Career stats →
DET

2025-26 Season

CADE CUNNINGHAM

Detroit Pistons | Guard | 6-6
Cade Cunningham
24.5PPG
5.5RPG
9.5APG
34.9MPG
+13.2 Impact

Cunningham produces at an elite rate for a 35-minute workload.

·
Embed this player card

Copy & paste this HTML into any page:

The widget updates automatically whenever our data does.

IMPACT BREAKDOWN
Every stat, every credit, every cost — per game average
+13.2
Scoring +21.7
Points Scored 24.5 PPG = +24.5
Missed Shots difficulty-adjusted = -7.8
Shot Making above expected FG% = +5.0
Creation +3.3
Assists & Self-Creation 9.5 AST/g + self-creation = +3.3
Turnovers -9.4
Turnovers 4.0/g (live + dead blend) = -9.4
Defense +0.8
Steals 1.4/g = +3.2
Blocks 0.8/g = +0.7
Fouls + context committed fouls, matchup adj = -3.1
Hustle & Effort +3.8
Rebounds 5.5 RPG (OREB + DREB) = +1.2
Contested Shots 4.0/g = +0.8
Deflections 2.0/g = +1.3
Charges Drawn 0.0/g = +0.0
Loose Balls 0.7/g = +0.4
Screen Assists 0.2/g = +0.1
Raw Impact +20.2
Baseline (game-average expected) −7.0
Net Impact
+13.2
96th pctl vs Guards

PBP Credit: Every play is analyzed from play-by-play data. Scorers get difficulty-adjusted credit, assisters get creation value based on the shot opportunity they created, and turnovers are classified by type. Shot difficulty is derived from 1M+ shots across 4 seasons. Full methodology

SKILL DNA

Percentile rank vs 246 Guards with 10+ games

Scoring 96th
24.5 PPG
Efficiency 66th
56.5% TS
Playmaking 100th
9.5 APG
Rebounding 94th
5.5 RPG
Defense 97th
+14.1/g
Hustle 92th
+15.5/g
Creation 99th
+6.92/g
Shot Making 93th
+10.50/g
TO Discipline 2th
0.11/min

ON / OFF COURT

DET performance per 100 possessions with Cunningham on vs off the floor · 3,175 poss on, 3,301 off

Team net — ON court
+3.9
ORtg 92.4 · DRtg 88.5
Team net — OFF court
+5.7
ORtg 87.1 · DRtg 81.5
On/Off swing
-1.8
Points per 100 possessions the team gains (or loses) when he plays

THE SEASON SO FAR

Cade Cunningham’s opening stretch of the 2025-26 season was defined by a messy but brilliant evolution from an inefficient volume shooter into a gritty, all-around possession winner. Early on, his counting stats masked underlying flaws, like on 10/24 vs HOU where he posted 21 points and 9 assists but registered a -3.3 Impact. That negative mark stemmed from hidden costs, as poor defensive effort and sloppy execution bled away the actual value of his scoring. He quickly flipped the script with an utterly absurd marathon on 11/11 vs WAS. Cunningham needed a staggering 45 field goal attempts to reach 46 points, yet he walked away with a massive +41.9 Impact. Rather than letting his broken jumper sink the team, he bullied his way to value through sheer force of will, using relentless hustle plays, 12 rebounds, and suffocating defensive disruption to control the floor. He later showed he could thrive without forcing shots at all, logging just 18 points on 12/02 vs ATL. By locking in defensively and operating as a pure facilitator to the tune of eight assists, he generated a +13.1 Impact, winning the game with high-IQ basketball instead of brute force.

This midseason stretch was defined by Cunningham's evolution into a relentless maestro who dictated the pace of every game through his passing. He completely dismantled the defense on 12/27 vs UTA. Pairing 29 points with a brilliant 17 assists, he generated a massive +20.5 impact score by creating endless easy looks for his teammates. Even when he took a backseat as a scorer on 02/01 vs BKN, his 18 points yielded a staggering +24.7 impact score. That elite mark stemmed from his hyper-efficient 7-for-11 shooting and 12 assists, a clear indicator that his pure facilitation can carry an offense. However, his volume-heavy approach occasionally crashed hard. During an ugly outing on 01/16 vs PHX, Cunningham stumbled to a dismal -15.7 impact score. Despite tallying 11 assists, his atrocious 3-for-16 shooting and 0-for-7 brickfest from deep actively derailed possessions and dragged the entire unit down.

