GAME ANALYSIS

KEEP READING

Create a free account and follow your team to get the full analysis every morning.

Create Free Account

Already have an account? Log in

Share Post

PLAYER PERFORMANCE

UTA Utah Jazz
S Lauri Markkanen 33.5m
20
pts
6
reb
5
ast
Impact
+16.5

Torched closeouts with decisive drives and lethal off-ball movement that constantly bent the defense. While his scoring efficiency was elite, a handful of missed defensive assignments on the weak side kept his overall impact from reaching dominant levels.

Shooting
FG 8/13 (61.5%)
3PT 4/7 (57.1%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 76.9%
USG% 17.7%
Net Rtg +28.4
+/- +19
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 33.5m
Scoring +16.3
Creation +1.4
Shot Making +5.4
Hustle +5.7
Defense +0.0
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 13
FGM Against 7
Opp FG% 53.8%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1
S Keyonte George 29.9m
16
pts
2
reb
9
ast
Impact
+5.5

Racked up assists through aggressive drive-and-kick sequences, but gave much of that value back with poor perimeter shot selection. Forcing contested threes derailed offensive momentum and ultimately dragged his overall impact into negative territory.

Shooting
FG 6/12 (50.0%)
3PT 1/7 (14.3%)
FT 3/4 (75.0%)
Advanced
TS% 58.1%
USG% 25.4%
Net Rtg +29.1
+/- +18
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 29.9m
Scoring +10.9
Creation +3.2
Shot Making +3.3
Hustle +0.6
Defense +4.4
Turnovers -7.1
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 9
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 55.6%
STL 2
BLK 0
TO 3
S Walker Kessler 28.7m
22
pts
9
reb
4
ast
Impact
+22.1

Delivered an absolute masterclass in two-way efficiency, pairing perfect shooting with suffocating rim protection. His ability to unexpectedly pop for trailing threes completely scrambled the opposing frontcourt, driving a massive positive impact.

Shooting
FG 7/7 (100.0%)
3PT 2/2 (100.0%)
FT 6/8 (75.0%)
Advanced
TS% 104.6%
USG% 19.0%
Net Rtg +26.2
+/- +13
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 28.7m
Scoring +21.0
Creation +1.3
Shot Making +3.8
Hustle +5.6
Defense +2.7
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 18
FGM Against 11
Opp FG% 61.1%
STL 2
BLK 4
TO 1
S Kyle Filipowski 24.5m
9
pts
4
reb
5
ast
Impact
-3.5

Snapped a hot shooting streak by forcing heavily contested perimeter looks early in the shot clock. His struggles to stretch the floor allowed the defense to pack the paint, stalling the offense and resulting in a negative net rating.

Shooting
FG 4/10 (40.0%)
3PT 1/6 (16.7%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 45.0%
USG% 17.5%
Net Rtg +15.2
+/- +7
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 24.5m
Scoring +4.4
Creation +0.7
Shot Making +1.5
Hustle +5.1
Defense -4.8
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 11
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 45.5%
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 0
S Svi Mykhailiuk 24.4m
9
pts
1
reb
3
ast
Impact
+3.9

Punished defensive lapses with deadly catch-and-shoot precision from the corners. His value was further amplified by exceptional hustle, frequently winning loose balls to extend crucial offensive possessions.

Shooting
FG 3/4 (75.0%)
3PT 3/4 (75.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 112.5%
USG% 7.1%
Net Rtg +44.6
+/- +20
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 24.4m
Scoring +8.2
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +2.9
Hustle +0.3
Defense +2.4
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 12
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 25.0%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 0
20
pts
4
reb
2
ast
Impact
+7.2

Maintained his recent scoring groove by aggressively attacking closeouts and finishing through contact. His decisive shot-making provided a reliable release valve for the offense, even if his defensive rotations were occasionally a step slow.

