HOU

2025-26 Season

ALPEREN SENGUN

Houston Rockets | Center | 6-11
Alperen Sengun
20.4 PPG
8.8 RPG
6.2 APG
33.4 MPG
+5.8 Impact

Sengun produces at an elite rate for a 33-minute workload. 3.2 turnovers per game cost 6.2 points of value nightly. Elite defensive value (+3.9/game) is a major strength.

NET IMPACT BREAKDOWN
Every stat, every credit, every cost — per game average
+5.8
Scoring +12.8
Points 20.4 PPG × +1.00 = +20.4
Missed 2PT 6.2/g × -0.78 = -4.9
Missed 3PT 1.2/g × -0.87 = -1.0
Missed FT 1.7/g × -1.00 = -1.7
Creation +5.9
Assists 6.2/g × +0.50 = +3.1
Off. Rebounds 2.2/g × +1.26 = +2.8
Turnovers -6.2
Turnovers 3.2/g × -1.95 = -6.2
Defense +3.9
Steals 1.2/g × +2.30 = +2.8
Blocks 1.1/g × +0.90 = +1.0
Def. Rebounds 6.6/g × +0.30 = +2.0
Fouls Committed 2.5/g × -0.75 = -1.9
Hustle & Effort +4.5
Contested Shots 8.4/g × +0.20 = +1.7
Deflections 2.3/g × +0.65 = +1.5
Charges Drawn 0.1/g × +2.70 = +0.3
Loose Balls 0.7/g × +0.60 = +0.4
Screen Assists 2.1/g × +0.30 = +0.6
Raw Impact +20.9
Baseline (game-average expected) −15.1
Net Impact
+5.8
78th pctl vs Centers

About this model: Net Impact can't measure floor spacing, help defense rotations, or playmaking gravity — so wings and guards are slightly undervalued vs bigs. How Net Impact works

SKILL DNA

Percentile rank vs 92 Centers with 10+ games

Scoring 94th
20.7 PPG
Efficiency 45th
57.9% TS
Playmaking 98th
6.3 APG
Rebounding 83th
8.9 RPG
Rim Protection 42th
0.18/min
Hustle 56th
0.12/min
Shot Creation 50th
0% pullup
TO Discipline 3th
0.10/min

THE SEASON SO FAR

Alperen Sengun spent the first quarter of the season evolving into a true offensive hub, though his nightly effectiveness swung wildly based on his shot selection. Look at the 11/16 vs ORL matchup, where he poured in 30 points, 12 rebounds, and 8 assists but only managed a mild +3.3 impact score. The hidden cost of that raw production was a disastrous 11-for-31 shooting night filled with missed bunnies and forced hook shots that severely diluted his value. Conversely, he found ways to dictate winning basketball even when his scoring volume dipped. During the 11/12 vs WAS contest, Sengun tallied just 16 points, yet he generated a sturdy +5.3 impact score because his elite elbow playmaking and dominance on the glass (+3.3 hustle metric) kept the offense humming. When he perfectly balanced his scoring and passing, the results were terrifying for opponents. He completely dissected double-teams during the 11/14 vs POR game, posting 25 points on hyper-efficient 9-for-13 shooting. That masterful blend of central hub play yielded a monstrous +25.7 impact score, heavily boosted by a massive +18.1 defensive metric.

Alperen Sengun's midseason stretch was defined by extreme volatility as a central offensive hub, swinging wildly between masterful paint orchestration and forced, inefficient post-ups. When he operated with patience and elite footwork, he was practically unstoppable. He peaked on 01/26 vs MEM with a staggering +19.6 impact score, converting 15 of his 17 field goal attempts to achieve absolute dominance in the painted area. Yet, his insistence on forcing tough shots through double-teams often dragged his overall value into the red. Look no further than his 01/31 vs DAL performance. Despite tallying 14 rebounds and seven assists, a brutal 6-for-20 shooting night resulted in a -4.8 impact score because his stubborn shot selection actively damaged the offense. Conversely, a stark drop in scoring aggression was just as harmful, as seen on 12/20 vs DEN where his passive eight-point outing yielded a disastrous -7.2 impact. The Turkish big man remains a brilliant playmaker, but this window revealed how quickly his nightly influence plummets when his interior decision-making betrays him.

