GAME ANALYSIS

PLAYER PERFORMANCE

OKC Oklahoma City Thunder
S Chet Holmgren 30.5m
22
pts
7
reb
2
ast
Impact
+8.4

Dominant two-way performance was highlighted by excellent floor-stretching capability and elite shot selection. His rim protection paired perfectly with his perimeter touch to completely dictate the flow of the game.

Shooting
FG 8/13 (61.5%)
3PT 3/5 (60.0%)
FT 3/3 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 76.8%
USG% 21.1%
Net Rtg +10.7
+/- +8
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 30.5m
Offense +18.5
Hustle +3.5
Defense +4.2
Raw total +26.2
Avg player in 30.5m -17.8
Impact +8.4
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 11
FGM Against 6
Opp FG% 54.5%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 1
S Cason Wallace 29.2m
5
pts
1
reb
4
ast
Impact
+2.1

Elite defensive pressure and relentless hustle plays completely offset a horrific shooting night. He managed to stay in the green by generating extra possessions and locking down the perimeter when it mattered most.

Shooting
FG 1/8 (12.5%)
3PT 1/6 (16.7%)
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 28.2%
USG% 13.0%
Net Rtg -6.4
+/- -3
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 29.2m
Offense +2.6
Hustle +7.2
Defense +9.2
Raw total +19.0
Avg player in 29.2m -16.9
Impact +2.1
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 14
FGM Against 6
Opp FG% 42.9%
STL 5
BLK 0
TO 0
S Jalen Williams 28.7m
20
pts
1
reb
5
ast
Impact
+9.8

Slicing through the defense with highly efficient interior scoring drove a massive positive impact. His ability to consistently break down primary defenders created a cascading effect that elevated the entire lineup.

Shooting
FG 8/14 (57.1%)
3PT 2/2 (100.0%)
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 67.2%
USG% 23.5%
Net Rtg +6.6
+/- +4
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 28.7m
Offense +16.1
Hustle +3.8
Defense +6.7
Raw total +26.6
Avg player in 28.7m -16.8
Impact +9.8
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 8
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 2
BLK 0
TO 1
32
pts
7
reb
6
ast
Impact
+18.5

Masterful offensive orchestration and relentless rim pressure generated an astronomical impact score. His ability to manipulate matchups and dictate the pace made him virtually unguardable throughout the contest.

Shooting
FG 13/24 (54.2%)
3PT 2/6 (33.3%)
FT 4/6 (66.7%)
Advanced
TS% 60.1%
USG% 36.5%
Net Rtg +13.4
+/- +10
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 28.7m
Offense +24.6
Hustle +4.2
Defense +6.3
Raw total +35.1
Avg player in 28.7m -16.6
Impact +18.5
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 10
FGM Against 6
Opp FG% 60.0%
STL 2
BLK 2
TO 1
S Luguentz Dort 18.1m
0
pts
1
reb
1
ast
Impact
-13.1

Total offensive blackout from the perimeter destroyed his overall value and disrupted the team's spacing. Forcing contested jumpers rendered his usual point-of-attack defense an afterthought, driving a massive negative score.

Shooting
FG 0/6 (0.0%)
3PT 0/5 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 15.6%
Net Rtg -22.5
+/- -8
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 18.1m
Offense -6.1
Hustle +1.6
Defense +1.8
Raw total -2.7
Avg player in 18.1m -10.4
Impact -13.1
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 9
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 55.6%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1
16
pts
7
reb
5
ast
Impact
+5.9

Capitalized on defensive breakdowns with aggressive downhill drives to spark the second unit. His steady decision-making and efficient finishing proved vital during key rotational transition periods.

Shooting
FG 7/15 (46.7%)
3PT 1/3 (33.3%)
FT 1/1 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 51.8%
USG% 22.5%
Net Rtg +40.3
+/- +25
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 28.6m
Offense +11.4
Hustle +4.2
Defense +6.9
Raw total +22.5
Avg player in 28.6m -16.6
Impact +5.9
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 5
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 60.0%
STL 2
BLK 0
TO 1
5
pts
4
reb
0
ast
Impact
-6.3

Broke a streak of highly efficient outings with a clunky offensive performance that stalled momentum. Despite decent defensive positioning, his inability to capitalize on open looks dragged down his overall impact.

