LAC

2025-26 Season

DARIUS GARLAND

LA Clippers | Guard | 6-1
Darius Garland
18.7PPG
2.4RPG
6.7APG
29.9MPG
+3.4 Impact

Garland produces at an above average rate for a 30-minute workload.

·
Embed this player card

Copy & paste this HTML into any page:

The widget updates automatically whenever our data does.

IMPACT BREAKDOWN
Every stat, every credit, every cost — per game average
+3.4
Scoring +17.4
Points Scored 18.7 PPG = +18.7
Missed Shots difficulty-adjusted = -6.0
Shot Making above expected FG% = +4.7
Creation +1.8
Assists & Self-Creation 6.7 AST/g + self-creation = +1.8
Turnovers -6.7
Turnovers 2.9/g (live + dead blend) = -6.7
Defense +0.5
Steals 1.0/g = +2.3
Blocks 0.2/g = +0.2
Fouls + context committed fouls, matchup adj = -2.0
Hustle & Effort +1.4
Rebounds 2.4 RPG (OREB + DREB) = -0.7
Contested Shots 2.9/g = +0.6
Deflections 1.6/g = +1.1
Charges Drawn 0.0/g = +0.1
Loose Balls 0.4/g = +0.2
Screen Assists 0.2/g = +0.1
Raw Impact +14.4
Baseline (game-average expected) −11.0
Net Impact
+3.4
75th pctl vs Guards

PBP Credit: Every play is analyzed from play-by-play data. Scorers get difficulty-adjusted credit, assisters get creation value based on the shot opportunity they created, and turnovers are classified by type. Shot difficulty is derived from 1M+ shots across 4 seasons. Full methodology

SKILL DNA

Percentile rank vs 246 Guards with 10+ games

Scoring 88th
18.7 PPG
Efficiency 80th
58.5% TS
Playmaking 93th
6.7 APG
Rebounding 34th
2.4 RPG
Defense 15th
+4.7/g
Hustle 22th
+6.3/g
Creation 90th
+4.73/g
Shot Making 97th
+11.55/g
TO Discipline 10th
0.10/min

THE SEASON SO FAR

Darius Garland's first sixteen games of the season were defined by maddening inconsistency, oscillating violently between brilliant offensive explosions and disastrous shooting nights. Take the 11/30 vs BOS matchup as a prime example of his erratic value. He tallied a respectable 21 points and 8 assists, but his -0.1 Impact score revealed the hidden costs of poor shot selection and frequent defensive lapses. That questionable decision-making hit rock bottom on 12/13 vs WAS, where he hoisted an abysmal 0/11 from beyond the arc to post a -1.1 Impact. Yet, just when you want to write him off, he flips the script. He erupted on 12/20 vs CHI, pouring in 35 points on 13/27 shooting to generate a massive +19.2 Impact. His blistering 6/12 mark from three-point range fueled that elite rating, punishing the defense every time they gave him an inch of breathing room. If Garland wants to elevate from a volatile spark plug to a reliable floor general, he must eliminate the dreadful perimeter shooting nights that continually sabotage his overall value.

Darius Garland's mid-season stretch was defined by wild swings in actual on-court value and a jarring, temporary demotion to the bench. His counting stats often masked deeper flaws. Despite posting a respectable 18 points and 8 assists on 01/03 vs DEN, Garland dragged the team down with a dismal -8.1 Impact score, bleeding value through poor defensive rotations and careless decision-making. He flipped the script entirely on 01/07 vs IND. Torching the defense for 29 points on a highly efficient 14-of-23 from the floor, he drove elite team success with a dominant +16.2 Impact. Inconsistency eventually forced a brief move to the second unit, where he looked completely lost on 03/02 vs GSW. He managed just 12 points and 2 assists in that reserve role, posting a -5.2 Impact because he failed to generate any meaningful offensive flow to offset his typical defensive limitations. When he limits his defensive bleeding and hunts efficient shots, he remains a lethal offensive engine, but the erratic floor-general act is wearing thin.

