Interactive analysis

EXPLORE THE GAME

Every shot, every lead change, every rotation — visualized.

Lead over time · win-probability overlay
LEAD TRACKER
LAC lead ATL lead Win %
Every shot · colored by difficulty
SHOT CHART
Click shooters to compare their shots on the court
ATL 2P — 3P —
LAC 2P — 3P —
Tough make Easy make Blown miss Tough miss 166 attempts

ATL ATL Shot-making Δ

Johnson 7/16 -3.1
Krejčí Hard 9/13 +12.6
Porziņģis 5/12 -1.3
Risacher Hard 4/11 -1.4
Okongwu 4/10 -3.1
Kennard 3/9 -2.9
Daniels 3/9 -3.9
Wallace Hard 2/3 +2.2
Gueye Open 1/1 +0.6

LAC LAC Shot-making Δ

Harden Hard 12/23 +8.3
Collins 3/11 -5.0
Zubac 6/10 +2.0
Dunn 5/10 -0.2
Jones Jr. 3/8 -2.6
Christie Hard 1/7 -3.7
Lopez Hard 2/5 +2.2
Batum Hard 1/5 -2.7
Brown 3/3 +3.5
How the game was played
BY THE NUMBERS
ATL
LAC
38/84 Field Goals 36/82
45.2% Field Goal % 43.9%
13/34 3-Pointers 12/38
38.2% 3-Point % 31.6%
16/20 Free Throws 18/25
80.0% Free Throw % 72.0%
56.6% True Shooting % 54.8%
53 Total Rebounds 50
7 Offensive 11
34 Defensive 31
30 Assists 19
2.50 Assist/TO Ratio 1.58
11 Turnovers 11
7 Steals 7
8 Blocks 9
22 Fouls 14
44 Points in Paint 42
20 Fast Break Pts 4
20 Points off TOs 19
20 Second Chance Pts 13
47 Bench Points 23
10 Largest Lead 17
Biggest contributors
TOP NET IMPACT
1
James Harden
35 PTS · 10 REB · 11 AST · 38.8 MIN
+26.15
2
Vít Krejčí
28 PTS · 3 REB · 2 AST · 30.0 MIN
+24.98
3
Kristaps Porziņģis
20 PTS · 3 REB · 4 AST · 26.4 MIN
+16.97
4
Jalen Johnson
16 PTS · 10 REB · 8 AST · 34.8 MIN
+15.42
5
Derrick Jones Jr.
11 PTS · 2 REB · 2 AST · 33.3 MIN
+14.93
6
Kobe Brown
9 PTS · 2 REB · 0 AST · 15.5 MIN
+9.81
7
Kris Dunn
11 PTS · 2 REB · 0 AST · 36.4 MIN
+9.66
8
Ivica Zubac
13 PTS · 12 REB · 1 AST · 30.1 MIN
+9.51
9
Luke Kennard
7 PTS · 4 REB · 2 AST · 20.1 MIN
+6.81
10
John Collins
9 PTS · 7 REB · 0 AST · 31.4 MIN
+6.51
Play-by-play (most recent first)
PLAY FEED
Q4 0:04 M. Gueye REBOUND (Off:0 Def:3) 105–102
Q4 0:06 V. Krejčí BLOCK (1 BLK) 105–102
Q4 0:06 MISS N. Batum 26' running 3PT - blocked 105–102
Q4 0:08 I. Zubac REBOUND (Off:3 Def:9) 105–102
Q4 0:10 MISS Z. Risacher Free Throw 2 of 2 105–102
Q4 0:10 TEAM offensive REBOUND 105–102
Q4 0:10 MISS Z. Risacher Free Throw 1 of 2 105–102
Q4 0:10 K. Dunn personal FOUL (3 PF) (Risacher 2 FT) 105–102
Q4 0:10 Z. Risacher REBOUND (Off:0 Def:5) 105–102
Q4 0:11 MISS J. Harden 34' running pullup 3PT 105–102
Q4 0:17 D. Jones Jr. STEAL (2 STL) 105–102
Q4 0:17 Z. Risacher lost ball TURNOVER (2 TO) 105–102
Q4 0:25 J. Harden Free Throw 1 of 1 (35 PTS) 105–102
Q4 0:25 V. Krejčí shooting personal FOUL (2 PF) (Harden 1 FT) 105–101
Q4 0:25 J. Harden 26' 3PT (34 PTS) 105–101

GAME ANALYSIS

KEEP READING

Create a free account and follow your team to get the full analysis every morning.

