Interactive analysis

EXPLORE THE GAME

Every shot, every lead change, every rotation — visualized.

Lead over time · win-probability overlay
LEAD TRACKER
LAL lead LAC lead Win %
Every shot · colored by difficulty
SHOT CHART
Click shooters to compare their shots on the court
LAC 2P — 3P —
LAL 2P — 3P —
Tough make Easy make Blown miss Tough miss 167 attempts

LAC LAC Shot-making Δ

Leonard 11/19 +7.3
Mathurin 7/16 -0.9
Lopez 7/12 +2.3
Jones Jr. Open 6/10 +0.9
Collins 5/8 +1.7
Miller 3/8 -2.7
Dunn Open 4/4 +2.6
Niederhäuser Open 2/3 +0.3
Batum Hard 0/2 -2.0

LAL LAL Shot-making Δ

Dončić Hard 11/25 +3.4
Reaves 9/15 +6.2
James 5/13 -1.9
Ayton Open 5/10 -1.6
Kennard 4/6 +2.3
Hayes Open 4/5 +2.0
Smart Hard 3/4 +3.3
Hachimura Hard 1/4 -0.8
Vanderbilt Open 1/2 -0.8
LaRavia Hard 1/1 +1.9
How the game was played
BY THE NUMBERS
LAC
LAL
45/82 Field Goals 44/85
54.9% Field Goal % 51.8%
8/21 3-Pointers 17/31
38.1% 3-Point % 54.8%
24/29 Free Throws 20/25
82.8% Free Throw % 80.0%
64.4% True Shooting % 65.1%
51 Total Rebounds 39
10 Offensive 5
32 Defensive 27
25 Assists 31
1.56 Assist/TO Ratio 2.58
16 Turnovers 12
7 Steals 8
5 Blocks 4
20 Fouls 24
58 Points in Paint 50
16 Fast Break Pts 14
18 Points off TOs 20
18 Second Chance Pts 10
42 Bench Points 25
5 Largest Lead 16
Biggest contributors
TOP NET IMPACT
1
Luka Dončić
38 PTS · 6 REB · 11 AST · 37.9 MIN
+33.4
2
Austin Reaves
29 PTS · 6 REB · 2 AST · 32.7 MIN
+25.97
3
Brook Lopez
16 PTS · 10 REB · 1 AST · 34.6 MIN
+24.09
4
Kawhi Leonard
31 PTS · 4 REB · 5 AST · 30.9 MIN
+18.5
5
Derrick Jones Jr.
13 PTS · 8 REB · 2 AST · 38.6 MIN
+15.63
6
Deandre Ayton
13 PTS · 7 REB · 1 AST · 27.5 MIN
+11.06
7
Bennedict Mathurin
26 PTS · 7 REB · 2 AST · 31.7 MIN
+9.39
8
Jaxson Hayes
8 PTS · 3 REB · 0 AST · 11.5 MIN
+8.27
9
John Collins
12 PTS · 1 REB · 0 AST · 16.2 MIN
+8.22
10
LeBron James
13 PTS · 3 REB · 11 AST · 33.1 MIN
+7.15
Play-by-play (most recent first)
PLAY FEED
Q4 0:03 L. James REBOUND (Off:0 Def:3) 122–125
Q4 0:06 MISS N. Batum 27' running 3PT 122–125
Q4 0:08 N. Batum STEAL (1 STL) 122–125
Q4 0:08 L. James bad pass TURNOVER (3 TO) 122–125
Q4 0:09 J. Miller Free Throw 2 of 2 (10 PTS) 122–125
Q4 0:09 J. Miller Free Throw 1 of 2 (9 PTS) 121–125
Q4 0:09 D. Ayton shooting personal FOUL (2 PF) (Miller 2 FT) 120–125
Q4 0:21 L. Dončić Free Throw 2 of 2 (38 PTS) 120–125
Q4 0:21 L. Dončić Free Throw 1 of 2 (37 PTS) 120–124
Q4 0:21 K. Dunn shooting personal FOUL (5 PF) (Dončić 2 FT) 120–123
Q4 0:43 A. Reaves REBOUND (Off:1 Def:5) 120–123
Q4 0:46 MISS D. Jones Jr. Free Throw 1 of 1 120–123
Q4 0:46 D. Ayton shooting personal FOUL (1 PF) (Jones Jr. 1 FT) 120–123
Q4 0:46 D. Jones Jr. putback Layup (13 PTS) 120–123
Q4 0:46 D. Jones Jr. REBOUND (Off:3 Def:5) 118–123

GAME ANALYSIS

KEEP READING

Create a free account and follow your team to get the full analysis every morning.

