HOU

2025-26 Season

ALPEREN SENGUN

Houston Rockets | Center | 6-11
Alperen Sengun
20.4PPG
9.0RPG
6.1APG
33.7MPG
+12.6 Impact

Sengun produces at an elite rate for a 34-minute workload.

·
Embed this player card

Copy & paste this HTML into any page:

The widget updates automatically whenever our data does.

IMPACT BREAKDOWN
Every stat, every credit, every cost — per game average
+12.6
Scoring +17.4
Points Scored 20.4 PPG = +20.4
Missed Shots difficulty-adjusted = -6.6
Shot Making above expected FG% = +3.6
Creation +2.2
Assists & Self-Creation 6.1 AST/g + self-creation = +2.2
Turnovers -7.3
Turnovers 3.1/g (live + dead blend) = -7.3
Defense +0.1
Steals 1.2/g = +2.8
Blocks 1.1/g = +1.0
Fouls + context committed fouls, matchup adj = -3.7
Hustle & Effort +9.2
Rebounds 9.0 RPG (OREB + DREB) = +5.3
Contested Shots 7.2/g = +1.4
Deflections 2.0/g = +1.3
Charges Drawn 0.1/g = +0.2
Loose Balls 0.6/g = +0.4
Screen Assists 1.9/g = +0.6
Raw Impact +21.6
Baseline (game-average expected) −9.0
Net Impact
+12.6
89th pctl vs Centers

PBP Credit: Every play is analyzed from play-by-play data. Scorers get difficulty-adjusted credit, assisters get creation value based on the shot opportunity they created, and turnovers are classified by type. Shot difficulty is derived from 1M+ shots across 4 seasons. Full methodology

SKILL DNA

Percentile rank vs 93 Centers with 10+ games

Scoring 95th
20.6 PPG
Efficiency 36th
57.3% TS
Playmaking 98th
6.1 APG
Rebounding 84th
9.1 RPG
Defense 62th
+7.0/g
Hustle 66th
+19.4/g
Creation 93th
+5.03/g
Shot Making 91th
+8.39/g
TO Discipline 5th
0.09/min

THE SEASON SO FAR

Alperen Sengun spent the first quarter of the 2025-26 season operating as a relentless offensive engine, dictating the entire flow of the floor regardless of his shooting rhythm. He is far more than just a volume scorer. Look at his gritty performance on 10/24 vs DET, where his jumper completely abandoned him during an ugly 5-for-18 shooting night that yielded just 17 points. Even with the bricklaying, he still ground out a +8.9 Impact score by leaning on tenacious hustle plays, active defensive rotations, and seven assists to create essential non-scoring value. Conversely, gaudy point totals occasionally masked underlying costs. He needed a brutal 31 shot attempts to score 30 points on 11/17 vs ORL, dragging his efficiency into the gutter and resulting in a surprisingly modest +8.4 Impact score due to that disastrous shot selection. He only truly hurt his squad when he became entirely passive. That exact scenario unfolded on 12/20 vs DEN, where a quiet 8-point, 6-rebound disappearing act earned him a brutal -11.7 Impact score.

Alperen Sengun evolved into a monstrous offensive hub during this midseason stretch, terrorizing opponents with a blend of brute-force paint dominance and elite playmaking. Look at his absolute masterpiece on 02/02 vs IND, where he bullied his way to 39 points and 16 rebounds to post a staggering +36.7 Impact score. That astronomical rating stemmed from his relentless physical imposition and high-value shot selection, completely breaking Indiana's interior defense. He was similarly unstoppable from the floor on 01/27 vs MEM, shooting an absurd 15-of-17 for 33 points to earn a +23.8 Impact. Even when his touch vanished, his basketball IQ kept his team afloat. During a brutal 3-for-14 shooting night on 01/29 vs ATL, Sengun still managed a +3.9 Impact by pivoting into a gritty defensive anchor and glass-cleaner, grabbing 13 boards and blowing up Atlanta's offensive sets. True franchise bigs find ways to tilt the floor even when the jump hook refuses to fall.