Create Free Account

Already have an account? Log in

PLAYER PERFORMANCE

LAC LA Clippers
S James Harden 38.8m
35
pts
10
reb
11
ast
Impact
+26.1

Operating as the ultimate offensive engine, his high-volume shot creation and playmaking fueled a dominant +10.7 impact score. He broke out of a recent scoring lull by punishing defensive drop coverages, while surprisingly adding strong defensive value (+5.8) on the other end.

Shooting
FG 12/23 (52.2%)
3PT 6/14 (42.9%)
FT 5/6 (83.3%)
Advanced
TS% 68.3%
USG% 35.6%
Net Rtg 0.0
+/- 0
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 38.8m
Scoring +25.8
Creation +1.7
Shot Making +8.8
Hustle +11.7
Defense +1.0
Turnovers -14.2
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 16
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 25.0%
STL 0
BLK 2
TO 6
S Kris Dunn 36.4m
11
pts
2
reb
0
ast
Impact
+1.7

Despite a massive scoring jump compared to his recent slump, hidden costs during his minutes dragged his total impact to -4.3. His trademark point-of-attack defense (+4.3) was present, but the team bled points during his specific rotation stretches.

Shooting
FG 5/10 (50.0%)
3PT 1/4 (25.0%)
FT 0/1 (0.0%)
Advanced
TS% 52.7%
USG% 12.3%
Net Rtg +18.6
+/- +13
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 36.4m
Scoring +6.6
Creation +0.1
Shot Making +2.7
Hustle +0.6
Defense +3.1
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 7
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 42.9%
STL 2
BLK 1
TO 0
11
pts
2
reb
2
ast
Impact
+6.3

Defensive disruption (+6.9) and a sudden scoring surge compared to his recent slump fueled a solid +2.7 overall rating. While missed perimeter shots capped his offensive ceiling, his athleticism on the wing consistently blew up opponent sets.

Shooting
FG 3/8 (37.5%)
3PT 0/2 (0.0%)
FT 5/6 (83.3%)
Advanced
TS% 51.7%
USG% 14.3%
Net Rtg +6.3
+/- +3
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 33.3m
Scoring +6.8
Creation +1.8
Shot Making +1.2
Hustle +2.5
Defense +5.2
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 7
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 42.9%
STL 2
BLK 1
TO 0
S John Collins 31.4m
9
pts
7
reb
0
ast
Impact
+1.2

A sudden and sharp drop in shooting efficiency ended his recent hot streak, dragging his total impact down to -3.5. Strong hustle metrics (+4.5) showed he was still working hard, but forcing bad looks from the perimeter ultimately hurt the offense.

Shooting
FG 3/11 (27.3%)
3PT 1/6 (16.7%)
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 37.9%
USG% 16.2%
Net Rtg 0.0
+/- 0
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 31.4m
Scoring +2.5
Creation +0.6
Shot Making +1.6
Hustle +8.9
Defense -0.9
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 12
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 41.7%
STL 1
BLK 1
TO 0
S Ivica Zubac 30.1m
13
pts
12
reb
1
ast
Impact
+6.8

Efficient interior finishing and disciplined rim protection (+5.3) anchored his positive +0.8 impact score. He provided a steady, reliable presence in the paint without forcing bad shots or turning the ball over.

Shooting
FG 6/10 (60.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 1/4 (25.0%)
Advanced
TS% 55.3%
USG% 20.3%
Net Rtg +1.8
+/- +1
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 30.1m
Scoring +8.8
Creation +0.4
Shot Making +2.9
Hustle +14.3
Defense -3.7
Turnovers -4.7
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 11
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 36.4%
STL 0
BLK 2
TO 2
2
pts
4
reb
0
ast
Impact
-8.8

Offensive passivity and missed perimeter looks compounded his recent shooting woes, resulting in a poor -5.0 total impact. His veteran defensive positioning (+4.4) remains solid, but failing to punish defenses for leaving him open stalled the offense.