Shooting
FG 2/7 (28.6%)
3PT 0/2 (0.0%)
FT 1/2 (50.0%)
Advanced
TS% 31.7%
USG% 16.0%
Net Rtg +22.5
+/- +8
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 22.6m
Offense +2.4
Hustle +1.0
Defense +3.5
Raw total +6.9
Avg player in 22.6m -13.2
Impact -6.3
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 6
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 0
Isaiah Joe 22.2m
14
pts
4
reb
2
ast
Impact
+3.6

Lethal spot-up shooting provided crucial spacing that opened up driving lanes for the primary creators. His quick trigger from deep forced defensive rotations that constantly kept the opponent scrambling.

Shooting
FG 5/7 (71.4%)
3PT 4/6 (66.7%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 100.0%
USG% 15.5%
Net Rtg +29.5
+/- +14
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 22.2m
Offense +10.9
Hustle +1.1
Defense +4.6
Raw total +16.6
Avg player in 22.2m -13.0
Impact +3.6
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 5
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 20.0%
STL 2
BLK 0
TO 2
4
pts
4
reb
0
ast
Impact
+1.8

Executed his defensive assignments without mistakes to provide solid rotational value. A rare burst of efficient finishing at the rim helped him secure a modest positive rating.

Shooting
FG 2/3 (66.7%)
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 66.7%
USG% 9.1%
Net Rtg +52.5
+/- +21
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 16.0m
Offense +3.1
Hustle +2.4
Defense +5.6
Raw total +11.1
Avg player in 16.0m -9.3
Impact +1.8
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 8
FGM Against 2
Opp FG% 25.0%
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 1
Alex Caruso 15.4m
4
pts
2
reb
3
ast
Impact
+11.3

Wreaked havoc as an off-ball disruptor, generating massive defensive value in limited minutes. His relentless energy and elite rotational awareness completely stifled the opponent's secondary actions.

Shooting
FG 2/4 (50.0%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 50.0%
USG% 9.5%
Net Rtg +76.3
+/- +26
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 15.4m
Offense +5.1
Hustle +6.5
Defense +8.8
Raw total +20.4
Avg player in 15.4m -9.1
Impact +11.3
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 7
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 42.9%
STL 4
BLK 0
TO 0
LAC LA Clippers
S Kawhi Leonard 32.1m
22
pts
8
reb
6
ast
Impact
+2.2

Perimeter struggles heavily capped his overall impact despite strong defensive metrics. His steadying presence on the wing helped contain dribble penetration, but the missed outside looks prevented a dominant rating.

Shooting
FG 9/17 (52.9%)
3PT 0/5 (0.0%)
FT 4/4 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 58.6%
USG% 27.2%
Net Rtg -30.7
+/- -24
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 32.1m
Offense +15.0
Hustle +1.4
Defense +4.5
Raw total +20.9
Avg player in 32.1m -18.7
Impact +2.2
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 7
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 57.1%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 3
S Ivica Zubac 31.7m
11
pts
11
reb
3
ast
Impact
+2.9

Elite rim deterrence drove massive defensive metrics by forcing opponents into tough floaters. While his offensive usage was minimal, his sheer physical presence in the paint defined his minutes.

Shooting
FG 3/7 (42.9%)
3PT 0/0
FT 5/6 (83.3%)
Advanced
TS% 57.1%
USG% 14.8%
Net Rtg -17.8
+/- -14
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 31.7m
Offense +9.5
Hustle +2.4
Defense +9.5
Raw total +21.4
Avg player in 31.7m -18.5
Impact +2.9
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 14
FGM Against 6
Opp FG% 42.9%
STL 0
BLK 2
TO 2
S Kris Dunn 31.4m
14
pts
5
reb
4
ast
Impact
-13.5

Hidden negatives like poor transition defense and spacing issues cratered his impact score despite a massive offensive jump from his recent baseline. His inability to orchestrate the half-court offense cleanly resulted in disjointed possessions.

Shooting
FG 5/8 (62.5%)
3PT 3/6 (50.0%)
FT 1/2 (50.0%)
Advanced
TS% 78.8%
USG% 19.2%
Net Rtg -0.2
+/- +1
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 31.4m
Offense +1.4
Hustle +2.3
Defense +1.0
Raw total +4.7
Avg player in 31.4m -18.2
Impact -13.5
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 15
FGM Against 6
Opp FG% 40.0%
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 6
S John Collins 28.4m
20
pts
4
reb
2
ast
Impact
+5.3

Continued a scorching trend of interior finishing, leveraging aggressive rim-runs to generate a robust positive score. His high-energy defensive rotations paired perfectly with his offensive efficiency to anchor the frontcourt.

