings and guards are slightly undervalued vs bigs. How Net Impact works

SKILL DNA

Percentile rank vs 235 Guards with 10+ games

Scoring 63th
12.1 PPG
Efficiency 68th
57.3% TS
Playmaking 27th
1.6 APG
Rebounding 60th
3.3 RPG
Rim Protection 71th
0.14/min
Hustle 66th
0.11/min
Shot Creation 50th
0% pullup
TO Discipline 78th
0.04/min

THE SEASON SO FAR

Moses Moody’s early season was defined by a maddening pendulum swing between lethal perimeter explosions and erratic offensive craterings. When he caught fire, he looked virtually unstoppable. He peaked on 11/16 vs NOP with a blistering 32-point outing, where his decisive spot-up shooting stretched the defense and yielded a massive +25.2 impact score. However, his shot selection frequently betrayed him. On 11/24 vs UTA, he tallied a respectable 15 points, but chucking a heavy volume of three-point attempts with poor returns severely damaged his offensive value and saddled him with a -3.1 impact. Conversely, Moody occasionally salvaged his floor game when his jumper abandoned him, as seen on 11/29 vs NOP. Despite scoring a modest 11 points on 4-of-12 shooting, he still recorded a +7.2 impact score by shifting his focus entirely to phenomenal defensive execution and high-motor hustle plays. To remain a trusted starter, he must permanently curb his erratic decision-making and lean into that gritty defensive identity.

Maddening inconsistency defined this stretch for Moses Moody, as he vacillated wildly between lethal perimeter sniper and an absolute offensive void. When he found his rhythm, he was brilliant, peaking on 12/22 vs ORL with 20 points and a towering +9.6 impact score fueled by elite floor spacing and decisive drives against closeouts. However, his shot selection often betrayed him on off nights. During his 12/28 vs TOR appearance, an absolute cratering of offensive production tanked his rating to a catastrophic -9.7 impact. Yet Moody occasionally found ways to contribute when his jumper completely abandoned him. Take 01/05 vs LAC, where he scored just 4 points on brutal 1-for-5 shooting but still salvaged a positive +1.1 impact score through relentless defensive intensity. He remains a frustratingly volatile rotation piece who must rely on that exact kind of defensive grit when his scoring touch disappears.

A volatile blend of perimeter explosions and frustrating defensive lapses defined this midseason stretch for Moses Moody. When his shot selection clicked, he was an absolute flamethrower. He dropped 26 points on 01/28 vs UTA, generating a massive +18.0 impact by ruthlessly punishing defensive rotations from deep. Yet, scoring alone rarely guaranteed positive value on the floor. Despite putting up a respectable 17 points on 02/11 vs SAS, Moody posted a brutal -7.0 impact because opponents repeatedly hunted him in isolation matchups. Conversely, he occasionally found ways to salvage his floor game when his jumper completely abandoned him. During an ugly 10-point outing on 03/02 vs LAC, his horrific perimeter shooting was offset by stellar defensive contributions and +4.9 hustle metrics, resulting in a flat -0.0 impact. Moody remains a potent offensive weapon, but his defensive consistency dictates whether he actually helps his team win.

IMPACT TIMELINE

Game-by-game performance vs average. Green = above average, red = below.

PATTERNS

Boom-or-bust player. Moody's impact swings wildly relative to his average — some nights dominant, others invisible. Scoring varies by ~7 points per game.

Middle-of-the-road efficiency — shoots 45%+ from the field in 50% of games. Not automatic, but not a problem either.

Defensive difference-maker. Moody consistently forces tough shots and protects the rim — opponents shoot worse when he's guarding them.

Tends to go on runs. Longest hot streak: 7 games. Longest cold streak: 5 games.

MATCHUP HISTORY

Based on 69 games with tracking data. Shows who guarded this player on offense and who he guarded on defense, with their shooting stats in those matchups.

ON OFFENSE: WHO GUARDED HIM

His shooting stats against each primary defender this season

D. Booker 62.9 poss
FG% 37.5%
3P% 40.0%
PPP 0.13
PTS 8
C. Flagg 59.3 poss
FG% 42.9%
3P% 30.0%
PPP 0.25
PTS 15
A. Bailey 54.9 poss
FG% 53.8%
3P% 44.4%
PPP 0.38
PTS 21
D. DiVincenzo 44.9 poss
FG% 55.6%
3P% 66.7%
PPP 0.31
PTS 14
S. Bey 44.6 poss
FG% 62.5%
3P% 66.7%
PPP 0.31
PTS 14
S. Sharpe 41.1 poss
FG% 66.7%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.22
PTS 9
D. Bane 40.0 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.07
PTS 3
D. Vassell 38.3 poss
FG% 25.0%
3P% 33.3%
PPP 0.13
PTS 5
J. Murray 37.1 poss
FG% 40.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.22
PTS 8
I. Quickley 36.8 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.05
PTS 2

ON DEFENSE: WHO HE GUARDED

How opponents shot when he was the primary defender. Lower FG% = better defense.

C. Flagg 53.6 poss
FG% 41.7%
3P% 33.3%
PPP 0.26
PTS 14
S. Bey 50.3 poss
FG% 60.0%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.3
PTS 15
D. Fox 46.4 poss
FG% 54.5%
3P% 33.3%
PPP 0.32
PTS 15
D. Booker 43.5 poss
FG% 42.9%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.28
PTS 12
S. Sharpe 42.5 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 60.0%
PPP 0.31
PTS 13
K. George 39.2 poss
FG% 54.5%
3P% 60.0%
PPP 0.41
PTS 16
C. Gillespie 38.7 poss
FG% 20.0%
3P% 33.3%
PPP 0.08
PTS 3
D. Brooks 38.4 poss
FG% 30.0%
3P% 33.3%
PPP 0.21
PTS 8
J. Murray 32.8 poss
FG% 55.6%
3P% 60.0%
PPP 0.4
PTS 13
H. Barnes 32.1 poss
FG% 66.7%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.12
PTS 4

SEASON STATS

60
Games
12.1
PPG
3.3
RPG
1.6
APG
1.0
SPG
0.6
BPG
44.0
FG%
40.1
3P%
77.0
FT%
25.7
MPG

GAME LOG

60 games played