Shooting
FG 1/5 (20.0%)
3PT 0/3 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 20.0%
USG% 12.8%
Net Rtg -2.6
+/- -4
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 19.6m
Scoring -1.0
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.6
Hustle +1.2
Defense +2.9
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 7
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 71.4%
STL 1
BLK 1
TO 0
Cam Christie 18.4m
3
pts
3
reb
3
ast
Impact
-8.9

Continuing a brutal shooting slump, his inability to convert on offense created a severe -4.3 drag on the team. He competed hard on the defensive end (+3.7), but his current lack of scoring touch makes him an offensive liability.

Shooting
FG 1/7 (14.3%)
3PT 1/4 (25.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 21.4%
USG% 17.5%
Net Rtg -30.8
+/- -12
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 18.4m
Scoring -1.1
Creation +0.8
Shot Making +0.9
Hustle +0.9
Defense +0.8
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 8
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 0
Brook Lopez 16.6m
9
pts
0
reb
2
ast
Impact
-11.6

Opponents clearly exploited his lack of mobility in the pick-and-roll, leading to a negative defensive rating (-0.6) that tanked his overall impact to -6.5. While he hit a couple of outside shots, his inability to protect the perimeter during his short stint proved costly.

Shooting
FG 2/5 (40.0%)
3PT 2/4 (50.0%)
FT 3/4 (75.0%)
Advanced
TS% 66.6%
USG% 27.8%
Net Rtg -11.4
+/- -4
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 16.6m
Scoring +6.3
Creation +0.7
Shot Making +1.9
Hustle +0.0
Defense -1.1
Turnovers -7.8
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 14
FGM Against 6
Opp FG% 42.9%
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 3
Kobe Brown 15.5m
9
pts
2
reb
0
ast
Impact
-0.4

Perfect shooting execution maximized his limited floor time, driving a highly efficient +6.6 overall impact. He capitalized on every single offensive touch, extending a streak of highly efficient performances with excellent shot selection.

Shooting
FG 3/3 (100.0%)
3PT 1/1 (100.0%)
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 116.0%
USG% 12.5%
Net Rtg -37.1
+/- -12
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 15.5m
Scoring +9.0
Creation +0.4
Shot Making +1.4
Hustle +1.6
Defense -0.3
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 11
FGM Against 8
Opp FG% 72.7%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
ATL Atlanta Hawks
S Dyson Daniels 38.6m
6
pts
3
reb
8
ast
Impact
-2.3

Elite defensive metrics (+8.7) and relentless hustle plays were completely undermined by a sharp regression in his offensive execution. Clanking crucial shots and failing to connect from deep resulted in a -4.4 total impact, a stark contrast to his recent highly efficient stretch.

Shooting
FG 3/9 (33.3%)
3PT 0/2 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 33.3%
USG% 15.1%
Net Rtg +1.6
+/- 0
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 38.6m
Scoring +1.4
Creation +0.9
Shot Making +1.1
Hustle +2.8
Defense +6.7
Turnovers -5.7
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 20
FGM Against 8
Opp FG% 40.0%
STL 3
BLK 1
TO 4
S Jalen Johnson 34.8m
16
pts
10
reb
8
ast
Impact
+5.7

A noticeable cooling off from his recent scoring tear left his overall impact hovering just above neutral (+0.4). Missed perimeter attempts and a dip in overall efficiency limited his offensive ceiling, though steady defensive rotations prevented a negative rating.

Shooting
FG 7/16 (43.8%)
3PT 0/3 (0.0%)
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 47.4%
USG% 23.7%
Net Rtg +4.5
+/- +3
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 34.8m
Scoring +9.3
Creation +2.5
Shot Making +2.2
Hustle +3.0
Defense -0.3
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 10
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 1
BLK 1
TO 1
11
pts
5
reb
0
ast
Impact
-4.5

Despite a scoring bump compared to recent outings, poor shooting efficiency dragged his overall impact deeply into the red (-7.3). His strong defensive metrics (+7.2) and active hustle plays showed excellent engagement, but clunky shot selection ultimately outweighed his off-ball contributions.

