Interactive analysis

EXPLORE THE GAME

Every shot, every lead change, every rotation — visualized.

Lead over time · win-probability overlay
LEAD TRACKER
NOP lead LAC lead Win %
Every shot · colored by difficulty
SHOT CHART
Click shooters to compare their shots on the court
LAC 2P — 3P —
NOP 2P — 3P —
Tough make Easy make Blown miss Tough miss 171 attempts

LAC LAC Shot-making Δ

Leonard 9/12 +9.3
Garland Open 6/12 -1.6
Lopez Open 5/12 -4.7
Collins Open 6/11 -2.3
Miller Open 6/10 -0.4
Jackson Open 5/7 +1.0
Dunn Hard 2/6 -0.7
Jones Jr. 2/6 -3.4
Sanders Hard 1/6 -3.5
Pedulla Hard 1/3 -1.0

NOP NOP Shot-making Δ

Bey 10/21 +0.2
Murphy III Hard 7/17 +0.4
Murray Hard 7/12 +4.6
Williamson Open 6/8 +1.3
Matković Open 4/8 -1.2
Fears 4/6 +2.2
Queen 2/4 +0.5
Jones 2/4 0.0
Missi Open 2/3 0.0
How the game was played
BY THE NUMBERS
LAC
NOP
45/88 Field Goals 44/83
51.1% Field Goal % 53.0%
9/31 3-Pointers 16/37
29.0% 3-Point % 43.2%
10/13 Free Throws 20/21
76.9% Free Throw % 95.2%
58.2% True Shooting % 67.2%
39 Total Rebounds 48
14 Offensive 13
22 Defensive 27
24 Assists 32
1.50 Assist/TO Ratio 1.68
15 Turnovers 18
10 Steals 12
2 Blocks 6
17 Fouls 14
66 Points in Paint 54
9 Fast Break Pts 22
25 Points off TOs 23
14 Second Chance Pts 18
38 Bench Points 38
18 Largest Lead 20
Biggest contributors
TOP NET IMPACT
1
Saddiq Bey
25 PTS · 5 REB · 4 AST · 35.0 MIN
+23.23
2
Kawhi Leonard
25 PTS · 8 REB · 1 AST · 29.0 MIN
+22.17
3
Trey Murphy III
23 PTS · 7 REB · 5 AST · 39.7 MIN
+21.64
4
John Collins
18 PTS · 7 REB · 2 AST · 24.3 MIN
+15.75
5
Jordan Miller
13 PTS · 3 REB · 1 AST · 23.4 MIN
+15.75
6
Derik Queen
14 PTS · 2 REB · 2 AST · 19.4 MIN
+14.83
7
Herbert Jones
7 PTS · 3 REB · 3 AST · 26.3 MIN
+14.06
8
Darius Garland
13 PTS · 1 REB · 6 AST · 28.8 MIN
+12.97
9
Zion Williamson
14 PTS · 4 REB · 3 AST · 27.7 MIN
+11.6
10
Karlo Matković
9 PTS · 8 REB · 0 AST · 25.2 MIN
+10.14
Play-by-play (most recent first)
PLAY FEED
Q4 0:03 NOP shot clock Team TURNOVER 109–124
Q4 0:27 H. Jones STEAL (5 STL) 109–124
Q4 0:27 I. Jackson bad pass TURNOVER (4 TO) 109–124
Q4 0:30 I. Jackson REBOUND (Off:5 Def:1) 109–124
Q4 0:32 MISS H. Jones 25' step back 3PT 109–124
Q4 0:54 K. Matković REBOUND (Off:4 Def:4) 109–124
Q4 0:56 MISS K. Sanders cutting Layup 109–124
Q4 1:15 D. Murray 26' 3PT pullup (17 PTS) 109–124
Q4 1:38 C. Christie 14' pullup Jump Shot (4 PTS) (K. Sanders 2 AST) 109–121
Q4 1:47 D. Murray lost ball out-of-bounds TURNOVER (6 TO) 107–121
Q4 1:59 S. Bey STEAL (2 STL) 107–121
Q4 1:59 C. Christie lost ball TURNOVER (1 TO) 107–121
Q4 2:03 I. Jackson STEAL (1 STL) 107–121
Q4 2:03 K. Matković bad pass TURNOVER (1 TO) 107–121
Q4 2:11 C. Christie running Layup (2 PTS) (B. Bogdanović 1 AST) 107–121

GAME ANALYSIS

KEEP READING

Create a free account and follow your team to get the full analysis every morning.

Create Free Account

Already have an account? Log in

PLAYER PERFORMANCE

NOP New Orleans Pelicans
S Trey Murphy III 39.7m
23
pts
7
reb
5
ast
Impact
+15.4

High-volume floor spacing forced the defense into impossible rotations, even if the perimeter efficiency was slightly uneven. He leveraged his length brilliantly on the other end, acting as a devastating free safety to rack up a +9.2 defensive impact. Those disruptive plays in the passing lanes consistently ignited the fast break.

