2025-26 Season
DARIUS GARLAND
2025-26 Season
DARIUS GARLAND
Garland produces at an above average rate for a 30-minute workload.
Garland produces at an above average rate for a 30-minute workload.
PBP Credit: Every play is analyzed from play-by-play data. Scorers get difficulty-adjusted credit, assisters get creation value based on the shot opportunity they created, and turnovers are classified by type. Shot difficulty is derived from 1M+ shots across 4 seasons. Full methodology
TEAM COMPARISON
of 18 teammates (10+ games, 10+ min)
Similar Players
Same position, closest production profile this season.
SKILL DNA
Percentile rank vs 246 Guards with 10+ games
THE SEASON SO FAR
Darius Garland's first sixteen games of the season were defined by maddening inconsistency, oscillating violently between brilliant offensive explosions and disastrous shooting nights. Take the 11/30 vs BOS matchup as a prime example of his erratic value. He tallied a respectable 21 points and 8 assists, but his -0.1 Impact score revealed the hidden costs of poor shot selection and frequent defensive lapses. That questionable decision-making hit rock bottom on 12/13 vs WAS, where he hoisted an abysmal 0/11 from beyond the arc to post a -1.1 Impact. Yet, just when you want to write him off, he flips the script. He erupted on 12/20 vs CHI, pouring in 35 points on 13/27 shooting to generate a massive +19.2 Impact. His blistering 6/12 mark from three-point range fueled that elite rating, punishing the defense every time they gave him an inch of breathing room. If Garland wants to elevate from a volatile spark plug to a reliable floor general, he must eliminate the dreadful perimeter shooting nights that continually sabotage his overall value.
Darius Garland's mid-season stretch was defined by wild swings in actual on-court value and a jarring, temporary demotion to the bench. His counting stats often masked deeper flaws. Despite posting a respectable 18 points and 8 assists on 01/03 vs DEN, Garland dragged the team down with a dismal -8.1 Impact score, bleeding value through poor defensive rotations and careless decision-making. He flipped the script entirely on 01/07 vs IND. Torching the defense for 29 points on a highly efficient 14-of-23 from the floor, he drove elite team success with a dominant +16.2 Impact. Inconsistency eventually forced a brief move to the second unit, where he looked completely lost on 03/02 vs GSW. He managed just 12 points and 2 assists in that reserve role, posting a -5.2 Impact because he failed to generate any meaningful offensive flow to offset his typical defensive limitations. When he limits his defensive bleeding and hunts efficient shots, he remains a lethal offensive engine, but the erratic floor-general act is wearing thin.
This fifteen-game stretch was a volatile rollercoaster of offensive brilliance and baffling inefficiency for Darius Garland. You can see the frustrating duality perfectly in the 03/16 vs SAS matchup. He stuffed the stat sheet with 25 points and 10 assists, yet posted a -0.8 Impact score because hidden costs like defensive lapses dragged his overall value into the red. Just days later, he caught absolute fire. During the 03/21 vs DAL game, Garland erupted for 41 points and 11 assists on blistering 15-for-24 shooting, generating a massive +28.0 Impact by combining elite shot-making with flawless offensive orchestration. Still, his underlying worth occasionally surfaced even when his jumper completely abandoned him. Take the 04/10 vs POR contest, where he shot a miserable 5-for-16 from the floor but still registered a +8.2 Impact since his relentless hustle plays and defensive effort kept the team afloat.
IMPACT TIMELINE
Game-by-game performance vs average. Green = above average, red = below.
Volatile for his role. Garland has noticeable ups and downs, with scoring moving ~7 points between games.
Middle-of-the-road efficiency — shoots 45%+ from the field in 49% of games. Not automatic, but not a problem either.
Good defender on his best nights, but it comes and goes. Some games Garland locks in defensively, others he gets picked apart.
Getting better as the season goes on. First-half impact: +0.7, second-half: +6.1. That's a significant jump — could be a role change, confidence, or development clicking.
Hot right now — 5 straight games with positive impact. Longest positive run this season: 6 games.
MATCHUP HISTORY ⚠ Updated 46 days ago
Based on 41 games with tracking data. Shows who guarded this player on offense and who he guarded on defense, with their shooting stats in those matchups.
ON OFFENSE: WHO GUARDED HIM
His shooting stats against each primary defender this season
ON DEFENSE: WHO HE GUARDED
How opponents shot when he was the primary defender. Lower FG% = better defense.
SEASON STATS
GAME LOG
47 games played