This stretch was defined by extreme volatility, oscillating wildly between transcendent offensive hub mastery and frustrating bouts of self-inflicted damage. When Sengun operated patiently from the high post, he was utterly unstoppable. Look at his masterpiece on 03/23 vs CHI, where he posted 33 points, 13 rebounds, and 10 assists to drive a massive +30.3 impact score through near-perfect interior finishing. He generated immense value even on modest scoring nights, like on 02/07 vs OKC, where just 17 points translated to a +17.5 impact because he anchored the defense and picked apart the opposition with 11 assists. Yet, his worst habits routinely dragged down his overall effectiveness. During the 02/26 vs ORL matchup, he scored an efficient 16 points but posted a dismal -5.0 impact score because costly live-ball turnovers and foul trouble completely erased his scoring value. He remains a brilliant tactician with the ball in his hands, but those hidden costs still dictate whether he acts as a true engine or a burdensome anchor.

IMPACT TIMELINE

Game-by-game performance vs average. Green = above average, red = below.

PATTERNS

Very consistent. Sengun posts positive impact in 76% of games — you almost always get a productive night. Scoring varies by ~8 points, but the overall contribution stays positive.

Middle-of-the-road efficiency — shoots 45%+ from the field in 68% of games. Not automatic, but not a problem either.

Defensive difference-maker. Sengun consistently forces tough shots and protects the rim — opponents shoot worse when he's guarding them.

Tends to go on runs. Longest hot streak: 11 games. Longest cold streak: 2 games.

MATCHUP HISTORY

Based on 67 games with tracking data. Shows who guarded this player on offense and who he guarded on defense, with their shooting stats in those matchups.

ON OFFENSE: WHO GUARDED HIM

His shooting stats against each primary defender this season

M. Raynaud 103.1 poss
FG% 63.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.36
PTS 37
N. Jokić 92.0 poss
FG% 43.3%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.3
PTS 28
V. Wembanyama 89.3 poss
FG% 66.7%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.45
PTS 40
B. Lopez 81.4 poss
FG% 52.2%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.36
PTS 29
R. Gobert 71.3 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.32
PTS 23
K. Filipowski 70.6 poss
FG% 78.6%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.31
PTS 22
C. Holmgren 69.2 poss
FG% 42.1%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.3
PTS 21
D. Ayton 61.5 poss
FG% 90.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.33
PTS 20
J. Nurkić 58.5 poss
FG% 40.0%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.31
PTS 18
K. Towns 57.7 poss
FG% 55.6%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.23
PTS 13

ON DEFENSE: WHO HE GUARDED

How opponents shot when he was the primary defender. Lower FG% = better defense.

N. Jokić 119.9 poss
FG% 52.4%
3P% 41.7%
PPP 0.42
PTS 50
M. Raynaud 101.2 poss
FG% 47.4%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.19
PTS 19
R. Gobert 64.3 poss
FG% 57.1%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.12
PTS 8
D. Ayton 64.2 poss
FG% 75.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.19
PTS 12
K. Filipowski 60.7 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 25.0%
PPP 0.21
PTS 13
L. Kornet 57.5 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.1
PTS 6
B. Lopez 55.9 poss
FG% 62.5%
3P% 60.0%
PPP 0.23
PTS 13
V. Wembanyama 55.5 poss
FG% 38.9%
3P% 16.7%
PPP 0.4
PTS 22
W. Carter Jr. 49.4 poss
FG% 70.0%
3P% 66.7%
PPP 0.34
PTS 17
J. Nurkić 47.6 poss
FG% 63.6%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.34
PTS 16

SEASON STATS

67
Games
20.4
PPG
8.8
RPG
6.2
APG
1.2
SPG
1.1
BPG
52.2
FG%
29.1
3P%
68.1
FT%
33.4
MPG

GAME LOG

67 games played