Shooting
FG 7/17 (41.2%)
3PT 4/12 (33.3%)
FT 5/6 (83.3%)
Advanced
TS% 58.6%
USG% 22.8%
Net Rtg +11.1
+/- +9
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 39.7m
Scoring +15.0
Creation +2.2
Shot Making +5.0
Hustle +2.1
Defense +2.9
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 21
FGM Against 11
Opp FG% 52.4%
STL 3
BLK 1
TO 1
S Saddiq Bey 35.0m
25
pts
5
reb
4
ast
Impact
+18.2

Relentless perimeter volume stretched the defense to its breaking point and opened up driving lanes for teammates. He hunted his shot aggressively in transition, punishing late closeouts with a barrage of deep makes. This floor-spacing gravity, combined with sturdy wing defense (+5.0), drove a dominant overall rating.

Shooting
FG 10/21 (47.6%)
3PT 5/10 (50.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 59.5%
USG% 26.1%
Net Rtg +25.2
+/- +19
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 35.0m
Scoring +16.1
Creation +0.2
Shot Making +6.7
Hustle +6.3
Defense +3.2
Turnovers -4.7
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 12
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 41.7%
STL 2
BLK 0
TO 2
S Dejounte Murray 29.6m
17
pts
4
reb
11
ast
Impact
-2.7

A glittering playmaking line completely masked a disastrous floor-general performance riddled with careless live-ball giveaways. He repeatedly forced passes into tight pick-and-roll windows, fueling opponent transition runs that cratered his net rating. Despite hitting key perimeter shots, his inability to value the basketball bled massive value.

Shooting
FG 7/12 (58.3%)
3PT 3/7 (42.9%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 70.8%
USG% 26.5%
Net Rtg +14.8
+/- +9
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 29.6m
Scoring +13.1
Creation +2.4
Shot Making +5.0
Hustle +1.2
Defense +0.5
Turnovers -14.2
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 10
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 6
S Zion Williamson 27.7m
14
pts
4
reb
3
ast
Impact
+2.8

Unstoppable interior bullying was heavily mitigated by careless ball security in traffic. While he generated massive gravity every time he touched the paint, forced passes out of double-teams led to momentum-killing live-ball turnovers. The sheer efficiency of his rim attempts barely kept his net impact above water.

Shooting
FG 6/8 (75.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 78.8%
USG% 15.9%
Net Rtg +17.8
+/- +11
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 27.7m
Scoring +12.4
Creation +1.1
Shot Making +1.8
Hustle +2.2
Defense -1.4
Turnovers -3.5
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 12
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 41.7%
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 2
S Herbert Jones 26.3m
7
pts
3
reb
3
ast
Impact
+5.3

Absolute defensive mastery defined this performance, as he completely erased the opponent's primary creator from the game. His elite screen navigation and relentless ball pressure generated a massive +10.8 defensive rating. He didn't need offensive volume to dominate, relying instead on deflections and loose-ball recoveries (+5.8 hustle) to swing momentum.

Shooting
FG 2/4 (50.0%)
3PT 1/2 (50.0%)
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 71.7%
USG% 11.9%
Net Rtg +3.5
+/- +3
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 26.3m
Scoring +5.5
Creation +0.9
Shot Making +1.4
Hustle +2.8
Defense +11.2
Turnovers -5.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 7
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 57.1%
STL 5
BLK 0
TO 2
9
pts
8
reb
0
ast
Impact
+2.5

Active hands in drop coverage disrupted the opponent's pick-and-roll rhythm, yielding a strong +5.5 defensive rating. He consistently rolled hard to the rim, collapsing the defense and creating secondary scoring opportunities. This steady, mistake-free execution provided a reliable anchor for the second unit.

Shooting
FG 4/8 (50.0%)
3PT 1/3 (33.3%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 56.3%
USG% 14.8%
Net Rtg +42.0
+/- +21
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 25.2m
Scoring +5.3
Creation +0.7
Shot Making +1.1
Hustle +10.2
Defense -1.1
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 13
FGM Against 8
Opp FG% 61.5%
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 1
Derik Queen 19.4m
14
pts
2
reb
2
ast
Impact
+8.1

Relentless physicality in the paint allowed him to live at the foul line, driving a highly efficient scoring output. He consistently established deep post position, forcing the defense into costly rotation mistakes and hacking fouls. This brute-force approach yielded a massive positive impact without requiring heavy field goal volume.

