GSW

2025-26 Season

QUINTEN POST

Golden State Warriors | Center | 7-0
Quinten Post
7.7PPG
4.0RPG
1.4APG
17.3MPG
-3.1 Impact

Post produces at an below average rate for a 17-minute workload.

·
Embed this player card

Copy & paste this HTML into any page:

The widget updates automatically whenever our data does.

IMPACT BREAKDOWN
Every stat, every credit, every cost — per game average
-3.1
Scoring +6.7
Points Scored 7.7 PPG = +7.7
Missed Shots difficulty-adjusted = -2.9
Shot Making above expected FG% = +1.9
Creation +0.3
Assists & Self-Creation 1.4 AST/g + self-creation = +0.3
Turnovers -2.1
Turnovers 0.8/g (live + dead blend) = -2.1
Defense -0.7
Steals 0.4/g = +0.9
Blocks 0.5/g = +0.5
Fouls + context committed fouls, matchup adj = -2.1
Hustle & Effort +3.4
Rebounds 4.0 RPG (OREB + DREB) = +1.3
Contested Shots 6.1/g = +1.2
Deflections 0.6/g = +0.4
Charges Drawn 0.0/g = +0.0
Loose Balls 0.3/g = +0.2
Screen Assists 0.9/g = +0.3
Raw Impact +7.6
Baseline (game-average expected) −10.7
Net Impact
-3.1
24th pctl vs Centers

PBP Credit: Every play is analyzed from play-by-play data. Scorers get difficulty-adjusted credit, assisters get creation value based on the shot opportunity they created, and turnovers are classified by type. Shot difficulty is derived from 1M+ shots across 4 seasons. Full methodology

SKILL DNA

Percentile rank vs 93 Centers with 10+ games

Scoring 44th
8.4 PPG
Efficiency 18th
54.7% TS
Playmaking 52th
1.5 APG
Rebounding 25th
4.4 RPG
Defense 40th
+5.4/g
Hustle 27th
+13.0/g
Creation 19th
+1.67/g
Shot Making 65th
+5.93/g
TO Discipline 55th
0.05/min

THE SEASON SO FAR

Quinten Post's opening stretch of the season was defined by a chaotic tug-of-war between his tantalizing ceiling as a stretch-big and his glaring nightly inconsistency. He bounced erratically between the starting lineup and the deep bench, entirely dependent on whether his perimeter jumper was falling. When he found his rhythm, his floor-spacing transformed the offense. Look at his start on 11/05 vs PHX, where he drained four three-pointers and grabbed seven rebounds to post a stellar +10.5 impact score. The very next night on 11/06 vs SAC, his shot abandoned him completely; he missed all five field goal attempts, scored zero points, and cratered to a -9.7 impact score. Even his most productive box scores often concealed underlying flaws that limited his overall effectiveness. During his season-high 19-point performance on 11/20 vs MIA, Post registered a shockingly pedestrian +2.1 impact score because his sluggish defensive effort gave back nearly everything he generated on offense. To lock down a permanent rotation spot, he must find ways to impact winning on the nights his outside shot goes cold.

Quinten Post spent the middle of the season trapped in a frustratingly erratic rhythm, swinging wildly between floor-spacing asset and offensive liability. Take his 12/07 vs CLE performance, where he managed a near double-double with 12 points and 9 rebounds, yet still posted a -2.5 Impact because he clanked his way to a 5-for-14 shooting night that wasted valuable possessions. He found much better ways to contribute without forcing his shot on 12/23 vs ORL. Despite logging just 8 points on a rough 0-for-3 night from beyond the arc, Post generated a strong +5.9 Impact by doing the dirty work—hammering the glass for 12 boards and keeping the offense flowing with 4 assists. Unfortunately, those gritty, well-rounded efforts were too rare. He finally hit his absolute peak on 01/20 vs MIA, pairing 9 rebounds with 15 highly efficient points on 5-of-7 shooting to earn a massive +12.8 Impact score. When his outside stroke actually falls, he transforms from a spacing detriment into a highly effective frontcourt weapon.

Quinten Post's mid-season stretch was defined by maddening inconsistency, operating as a volatile big man whose value plummeted the moment his jumper stopped falling. When he forced the issue from the perimeter, the results were disastrous, perfectly illustrated on 03/09 vs UTA. In that start, a brutal 0-for-6 night from deep dragged him down to a -7.4 Impact score despite reaching 10 points. Yet, when he stopped shooting entirely, his hesitance crippled the offense just as badly. During a 20-minute stint on 03/05 vs HOU, Post attempted just two field goals. That passivity resulted in a staggering -15.8 Impact score, as his complete lack of scoring gravity allowed defenders to freely ignore him. He finally found his rhythm on 03/15 vs NYK, pouring in 22 points on 9-of-16 shooting. By confidently knocking down four triples and keeping the defense honest, he generated a +3.1 Impact score and looked like a legitimate rotation threat.

IMPACT TIMELINE

Game-by-game performance vs average. Green = above average, red = below.

PATTERNS

Inconsistent. Post has clear good-night/bad-night splits, with scoring swinging ~5 points between games. You're never quite sure which version shows up.

Middle-of-the-road efficiency — shoots 45%+ from the field in 47% of games. Not automatic, but not a problem either.

Defensive difference-maker. Post consistently forces tough shots and protects the rim — opponents shoot worse when he's guarding them.

MATCHUP HISTORY ⚠ Updated 46 days ago

Based on 74 games with tracking data. Shows who guarded this player on offense and who he guarded on defense, with their shooting stats in those matchups.

ON OFFENSE: WHO GUARDED HIM

His shooting stats against each primary defender this season

R. Gobert 87.6 poss
FG% 25.0%
3P% 25.0%
PPP 0.14
PTS 12
L. Markkanen 41.0 poss
FG% 25.0%
3P% 33.3%
PPP 0.07
PTS 3
D. Avdija 39.1 poss
FG% 66.7%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.13
PTS 5
K. Towns 36.7 poss
FG% 37.5%
3P% 40.0%
PPP 0.22
PTS 8
O. Ighodaro 36.1 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 20.0%
PPP 0.14
PTS 5
C. Holmgren 33.1 poss
FG% 40.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.12
PTS 4
O. Okongwu 32.6 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 25.0%
PPP 0.21
PTS 7
B. Adebayo 31.0 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.1
PTS 3
B. Ingram 30.3 poss
FG% 16.7%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.1
PTS 3
E. Mobley 30.1 poss
FG% 28.6%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.13
PTS 4

ON DEFENSE: WHO HE GUARDED

How opponents shot when he was the primary defender. Lower FG% = better defense.

R. Gobert 94.1 poss
FG% 77.8%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.16
PTS 15
M. Williams 59.0 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.08
PTS 5
D. Clingan 58.6 poss
FG% 83.3%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.2
PTS 12
E. Mobley 41.2 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.19
PTS 8
O. Ighodaro 40.5 poss
FG% 66.7%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.1
PTS 4
K. Filipowski 35.6 poss
FG% 40.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.2
PTS 7
B. Adebayo 35.3 poss
FG% 40.0%
3P% 33.3%
PPP 0.45
PTS 16
I. Zubac 32.4 poss
FG% 42.9%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.25
PTS 8
O. Okongwu 32.2 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 66.7%
PPP 0.25
PTS 8
C. Holmgren 32.0 poss
FG% 75.0%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.28
PTS 9

SEASON STATS

67
Games
7.7
PPG
4.0
RPG
1.4
APG
0.4
SPG
0.5
BPG
44.0
FG%
33.6
3P%
79.1
FT%
17.3
MPG

GAME LOG

67 games played