Shooting
FG 4/11 (36.4%)
3PT 2/6 (33.3%)
FT 1/4 (25.0%)
Advanced
TS% 43.1%
USG% 21.7%
Net Rtg -1.9
+/- 0
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 31.0m
Scoring +4.5
Creation +0.2
Shot Making +3.0
Hustle +1.5
Defense +3.4
Turnovers -4.7
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 16
FGM Against 8
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 1
BLK 2
TO 2
20
pts
3
reb
4
ast
Impact
+9.0

Elite hustle (+5.7) and an ability to consistently generate interior offense drove a dominant +12.9 overall rating. Even with a cold night from beyond the arc, his knack for securing extra possessions masked the perimeter inefficiency.

Shooting
FG 5/12 (41.7%)
3PT 1/5 (20.0%)
FT 9/9 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 62.7%
USG% 28.1%
Net Rtg -28.0
+/- -14
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 26.4m
Scoring +14.9
Creation +2.5
Shot Making +2.7
Hustle +3.8
Defense -3.8
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 16
FGM Against 9
Opp FG% 56.2%
STL 0
BLK 3
TO 0
S Keaton Wallace 24.3m
5
pts
4
reb
1
ast
Impact
-10.0

Low offensive volume and negative defensive value (-0.1) caused his overall impact to plummet to -8.5 during his rotation minutes. While he saw a slight uptick in scoring compared to recent games, his inability to disrupt opponents on the perimeter bled points.

Shooting
FG 2/3 (66.7%)
3PT 1/2 (50.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 83.3%
USG% 7.4%
Net Rtg -14.6
+/- -8
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 24.3m
Scoring +4.2
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +1.5
Hustle +1.2
Defense -3.4
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 10
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1
28
pts
3
reb
2
ast
Impact
+19.6

An absolute flamethrower from beyond the arc, his elite shot selection and near-perfect execution drove a massive +12.8 impact. His ability to punish defensive rotations with lethal perimeter efficiency single-handedly tilted the game's momentum.

Shooting
FG 9/13 (69.2%)
3PT 8/10 (80.0%)
FT 2/3 (66.7%)
Advanced
TS% 97.8%
USG% 19.7%
Net Rtg +26.5
+/- +18
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 30.0m
Scoring +24.6
Creation +0.4
Shot Making +7.8
Hustle +0.9
Defense -2.6
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 11
FGM Against 6
Opp FG% 54.5%
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 0
10
pts
6
reb
3
ast
Impact
+2.1

Forcing uncharacteristic perimeter shots dragged his overall impact slightly into the red (-1.1). Solid interior defense (+3.0) and decent hustle kept the damage minimal, but his lack of finishing touch compared to recent outings stalled the offense.

Shooting
FG 4/10 (40.0%)
3PT 0/3 (0.0%)
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 46.0%
USG% 19.0%
Net Rtg +28.3
+/- +15
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 26.4m
Scoring +5.8
Creation +1.3
Shot Making +1.5
Hustle +7.6
Defense -2.2
Turnovers -1.1
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 11
FGM Against 2
Opp FG% 18.2%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1
Luke Kennard 20.1m
7
pts
4
reb
2
ast
Impact
-1.3

Usually a reliable floor spacer, an inability to convert open looks tanked his overall value to -1.7. The poor shooting efficiency completely negated his surprisingly positive defensive contributions (+2.2) during his stint.

Shooting
FG 3/9 (33.3%)
3PT 1/3 (33.3%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 38.9%
USG% 19.6%
Net Rtg -7.1
+/- -1
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 20.1m
Scoring +2.2
Creation +0.8
Shot Making +2.0
Hustle +5.1
Defense +2.1
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 8
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 37.5%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 1
2
pts
3
reb
2
ast
Impact
-11.2

Extremely low volume during a brief rotation stint resulted in a nearly neutral -0.4 impact score. He executed perfectly on his lone offensive touch, but simply didn't log enough floor time to generate meaningful momentum.

Shooting
FG 1/1 (100.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 100.0%
USG% 8.0%
Net Rtg -0.5
+/- +2
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 8.5m
Scoring +2.0
Creation +0.1
Shot Making +0.1
Hustle +0.9
Defense +0.2
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 1
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 100.0%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 1