LAC

2025-26 Season

JORDAN MILLER

LA Clippers | Guard | 6-5
Jordan Miller
9.7 PPG
3.0 RPG
2.1 APG
21.7 MPG
-0.3 Impact

Miller produces at an average rate for a 22-minute workload.

NET IMPACT BREAKDOWN
Every stat, every credit, every cost — per game average
-0.3
Scoring +6.4
Points 9.7 PPG × +1.00 = +9.7
Missed 2PT 2.0/g × -0.78 = -1.6
Missed 3PT 1.2/g × -0.87 = -1.0
Missed FT 0.7/g × -1.00 = -0.7
Creation +2.1
Assists 2.1/g × +0.50 = +1.1
Off. Rebounds 0.8/g × +1.26 = +1.0
Turnovers -1.9
Turnovers 1.0/g × -1.95 = -1.9
Defense +0.8
Steals 0.8/g × +2.30 = +1.8
Blocks 0.2/g × +0.90 = +0.2
Def. Rebounds 2.3/g × +0.30 = +0.7
Fouls Committed 2.5/g × -0.75 = -1.9
Hustle & Effort +2.0
Contested Shots 3.3/g × +0.20 = +0.7
Deflections 1.4/g × +0.65 = +0.9
Loose Balls 0.3/g × +0.60 = +0.2
Screen Assists 0.2/g × +0.30 = +0.1
Off. Fouls Drawn 0.0/g uncredited × +2.70 = +0.1
Raw Impact +9.4
Baseline (game-average expected) −9.7
Net Impact
-0.3
66th pctl vs Guards

About this model: Net Impact can't measure floor spacing, help defense rotations, or playmaking gravity — so wings and guards are slightly undervalued vs bigs. How Net Impact works

SKILL DNA

Percentile rank vs 235 Guards with 10+ games

Scoring 55th
10.2 PPG
Efficiency 82th
59.4% TS
Playmaking 40th
2.2 APG
Rebounding 55th
3.2 RPG
Rim Protection 71th
0.14/min
Hustle 27th
0.09/min
Shot Creation 50th
0% pullup
TO Discipline 63th
0.05/min

THE SEASON SO FAR

Jordan Miller's first twenty games were defined by a maddening inconsistency, swinging violently between elite two-way wing play and complete offensive invisibility. When he actively engaged without the ball, he was lethal. His blistering perimeter shooting and decisive off-ball movement fueled a massive +10.5 impact score on 11/12 vs DEN. Yet, that aggression frequently vanished into thin air. Even when providing solid weak-side rim protection, his absolute refusal to look at the basket crippled the team's spacing, resulting in a disastrous -5.1 impact on 12/28 vs DET where he logged zero points in 17 minutes. Thankfully, he rebounded late in the stretch by leaning into his physical tools. On 01/16 vs TOR, Miller suffocated his primary assignments to drive an elite +10.7 impact score, pairing his lockdown defense with 19 points across a grueling 46 minutes. If he wants to thrive as a permanent rotation fixture, he must realize that relentless cutting and defensive hustle are his true NBA lifelines.

Jordan Miller's midseason stretch was defined by maddening inconsistency. He oscillated wildly between masterful offensive orchestration and catastrophic shot selection. His worst habits surfaced on 02/04 vs CLE, where a disastrous 2-for-10 shooting night yielded a brutal -13.0 impact score because he repeatedly forced contested looks early in the clock. Even when he scored efficiently, as he did during a 14-point effort on 02/22 vs ORL, his -0.6 impact score revealed the hidden costs of his poor defensive resistance. Yet, when Miller played within the flow of the offense, he looked entirely different. On 03/01 vs NOP, he generated a brilliant +11.5 impact score by making lightning-quick reads to dish out 8 assists while shooting a near-perfect 5-for-6 from the floor for 19 points. To survive in a permanent rotation spot, he must abandon the forced jumpers and commit entirely to high-IQ slashing.

IMPACT TIMELINE

Game-by-game performance vs average. Green = above average, red = below.

PATTERNS

Boom-or-bust player. Miller's impact swings wildly relative to his average — some nights dominant, others invisible. Scoring varies by ~6 points per game.

Middle-of-the-road efficiency — shoots 45%+ from the field in 61% of games. Not automatic, but not a problem either.

Defensive difference-maker. Miller consistently forces tough shots and protects the rim — opponents shoot worse when he's guarding them.

Tends to go on runs. Longest hot streak: 4 games. Longest cold streak: 9 games.

MATCHUP HISTORY

Based on 57 games with tracking data. Shows who guarded this player on offense and who he guarded on defense, with their shooting stats in those matchups.

ON OFFENSE: WHO GUARDED HIM

His shooting stats against each primary defender this season

N. Clifford 33.9 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.12
PTS 4
S. Bey 33.2 poss
FG% 66.7%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.12
PTS 4
T. Hardaway Jr. 30.6 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.07
PTS 2
R. Sheppard 28.2 poss
FG% 40.0%
3P% 33.3%
PPP 0.18
PTS 5
A. Dosunmu 27.8 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.14
PTS 4
A. Edwards 26.5 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.15
PTS 4
B. Hyland 26.4 poss
FG% 20.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.11
PTS 3
T. Murphy III 26.3 poss
FG% 83.3%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.53
PTS 14
B. Brown 25.9 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.31
PTS 8
O. Agbaji 25.9 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0

ON DEFENSE: WHO HE GUARDED

How opponents shot when he was the primary defender. Lower FG% = better defense.

S. Bey 59.3 poss
FG% 11.1%
3P% 33.3%
PPP 0.05
PTS 3
B. Brown 35.8 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.14
PTS 5
O. Agbaji 32.9 poss
FG% 20.0%
3P% 25.0%
PPP 0.09
PTS 3
K. Johnson 30.4 poss
FG% 57.1%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.3
PTS 9
N. Clifford 28.4 poss
FG% 25.0%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.11
PTS 3
W. Riley 26.3 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
P. Nance 26.0 poss
FG% 66.7%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.15
PTS 4
B. McGowens 25.4 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.08
PTS 2
M. Smart 24.7 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.24
PTS 6
N. Reid 24.7 poss
FG% 75.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.24
PTS 6

SEASON STATS

55
Games
9.7
PPG
3.0
RPG
2.1
APG
0.8
SPG
0.2
BPG
52.2
FG%
32.0
3P%
76.4
FT%
21.7
MPG

GAME LOG

55 games played