IND

2025-26 Season

KOBE BROWN

Indiana Pacers | Forward | 6-7
Kobe Brown
5.5 PPG
2.9 RPG
1.2 APG
14.8 MPG
-1.8 Impact

Brown produces at an below average rate for a 15-minute workload.

NET IMPACT BREAKDOWN
Every stat, every credit, every cost — per game average
-1.8
Scoring +3.5
Points 5.5 PPG × +1.00 = +5.5
Missed 2PT 0.9/g × -0.78 = -0.7
Missed 3PT 1.3/g × -0.87 = -1.1
Missed FT 0.2/g × -1.00 = -0.2
Creation +1.5
Assists 1.2/g × +0.50 = +0.6
Off. Rebounds 0.7/g × +1.26 = +0.9
Turnovers -1.6
Turnovers 0.8/g × -1.95 = -1.6
Defense -0.4
Steals 0.3/g × +2.30 = +0.7
Blocks 0.2/g × +0.90 = +0.2
Def. Rebounds 2.1/g × +0.30 = +0.6
Fouls Committed 2.5/g × -0.75 = -1.9
Hustle & Effort +1.5
Contested Shots 1.8/g × +0.20 = +0.4
Deflections 0.7/g × +0.65 = +0.5
Charges Drawn 0.1/g × +2.70 = +0.3
Loose Balls 0.2/g × +0.60 = +0.1
Screen Assists 0.2/g × +0.30 = +0.1
Off. Fouls Drawn 0.1/g uncredited × +2.70 = +0.1
Raw Impact +4.5
Baseline (game-average expected) −6.3
Net Impact
-1.8
23th pctl vs Forwards

About this model: Net Impact can't measure floor spacing, help defense rotations, or playmaking gravity — so wings and guards are slightly undervalued vs bigs. How Net Impact works

SKILL DNA

Percentile rank vs 227 Forwards with 10+ games

Scoring 32th
6.9 PPG
Efficiency 64th
58.7% TS
Playmaking 41th
1.4 APG
Rebounding 36th
3.6 RPG
Rim Protection 19th
0.10/min
Hustle 22th
0.08/min
Shot Creation 50th
0% pullup
TO Discipline 31th
0.05/min

THE SEASON SO FAR

Kobe Brown's opening stretch of the season was defined by maddening inconsistency and a desperate search for a stable rotation role. He bounced wildly between highly efficient cameos and total invisibility. Look no further than his 11/25 vs LAL appearance. Despite shooting an efficient 3-for-4 from the floor to tally 6 points in 21 minutes, Brown posted a dismal -7.1 impact score because a complete lack of hustle plays and negative defensive effort cratered his overall value. Conversely, he found ways to contribute without shooting the lights out during a brief stint on 10/22 vs UTA. Scoring just 2 points in four minutes, he generated a +3.0 impact score by acting as a brilliant offensive connector who facilitated seamless ball reversals. He finally put the whole package together on 12/05 vs MEM, pouring in 13 points in 21 minutes to earn a massive +8.7 impact score. That peak performance was fueled by elite defensive positioning and a relentless motor, revealing exactly what kind of two-way spark plug he can be when fully engaged.

This stretch was defined by a frustrating paradox where an increase in playing time and raw production actively harmed his team on the floor. Look at his 02/19 vs WAS outing, where he tallied 12 points and 9 rebounds in 33 minutes but still posted a dismal -3.8 impact score. Those counting numbers were entirely undone by hidden costs, as poor transition defense allowed Washington to run wild on the other end. The floor completely caved in on 02/24 vs PHI, where he tallied 9 points and 10 rebounds but generated a brutal -11.6 impact score by forcing contested looks early in the shot clock. Ironically, Brown was often much more helpful when he barely shot the ball at all. During a brief 7-minute appearance on 01/25 vs BKN, he managed a +1.2 impact score with just 2 points. He generated that positive value entirely through active hands and physical on-ball defense to set a rugged tone. When he embraced the gritty margins, he helped the rotation; when he forced his own offense, the entire lineup suffered.

IMPACT TIMELINE

Game-by-game performance vs average. Green = above average, red = below.

PATTERNS

Below-average consistency. Brown is negative impact in 68% of games, with scoring moving ~5 points game-to-game.

Middle-of-the-road efficiency — shoots 45%+ from the field in 50% of games. Not automatic, but not a problem either.

Average defender. Brown doesn't hurt you defensively, but he's not making opponents uncomfortable either.

Flat trajectory all season — first-half impact -1.1, second-half -2.4. No major shifts, which fits with the overall steadiness.

Tends to go on runs. Longest hot streak: 4 games. Longest cold streak: 6 games.

MATCHUP HISTORY

Based on 73 games with tracking data. Shows who guarded this player on offense and who he guarded on defense, with their shooting stats in those matchups.

ON OFFENSE: WHO GUARDED HIM

His shooting stats against each primary defender this season

O. Anunoby 38.7 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 33.3%
PPP 0.13
PTS 5
J. Jackson Jr. 34.0 poss
FG% 37.5%
3P% 28.6%
PPP 0.29
PTS 10
K. Richmond 29.5 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.1
PTS 3
A. Williams 25.3 poss
FG% 57.1%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.43
PTS 11
B. Coulibaly 24.4 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
M. Diawara 24.3 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.08
PTS 2
L. Ball 23.2 poss
FG% 25.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.09
PTS 2
J. Miller 22.9 poss
FG% 25.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.09
PTS 2
J. Landale 20.7 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.05
PTS 1
J. Jaquez Jr. 20.2 poss
FG% 75.0%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.35
PTS 7

ON DEFENSE: WHO HE GUARDED

How opponents shot when he was the primary defender. Lower FG% = better defense.

O. Anunoby 47.3 poss
FG% 45.5%
3P% 66.7%
PPP 0.25
PTS 12
M. Diawara 38.6 poss
FG% 25.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.05
PTS 2
J. Jaquez Jr. 33.9 poss
FG% 40.0%
3P% 33.3%
PPP 0.29
PTS 10
J. Jackson Jr. 30.7 poss
FG% 42.9%
3P% 66.7%
PPP 0.29
PTS 9
K. Richmond 29.6 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
K. Knueppel 25.4 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.2
PTS 5
M. Bridges 23.2 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.09
PTS 2
J. Miller 23.2 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.09
PTS 2
A. Williams 23.0 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.09
PTS 2
R. Rupert 21.4 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.19
PTS 4

SEASON STATS

57
Games
5.5
PPG
2.9
RPG
1.2
APG
0.3
SPG
0.2
BPG
47.3
FG%
36.7
3P%
79.6
FT%
14.8
MPG

GAME LOG

57 games played