This fifteen-game stretch was a volatile rollercoaster of offensive brilliance and baffling inefficiency for Darius Garland. You can see the frustrating duality perfectly in the 03/16 vs SAS matchup. He stuffed the stat sheet with 25 points and 10 assists, yet posted a -0.8 Impact score because hidden costs like defensive lapses dragged his overall value into the red. Just days later, he caught absolute fire. During the 03/21 vs DAL game, Garland erupted for 41 points and 11 assists on blistering 15-for-24 shooting, generating a massive +28.0 Impact by combining elite shot-making with flawless offensive orchestration. Still, his underlying worth occasionally surfaced even when his jumper completely abandoned him. Take the 04/10 vs POR contest, where he shot a miserable 5-for-16 from the floor but still registered a +8.2 Impact since his relentless hustle plays and defensive effort kept the team afloat.

IMPACT TIMELINE

Game-by-game performance vs average. Green = above average, red = below.

PATTERNS

Volatile for his role. Garland has noticeable ups and downs, with scoring moving ~7 points between games.

Middle-of-the-road efficiency — shoots 45%+ from the field in 49% of games. Not automatic, but not a problem either.

Good defender on his best nights, but it comes and goes. Some games Garland locks in defensively, others he gets picked apart.

Getting better as the season goes on. First-half impact: +0.7, second-half: +6.1. That's a significant jump — could be a role change, confidence, or development clicking.

Hot right now — 5 straight games with positive impact. Longest positive run this season: 6 games.

MATCHUP HISTORY ⚠ Updated 46 days ago

Based on 41 games with tracking data. Shows who guarded this player on offense and who he guarded on defense, with their shooting stats in those matchups.

ON OFFENSE: WHO GUARDED HIM

His shooting stats against each primary defender this season

A. Nembhard 73.9 poss
FG% 59.1%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.42
PTS 31
D. DiVincenzo 57.2 poss
FG% 70.0%
3P% 33.3%
PPP 0.26
PTS 15
D. Fox 49.9 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.08
PTS 4
M. Bridges 49.0 poss
FG% 28.6%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.12
PTS 6
B. Carrington 48.6 poss
FG% 25.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.08
PTS 4
S. Castle 48.5 poss
FG% 35.7%
3P% 28.6%
PPP 0.31
PTS 15
B. Sheppard 48.4 poss
FG% 37.5%
3P% 66.7%
PPP 0.21
PTS 10
FG% 42.9%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.18
PTS 8
T. Camara 42.2 poss
FG% 25.0%
3P% 33.3%
PPP 0.19
PTS 8
J. McDaniels 40.9 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.1
PTS 4

ON DEFENSE: WHO HE GUARDED

How opponents shot when he was the primary defender. Lower FG% = better defense.

D. DiVincenzo 66.9 poss
FG% 75.0%
3P% 66.7%
PPP 0.24
PTS 16
D. Vassell 54.4 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 44.4%
PPP 0.26
PTS 14
G. Trent Jr. 51.4 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 33.3%
PPP 0.1
PTS 5
A. Nembhard 51.3 poss
FG% 55.6%
3P% 75.0%
PPP 0.25
PTS 13
J. McDaniels 42.7 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.21
PTS 9
B. Carrington 42.3 poss
FG% 14.3%
3P% 16.7%
PPP 0.09
PTS 4
M. Bridges 41.5 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.24
PTS 10
J. Fears 40.4 poss
FG% 60.0%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.17
PTS 7
V. Edgecombe 40.3 poss
FG% 28.6%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.1
PTS 4
B. Sheppard 40.2 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0

SEASON STATS

47
Games
18.7
PPG
2.4
RPG
6.7
APG
1.0
SPG
0.2
BPG
46.1
FG%
39.5
3P%
86.8
FT%
29.9
MPG

GAME LOG

47 games played