GAME ANALYSIS

PLAYER PERFORMANCE

GSW Golden State Warriors
22
pts
7
reb
3
ast
Impact
+0.8

High-volume creation was heavily taxed by loose ball security and costly live-ball turnovers. He generated fantastic looks through sheer hustle (+5.5) and clever pacing, but frequently gave the advantage right back. A chaotic, high-variance performance where the brilliant moments barely outpaced the mistakes.

Shooting
FG 9/18 (50.0%)
3PT 3/6 (50.0%)
FT 1/2 (50.0%)
Advanced
TS% 58.3%
USG% 22.0%
Net Rtg -15.7
+/- -13
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 37.0m
Offense +13.3
Hustle +5.5
Defense +3.2
Raw total +22.0
Avg player in 37.0m -21.2
Impact +0.8
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 16
FGM Against 6
Opp FG% 37.5%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 2
S Draymond Green 31.4m
4
pts
2
reb
6
ast
Impact
-15.8

Offensive spacing evaporated completely as opponents aggressively dared him to shoot from deep. The resulting clanks fueled transition opportunities the other way, severely damaging his overall impact (-15.8). While his vocal leadership and rotational defense remained intact, the offensive liability was simply too much to overcome.

Shooting
FG 1/5 (20.0%)
3PT 1/5 (20.0%)
FT 1/2 (50.0%)
Advanced
TS% 34.0%
USG% 12.0%
Net Rtg -28.6
+/- -18
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 31.4m
Offense -3.4
Hustle +3.8
Defense +1.7
Raw total +2.1
Avg player in 31.4m -17.9
Impact -15.8
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 11
FGM Against 7
Opp FG% 63.6%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 3
S Al Horford 27.1m
17
pts
6
reb
3
ast
Impact
+4.2

Stretched the floor beautifully as a trail big, punishing drop coverages with deadly pick-and-pop execution. His veteran savvy showed up in timely closeouts and intelligent positional defense. A masterclass in maximizing angles and spacing to generate positive value.

Shooting
FG 5/11 (45.5%)
3PT 4/8 (50.0%)
FT 3/5 (60.0%)
Advanced
TS% 64.4%
USG% 20.0%
Net Rtg -24.4
+/- -15
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 27.1m
Offense +14.3
Hustle +3.1
Defense +2.3
Raw total +19.7
Avg player in 27.1m -15.5
Impact +4.2
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 13
FGM Against 6
Opp FG% 46.2%
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 0
7
pts
4
reb
2
ast
Impact
-15.8

Shot selection was borderline catastrophic, repeatedly forcing contested floaters and off-balance jumpers early in the clock. This offensive black hole completely short-circuited the team's half-court rhythm. The inability to contain dribble penetration on the other end compounded a disastrous outing.

Shooting
FG 3/14 (21.4%)
3PT 1/7 (14.3%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 25.0%
USG% 23.2%
Net Rtg -30.1
+/- -16
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 27.1m
Offense -1.7
Hustle +1.5
Defense -0.1
Raw total -0.3
Avg player in 27.1m -15.5
Impact -15.8
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 7
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 71.4%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 2
S Moses Moody 25.1m
10
pts
3
reb
1
ast
Impact
+0.1

A horrific perimeter shooting night nearly erased his otherwise stellar defensive contributions. He salvaged his overall impact by relentlessly crashing the glass and blowing up passing lanes (+6.3 defense). The constant two-way motor kept him afloat despite the bricklaying on offense.

Shooting
FG 4/12 (33.3%)
3PT 2/8 (25.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 41.7%
USG% 22.4%
Net Rtg +2.0
+/- -1
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 25.1m
Offense +3.2
Hustle +4.9
Defense +6.3
Raw total +14.4
Avg player in 25.1m -14.3
Impact +0.1
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 11
FGM Against 2
Opp FG% 18.2%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 1
Gui Santos 31.0m
5
pts
10
reb
3
ast
Impact
-0.1

Generated massive defensive value (+9.7) by completely shutting down the wings and securing tough contested rebounds. However, his total inability to finish around the rim or knock down open looks neutralized his elite energy plays. A classic case of world-class effort being undone by a lack of offensive polish.

