Interactive analysis

EXPLORE THE GAME

Every shot, every lead change, every rotation — visualized.

Lead over time · win-probability overlay
LEAD TRACKER
DAL lead LAC lead Win %
Every shot · colored by difficulty
SHOT CHART
Click shooters to compare their shots on the court
LAC 2P — 3P —
DAL 2P — 3P —
Tough make Easy make Blown miss Tough miss 194 attempts

LAC LAC Shot-making Δ

Harden 13/25 +5.3
Zubac Open 11/15 +4.3
Bogdanović 8/14 +5.5
Jones Jr. 4/10 -3.6
Collins 3/8 -2.5
Dunn 2/8 -4.4
Batum Hard 2/6 -1.9
Sanders Hard 1/5 -3.0
Miller Open 1/3 -1.9
Lopez Hard 0/1 -0.9

DAL DAL Shot-making Δ

Russell 11/24 -1.1
Marshall 8/19 -1.2
Flagg 8/13 +2.6
Thompson Hard 4/11 +0.5
Christie Hard 3/9 -0.1
Williams 2/9 -6.8
Gafford Open 4/7 -1.3
Cisse Open 3/3 +1.8
Lively II Open 1/3 -1.7
Martin Open 0/1 -1.4
How the game was played
BY THE NUMBERS
LAC
DAL
45/95 Field Goals 44/99
47.4% Field Goal % 44.4%
13/42 3-Pointers 10/36
31.0% 3-Point % 27.8%
30/36 Free Throws 29/38
83.3% Free Throw % 76.3%
60.0% True Shooting % 54.9%
56 Total Rebounds 66
7 Offensive 11
38 Defensive 39
22 Assists 18
0.96 Assist/TO Ratio 0.72
20 Turnovers 22
16 Steals 11
6 Blocks 7
32 Fouls 25
58 Points in Paint 58
22 Fast Break Pts 16
23 Points off TOs 26
10 Second Chance Pts 15
33 Bench Points 56
15 Largest Lead 6
Biggest contributors
TOP NET IMPACT
1
James Harden
41 PTS · 14 REB · 11 AST · 51.0 MIN
+36.68
2
Naji Marshall
28 PTS · 8 REB · 2 AST · 47.2 MIN
+22.82
3
Bogdan Bogdanović
21 PTS · 3 REB · 3 AST · 37.1 MIN
+22.68
4
Ivica Zubac
27 PTS · 11 REB · 2 AST · 46.2 MIN
+20.47
5
Derrick Jones Jr.
15 PTS · 4 REB · 0 AST · 40.3 MIN
+12.03
6
Moussa Cisse
9 PTS · 3 REB · 0 AST · 11.1 MIN
+9.51
7
Kris Dunn
9 PTS · 2 REB · 5 AST · 32.2 MIN
+9.0
8
Daniel Gafford
10 PTS · 8 REB · 1 AST · 27.4 MIN
+8.84
9
D'Angelo Russell
28 PTS · 6 REB · 5 AST · 38.6 MIN
+7.27
10
Cooper Flagg
16 PTS · 5 REB · 0 AST · 47.7 MIN
+7.02
Play-by-play (most recent first)
PLAY FEED
Q6 0:00 TEAM offensive REBOUND 133–127
Q6 0:00 MISS B. Bogdanović 26' pullup 3PT 133–127
Q6 0:22 N. Batum STEAL (3 STL) 133–127
Q6 0:22 C. Flagg lost ball TURNOVER (4 TO) 133–127
Q6 0:27 M. Christie STEAL (2 STL) 133–127
Q6 0:27 J. Harden bad pass TURNOVER (3 TO) 133–127
Q6 0:30 J. Harden REBOUND (Off:2 Def:12) 133–127
Q6 0:33 MISS M. Christie 26' pullup 3PT 133–127
Q6 0:36 N. Batum kicked ball VIOLATION 133–127
Q6 0:36 N. Marshall REBOUND (Off:2 Def:6) 133–127
Q6 0:38 MISS J. Harden 24' turnaround 3PT 133–127
Q6 0:52 I. Zubac REBOUND (Off:4 Def:7) 133–127
Q6 0:53 MISS B. Bogdanović driving Layup 133–127
Q6 1:15 B. Bogdanović STEAL (4 STL) 133–127
Q6 1:15 D. Russell lost ball TURNOVER (7 TO) 133–127

GAME ANALYSIS

KEEP READING

Create a free account and follow your team to get the full analysis every morning.