Create Free Account

Already have an account? Log in

PLAYER PERFORMANCE

LAL Los Angeles Lakers
S Luka Dončić 37.9m
38
pts
6
reb
11
ast
Impact
+33.5

An absolute barrage of unassisted perimeter shot-making broke the opponent's defensive scheme entirely. Surprisingly engaged off-ball defense and quick reads out of double-teams ensured his massive usage translated directly to winning basketball.

Shooting
FG 11/25 (44.0%)
3PT 8/14 (57.1%)
FT 8/11 (72.7%)
Advanced
TS% 63.7%
USG% 36.4%
Net Rtg +6.0
+/- +6
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 37.9m
Scoring +26.4
Creation +1.8
Shot Making +9.2
Hustle +4.7
Defense +4.2
Turnovers -4.7
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 14
FGM Against 7
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 3
BLK 1
TO 2
S LeBron James 33.1m
13
pts
3
reb
11
ast
Impact
-2.2

Uncharacteristic sloppiness with the basketball fueled a disastrous negative impact, as telegraphed passes led directly to transition points. Settling for contested perimeter jumpers rather than pressuring the rim further depressed his overall value.

Shooting
FG 5/13 (38.5%)
3PT 1/3 (33.3%)
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 46.8%
USG% 21.3%
Net Rtg -10.3
+/- -7
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 33.1m
Scoring +7.2
Creation +3.6
Shot Making +3.0
Hustle +0.9
Defense +1.8
Turnovers -7.8
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 4
FGM Against 2
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 3
S Austin Reaves 32.7m
29
pts
6
reb
2
ast
Impact
+25.5

Masterful navigation of high pick-and-rolls created pristine shot quality for himself and others. His relentless point-of-attack defense and willingness to dive for loose balls drove an overwhelmingly positive two-way performance.

Shooting
FG 9/15 (60.0%)
3PT 4/5 (80.0%)
FT 7/7 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 80.2%
USG% 28.2%
Net Rtg +1.8
+/- 0
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 32.7m
Scoring +24.4
Creation +2.1
Shot Making +6.1
Hustle +7.6
Defense +4.4
Turnovers -7.1
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 12
FGM Against 6
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 2
BLK 0
TO 3
S Marcus Smart 29.5m
7
pts
2
reb
0
ast
Impact
-7.6

Excessive foul trouble and erratic decision-making completely derailed his time on the court. Despite hitting a few shots, his over-aggressive gambling on defense consistently compromised the team's shell, leading to easy opponent layups.

Shooting
FG 3/4 (75.0%)
3PT 1/2 (50.0%)
FT 0/2 (0.0%)
Advanced
TS% 71.7%
USG% 7.8%
Net Rtg +1.7
+/- +1
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 29.5m
Scoring +5.2
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +2.1
Hustle +0.6
Defense -0.9
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 12
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 41.7%
STL 1
BLK 1
TO 1
S Deandre Ayton 27.5m
13
pts
7
reb
1
ast
Impact
+2.4

Provided steady interior resistance and capitalized on deep post position to maintain a positive baseline. However, a tendency to bring the ball down in traffic resulted in stripped possessions, preventing a truly dominant impact score.

Shooting
FG 5/10 (50.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 3/3 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 57.4%
USG% 20.3%
Net Rtg -1.3
+/- -2
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 27.5m
Scoring +9.2
Creation +1.1
Shot Making +1.2
Hustle +7.0
Defense -2.6
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 13
FGM Against 8
Opp FG% 61.5%
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 1
3
pts
2
reb
2
ast
Impact
-7.9

Offensive rhythm was shattered by forcing contested looks early in the shot clock. This poor shot selection, combined with a failure to secure defensive rebounds in traffic, resulted in a heavily negative overall showing.