Shooting
FG 7/13 (53.8%)
3PT 3/7 (42.9%)
FT 3/3 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 69.8%
USG% 28.8%
Net Rtg +21.0
+/- +8
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 22.7m
Scoring +15.2
Creation +0.7
Shot Making +5.1
Hustle +1.2
Defense -2.9
Turnovers -1.1
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 8
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 37.5%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 1
Ace Bailey 20.2m
2
pts
4
reb
2
ast
Impact
-11.3

Looked completely out of sync offensively, halting ball movement and driving into crowded paint areas. The resulting empty possessions and live-ball turnovers fueled opponent transition breaks, resulting in a disastrous net rating.

Shooting
FG 1/5 (20.0%)
3PT 0/2 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 20.0%
USG% 12.5%
Net Rtg +9.2
+/- +5
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 20.2m
Scoring -0.8
Creation +0.7
Shot Making +0.2
Hustle +4.1
Defense -1.6
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 8
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 62.5%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1
13
pts
6
reb
0
ast
Impact
+4.4

Bounced back from a recent slump by taking what the defense gave him and knocking down open looks in rhythm. His disciplined verticality at the rim deterred several driving attempts, providing solid two-way value.

Shooting
FG 4/6 (66.7%)
3PT 2/3 (66.7%)
FT 3/4 (75.0%)
Advanced
TS% 83.8%
USG% 21.3%
Net Rtg +9.8
+/- +4
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 18.7m
Scoring +10.9
Creation +0.7
Shot Making +2.4
Hustle +3.7
Defense +2.6
Turnovers -4.7
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 6
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 1
BLK 1
TO 2
10
pts
6
reb
5
ast
Impact
+4.8

Injected pace into the second unit by aggressively pushing the ball in transition and finding cutters. His active hands at the point of attack disrupted opposing ball-handlers, driving a highly efficient two-way performance.

Shooting
FG 4/8 (50.0%)
3PT 1/3 (33.3%)
FT 1/1 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 59.2%
USG% 21.7%
Net Rtg +7.7
+/- +3
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 18.1m
Scoring +7.5
Creation +1.0
Shot Making +2.5
Hustle +6.7
Defense +2.9
Turnovers -4.7
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 4
FGM Against 2
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 2
BLK 0
TO 2
8
pts
4
reb
3
ast
Impact
+2.4

Anchored the drop coverage effectively, using his massive frame to seal off driving lanes and control the defensive glass. Although his attempts to stretch the floor fell flat, his physical screens freed up guards for clean downhill attacks.

Shooting
FG 4/9 (44.4%)
3PT 0/3 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 44.4%
USG% 23.8%
Net Rtg +27.0
+/- +9
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 16.9m
Scoring +4.0
Creation +0.7
Shot Making +1.7
Hustle +4.1
Defense +4.1
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 12
FGM Against 6
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 2
BLK 0
TO 1
0
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
-3.5

Barely broke a sweat during a fleeting appearance at the end of the rotation. Failed to register any meaningful impact as the game flow largely bypassed him during garbage time.

Shooting
FG 0/0
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 0.0%
Net Rtg -20.0
+/- -1
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 2.4m
Scoring +5.4
Creation +0.7
Shot Making +1.5
Hustle +2.9
Defense -1.7
Turnovers -2.6
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
LAC LA Clippers
S James Harden 29.2m
15
pts
2
reb
11
ast
Impact
+1.7

Heavy reliance on contested step-back threes yielded poor efficiency and disrupted the team's offensive flow. Although his elite court vision produced high-value assists, the sheer volume of empty possessions and defensive indifference offset his playmaking contributions.

Shooting
FG 5/12 (41.7%)
3PT 2/9 (22.2%)
FT 3/4 (75.0%)
Advanced
TS% 54.5%
USG% 24.2%
Net Rtg -38.1
+/- -21
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 29.2m
Scoring +9.2
Creation +2.3
Shot Making +3.3
Hustle +0.6
Defense -1.6
Turnovers -4.7
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 7
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 71.4%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 2
S Kawhi Leonard 29.1m
10
pts
4
reb
2
ast
Impact
+0.5

A heavy volume of clanked perimeter jumpers stalled the offense and allowed the opponent to leak out in transition. While his active hands generated deflections and solid defensive metrics, his inability to find a rhythm as a primary creator resulted in a surprisingly negative net rating.