This late-season stretch was defined by Alperen Sengun realizing his full potential as an offensive fulcrum, oscillating between absolute dominance and occasional bouts of erratic shot selection. He completely dismantled the defense on 03/23 vs CHI, logging a massive +37.4 Impact score by pairing surgical efficiency—hitting 16 of his 19 shots—with brilliant passing to finish with 33 points, 13 boards, and 10 assists. However, his aggressive mindset occasionally backfired when his touch abandoned him. During the 03/05 vs GSW matchup, he tallied a healthy 17 points and 7 assists, but his -5.1 Impact score revealed the hidden cost of empty possessions and forcing heavily contested looks to finish just 8-for-20 from the floor. Conversely, he found ways to salvage rough scoring nights through sheer effort and rebounding. On 04/07 vs PHX, a miserable 5-for-15 shooting night yielded only 12 points. Yet, he still squeezed out a +0.6 Impact in that contest by crashing the glass for 14 rebounds and keeping the half-court offense flowing with 6 assists.

IMPACT TIMELINE

Game-by-game performance vs average. Green = above average, red = below.

PATTERNS

Very consistent. Sengun posts positive impact in 90% of games — you almost always get a productive night. Scoring varies by ~8 points, but the overall contribution stays positive.

Middle-of-the-road efficiency — shoots 45%+ from the field in 68% of games. Not automatic, but not a problem either.

Defensive difference-maker. Sengun consistently forces tough shots and protects the rim — opponents shoot worse when he's guarding them.

Small downward trend. First-half impact: +13.8, second-half: +11.5. Not alarming yet, but trending the wrong direction.

Hot right now — 7 straight games with positive impact. Longest positive run this season: 22 games.

MATCHUP HISTORY ⚠ Updated 46 days ago

Based on 67 games with tracking data. Shows who guarded this player on offense and who he guarded on defense, with their shooting stats in those matchups.

ON OFFENSE: WHO GUARDED HIM

His shooting stats against each primary defender this season

M. Raynaud 103.1 poss
FG% 63.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.36
PTS 37
N. Jokić 92.0 poss
FG% 43.3%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.3
PTS 28
V. Wembanyama 89.3 poss
FG% 66.7%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.45
PTS 40
B. Lopez 81.4 poss
FG% 52.2%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.36
PTS 29
R. Gobert 71.3 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.32
PTS 23
K. Filipowski 70.6 poss
FG% 78.6%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.31
PTS 22
C. Holmgren 69.2 poss
FG% 42.1%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.3
PTS 21
D. Ayton 61.5 poss
FG% 90.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.33
PTS 20
J. Nurkić 58.5 poss
FG% 40.0%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.31
PTS 18
K. Towns 57.7 poss
FG% 55.6%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.23
PTS 13

ON DEFENSE: WHO HE GUARDED

How opponents shot when he was the primary defender. Lower FG% = better defense.

N. Jokić 119.9 poss
FG% 52.4%
3P% 41.7%
PPP 0.42
PTS 50
M. Raynaud 101.2 poss
FG% 47.4%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.19
PTS 19
R. Gobert 64.3 poss
FG% 57.1%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.12
PTS 8
D. Ayton 64.2 poss
FG% 75.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.19
PTS 12
K. Filipowski 60.7 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 25.0%
PPP 0.21
PTS 13
L. Kornet 57.5 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.1
PTS 6
B. Lopez 55.9 poss
FG% 62.5%
3P% 60.0%
PPP 0.23
PTS 13
V. Wembanyama 55.5 poss
FG% 38.9%
3P% 16.7%
PPP 0.4
PTS 22
W. Carter Jr. 49.4 poss
FG% 70.0%
3P% 66.7%
PPP 0.34
PTS 17
J. Nurkić 47.6 poss
FG% 63.6%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.34
PTS 16

SEASON STATS

78
Games
20.4
PPG
9.0
RPG
6.1
APG
1.2
SPG
1.1
BPG
51.5
FG%
29.5
3P%
69.1
FT%
33.7
MPG

GAME LOG

78 games played