Interactive analysis

EXPLORE THE GAME

Every shot, every lead change, every rotation — visualized.

Lead over time · win-probability overlay
LEAD TRACKER
SAC lead LAC lead Win %
Every shot · colored by difficulty
SHOT CHART
Click shooters to compare their shots on the court
LAC 2P — 3P —
SAC 2P — 3P —
Tough make Easy make Blown miss Tough miss 177 attempts

LAC LAC Shot-making Δ

Collins 9/20 +2.4
Leonard Hard 9/18 +3.0
Garland Hard 7/14 +1.7
Sanders Hard 5/8 +4.8
Miller Hard 5/6 +7.3
Dunn Hard 5/6 +6.5
Lopez Hard 2/5 -0.1
Mathurin Hard 2/4 +1.1
Jones Jr. Open 3/4 +0.9
Christie 1/4 -1.7

SAC SAC Shot-making Δ

Clifford Hard 8/16 +1.9
Carter 8/14 +1.4
Plowden Hard 5/13 -0.6
Raynaud 5/12 -2.5
Cardwell Open 7/8 +5.6
Achiuwa 3/6 +0.3
DeRozan Hard 4/5 +4.8
Monk Hard 3/5 +1.9
McDermott Hard 1/3 +0.1
Hayes Hard 1/3 -1.0
How the game was played
BY THE NUMBERS
LAC
SAC
49/92 Field Goals 45/85
53.3% Field Goal % 52.9%
20/41 3-Pointers 9/32
48.8% 3-Point % 28.1%
20/21 Free Throws 10/20
95.2% Free Throw % 50.0%
68.2% True Shooting % 58.1%
45 Total Rebounds 50
10 Offensive 12
27 Defensive 30
30 Assists 25
2.00 Assist/TO Ratio 1.25
14 Turnovers 20
15 Steals 9
1 Blocks 8
20 Fouls 19
46 Points in Paint 62
21 Fast Break Pts 12
29 Points off TOs 16
15 Second Chance Pts 16
67 Bench Points 42
37 Largest Lead 3
Biggest contributors
TOP NET IMPACT
1
Kobe Sanders
17 PTS · 0 REB · 1 AST · 20.3 MIN
+21.17
2
John Collins
25 PTS · 4 REB · 2 AST · 23.9 MIN
+20.7
3
Kawhi Leonard
26 PTS · 6 REB · 3 AST · 29.9 MIN
+19.97
4
Kris Dunn
13 PTS · 6 REB · 4 AST · 26.6 MIN
+18.35
5
Dylan Cardwell
15 PTS · 8 REB · 2 AST · 27.2 MIN
+18.14
6
Jordan Miller
13 PTS · 2 REB · 6 AST · 23.5 MIN
+13.62
7
Maxime Raynaud
11 PTS · 15 REB · 2 AST · 33.2 MIN
+12.33
8
Nique Clifford
18 PTS · 5 REB · 5 AST · 38.1 MIN
+12.09
9
Darius Garland
17 PTS · 4 REB · 6 AST · 24.4 MIN
+10.66
10
Bennedict Mathurin
5 PTS · 6 REB · 5 AST · 27.4 MIN
+10.64
Play-by-play (most recent first)
PLAY FEED
Q4 0:23 D. Plowden running Layup (15 PTS) (N. Clifford 5 AST) 138–109
Q4 0:29 D. Cardwell REBOUND (Off:2 Def:6) 138–107
Q4 0:30 MISS B. Bogdanović 25' pullup 3PT 138–107
Q4 0:41 N. Omier REBOUND (Off:0 Def:1) 138–107
Q4 0:41 MISS D. Carter 25' step back 3PT 138–107
Q4 0:47 K. Sanders 3PT (17 PTS) (N. Omier 1 AST) 138–107
Q4 1:08 N. Clifford 25' 3PT running pullup (18 PTS) 135–107
Q4 1:13 D. Cardwell REBOUND (Off:2 Def:5) 135–104
Q4 1:16 MISS C. Christie 9' driving floating Shot 135–104
Q4 1:26 D. Carter driving Layup (21 PTS) 135–104
Q4 1:35 M. Raynaud REBOUND (Off:4 Def:11) 135–102
Q4 1:39 MISS K. Sanders driving Layup 135–102
Q4 1:52 D. Cardwell 3PT (15 PTS) (D. Plowden 3 AST) 135–102
Q4 2:05 M. Raynaud REBOUND (Off:4 Def:10) 135–99
Q4 2:08 MISS B. Bogdanović 24' 3PT 135–99

GAME ANALYSIS

KEEP READING

Create a free account and follow your team to get the full analysis every morning.

