LAC

2025-26 Season

NICOLAS BATUM

LA Clippers | Guard-Forward | 6-7
Nicolas Batum
4.0PPG
2.5RPG
0.9APG
17.5MPG
-6.7 Impact

Batum produces at an poor rate for a 18-minute workload.

·
Embed this player card

Copy & paste this HTML into any page:

The widget updates automatically whenever our data does.

IMPACT BREAKDOWN
Every stat, every credit, every cost — per game average
-6.7
Scoring +3.8
Points Scored 4.0 PPG = +4.0
Missed Shots difficulty-adjusted = -1.5
Shot Making above expected FG% = +1.3
Creation +0.1
Assists & Self-Creation 0.9 AST/g + self-creation = +0.1
Turnovers -1.2
Turnovers 0.5/g (live + dead blend) = -1.2
Defense +0.5
Steals 0.6/g = +1.4
Blocks 0.3/g = +0.3
Fouls + context committed fouls, matchup adj = -1.2
Hustle & Effort +1.4
Rebounds 2.5 RPG (OREB + DREB) = -0.3
Contested Shots 2.8/g = +0.6
Deflections 1.3/g = +0.8
Charges Drawn 0.0/g = +0.0
Loose Balls 0.3/g = +0.2
Screen Assists 0.2/g = +0.1
Raw Impact +4.6
Baseline (game-average expected) −11.3
Net Impact
-6.7
8th pctl vs Guards

PBP Credit: Every play is analyzed from play-by-play data. Scorers get difficulty-adjusted credit, assisters get creation value based on the shot opportunity they created, and turnovers are classified by type. Shot difficulty is derived from 1M+ shots across 4 seasons. Full methodology

SKILL DNA

Percentile rank vs 246 Guards with 10+ games

Scoring 5th
4.0 PPG
Efficiency 52th
54.9% TS
Playmaking 7th
0.9 APG
Rebounding 41th
2.5 RPG
Defense 61th
+7.8/g
Hustle 34th
+7.6/g
Creation 6th
+1.19/g
Shot Making 11th
+3.84/g
TO Discipline 90th
0.03/min

THE SEASON SO FAR

This 25-game stretch was defined by a fading veteran clinging to relevance as an offensive ghost whose minutes routinely bled value. Look no further than his brutal performance on 11/30 vs DAL, where he logged 28 minutes of empty cardio, missing all four of his shots to generate a staggering -14.6 Impact score. Even when his shot occasionally fell, the underlying metrics exposed a player struggling to keep up with the pace of the modern game. During his highest-scoring night on 11/18 vs PHI, Batum dropped 11 points but still posted a -1.1 Impact because he needed seven shot attempts to get there and offered zero disruptive defensive edge to offset his volume. He did manage a rare flash of effectiveness on 11/22 vs CHA, producing a season-best +6.4 Impact. In that matchup, he hit three of his four three-point attempts for 9 points, generating positive value through highly efficient spot-up shooting and mistake-free spacing. Ultimately, those fleeting moments of competence could not mask the reality that Batum spent the first quarter of the season as a severe rotational liability.

This stretch of the season was defined by a brutal, prolonged slump where Nicolas Batum looked every bit his age, struggling to stay relevant in a diminished bench role. He offered a fleeting glimpse of his vintage self on 01/02 vs UTA, draining four triples for 14 points and generating a +8.6 Impact score. That rare positive outing stemmed entirely from elite spot-up efficiency and active hustle plays, rather than his usual perimeter struggles. But those moments quickly evaporated into a string of offensive zeroes, bottoming out completely on 02/02 vs PHI. During that matchup, he missed both of his shots and posted a dismal -15.7 Impact, dragged down by an absolute inability to generate spacing or deter penetration. Even when handed a rare starting nod on 01/17 vs TOR, Batum lasted just six minutes, putting up zero points and a -12.4 Impact before being yanked. Aside from chucking the occasional corner three, the veteran simply lacked the foot speed and offensive gravity to justify his rotation minutes.

Nicolas Batum’s late-season stretch was defined by a stark, painful fade into irrelevance. The aging veteran routinely struggled to stay on the floor or generate any meaningful production. Even when pressed into the starting lineup on 02/26 vs MIN, he went completely scoreless across 26 minutes. His dismal -9.0 Impact score that night stemmed directly from a total lack of offensive gravity, allowing defenders to freely pack the paint and ignore him on the perimeter. The bottom fell out completely on 03/02 vs GSW, where a brief six-minute cameo yielded zeroes across the box score and a staggering -11.8 Impact. He managed exactly one positive outing during this brutal run, hitting three triples for nine points on 03/25 vs TOR to scrape together a +2.4 Impact. Aside from that fleeting spark, Batum looked entirely spent.

IMPACT TIMELINE

Game-by-game performance vs average. Green = above average, red = below.

PATTERNS

Struggling. Batum has posted negative impact in 92% of games this season. The production rarely outweighs the cost.

Streaky shooter — only cracks 45% from the field in 28% of games. Efficiency is all over the place night-to-night.

Good defender on his best nights, but it comes and goes. Some games Batum locks in defensively, others he gets picked apart.

Small downward trend. First-half impact: -5.9, second-half: -7.6. Not alarming yet, but trending the wrong direction.

In a rough stretch — 7 straight games with negative impact. Longest cold streak this season: 34 games.

MATCHUP HISTORY ⚠ Updated 46 days ago

Based on 73 games with tracking data. Shows who guarded this player on offense and who he guarded on defense, with their shooting stats in those matchups.

ON OFFENSE: WHO GUARDED HIM

His shooting stats against each primary defender this season

N. Reid 53.2 poss
FG% 66.7%
3P% 66.7%
PPP 0.11
PTS 6
K. Thompson 38.4 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
L. James 37.4 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.08
PTS 3
R. Sheppard 35.0 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.17
PTS 6
J. Champagnie 34.3 poss
FG% 40.0%
3P% 40.0%
PPP 0.17
PTS 6
C. Flagg 30.1 poss
FG% 20.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.07
PTS 2
R. O'Neale 29.8 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.1
PTS 3
D. Booker 27.6 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
D. Avdija 23.8 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
J. Jackson Jr. 23.5 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.21
PTS 5

ON DEFENSE: WHO HE GUARDED

How opponents shot when he was the primary defender. Lower FG% = better defense.

N. Reid 46.4 poss
FG% 40.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.11
PTS 5
K. Thompson 40.1 poss
FG% 60.0%
3P% 57.1%
PPP 0.4
PTS 16
R. O'Neale 36.9 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 25.0%
PPP 0.19
PTS 7
C. Flagg 35.2 poss
FG% 75.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.28
PTS 10
J. Champagnie 35.1 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.09
PTS 3
J. Randle 31.2 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.13
PTS 4
C. Gillespie 28.6 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 40.0%
PPP 0.21
PTS 6
R. Hachimura 26.7 poss
FG% 66.7%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.15
PTS 4
D. Robinson 26.4 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.15
PTS 4
J. Jackson Jr. 26.4 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.08
PTS 2

SEASON STATS

74
Games
4.0
PPG
2.5
RPG
0.9
APG
0.6
SPG
0.3
BPG
40.3
FG%
40.4
3P%
81.8
FT%
17.5
MPG

GAME LOG

74 games played