Shooting
FG 2/4 (50.0%)
3PT 1/1 (100.0%)
FT 9/9 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 87.9%
USG% 15.4%
Net Rtg +10.0
+/- +4
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 19.4m
Scoring +12.7
Creation +3.0
Shot Making +1.1
Hustle +0.6
Defense +1.8
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 20
FGM Against 13
Opp FG% 65.0%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 0
Yves Missi 18.8m
4
pts
6
reb
1
ast
Impact
-4.4

Elite vertical spacing and intimidating rim protection anchored the interior during his minutes. He deterred multiple drives at the summit, translating into a robust +6.4 defensive metric that stifled the opponent's paint attacks. His willingness to do the dirty work on the glass provided crucial extra possessions.

Shooting
FG 2/3 (66.7%)
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 66.7%
USG% 8.7%
Net Rtg -23.9
+/- -7
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 18.8m
Scoring +3.0
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.6
Hustle +3.7
Defense +1.5
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 10
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 30.0%
STL 0
BLK 3
TO 1
11
pts
1
reb
3
ast
Impact
-4.8

Defensive miscommunications and poor closeouts negated a highly efficient shooting performance. Opponents actively targeted him in isolation, easily bypassing his initial pressure to collapse the defense. The resulting scramble situations bled points at a rate that his tidy offensive execution couldn't overcome.

Shooting
FG 4/6 (66.7%)
3PT 1/2 (50.0%)
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 79.9%
USG% 20.4%
Net Rtg +13.1
+/- +6
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 18.4m
Scoring +9.6
Creation +1.4
Shot Making +2.2
Hustle +1.3
Defense +0.0
Turnovers -7.1
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 9
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 44.4%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 3
LAC LA Clippers
S Brook Lopez 31.5m
11
pts
5
reb
4
ast
Impact
+0.1

A frigid night from the perimeter dragged his overall impact into the red despite excellent rim protection. He altered multiple shots in the paint to boost his defensive metrics (+4.2), but the empty possessions from deep stalled the offense. The spacing issues created by his missed trail threes ultimately neutralized his strong hustle plays.

Shooting
FG 5/12 (41.7%)
3PT 0/3 (0.0%)
FT 1/2 (50.0%)
Advanced
TS% 42.7%
USG% 18.1%
Net Rtg -24.4
+/- -14
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 31.5m
Scoring +4.9
Creation +1.0
Shot Making +1.5
Hustle +5.4
Defense -1.6
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 17
FGM Against 10
Opp FG% 58.8%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
4
pts
2
reb
3
ast
Impact
-7.2

Offensive invisibility completely tanked his overall rating, as missed perimeter looks created dead-end possessions. While his point-of-attack defense remained disruptive (+3.9), it couldn't mask the severe spacing issues he caused on the other end. Opponents actively sagged off him, bogging down the entire half-court scheme.

Shooting
FG 2/6 (33.3%)
3PT 0/3 (0.0%)
FT 0/2 (0.0%)
Advanced
TS% 29.1%
USG% 12.3%
Net Rtg -5.6
+/- -2
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 29.0m
Scoring -0.4
Creation +2.2
Shot Making +0.2
Hustle +2.5
Defense +1.3
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 6
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 2
BLK 0
TO 1
S Kawhi Leonard 29.0m
25
pts
8
reb
1
ast
Impact
+19.6

Elite shot selection fueled a highly efficient scoring night that anchored the half-court offense. His suffocating perimeter defense generated a massive +7.7 defensive impact rating, completely disrupting the opponent's primary actions. The combination of high-value perimeter makes and zero wasted possessions resulted in a dominant overall footprint.

Shooting
FG 9/12 (75.0%)
3PT 4/6 (66.7%)
FT 3/3 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 93.8%
USG% 27.0%
Net Rtg -17.2
+/- -10
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 29.0m
Scoring +22.8
Creation +1.9
Shot Making +6.2
Hustle +2.4
Defense +4.7
Turnovers -9.5
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 7
FGM Against 2
Opp FG% 28.6%
STL 2
BLK 0
TO 4
S Darius Garland 28.8m
13
pts
1
reb
6
ast
Impact
+3.4

Passive playmaking and a sharp drop in scoring volume kept his net impact hovering right around neutral. He navigated ball screens well to generate a +4.3 defensive rating, but failed to apply his usual rim pressure on offense. The lack of aggressive downhill drives allowed the defense to stay home on shooters.

Shooting
FG 6/12 (50.0%)
3PT 1/3 (33.3%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 54.2%
USG% 18.2%
Net Rtg -16.7
+/- -11
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 28.8m
Scoring +8.1
Creation +1.8
Shot Making +3.1
Hustle +0.3
Defense +0.8
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 11
FGM Against 7
Opp FG% 63.6%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 0
S John Collins 24.3m
18
pts
7
reb
2
ast
Impact
+10.5

Relentless interior finishing drove a massive box score impact despite coming up empty from beyond the arc. He consistently beat his man down the floor in transition, generating high-value looks at the rim. Strong hustle metrics (+3.5) compensated for a relatively quiet night on the defensive end.

