UTA

2025-26 Season

KEYONTE GEORGE

Utah Jazz | Guard | 6-4
Keyonte George
23.6 PPG
3.7 RPG
6.1 APG
33.1 MPG
+0.7 Impact

George produces at an average rate for a 33-minute workload. 3.1 turnovers per game cost 6.0 points of value nightly.

NET IMPACT BREAKDOWN
Every stat, every credit, every cost — per game average
+0.7
Scoring +15.4
Points 23.6 PPG × +1.00 = +23.6
Missed 2PT 4.7/g × -0.78 = -3.7
Missed 3PT 4.2/g × -0.87 = -3.7
Missed FT 0.8/g × -1.00 = -0.8
Creation +4.1
Assists 6.1/g × +0.50 = +3.0
Off. Rebounds 0.9/g × +1.26 = +1.1
Turnovers -6.0
Turnovers 3.1/g × -1.95 = -6.0
Defense +1.7
Steals 1.1/g × +2.30 = +2.5
Blocks 0.3/g × +0.90 = +0.3
Def. Rebounds 2.8/g × +0.30 = +0.8
Fouls Committed 2.5/g × -0.75 = -1.9
Hustle & Effort +2.9
Contested Shots 3.2/g × +0.20 = +0.6
Deflections 1.7/g × +0.65 = +1.1
Loose Balls 0.6/g × +0.60 = +0.4
Screen Assists 0.5/g × +0.30 = +0.1
Off. Fouls Drawn 0.3/g uncredited × +2.70 = +0.7
Raw Impact +18.1
Baseline (game-average expected) −17.4
Net Impact
+0.7
76th pctl vs Guards

About this model: Net Impact can't measure floor spacing, help defense rotations, or playmaking gravity — so wings and guards are slightly undervalued vs bigs. How Net Impact works

SKILL DNA

Percentile rank vs 235 Guards with 10+ games

Scoring 95th
23.6 PPG
Efficiency 82th
59.3% TS
Playmaking 91th
6.1 APG
Rebounding 69th
3.7 RPG
Rim Protection 34th
0.10/min
Hustle 29th
0.09/min
Shot Creation 50th
0% pullup
TO Discipline 12th
0.09/min

THE SEASON SO FAR

Keyonte George spent the first twenty games of the season trapped in a maddening cycle of high-volume shot creation and devastating hidden costs. Look no further than his 10/27 vs PHX performance, where he racked up 26 points and 10 assists but posted an abysmal -8.6 impact score because of poor perimeter shot selection. He consistently sabotaged his own box score numbers with defensive bleeding and reckless decision-making. Yet, he occasionally found ways to win on the margins. During his 10/31 vs PHX outing, a modest 17-point, 3-for-10 shooting night still yielded a +1.4 impact score because his high-level playmaking and relentless hustle plays generated crucial non-scoring value. Unfortunately, when his shot completely abandoned him, the results were apocalyptic. His 11/30 vs HOU appearance stands out as a true disaster class, where a scoreless 0-for-6 shooting night dragged his impact down to a catastrophic -29.1. Until he cleans up his erratic chucking and live-ball turnovers, his massive usage rate will continue to hurt his team just as often as it helps.

A maddening duality defined this midseason stretch for Keyonte George, where brilliant orchestration constantly collided with reckless shot selection. He could look completely unstoppable on nights like 12/30 vs BOS, pouring in 37 points and generating a +10.6 impact score through explosive shot-making from all three levels. Yet, his box score frequently lied. Take his performance on 01/07 vs OKC, where he racked up 25 points and 11 assists but posted a brutal -7.5 impact mark. Those seemingly gaudy traditional stats were completely torpedoed by inefficient volume shooting and poor perimeter execution. He fell into a similar trap on 01/03 vs GSW, tallying 22 points and 9 assists while dragging the lineup down to a -10.1 impact because of errant decision-making and forced attempts in traffic. When George dictates the tempo and attacks the rim, he is a lethal offensive engine, but his insistence on forcing bad shots remains a glaring hidden cost.

IMPACT TIMELINE

Game-by-game performance vs average. Green = above average, red = below.

PATTERNS

Boom-or-bust player. George's impact swings wildly relative to his average — some nights dominant, others invisible. Scoring varies by ~9 points per game.

Middle-of-the-road efficiency — shoots 45%+ from the field in 48% of games. Not automatic, but not a problem either.

Defensive difference-maker. George consistently forces tough shots and protects the rim — opponents shoot worse when he's guarding them.

Slight upward trend. First-half impact: -0.4, second-half: +1.8. Modest improvement — possibly settling into a rhythm.

MATCHUP HISTORY

Based on 56 games with tracking data. Shows who guarded this player on offense and who he guarded on defense, with their shooting stats in those matchups.

ON OFFENSE: WHO GUARDED HIM

His shooting stats against each primary defender this season

S. Castle 102.1 poss
FG% 45.5%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.17
PTS 17
J. Wells 85.2 poss
FG% 45.5%
3P% 25.0%
PPP 0.21
PTS 18
C. Wallace 72.9 poss
FG% 41.7%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.14
PTS 10
N. Marshall 69.5 poss
FG% 60.0%
3P% 57.1%
PPP 0.23
PTS 16
J. McDaniels 58.4 poss
FG% 35.7%
3P% 12.5%
PPP 0.24
PTS 14
A. Reaves 53.4 poss
FG% 81.8%
3P% 66.7%
PPP 0.37
PTS 20
T. Camara 51.6 poss
FG% 66.7%
3P% 33.3%
PPP 0.31
PTS 16
M. Christie 49.8 poss
FG% 54.5%
3P% 25.0%
PPP 0.3
PTS 15
A. Black 48.0 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 33.3%
PPP 0.31
PTS 15
A. Edwards 46.3 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 57.1%
PPP 0.3
PTS 14

ON DEFENSE: WHO HE GUARDED

How opponents shot when he was the primary defender. Lower FG% = better defense.

S. Curry 70.2 poss
FG% 57.1%
3P% 53.3%
PPP 0.48
PTS 34
L. Dončić 62.5 poss
FG% 56.2%
3P% 37.5%
PPP 0.4
PTS 25
A. Edwards 59.1 poss
FG% 23.5%
3P% 20.0%
PPP 0.17
PTS 10
M. Christie 57.6 poss
FG% 83.3%
3P% 75.0%
PPP 0.23
PTS 13
A. Reaves 56.7 poss
FG% 40.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.07
PTS 4
J. Wells 55.8 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.22
PTS 12
C. Wallace 54.8 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.05
PTS 3
S. Castle 51.3 poss
FG% 22.2%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.12
PTS 6
C. Cunningham 51.3 poss
FG% 53.3%
3P% 66.7%
PPP 0.37
PTS 19
D. Booker 48.0 poss
FG% 47.1%
3P% 40.0%
PPP 0.38
PTS 18

SEASON STATS

54
Games
23.6
PPG
3.7
RPG
6.1
APG
1.1
SPG
0.3
BPG
45.6
FG%
37.1
3P%
89.2
FT%
33.1
MPG

GAME LOG

54 games played