This midseason run marked Cunningham’s volatile transition into a pure, high-volume offensive maestro. He operated as an unstoppable engine during the 02/19 vs NYK matchup, hanging 42 points and 13 assists on the defense to generate a staggering +37.4 impact score. But giving him the ultimate green light occasionally backfired. Look at the 02/23 vs SAS game, where he clanked his way to 16 points on a brutal 5-of-26 shooting performance. That miserable shot selection and the resulting wasted possessions dragged his impact down to a -3.6 for the night. Fortunately, he is learning how to salvage his value when the jumper fails him. During the 03/12 vs PHI contest, Cunningham attempted just six field goals for 8 points but still managed a +1.6 impact by pivoting entirely to facilitation and racking up 13 assists to keep the offense humming.

IMPACT TIMELINE

Game-by-game performance vs average. Green = above average, red = below.

PATTERNS

Very consistent. Cunningham posts positive impact in 87% of games — you almost always get a productive night. Scoring varies by ~9 points, but the overall contribution stays positive.

Middle-of-the-road efficiency — shoots 45%+ from the field in 56% of games. Not automatic, but not a problem either.

Defensive difference-maker. Cunningham consistently forces tough shots and protects the rim — opponents shoot worse when he's guarding them.

Small downward trend. First-half impact: +14.3, second-half: +12.1. Not alarming yet, but trending the wrong direction.

Tends to go on runs. Longest hot streak: 29 games. Longest cold streak: 1 games.

MATCHUP HISTORY ⚠ Updated 20 days ago

Based on 74 games with tracking data. Shows who guarded this player on offense and who he guarded on defense, with their shooting stats in those matchups.

ON OFFENSE: WHO GUARDED HIM

His shooting stats against each primary defender this season

A. Black 136.2 poss
FG% 42.9%
3P% 60.0%
PPP 0.26
PTS 36
D. Wade 120.9 poss
FG% 40.0%
3P% 33.3%
PPP 0.19
PTS 23
J. Tyson 116.1 poss
FG% 29.2%
3P% 40.0%
PPP 0.22
PTS 25
P. Banchero 116.1 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 42.9%
PPP 0.42
PTS 49
F. Wagner 108.0 poss
FG% 45.2%
3P% 29.4%
PPP 0.33
PTS 36
D. Daniels 102.2 poss
FG% 37.5%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.2
PTS 20
D. Mitchell 90.3 poss
FG% 27.8%
3P% 28.6%
PPP 0.16
PTS 14
S. Castle 88.4 poss
FG% 25.9%
3P% 28.6%
PPP 0.19
PTS 17
J. Suggs 86.2 poss
FG% 52.2%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.38
PTS 33
M. Strus 75.3 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 44.4%
PPP 0.31
PTS 23

ON DEFENSE: WHO HE GUARDED

How opponents shot when he was the primary defender. Lower FG% = better defense.

J. Suggs 131.7 poss
FG% 17.2%
3P% 15.8%
PPP 0.1
PTS 13
J. Harden 129.0 poss
FG% 37.5%
3P% 30.8%
PPP 0.19
PTS 24
P. Banchero 102.2 poss
FG% 40.0%
3P% 20.0%
PPP 0.45
PTS 46
J. Tyson 98.8 poss
FG% 64.3%
3P% 62.5%
PPP 0.24
PTS 24
F. Wagner 84.3 poss
FG% 41.2%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.2
PTS 17
A. Black 81.1 poss
FG% 21.4%
3P% 16.7%
PPP 0.09
PTS 7
D. Bane 78.7 poss
FG% 39.1%
3P% 33.3%
PPP 0.3
PTS 24
D. Mitchell 78.0 poss
FG% 53.8%
3P% 33.3%
PPP 0.21
PTS 16
D. Daniels 76.0 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.13
PTS 10
D. Mitchell 75.0 poss
FG% 46.7%
3P% 27.3%
PPP 0.45
PTS 34

SEASON STATS

76
Games
24.5
PPG
5.5
RPG
9.5
APG
1.4
SPG
0.8
BPG
45.6
FG%
34.6
3P%
82.1
FT%
34.9
MPG

GAME LOG

76 games played