Shooting
FG 7/13 (53.8%)
3PT 1/4 (25.0%)
FT 5/6 (83.3%)
Advanced
TS% 63.9%
USG% 27.3%
Net Rtg +5.3
+/- +1
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 28.4m
Offense +11.1
Hustle +4.8
Defense +6.0
Raw total +21.9
Avg player in 28.4m -16.6
Impact +5.3
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 18
FGM Against 6
Opp FG% 33.3%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 2
14
pts
2
reb
1
ast
Impact
-7.1

Severe defensive liabilities completely erased the gains from his sudden scoring surge. Opponents relentlessly targeted him in isolation, turning his minutes into a significant net negative despite the improved shooting.

Shooting
FG 6/12 (50.0%)
3PT 2/6 (33.3%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 58.3%
USG% 23.3%
Net Rtg -2.4
+/- +1
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 24.4m
Offense +6.0
Hustle +2.9
Defense -1.8
Raw total +7.1
Avg player in 24.4m -14.2
Impact -7.1
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 18
FGM Against 14
Opp FG% 77.8%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 2
Kobe Sanders 29.6m
5
pts
4
reb
4
ast
Impact
-13.9

Offensive stagnation and clunky shot selection destroyed his value, overshadowing surprisingly robust defensive metrics. His failure to initiate sets effectively completely stalled the second unit's momentum during his shifts.

Shooting
FG 2/5 (40.0%)
3PT 1/3 (33.3%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 50.0%
USG% 14.9%
Net Rtg -19.1
+/- -13
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 29.6m
Offense -6.7
Hustle +3.8
Defense +6.3
Raw total +3.4
Avg player in 29.6m -17.3
Impact -13.9
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 10
FGM Against 6
Opp FG% 60.0%
STL 2
BLK 1
TO 6
3
pts
6
reb
3
ast
Impact
-10.6

Clanking multiple perimeter looks derailed his offensive flow and dragged his overall rating deep into the red. While he battled valiantly on defense, the lack of scoring punch made him a significant liability on the floor.

Shooting
FG 1/5 (20.0%)
3PT 0/2 (0.0%)
FT 1/2 (50.0%)
Advanced
TS% 25.5%
USG% 18.9%
Net Rtg -36.4
+/- -16
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 20.4m
Offense -5.1
Hustle +1.6
Defense +4.8
Raw total +1.3
Avg player in 20.4m -11.9
Impact -10.6
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 10
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 30.0%
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 4
6
pts
2
reb
0
ast
Impact
-2.4

Veteran defensive stability kept him relevant, but a low-volume offensive output kept his impact slightly negative. His value was largely tied to executing crisp rotational help defense rather than tangible production.

Shooting
FG 2/5 (40.0%)
3PT 2/5 (40.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 60.0%
USG% 11.1%
Net Rtg -59.6
+/- -28
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 19.8m
Offense +1.4
Hustle +1.6
Defense +6.0
Raw total +9.0
Avg player in 19.8m -11.4
Impact -2.4
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 13
FGM Against 7
Opp FG% 53.8%
STL 2
BLK 1
TO 1
Brook Lopez 15.2m
6
pts
5
reb
2
ast
Impact
-0.5

A sharp drop in offensive involvement from his recent averages neutralized his typical impact. He provided adequate drop-coverage defense, but the lack of scoring volume left his overall influence on the game relatively flat.

Shooting
FG 2/4 (50.0%)
3PT 1/1 (100.0%)
FT 1/2 (50.0%)
Advanced
TS% 61.5%
USG% 16.7%
Net Rtg -15.2
+/- -5
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 15.2m
Offense +5.3
Hustle +1.1
Defense +2.0
Raw total +8.4
Avg player in 15.2m -8.9
Impact -0.5
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 4
FGM Against 2
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 1
0
pts
2
reb
0
ast
Impact
-2.8

Barely saw the floor, functioning purely as an emergency rotation piece during a brief, uneventful stint. Failed to register any meaningful statistics, resulting in a slightly negative footprint.

Shooting
FG 0/0
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 11.1%
Net Rtg -33.3
+/- -3
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 3.5m
Offense -1.9
Hustle +0.7
Defense +0.6
Raw total -0.6
Avg player in 3.5m -2.2
Impact -2.8
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 2
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1
Kobe Brown 3.3m
0
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
-1.7

Logged empty minutes at the end of the rotation after a string of highly efficient games. His brief appearance offered no opportunity to influence the game in either direction, resulting in a negligible impact.

Shooting
FG 0/0
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 0.0%
Net Rtg -62.5
+/- -5
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 3.3m
Offense 0.0
Hustle +0.2
Defense 0.0
Raw total +0.2
Avg player in 3.3m -1.9
Impact -1.7
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 1
FGM Against 0
Opp FG% 0.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0