LAC

2025-26 Season

ISAIAH JACKSON

LA Clippers | Forward | 6-8
Isaiah Jackson
6.7 PPG
5.3 RPG
0.9 APG
16.5 MPG
+3.3 Impact

Jackson produces at an above average rate for a 16-minute workload.

NET IMPACT BREAKDOWN
Every stat, every credit, every cost — per game average
+3.3
Scoring +4.7
Points 6.7 PPG × +1.00 = +6.7
Missed 2PT 1.5/g × -0.78 = -1.2
Missed 3PT 0.1/g × -0.87 = -0.1
Missed FT 0.7/g × -1.00 = -0.7
Creation +2.1
Assists 0.9/g × +0.50 = +0.5
Off. Rebounds 1.3/g × +1.26 = +1.6
Turnovers -2.1
Turnovers 1.1/g × -1.95 = -2.1
Defense +1.7
Steals 0.7/g × +2.30 = +1.6
Blocks 0.9/g × +0.90 = +0.8
Def. Rebounds 4.0/g × +0.30 = +1.2
Fouls Committed 2.5/g × -0.75 = -1.9
Hustle & Effort +3.0
Contested Shots 5.1/g × +0.20 = +1.0
Deflections 1.8/g × +0.65 = +1.2
Loose Balls 0.3/g × +0.60 = +0.2
Screen Assists 1.7/g × +0.30 = +0.5
Off. Fouls Drawn 0.0/g uncredited × +2.70 = +0.1
Raw Impact +9.4
Baseline (game-average expected) −6.1
Net Impact
+3.3
84th pctl vs Forwards

About this model: Net Impact can't measure floor spacing, help defense rotations, or playmaking gravity — so wings and guards are slightly undervalued vs bigs. How Net Impact works

SKILL DNA

Percentile rank vs 227 Forwards with 10+ games

Scoring 37th
7.2 PPG
Efficiency 71th
59.7% TS
Playmaking 22th
1.0 APG
Rebounding 77th
5.7 RPG
Rim Protection 89th
0.21/min
Hustle 93th
0.15/min
Shot Creation 50th
0% pullup
TO Discipline 23th
0.06/min

THE SEASON SO FAR

Isaiah Jackson's first twenty games were defined by a volatile evolution from an early-season defensive liability into a wildly explosive rim-running enforcer. He looked completely lost during a disastrous 10/23 vs OKC outing, posting a dismal -6.6 impact score while missing every interior look and bleeding value through defensive lapses. He eventually found his footing by embracing sheer physicality. On 11/03 vs MIL, Jackson erupted for 21 points and 10 rebounds, punishing weak interior defense to post a staggering +19.8 impact. Even when his scoring vanished, he learned to tilt the floor in other ways. During his 11/08 vs DEN matchup, he managed just 4 points but still drove a +3.5 impact by offering elite rim deterrence and relentless activity in the passing lanes. When he avoids poor pick-and-roll positioning, his aggressive energy on the glass makes him an undeniably chaotic force.

This stretch was defined by extreme volatility, with Isaiah Jackson oscillating wildly between game-changing defensive anchor and unplayable liability. His value rarely tied to his scoring column, perfectly illustrated during the 12/08 vs SAC matchup. Despite putting up zero points on 0-for-2 shooting, he logged a massive +4.2 impact score by salvaging his floor time with spectacular weakside shot-blocking. Yet, that same hyper-specialized profile completely collapsed on 01/21 vs BOS. In just nine minutes, a total offensive disappearing act dragged his impact down to a brutal -6.6, rendering him a massive negative on a night where he failed to generate any momentum. When he actually put everything together, the results were staggering. During the 02/02 vs HOU game, Jackson anchored the second unit for 25 minutes, generating a +6.4 impact through spectacular rim protection and high-energy rotations rather than his modest six points. He remains a chaotic situational weapon.

IMPACT TIMELINE

Game-by-game performance vs average. Green = above average, red = below.

PATTERNS

Volatile for his role. Jackson has noticeable ups and downs, with scoring moving ~5 points between games.

Reliable shooter — hits 45%+ from the field in 83% of games. You can count on efficient nights more often than not.

Defensive difference-maker. Jackson consistently forces tough shots and protects the rim — opponents shoot worse when he's guarding them.

Tends to go on runs. Longest hot streak: 9 games. Longest cold streak: 3 games.

MATCHUP HISTORY

Based on 60 games with tracking data. Shows who guarded this player on offense and who he guarded on defense, with their shooting stats in those matchups.

ON OFFENSE: WHO GUARDED HIM

His shooting stats against each primary defender this season

J. Duren 73.2 poss
FG% 60.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.1
PTS 7
J. Poeltl 44.9 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.13
PTS 6
M. Turner 42.6 poss
FG% 60.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.14
PTS 6
K. Filipowski 37.8 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.21
PTS 8
N. Jokić 35.9 poss
FG% 25.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.08
PTS 3
M. Potter 34.4 poss
FG% 75.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.17
PTS 6
D. Queen 33.9 poss
FG% 60.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.18
PTS 6
M. Bagley III 33.6 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.12
PTS 4
E. Mobley 29.7 poss
FG% 25.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.17
PTS 5
A. Sengun 29.3 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.07
PTS 2

ON DEFENSE: WHO HE GUARDED

How opponents shot when he was the primary defender. Lower FG% = better defense.

J. Duren 76.3 poss
FG% 57.1%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.28
PTS 21
J. Poeltl 49.1 poss
FG% 57.1%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.16
PTS 8
M. Turner 38.5 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.18
PTS 7
K. Filipowski 37.8 poss
FG% 25.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.21
PTS 8
N. Jokić 37.5 poss
FG% 70.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.37
PTS 14
D. Queen 35.4 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.17
PTS 6
M. Bagley III 31.5 poss
FG% 62.5%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.38
PTS 12
M. Potter 30.4 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.23
PTS 7
A. Sengun 30.1 poss
FG% 42.9%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.3
PTS 9
D. Green 28.7 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.07
PTS 2

SEASON STATS

55
Games
6.7
PPG
5.3
RPG
0.9
APG
0.7
SPG
0.9
BPG
63.7
FG%
0.0
3P%
64.8
FT%
16.5
MPG

GAME LOG

55 games played