Create Free Account

Already have an account? Log in

PLAYER PERFORMANCE

DAL Dallas Mavericks
S Cooper Flagg 47.6m
16
pts
5
reb
0
ast
Impact
+2.4

Despite solid interior finishing and disruptive length on the other end, his inability to stretch the floor proved costly. Opposing bigs simply camped in the lane, stalling out multiple crucial fourth-quarter possessions.

Shooting
FG 8/13 (61.5%)
3PT 0/3 (0.0%)
FT 0/1 (0.0%)
Advanced
TS% 59.5%
USG% 14.9%
Net Rtg -14.6
+/- -15
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 47.6m
Scoring +11.7
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +4.2
Hustle +2.5
Defense +0.8
Turnovers -8.2
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 29
FGM Against 11
Opp FG% 37.9%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 4
S Naji Marshall 47.1m
28
pts
8
reb
2
ast
Impact
+25.4

High-volume attacking yielded crucial foul-line trips that offset his overall inefficiency from the floor. Relentless downhill pressure forced the defense into early penalty situations, allowing his team to control the pace.

Shooting
FG 8/19 (42.1%)
3PT 3/5 (60.0%)
FT 9/10 (90.0%)
Advanced
TS% 59.8%
USG% 20.2%
Net Rtg +1.2
+/- -1
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 47.1m
Scoring +19.5
Creation +4.1
Shot Making +4.4
Hustle +10.2
Defense -2.6
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 19
FGM Against 10
Opp FG% 52.6%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 0
S Max Christie 36.8m
10
pts
7
reb
0
ast
Impact
-6.2

Settled for contested perimeter jumpers instead of pressuring the rim, resulting in empty offensive trips. This passive shot selection allowed the defense to stay home on shooters and easily recover.

Shooting
FG 3/9 (33.3%)
3PT 3/7 (42.9%)
FT 1/2 (50.0%)
Advanced
TS% 50.6%
USG% 13.6%
Net Rtg -12.8
+/- -14
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 36.8m
Scoring +5.0
Creation +0.2
Shot Making +2.9
Hustle +2.1
Defense -1.3
Turnovers -4.7
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 11
FGM Against 6
Opp FG% 54.5%
STL 2
BLK 1
TO 2
S Daniel Gafford 27.4m
10
pts
8
reb
1
ast
Impact
-4.8

Anchored the paint with disciplined drop coverage and vertical spacing on offense. His timely weak-side rotations deterred multiple drives and stabilized the interior defense throughout the night.

Shooting
FG 4/7 (57.1%)
3PT 0/0
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 63.5%
USG% 17.5%
Net Rtg -1.7
+/- -1
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 27.4m
Scoring +6.9
Creation +1.0
Shot Making +1.3
Hustle +6.3
Defense -2.7
Turnovers -7.1
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 11
FGM Against 7
Opp FG% 63.6%
STL 1
BLK 3
TO 3
7
pts
2
reb
5
ast
Impact
-3.4

Relentless loose-ball recoveries and elite transition pacing salvaged a truly abysmal shooting night. His sheer motor generated essential extra possessions that masked his half-court struggles, perfectly exemplified by a crucial third-quarter sequence where he kept three separate plays alive.

Shooting
FG 2/9 (22.2%)
3PT 0/5 (0.0%)
FT 3/4 (75.0%)
Advanced
TS% 32.5%
USG% 22.9%
Net Rtg -64.3
+/- -27
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 18.1m
Scoring +0.8
Creation +2.0
Shot Making +0.9
Hustle +0.6
Defense +3.2
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 2
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 2
BLK 0
TO 0
28
pts
6
reb
5
ast
Impact
-0.1

Empty-calorie volume driven by a barrage of missed deep looks consistently killed offensive momentum. His tendency to force early-clock pull-ups bailed out the defense right when they were scrambling, dragging down his overall impact despite the scoring load.

Shooting
FG 11/24 (45.8%)
3PT 0/6 (0.0%)
FT 6/9 (66.7%)
Advanced
TS% 50.1%
USG% 37.6%
Net Rtg +29.6
+/- +24
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 38.6m
Scoring +17.2
Creation +2.2
Shot Making +5.7
Hustle +1.8
Defense +0.1
Turnovers -16.6
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 13
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 30.8%
STL 2
BLK 0
TO 7
13
pts
2
reb
2
ast
Impact
-4.0

One-dimensional perimeter hunting yielded poor overall efficiency and limited his ability to impact the game elsewhere. Without the threat of a dribble-drive, defenders aggressively jumped his passing lanes.