Create Free Account

Already have an account? Log in

PLAYER PERFORMANCE

SAC Sacramento Kings
S Nique Clifford 38.1m
18
pts
5
reb
5
ast
Impact
+4.3

Cold perimeter shooting and empty possessions during key stretches sabotaged a heavy-workload performance. He provided solid defensive resistance, but his erratic shot selection from beyond the arc stalled out the offensive flow.

Shooting
FG 8/16 (50.0%)
3PT 2/7 (28.6%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 56.3%
USG% 20.7%
Net Rtg -23.5
+/- -19
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 38.1m
Scoring +12.2
Creation +2.2
Shot Making +4.6
Hustle +4.4
Defense -0.3
Turnovers -7.1
STL 1
BLK 1
TO 3
S Devin Carter 36.4m
21
pts
5
reb
5
ast
Impact
+3.8

A complete inability to connect from deep severely cramped the floor and damaged his net impact. He found success attacking the interior, but those 0-for-5 blanks from the perimeter resulted in empty trips that fueled opponent runs.

Shooting
FG 8/14 (57.1%)
3PT 0/5 (0.0%)
FT 5/9 (55.6%)
Advanced
TS% 58.5%
USG% 23.3%
Net Rtg -16.7
+/- -13
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 36.4m
Scoring +14.7
Creation +3.3
Shot Making +4.3
Hustle +1.5
Defense -2.1
Turnovers -7.1
STL 1
BLK 1
TO 3
S Maxime Raynaud 33.2m
11
pts
15
reb
2
ast
Impact
+11.9

Tremendous rebounding volume and rim protection were completely undone by clunky offensive execution. Missed bunnies in the paint and likely transition-starting turnovers dragged his net score into the red despite his dominant physical presence.

Shooting
FG 5/12 (41.7%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 1/2 (50.0%)
Advanced
TS% 42.7%
USG% 18.1%
Net Rtg -17.0
+/- -11
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 33.2m
Scoring +5.0
Creation +0.2
Shot Making +1.7
Hustle +18.1
Defense +2.6
Turnovers -4.7
STL 1
BLK 1
TO 2
8
pts
5
reb
0
ast
Impact
-6.9

Poor positional awareness on the defensive end severely punished his overall rating. While he managed a few efficient finishes inside, his inability to anchor the paint or deter dribble penetration gave all that value right back.

Shooting
FG 3/6 (50.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 2/6 (33.3%)
Advanced
TS% 46.3%
USG% 21.3%
Net Rtg -53.7
+/- -22
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 20.2m
Scoring +4.3
Creation +0.6
Shot Making +1.4
Hustle +4.4
Defense -4.7
Turnovers -2.4
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1
S DeMar DeRozan 10.4m
9
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
-0.1

Surgical midrange execution yielded a highly positive impact before his night was cut short. He methodically picked apart his individual matchups, though the lack of minutes capped his overall influence on the game.

Shooting
FG 4/5 (80.0%)
3PT 1/1 (100.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 90.0%
USG% 25.0%
Net Rtg -1.2
+/- +2
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 10.4m
Scoring +8.4
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +2.6
Hustle +0.0
Defense +0.5
Turnovers -2.4
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 1
15
pts
2
reb
3
ast
Impact
+0.7

Shot-chucking from the outside buried his overall effectiveness. He generated decent hustle metrics, but burning through possessions with low-percentage looks prevented the offense from finding any sustainable rhythm.

Shooting
FG 5/13 (38.5%)
3PT 3/9 (33.3%)
FT 2/3 (66.7%)
Advanced
TS% 52.4%
USG% 16.7%
Net Rtg -22.2
+/- -16
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 35.7m
Scoring +8.5
Creation +0.5
Shot Making +3.7
Hustle +1.6
Defense +0.2
Turnovers -3.1
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 1
15
pts
8
reb
2
ast
Impact
+7.2

An absolute force on the interior, punishing mismatches with near-perfect efficiency around the rim. His relentless energy generated massive hustle and defensive metrics, anchoring a wildly successful two-way performance.

Shooting
FG 7/8 (87.5%)
3PT 1/1 (100.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 93.8%
USG% 15.7%
Net Rtg -29.5
+/- -17
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 27.2m
Scoring +14.5
Creation +0.5
Shot Making +1.8
Hustle +7.2
Defense +1.7
Turnovers -7.8
STL 2
BLK 4
TO 3
Malik Monk 14.4m
7
pts
0
reb
1
ast
Impact
-8.9

A lack of offensive initiation and sloppy ball security quickly derailed his brief stint. He failed to provide his usual spark-plug scoring, instead bogging down possessions and allowing the opposition to capitalize on his mistakes.