Shooting
FG 3/9 (33.3%)
3PT 1/5 (20.0%)
FT 3/3 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 48.4%
USG% 18.2%
Net Rtg -42.4
+/- -25
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 29.1m
Scoring +5.5
Creation +0.8
Shot Making +2.0
Hustle +4.1
Defense +1.0
Turnovers -4.7
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 14
FGM Against 8
Opp FG% 57.1%
STL 1
BLK 1
TO 2
S Ivica Zubac 27.2m
19
pts
7
reb
3
ast
Impact
+15.9

Dominated the interior with excellent rim-running and highly efficient finishing in the pick-and-roll. His massive box score impact was slightly tempered by a few defensive miscommunications, but he consistently punished mismatches in the paint to anchor the frontline.

Shooting
FG 9/13 (69.2%)
3PT 0/0
FT 1/1 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 70.7%
USG% 24.6%
Net Rtg -38.2
+/- -21
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 27.2m
Scoring +16.2
Creation +1.6
Shot Making +3.4
Hustle +8.9
Defense +0.5
Turnovers -4.7
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 11
FGM Against 9
Opp FG% 81.8%
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 2
S Bradley Beal 20.2m
5
pts
1
reb
0
ast
Impact
-9.3

Faded into the background offensively, failing to assert himself or create separation against physical perimeter defense. A lack of playmaking and a handful of costly live-ball turnovers completely tanked his overall value despite decent hustle metrics.

Shooting
FG 2/5 (40.0%)
3PT 1/4 (25.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 50.0%
USG% 14.6%
Net Rtg -16.4
+/- -9
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 20.2m
Scoring +2.5
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +1.5
Hustle +0.3
Defense -1.4
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 8
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 1
12
pts
1
reb
1
ast
Impact
-1.0

Impact was dragged into the red by poor off-ball awareness, repeatedly losing his man on backdoor cuts. This defensive leakage completely negated the value of his unexpected scoring burst and highly efficient finishing around the rim.

Shooting
FG 5/7 (71.4%)
3PT 1/3 (33.3%)
FT 1/2 (50.0%)
Advanced
TS% 76.1%
USG% 21.1%
Net Rtg -26.6
+/- -12
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 17.7m
Scoring +9.9
Creation +1.2
Shot Making +2.1
Hustle +1.3
Defense -3.2
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 4
FGM Against 0
Opp FG% 0.0%
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 1
John Collins 27.9m
14
pts
7
reb
1
ast
Impact
+10.1

Provided a crucial two-way spark by contesting shots at the rim and securing contested rebounds in traffic. His continued streak of efficient scoring was complemented by sharp weak-side defensive rotations that stymied opponent drives.

Shooting
FG 6/12 (50.0%)
3PT 1/2 (50.0%)
FT 1/2 (50.0%)
Advanced
TS% 54.3%
USG% 21.7%
Net Rtg +4.2
+/- 0
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 27.9m
Scoring +8.7
Creation +0.4
Shot Making +2.8
Hustle +8.9
Defense +3.0
Turnovers -3.5
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 13
FGM Against 7
Opp FG% 53.8%
STL 1
BLK 2
TO 2
Kris Dunn 22.1m
0
pts
5
reb
1
ast
Impact
-10.2

An absolute zero on the offensive end who allowed defenders to completely sag off and clog the driving lanes. While his point-of-attack defense and hustle remained characteristically disruptive, his inability to generate any scoring gravity severely handicapped the half-court offense.

Shooting
FG 0/3 (0.0%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 9.4%
Net Rtg -39.8
+/- -20
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 22.1m
Scoring -2.2
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +4.4
Defense +2.4
Turnovers -4.7
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 11
FGM Against 6
Opp FG% 54.5%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 2
Brook Lopez 17.0m
15
pts
3
reb
0
ast
Impact
+1.9

Settled almost exclusively for pick-and-pop triples, which stretched the floor but left the team vulnerable on the offensive glass. His rim protection was adequate, yet a failure to punish switches inside limited his overall effectiveness.