Shooting
FG 2/8 (25.0%)
3PT 1/3 (33.3%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 31.3%
USG% 13.0%
Net Rtg -2.5
+/- -5
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 31.0m
Offense +1.8
Hustle +6.2
Defense +9.7
Raw total +17.7
Avg player in 31.0m -17.8
Impact -0.1
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 16
FGM Against 10
Opp FG% 62.5%
STL 3
BLK 0
TO 2
18
pts
2
reb
2
ast
Impact
+10.6

Capitalized on every defensive rotation by knocking down spot-up daggers with machine-like precision. He played with tremendous pace, attacking closeouts decisively without over-dribbling. A highly impactful two-way shift defined by elite shot quality and disciplined defensive closeouts.

Shooting
FG 5/8 (62.5%)
3PT 3/4 (75.0%)
FT 5/6 (83.3%)
Advanced
TS% 84.6%
USG% 22.6%
Net Rtg +4.9
+/- +1
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 21.5m
Offense +16.1
Hustle +3.0
Defense +3.8
Raw total +22.9
Avg player in 21.5m -12.3
Impact +10.6
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 6
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 1
Pat Spencer 21.1m
9
pts
2
reb
5
ast
Impact
-4.7

Struggled to keep his man in front of him, consistently bleeding value at the point of attack. While he distributed the ball reasonably well, poor finishing in traffic limited his offensive upside. The defensive breakdowns ultimately overshadowed his playmaking flashes.

Shooting
FG 3/8 (37.5%)
3PT 1/4 (25.0%)
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 50.7%
USG% 20.8%
Net Rtg +3.7
+/- -1
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 21.1m
Offense +7.1
Hustle +0.8
Defense -0.6
Raw total +7.3
Avg player in 21.1m -12.0
Impact -4.7
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 10
FGM Against 8
Opp FG% 80.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1
Quinten Post 12.4m
9
pts
3
reb
1
ast
Impact
+4.8

Provided immediate offensive gravity as a stretch big, forcing opposing centers out of the paint. His decisive screening and quick triggers on pick-and-pops opened up massive driving lanes for the guards. Held his own defensively by utilizing his length to contest without fouling.

Shooting
FG 4/8 (50.0%)
3PT 1/3 (33.3%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 56.3%
USG% 27.6%
Net Rtg +24.5
+/- +5
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 12.4m
Offense +9.0
Hustle +0.8
Defense +2.1
Raw total +11.9
Avg player in 12.4m -7.1
Impact +4.8
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 8
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 0
0
pts
1
reb
0
ast
Impact
-3.0

Looked completely out of sync during a brief rotational stint, failing to execute offensive sets. A blown defensive assignment led to an easy backdoor cut, immediately tanking his impact score. Offered very little resistance or energy before being pulled.

Shooting
FG 0/1 (0.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 5.6%
Net Rtg -16.7
+/- -2
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 6.4m
Offense +0.5
Hustle +0.2
Defense 0.0
Raw total +0.7
Avg player in 6.4m -3.7
Impact -3.0
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 3
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 33.3%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
LAC LA Clippers
S Kawhi Leonard 28.9m
23
pts
8
reb
4
ast
Impact
+15.0

High-level shot-making and stifling perimeter defense drove a dominant two-way performance. His ability to consistently generate clean looks in isolation punished mismatches all night. A massive defensive impact (+6.7) completely disrupted the opponent's primary actions.