Shooting
FG 4/11 (36.4%)
3PT 4/10 (40.0%)
FT 1/1 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 56.8%
USG% 16.7%
Net Rtg +22.3
+/- +16
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 27.6m
Scoring +7.6
Creation +0.3
Shot Making +4.0
Hustle +0.6
Defense +0.0
Turnovers -4.7
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 3
FGM Against 0
Opp FG% 0.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 2
Caleb Martin 18.4m
2
pts
4
reb
3
ast
Impact
-12.7

Floated through his minutes without asserting himself, failing to generate any meaningful weak-side action. This passive approach allowed the defense to completely ignore him and overload the strong side.

Shooting
FG 0/1 (0.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 53.2%
USG% 8.0%
Net Rtg -7.2
+/- -4
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 18.4m
Scoring +0.8
Creation +0.5
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +5.1
Defense -3.7
Turnovers -3.5
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 12
FGM Against 9
Opp FG% 75.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 2
4
pts
5
reb
0
ast
Impact
-0.3

Provided a steadying presence inside, though his offensive role was entirely marginalized. A lack of assertive rim-running allowed his primary defender to freely roam as a free safety.

Shooting
FG 1/3 (33.3%)
3PT 0/0
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 51.5%
USG% 11.1%
Net Rtg -35.3
+/- -12
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 17.2m
Scoring +2.5
Creation +0.4
Shot Making +0.1
Hustle +5.4
Defense +2.9
Turnovers -1.1
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 8
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 62.5%
STL 1
BLK 1
TO 1
Moussa Cisse 11.1m
9
pts
3
reb
0
ast
Impact
-0.4

Maximized a brief stint with flawless rim-running and highly disruptive paint protection. His explosive verticality on lob attempts forced the defense to collapse, creating wide-open perimeter looks.

Shooting
FG 3/3 (100.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 3/5 (60.0%)
Advanced
TS% 86.5%
USG% 19.4%
Net Rtg +10.2
+/- +4
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 11.1m
Scoring +8.0
Creation +0.7
Shot Making +0.7
Hustle +2.8
Defense +0.2
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 6
FGM Against 2
Opp FG% 33.3%
STL 1
BLK 2
TO 1
LAC LA Clippers
S James Harden 51.0m
41
pts
14
reb
11
ast
Impact
+41.1

Masterful isolation shot creation and lethal step-back efficiency carried the offense through a grueling marathon workload. His ability to manipulate defensive switches and punish drop coverage dictated the entire tempo of the game.

Shooting
FG 13/25 (52.0%)
3PT 6/12 (50.0%)
FT 9/11 (81.8%)
Advanced
TS% 68.7%
USG% 26.2%
Net Rtg +6.3
+/- +8
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 51.0m
Scoring +31.6
Creation +2.5
Shot Making +9.2
Hustle +12.9
Defense -0.1
Turnovers -7.1
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 20
FGM Against 8
Opp FG% 40.0%
STL 1
BLK 2
TO 3
S Ivica Zubac 46.2m
27
pts
11
reb
2
ast
Impact
+20.3

Absolute dominance in the restricted area fueled a massive positive swing. He consistently sealed off smaller defenders in the post, forcing early defensive rotations and generating high-quality looks at the rim.

Shooting
FG 11/15 (73.3%)
3PT 0/0
FT 5/7 (71.4%)
Advanced
TS% 74.7%
USG% 21.5%
Net Rtg +24.6
+/- +25
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 46.2m
Scoring +23.1
Creation +2.3
Shot Making +4.5
Hustle +11.1
Defense +0.4
Turnovers -10.6
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 15
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 33.3%
STL 1
BLK 1
TO 5
15
pts
4
reb
0
ast
Impact
+2.8

Elite point-of-attack defense kept his overall impact afloat despite a rough night from the perimeter. His insistence on taking contested above-the-break threes bogged down half-court possessions, nearly erasing the value of his perimeter containment.