Shooting
FG 6/11 (54.5%)
3PT 0/3 (0.0%)
FT 6/6 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 66.0%
USG% 28.0%
Net Rtg +7.6
+/- +1
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 24.3m
Scoring +13.5
Creation +1.9
Shot Making +1.5
Hustle +8.9
Defense -2.0
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 12
FGM Against 11
Opp FG% 91.7%
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 1
Kris Dunn 25.9m
6
pts
1
reb
3
ast
Impact
-12.2

Severe offensive limitations cratered his overall impact despite respectable perimeter defense. He struggled to initiate sets, leading to stagnant possessions and low-quality looks late in the shot clock. Even a pair of timely spot-up triples couldn't salvage a disastrous stint of half-court execution.

Shooting
FG 2/6 (33.3%)
3PT 2/4 (50.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 50.0%
USG% 12.3%
Net Rtg -22.9
+/- -11
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 25.9m
Scoring +2.7
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +1.8
Hustle +0.3
Defense -1.4
Turnovers -4.7
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 9
FGM Against 2
Opp FG% 22.2%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 2
13
pts
3
reb
1
ast
Impact
+8.6

Opportunistic cutting and decisive drives fueled a highly efficient offensive showing. He paired that smart shot selection with excellent weak-side defensive rotations (+5.5) to consistently blow up opponent actions. This two-way reliability provided a massive stabilizing presence for the second unit.

Shooting
FG 6/10 (60.0%)
3PT 1/2 (50.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 65.0%
USG% 19.0%
Net Rtg -28.4
+/- -15
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 23.4m
Scoring +9.8
Creation +0.1
Shot Making +3.2
Hustle +3.8
Defense +4.7
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 13
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 38.5%
STL 2
BLK 0
TO 1
10
pts
6
reb
1
ast
Impact
-2.0

Flawless finishing around the basket was completely undone by defensive lapses and likely foul trouble. He consistently lost his man in pick-and-roll coverage, bleeding points in the paint that negated his offensive efficiency. A lack of discipline on closeouts ultimately dragged his net score into the negative.

Shooting
FG 5/7 (71.4%)
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 71.4%
USG% 21.6%
Net Rtg -25.0
+/- -9
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 19.4m
Scoring +8.2
Creation +1.1
Shot Making +1.8
Hustle +7.6
Defense -0.6
Turnovers -9.5
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 9
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 55.6%
STL 1
BLK 1
TO 4
Kobe Sanders 14.6m
3
pts
2
reb
2
ast
Impact
-15.9

Disastrous shot selection and forced perimeter looks derailed the offense during his minutes. He consistently settled for contested jumpers early in the clock, fueling transition opportunities for the opponent. The resulting empty possessions completely overwhelmed his marginal hustle contributions.

Shooting
FG 1/6 (16.7%)
3PT 1/4 (25.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 25.0%
USG% 17.5%
Net Rtg -28.4
+/- -7
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 14.6m
Scoring -1.2
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +1.0
Hustle +0.6
Defense -1.6
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 4
FGM Against 2
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1
0
pts
1
reb
1
ast
Impact
-11.2

Complete offensive invisibility during his brief run left the floor unbalanced. He passed up open looks and failed to bend the defense, allowing opponents to overload the strong side. A lack of aggression essentially turned his minutes into a 4-on-5 scenario offensively.

Shooting
FG 0/1 (0.0%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 8.3%
Net Rtg +2.2
+/- +1
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 4.7m
Scoring -0.8
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +0.3
Defense +0.0
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 2
FGM Against 2
Opp FG% 100.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
2
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
-9.6

A brief, disjointed stint was marred by rushed perimeter attempts that failed to draw iron. He struggled to match the game's physicality, getting easily displaced on defensive switches. Those quick, empty offensive trips prevented the unit from establishing any rhythm.

Shooting
FG 1/3 (33.3%)
3PT 0/2 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 33.3%
USG% 25.0%
Net Rtg +2.2
+/- +1
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 4.7m
Scoring +0.4
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.6
Hustle +0.0
Defense +0.0
Turnovers +0.0
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
4
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
-5.6

Flawless execution in a micro-stint provided an immediate jolt of energy to the rotation. He capitalized on broken plays with decisive cuts to the rim, maximizing his limited touches. Active hands in the passing lanes (+2.3 defense) further amplified his brief but highly effective appearance.

Shooting
FG 2/2 (100.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 100.0%
USG% 25.0%
Net Rtg +2.2
+/- +1
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 4.7m
Scoring +4.0
Creation +0.1
Shot Making +0.9
Hustle +0.0
Defense +2.4
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 1
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 100.0%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 1