Shooting
FG 1/4 (25.0%)
3PT 1/3 (33.3%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 37.5%
USG% 6.6%
Net Rtg +18.8
+/- +9
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 26.0m
Scoring +0.8
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.9
Hustle +1.6
Defense +0.8
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 7
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 42.9%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 0
Luke Kennard 18.0m
9
pts
2
reb
1
ast
Impact
-9.9

Hesitancy to let it fly from deep allowed defenders to cheat off him and muck up the spacing. His negative impact was cemented by getting caught on screens defensively, forcing teammates into disadvantageous rotation scenarios.

Shooting
FG 4/6 (66.7%)
3PT 1/3 (33.3%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 75.0%
USG% 18.6%
Net Rtg +8.5
+/- +2
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 18.0m
Scoring +7.4
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +2.3
Hustle +0.6
Defense -3.4
Turnovers -4.7
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 12
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 41.7%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 2
Jake LaRavia 14.1m
3
pts
1
reb
1
ast
Impact
-13.6

Consistently targeted in isolation, his slow lateral movement gave up straight-line drives that collapsed the defense. Making his lone shot attempt couldn't compensate for the structural damage his defensive limitations caused.

Shooting
FG 1/1 (100.0%)
3PT 1/1 (100.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 150.0%
USG% 2.9%
Net Rtg +3.3
+/- +1
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 14.1m
Scoring +3.0
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +1.0
Hustle +0.3
Defense -5.0
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 11
FGM Against 6
Opp FG% 54.5%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
Jaxson Hayes 11.5m
8
pts
3
reb
0
ast
Impact
-1.4

Elite vertical spacing and rim-running punished the opponent's drop coverage during a crucial second-quarter stretch. Disciplined rim protection without fouling anchored his highly efficient, positive stint off the bench.

Shooting
FG 4/5 (80.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 80.0%
USG% 18.5%
Net Rtg +4.2
+/- +1
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 11.5m
Scoring +7.3
Creation +2.0
Shot Making +0.4
Hustle +0.9
Defense +0.2
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 4
FGM Against 2
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 0
2
pts
0
reb
2
ast
Impact
-13.8

Offensive limitations severely cramped the floor, allowing his defender to act as a free safety in the paint. A lack of his usual disruptive energy on the defensive glass left his overall impact firmly in the negative.

Shooting
FG 1/2 (50.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 50.0%
USG% 9.1%
Net Rtg +26.4
+/- +4
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 9.8m
Scoring +1.0
Creation +0.3
Shot Making +0.1
Hustle +0.0
Defense -1.9
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 5
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 60.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
LAC LA Clippers
13
pts
8
reb
2
ast
Impact
+8.5

Active hands and relentless perimeter pressure generated strong defensive and hustle metrics. Despite these effort plays, his overall net impact was nearly erased by poorly timed fouls and offensive disjointedness in transition.

Shooting
FG 6/10 (60.0%)
3PT 1/3 (33.3%)
FT 0/1 (0.0%)
Advanced
TS% 62.3%
USG% 12.4%
Net Rtg +4.2
+/- +1
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 38.6m
Scoring +9.3
Creation +0.3
Shot Making +2.7
Hustle +9.2
Defense +1.5
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 16
FGM Against 9
Opp FG% 56.2%
STL 1
BLK 2
TO 1
S Kris Dunn 34.9m
8
pts
5
reb
8
ast
Impact
-11.5

Playmaking vision was completely overshadowed by crippling live-ball turnovers that ignited opponent fast breaks. His inability to stay in front of quicker guards at the point of attack bled points, tanking his overall value despite perfect shooting.

Shooting
FG 4/4 (100.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 100.0%
USG% 7.4%
Net Rtg -1.1
+/- -2
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 34.9m
Scoring +8.0
Creation +1.0
Shot Making +1.6
Hustle +1.5
Defense -6.5
Turnovers -4.7
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 19
FGM Against 7
Opp FG% 36.8%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 2
S Brook Lopez 34.5m
16
pts
10
reb
1
ast
Impact
+20.6

Absolute dominance as a drop-coverage anchor defined this massive positive performance. He consistently altered shots in the paint, racking up huge defensive and hustle value that far outweighed any offensive limitations.