Shooting
FG 9/14 (64.3%)
3PT 3/6 (50.0%)
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 77.3%
USG% 23.5%
Net Rtg +28.6
+/- +16
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 28.9m
Offense +21.9
Hustle +3.0
Defense +6.7
Raw total +31.6
Avg player in 28.9m -16.6
Impact +15.0
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 15
FGM Against 6
Opp FG% 40.0%
STL 2
BLK 0
TO 1
S Kris Dunn 25.9m
16
pts
7
reb
7
ast
Impact
+13.4

Absolute menace at the point of attack, generating massive value through relentless ball pressure and deflections (+5.9 hustle). He orchestrated the offense flawlessly while aggressively attacking closeouts for high-percentage finishes. This was a masterclass in two-way guard play that dictated the tempo whenever he was on the floor.

Shooting
FG 7/10 (70.0%)
3PT 2/4 (50.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 80.0%
USG% 16.7%
Net Rtg +29.4
+/- +18
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 25.9m
Offense +15.3
Hustle +5.9
Defense +7.0
Raw total +28.2
Avg player in 25.9m -14.8
Impact +13.4
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 9
FGM Against 2
Opp FG% 22.2%
STL 2
BLK 0
TO 1
9
pts
6
reb
1
ast
Impact
-8.3

Offensive futility cratered his overall value, as he bricked multiple wide-open perimeter looks. The defense sagged off him entirely, which clogged the driving lanes for his teammates. Despite decent defensive positioning, the sheer volume of wasted possessions (-8.3 total) made him a liability.

Shooting
FG 2/12 (16.7%)
3PT 0/4 (0.0%)
FT 5/6 (83.3%)
Advanced
TS% 30.7%
USG% 29.8%
Net Rtg +7.3
+/- 0
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 24.3m
Offense +2.7
Hustle +1.7
Defense +1.2
Raw total +5.6
Avg player in 24.3m -13.9
Impact -8.3
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 9
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 33.3%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 2
S Brook Lopez 23.9m
6
pts
4
reb
2
ast
Impact
-5.0

Settling for contested deep drops and missing every perimeter attempt severely limited his offensive utility. Opponents successfully pulled him away from the rim in pick-and-roll coverage, neutralizing his primary defensive value. The lack of interior gravity ultimately stalled the half-court offense during his shifts.

Shooting
FG 3/8 (37.5%)
3PT 0/4 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 37.5%
USG% 14.5%
Net Rtg +15.9
+/- +7
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 23.9m
Offense +4.3
Hustle +2.2
Defense +2.2
Raw total +8.7
Avg player in 23.9m -13.7
Impact -5.0
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 10
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 10.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
S Kobe Sanders 21.6m
8
pts
2
reb
1
ast
Impact
+2.3

Picked his spots perfectly within the flow of the offense to deliver a highly efficient scoring punch. Active hands and solid positional awareness yielded strong defensive metrics (+3.4). A low-mistake, steadying presence who capitalized on every rotational breakdown.

Shooting
FG 3/5 (60.0%)
3PT 2/3 (66.7%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 80.0%
USG% 9.8%
Net Rtg +7.3
+/- +3
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 21.6m
Offense +8.1
Hustle +3.1
Defense +3.4
Raw total +14.6
Avg player in 21.6m -12.3
Impact +2.3
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 6
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 0
17
pts
7
reb
0
ast
Impact
-4.9

A heavy diet of contested midrange pull-ups and forced drives tanked his overall efficiency. While he showed flashes of physical on-ball defense (+5.5), his tunnel vision on offense frequently derailed team momentum. The scoring volume was entirely offset by empty possessions and poor shot selection.

Shooting
FG 6/13 (46.2%)
3PT 0/2 (0.0%)
FT 5/5 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 55.9%
USG% 25.0%
Net Rtg +15.2
+/- +12
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 31.4m
Offense +4.8
Hustle +2.8
Defense +5.5
Raw total +13.1
Avg player in 31.4m -18.0
Impact -4.9
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 10
FGM Against 6
Opp FG% 60.0%
STL 1
BLK 1
TO 4
12
pts
6
reb
0
ast
Impact
+2.6

Ruthless efficiency around the basket highlighted a highly productive rotational stint. He punished sleeping defenders with timely baseline cuts and decisive straight-line drives. Solid weak-side defensive rotations (+5.2) rounded out a fundamentally sound performance.