Shooting
FG 3/5 (60.0%)
3PT 1/3 (33.3%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 70.0%
USG% 23.5%
Net Rtg -56.3
+/- -19
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 14.4m
Scoring +5.4
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +1.9
Hustle +0.0
Defense +2.4
Turnovers -7.1
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 3
2
pts
2
reb
4
ast
Impact
-8.2

Complete offensive ineptitude erased the value of his pesky point-of-attack defense. He was actively ignored by the opposing defense, suffocating his team's spacing and resulting in a net-negative impact.

Shooting
FG 1/3 (33.3%)
3PT 0/2 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 33.3%
USG% 18.2%
Net Rtg -65.1
+/- -18
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 13.5m
Scoring +0.4
Creation +0.1
Shot Making +0.5
Hustle +2.5
Defense +4.7
Turnovers -5.9
STL 2
BLK 0
TO 3
3
pts
0
reb
3
ast
Impact
-7.2

Failed to bend the defense as a movement shooter, rendering his minutes largely ineffective. Without his gravity creating open lanes, his lack of defensive resistance made him a liability on the floor.

Shooting
FG 1/3 (33.3%)
3PT 1/3 (33.3%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 50.0%
USG% 10.7%
Net Rtg -54.3
+/- -12
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 10.9m
Scoring +1.4
Creation +1.2
Shot Making +1.0
Hustle +0.0
Defense +0.0
Turnovers +0.0
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
LAC LA Clippers
S Kawhi Leonard 29.9m
26
pts
6
reb
3
ast
Impact
+19.2

A heavy scoring load drove a massive offensive box score rating, anchoring his positive net impact. While his perimeter jumper was slightly erratic, his ability to consistently generate quality looks as the primary option kept the offense afloat.

Shooting
FG 9/18 (50.0%)
3PT 3/9 (33.3%)
FT 5/5 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 64.4%
USG% 30.9%
Net Rtg +45.3
+/- +26
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 29.9m
Scoring +19.6
Creation +1.3
Shot Making +5.6
Hustle +5.7
Defense -1.6
Turnovers -2.4
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1
S Kris Dunn 26.6m
13
pts
6
reb
4
ast
Impact
+13.1

An absolute masterclass in two-way efficiency fueled a massive statistical surge. He locked down his perimeter matchups to generate a stellar defensive rating, while punishing the defense with flawless shot selection when left open.

Shooting
FG 5/6 (83.3%)
3PT 3/4 (75.0%)
FT 0/1 (0.0%)
Advanced
TS% 100.9%
USG% 13.3%
Net Rtg +29.6
+/- +16
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 26.6m
Scoring +11.7
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +3.9
Hustle +6.7
Defense +6.5
Turnovers -4.7
STL 3
BLK 0
TO 2
6
pts
3
reb
1
ast
Impact
-0.5

Despite highly efficient finishing when called upon, his overall impact slipped into the red due to extreme offensive passivity. He generated positive defensive and hustle metrics, but simply didn't command enough usage to leave a tangible imprint on the game.

Shooting
FG 3/4 (75.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 75.0%
USG% 8.8%
Net Rtg +39.6
+/- +21
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 25.2m
Scoring +5.0
Creation +0.8
Shot Making +0.6
Hustle +3.8
Defense +2.4
Turnovers -2.4
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 1
S Darius Garland 24.4m
17
pts
4
reb
6
ast
Impact
+0.4

Errant perimeter shooting dragged down an otherwise productive scoring night. His playmaking generated some positive offensive momentum, but likely live-ball mistakes and missed momentum threes ultimately pushed his net impact into the negative.

Shooting
FG 7/14 (50.0%)
3PT 2/7 (28.6%)
FT 1/1 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 58.9%
USG% 29.6%
Net Rtg +22.7
+/- +10
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 24.4m
Scoring +11.7
Creation +0.9
Shot Making +4.6
Hustle +1.2
Defense -2.6
Turnovers -4.7
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 2
S Brook Lopez 19.1m
9
pts
2
reb
0
ast
Impact
-6.8

Defensive struggles and a lack of interior presence severely hampered his overall rating. He failed to establish himself as a rim deterrent, and a low-volume shooting night wasn't enough to offset the points surrendered on the other end.