Shooting
FG 4/10 (40.0%)
3PT 0/3 (0.0%)
FT 7/8 (87.5%)
Advanced
TS% 55.5%
USG% 15.8%
Net Rtg +1.1
+/- +2
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 40.3m
Scoring +9.9
Creation +1.5
Shot Making +1.4
Hustle +1.2
Defense +4.7
Turnovers -5.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 15
FGM Against 7
Opp FG% 46.7%
STL 3
BLK 2
TO 2
S Kris Dunn 32.2m
9
pts
2
reb
5
ast
Impact
+1.3

Perimeter bricklaying completely erased the value of his stellar on-ball pressure. Opponents aggressively sagged off him in the half-court, effectively turning the offense into a cramped 4-on-5 battle.

Shooting
FG 2/8 (25.0%)
3PT 1/6 (16.7%)
FT 4/4 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 46.1%
USG% 14.7%
Net Rtg +2.9
+/- +3
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 32.2m
Scoring +4.0
Creation +2.8
Shot Making +1.1
Hustle +0.6
Defense +4.6
Turnovers -1.1
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 11
FGM Against 2
Opp FG% 18.2%
STL 2
BLK 1
TO 1
S John Collins 23.6m
8
pts
3
reb
0
ast
Impact
-12.1

A sudden loss of touch from outside ruined his pick-and-pop gravity, allowing the defense to consistently pack the paint. The resulting clogged driving lanes cratered the team's offensive flow during his minutes.

Shooting
FG 3/8 (37.5%)
3PT 0/3 (0.0%)
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 45.0%
USG% 21.4%
Net Rtg +35.2
+/- +17
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 23.6m
Scoring +4.5
Creation +0.4
Shot Making +1.3
Hustle +0.9
Defense +0.1
Turnovers -8.5
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 11
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 45.5%
STL 2
BLK 0
TO 3
21
pts
3
reb
3
ast
Impact
+15.3

Broke out of a brutal slump with lethal perimeter shot-making that completely tilted the floor. His constant off-ball motion exhausted chasers and opened up massive driving lanes for his teammates.

Shooting
FG 8/14 (57.1%)
3PT 5/8 (62.5%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 75.0%
USG% 17.4%
Net Rtg +6.6
+/- +7
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 37.1m
Scoring +16.3
Creation +0.1
Shot Making +6.3
Hustle +0.9
Defense +4.5
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 17
FGM Against 7
Opp FG% 41.2%
STL 4
BLK 0
TO 1
7
pts
2
reb
0
ast
Impact
-4.5

Solid rotational awareness on the defensive end couldn't compensate for a string of missed open corner looks. Failing to punish aggressive closeouts severely limited his overall effectiveness in the half-court.

Shooting
FG 2/6 (33.3%)
3PT 1/5 (20.0%)
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 50.9%
USG% 12.5%
Net Rtg -3.6
+/- -2
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 24.9m
Scoring +3.9
Creation +0.4
Shot Making +1.4
Hustle +0.6
Defense +3.4
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 8
FGM Against 6
Opp FG% 75.0%
STL 3
BLK 0
TO 1
Kobe Sanders 13.5m
3
pts
1
reb
1
ast
Impact
-15.8

Forced looks from deep and general offensive stagnation ruined his brief stint on the floor. A glaring lack of burst off the dribble prevented him from collapsing the defense, leading to empty possessions.

Shooting
FG 1/5 (20.0%)
3PT 0/3 (0.0%)
FT 1/2 (50.0%)
Advanced
TS% 25.5%
USG% 21.6%
Net Rtg -22.6
+/- -6
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 13.5m
Scoring -0.3
Creation +0.2
Shot Making +0.6
Hustle +0.3
Defense -2.2
Turnovers -2.2
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 1
FGM Against 0
Opp FG% 0.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 2
2
pts
2
reb
0
ast
Impact
-14.3

Struggled to find any rhythm in limited action, bleeding value through disjointed offensive spacing. He repeatedly drifted into occupied zones, which disrupted the natural flow of the pick-and-roll game.

Shooting
FG 1/3 (33.3%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 33.3%
USG% 17.9%
Net Rtg -44.0
+/- -11
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 11.4m
Scoring +0.2
Creation +0.2
Shot Making +0.3
Hustle +2.5
Defense -1.6
Turnovers -5.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 9
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 55.6%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 2
0
pts
3
reb
0
ast
Impact
-12.3

Completely ignored by the defense due to a total lack of rim pressure. His inability to establish deep post position allowed opponents to comfortably switch everything on the perimeter without consequence.

Shooting
FG 0/1 (0.0%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 3.8%
Net Rtg -54.2
+/- -13
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 9.8m
Scoring -0.8
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +0.9
Defense -1.6
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 6
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 83.3%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0