Shooting
FG 5/12 (41.7%)
3PT 5/11 (45.5%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 62.5%
USG% 34.1%
Net Rtg -14.8
+/- -6
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 17.0m
Scoring +9.8
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +4.8
Hustle +3.8
Defense -0.8
Turnovers -5.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 7
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 42.9%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 2
Chris Paul 15.0m
4
pts
1
reb
4
ast
Impact
-7.1

Looked a step slow navigating screens, resulting in compromised defensive positioning and forced rotations. His uncharacteristic struggles to organize the offense and create clean looks led to stagnant possessions that dragged down his net impact.

Shooting
FG 1/5 (20.0%)
3PT 1/4 (25.0%)
FT 1/1 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 36.8%
USG% 16.2%
Net Rtg -20.0
+/- -6
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 15.0m
Scoring +1.0
Creation +0.2
Shot Making +0.9
Hustle +1.3
Defense +1.8
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 6
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 1
3
pts
2
reb
1
ast
Impact
-9.2

Hesitant to pull the trigger on open looks, which bogged down ball movement and allowed the defense to reset. Despite making a few veteran reads in the passing lanes, his lack of offensive aggression rendered him a liability during his stint.

Shooting
FG 1/4 (25.0%)
3PT 1/4 (25.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 37.5%
USG% 10.5%
Net Rtg -45.2
+/- -14
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 15.0m
Scoring +0.6
Creation +0.7
Shot Making +0.9
Hustle +0.6
Defense -0.9
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 3
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 33.3%
STL 1
BLK 1
TO 0
5
pts
2
reb
1
ast
Impact
-2.9

Found ways to contribute positively despite a rough shooting night by making quick, decisive extra passes to keep the offense humming. His disciplined closeouts on the perimeter prevented easy catch-and-shoot opportunities, keeping his net impact marginally in the green.

Shooting
FG 1/4 (25.0%)
3PT 1/2 (50.0%)
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 51.2%
USG% 23.8%
Net Rtg +85.2
+/- +11
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 8.2m
Scoring +3.0
Creation +0.4
Shot Making +1.0
Hustle +2.5
Defense +0.0
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 1
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 100.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
4
pts
1
reb
0
ast
Impact
-5.1

Showed soft hands as a roll man, converting his lone opportunity in the paint with authority. Managed to hold his ground in post-up situations, offering a brief but stable interior presence.

Shooting
FG 1/1 (100.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 2/4 (50.0%)
Advanced
TS% 72.5%
USG% 30.0%
Net Rtg +85.7
+/- +6
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 3.9m
Scoring +3.0
Creation +0.4
Shot Making +0.1
Hustle +1.3
Defense +0.0
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 2
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
Kobe Brown 3.9m
2
pts
1
reb
2
ast
Impact
-6.9

Operated as an effective offensive connector during a short stint, facilitating seamless ball reversals. His quick decision-making against zone coverages helped generate high-quality looks for teammates, maximizing his limited floor time.

Shooting
FG 0/0
3PT 0/0
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 113.6%
USG% 10.0%
Net Rtg +85.7
+/- +6
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 3.9m
Scoring +2.0
Creation +1.1
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +1.3
Defense +0.0
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 2
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
0
pts
1
reb
1
ast
Impact
-9.6

Made his brief minutes count entirely on the defensive end by applying relentless ball pressure and blowing up dribble handoffs. Even without registering in the scoring column, his high-energy defensive rotations provided a noticeable jolt to the second unit.

Shooting
FG 0/1 (0.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 10.0%
Net Rtg +85.7
+/- +6
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 3.9m
Scoring -0.6
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +0.3
Defense +2.4
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 1
FGM Against 0
Opp FG% 0.0%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 0