Shooting
FG 2/5 (40.0%)
3PT 1/3 (33.3%)
FT 4/4 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 66.6%
USG% 19.0%
Net Rtg +35.7
+/- +15
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 19.1m
Scoring +6.7
Creation +1.4
Shot Making +1.1
Hustle +0.6
Defense -3.1
Turnovers -2.4
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1
5
pts
6
reb
5
ast
Impact
-1.5

Complete offensive invisibility tanked his overall rating despite putting up elite defensive metrics. He completely abandoned his usual scoring aggression, failing to pressure the rim or draw fouls to balance out his defensive effort.

Shooting
FG 2/4 (50.0%)
3PT 1/2 (50.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 62.5%
USG% 8.8%
Net Rtg +30.4
+/- +15
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 27.4m
Scoring +3.5
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +1.5
Hustle +1.8
Defense +7.1
Turnovers -4.7
STL 3
BLK 0
TO 2
John Collins 23.9m
25
pts
4
reb
2
ast
Impact
+17.1

Relentless offensive aggression defined this performance, as he hunted his shot to perfection from beyond the arc. His high-volume scoring completely overwhelmed the opposing frontcourt, resulting in a dominant positive impact.

Shooting
FG 9/20 (45.0%)
3PT 4/6 (66.7%)
FT 3/3 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 58.6%
USG% 37.7%
Net Rtg +32.7
+/- +15
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 23.9m
Scoring +17.6
Creation +1.4
Shot Making +5.8
Hustle +5.1
Defense +4.4
Turnovers -6.1
STL 2
BLK 0
TO 2
13
pts
2
reb
6
ast
Impact
+3.5

Flawless perimeter execution maximized his value in a secondary role. He capitalized on every catch-and-shoot opportunity, providing a lethal offensive spark without needing to dominate the ball.

Shooting
FG 5/6 (83.3%)
3PT 3/3 (100.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 108.3%
USG% 12.9%
Net Rtg +39.6
+/- +21
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 23.5m
Scoring +12.3
Creation +1.2
Shot Making +3.9
Hustle +0.6
Defense +1.0
Turnovers -4.7
STL 1
BLK 1
TO 2
Kobe Sanders 20.3m
17
pts
0
reb
1
ast
Impact
+14.6

A stunning two-way breakout saw him perfectly balance high-efficiency shot-making with relentless defensive energy. He exploited defensive rotations for easy perimeter looks while simultaneously blowing up opponent actions on the other end.

Shooting
FG 5/8 (62.5%)
3PT 3/5 (60.0%)
FT 4/4 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 87.1%
USG% 17.0%
Net Rtg +33.4
+/- +14
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 20.3m
Scoring +15.0
Creation +0.9
Shot Making +4.2
Hustle +0.0
Defense +7.0
Turnovers +0.0
STL 4
BLK 0
TO 0
2
pts
2
reb
1
ast
Impact
-11.1

Forced shots in limited minutes quickly cratered his net impact. He struggled to find the rhythm of the game during his brief stint, rushing his offensive touches rather than letting the play develop.

Shooting
FG 1/4 (25.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 25.0%
USG% 23.8%
Net Rtg +11.8
+/- +2
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 7.3m
Scoring +0.2
Creation +0.2
Shot Making +0.3
Hustle +1.6
Defense -0.3
Turnovers -2.4
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1
5
pts
1
reb
1
ast
Impact
-4.1

Maximized a tiny rotational window by aggressively attacking the basket. His perfect execution in limited touches provided a highly concentrated burst of positive offensive value.

Shooting
FG 1/1 (100.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 3/3 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 107.8%
USG% 15.4%
Net Rtg -18.9
+/- -1
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 5.0m
Scoring +5.0
Creation +0.7
Shot Making +0.7
Hustle +0.3
Defense +0.0
Turnovers +0.0
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
0
pts
1
reb
0
ast
Impact
-12.0

A purely cardio stint yielded zero tangible box score production. He was unable to generate any offensive initiation during his brief rotation, leaving his overall impact entirely dependent on the negative lineup shifts around him.

Shooting
FG 0/0
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 0.0%
Net Rtg -18.9
+/- -1
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 5.0m
Scoring +0.0
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +0.3
Defense -1.6
Turnovers +0.0
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
0
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
-12.2

Two quick, ill-advised perimeter misses immediately sank his rating during a fleeting appearance. He failed to establish any offensive rhythm, acting as a possession-killer in his brief time on the floor.

Shooting
FG 0/2 (0.0%)
3PT 0/2 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 33.3%
Net Rtg -133.3
+/- -8
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 2.6m
Scoring -1.5
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +0.0
Defense +0.0
Turnovers +0.0
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0