Shooting
FG 5/6 (83.3%)
3PT 0/0
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 87.2%
USG% 13.3%
Net Rtg +24.8
+/- +15
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 25.0m
Offense +10.5
Hustle +1.2
Defense +5.2
Raw total +16.9
Avg player in 25.0m -14.3
Impact +2.6
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 8
FGM Against 2
Opp FG% 25.0%
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 1
12
pts
2
reb
2
ast
Impact
-3.7

Perimeter shot-making completely abandoned him, leading to several stalled out possessions. He tried to compensate with high-energy rotations and loose ball recoveries (+5.3 hustle), but the offensive rhythm never materialized. Ultimately, his inability to stretch the floor allowed the defense to trap the pick-and-roll with impunity.

Shooting
FG 4/9 (44.4%)
3PT 2/7 (28.6%)
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 60.7%
USG% 27.3%
Net Rtg +8.2
+/- +5
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 22.8m
Offense +0.4
Hustle +5.3
Defense +3.6
Raw total +9.3
Avg player in 22.8m -13.0
Impact -3.7
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 12
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 33.3%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 5
11
pts
9
reb
0
ast
Impact
+15.3

Anchored the paint with a towering defensive presence (+13.1) that completely deterred rim attempts. He played perfectly within his role offensively, setting bruising screens and finishing the dump-offs. His sheer size and verticality altered the geometry of the opponent's half-court sets.

Shooting
FG 3/6 (50.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 5/6 (83.3%)
Advanced
TS% 63.7%
USG% 16.7%
Net Rtg +20.4
+/- +10
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 21.2m
Offense +11.4
Hustle +2.9
Defense +13.1
Raw total +27.4
Avg player in 21.2m -12.1
Impact +15.3
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 11
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 45.5%
STL 2
BLK 4
TO 0
0
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
-3.6

Barely registered a pulse during a brief, cardio-heavy stint. Failed to impact the game on either end, floating on the perimeter without forcing defensive rotations. A completely invisible shift that offered zero resistance or offensive gravity.

Shooting
FG 0/1 (0.0%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 5.9%
Net Rtg -63.3
+/- -9
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 6.3m
Offense -0.9
Hustle 0.0
Defense +0.9
Raw total 0.0
Avg player in 6.3m -3.6
Impact -3.6
How is this calculated?
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
0
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
-2.4

Rushed his lone offensive look during a fleeting appearance. Struggled to catch up to the speed of the game, resulting in a slightly negative stint. Offered no tangible hustle or defensive resistance in garbage time.

Shooting
FG 0/1 (0.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 16.7%
Net Rtg -100.0
+/- -4
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 2.9m
Offense -0.8
Hustle 0.0
Defense 0.0
Raw total -0.8
Avg player in 2.9m -1.6
Impact -2.4
How is this calculated?
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
0
pts
1
reb
0
ast
Impact
+0.2

Provided a brief burst of physical energy in the paint without disrupting the team concept. Managed to secure a tough contested board during his short run. Kept mistakes to a minimum to finish slightly in the green.

Shooting
FG 0/0
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 0.0%
Net Rtg -100.0
+/- -4
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 2.9m
Offense +1.3
Hustle +0.2
Defense +0.3
Raw total +1.8
Avg player in 2.9m -1.6
Impact +0.2
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 1
FGM Against 0
Opp FG% 0.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
0
pts
0
reb
1
ast
Impact
-1.9

Looked a step slow navigating screens during his brief time on the floor, bleeding value defensively (-0.8). Moved the ball willingly but failed to generate any real advantage off the bounce. A forgettable cameo defined by passive perimeter play.

Shooting
FG 0/0
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 0.0%
Net Rtg -100.0
+/- -4
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 2.9m
Offense +0.5
Hustle 0.0
Defense -0.8
Raw total -0.3
Avg player in 2.9m -1.6
Impact -1.9
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 1
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 100.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0