Shooting
FG 7/12 (58.3%)
3PT 1/3 (33.3%)
FT 1/1 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 64.3%
USG% 14.6%
Net Rtg +1.7
+/- 0
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 34.5m
Scoring +12.2
Creation +1.2
Shot Making +3.9
Hustle +12.7
Defense +3.1
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 23
FGM Against 7
Opp FG% 30.4%
STL 2
BLK 3
TO 0
S Kawhi Leonard 30.9m
31
pts
4
reb
5
ast
Impact
+18.3

Elite shot selection from the perimeter fueled a highly efficient offensive outing. However, his overall impact was muted by defensive lapses in isolation matchups that allowed opponents to trade baskets. The scoring volume masked some underlying rotational sluggishness.

Shooting
FG 11/19 (57.9%)
3PT 4/6 (66.7%)
FT 5/5 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 73.1%
USG% 34.7%
Net Rtg +4.4
+/- +4
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 30.9m
Scoring +25.2
Creation +2.8
Shot Making +7.5
Hustle +1.2
Defense +0.0
Turnovers -8.1
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 7
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 57.1%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 5
S John Collins 16.2m
12
pts
1
reb
0
ast
Impact
-2.2

Capitalized on interior mismatches during his brief time on the floor to generate high-percentage looks. His positive defensive metrics reflect a concerted effort to contest shots at the rim, anchoring the second unit's paint defense.

Shooting
FG 5/8 (62.5%)
3PT 1/2 (50.0%)
FT 1/2 (50.0%)
Advanced
TS% 67.6%
USG% 28.2%
Net Rtg -2.2
+/- -2
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 16.2m
Scoring +8.6
Creation +0.4
Shot Making +2.4
Hustle +1.3
Defense +2.4
Turnovers -4.7
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 8
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 2
26
pts
7
reb
2
ast
Impact
+6.3

Forced isolation attempts and heavily contested jumpers dragged down his efficiency, turning his offensive volume into a net negative. A distinct lack of off-ball awareness on defense further compounded the damage, allowing back-door cuts throughout the second half.

Shooting
FG 7/16 (43.8%)
3PT 1/4 (25.0%)
FT 11/14 (78.6%)
Advanced
TS% 58.7%
USG% 32.1%
Net Rtg -8.4
+/- -2
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 31.7m
Scoring +18.0
Creation +2.6
Shot Making +4.3
Hustle +7.0
Defense -5.6
Turnovers -7.8
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 9
FGM Against 6
Opp FG% 66.7%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 3
10
pts
1
reb
4
ast
Impact
-6.8

Settled for low-value mid-range jumpers instead of attacking the rim, which stifled offensive momentum. While he showed flashes of activity in passing lanes, the inefficient shot profile ultimately dragged his net score down.

Shooting
FG 3/8 (37.5%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 4/4 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 51.2%
USG% 19.0%
Net Rtg -6.7
+/- -2
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 24.7m
Scoring +6.1
Creation +0.9
Shot Making +1.2
Hustle +0.3
Defense -0.8
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 8
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 62.5%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 1
0
pts
3
reb
2
ast
Impact
-9.8

A complete non-factor offensively, displaying extreme passivity that allowed defenders to sag off and disrupt spacing. Even with fundamentally sound positional defense, his inability to command gravity on the perimeter hurt the team's half-court execution.

Shooting
FG 0/2 (0.0%)
3PT 0/2 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 5.6%
Net Rtg -23.3
+/- -9
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 15.3m
Scoring -1.6
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +2.8
Defense +2.4
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 4
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 75.0%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 0
6
pts
3
reb
1
ast
Impact
-5.3

Struggled to find a rhythm within the offensive flow, often clogging driving lanes during his short stint. Minor defensive miscommunications in pick-and-roll coverage kept his overall impact slightly in the red.

Shooting
FG 2/3 (66.7%)
3PT 0/0
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 77.3%
USG% 20.0%
Net Rtg -16.7
+/- -3
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 13.1m
Scoring +4.7
Creation +0.4
Shot Making +0.6
Hustle +3.8
Defense +1.5
Turnovers -4.2
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 5
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 80.0%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 2