Interactive analysis

EXPLORE THE GAME

Every shot, every lead change, every rotation — visualized.

Lead over time · win-probability overlay
LEAD TRACKER
LAC lead NOP lead Win %
Every shot · colored by difficulty
SHOT CHART
Click shooters to compare their shots on the court
NOP 2P — 3P —
LAC 2P — 3P —
Tough make Easy make Blown miss Tough miss 178 attempts

NOP NOP Shot-making Δ

Fears Hard 10/15 +10.1
Murphy III Hard 6/15 -0.1
Queen 6/13 -1.4
Bey 5/12 -1.3
Murray 6/10 +3.2
Missi Open 3/7 -2.8
Jones Hard 1/6 -4.0
McGowens 2/5 -1.4
Peavy Hard 0/2 -1.9
Matković Hard 0/2 -2.2

LAC LAC Shot-making Δ

Leonard 8/18 -2.3
Collins Open 5/14 -6.2
Mathurin 4/13 -5.8
Lopez Hard 6/9 +6.5
Jones Jr. 6/9 +4.6
Miller 5/6 +4.4
Batum Hard 3/5 +3.8
Dunn 4/5 +3.4
Sanders Hard 3/4 +4.8
Niederhäuser Open 2/3 +0.3
How the game was played
BY THE NUMBERS
NOP
LAC
40/89 Field Goals 48/89
44.9% Field Goal % 53.9%
12/33 3-Pointers 17/36
36.4% 3-Point % 47.2%
25/30 Free Throws 24/29
83.3% Free Throw % 82.8%
57.2% True Shooting % 67.3%
54 Total Rebounds 46
14 Offensive 10
27 Defensive 28
22 Assists 29
1.29 Assist/TO Ratio 3.22
16 Turnovers 8
6 Steals 11
4 Blocks 3
21 Fouls 22
50 Points in Paint 60
13 Fast Break Pts 22
9 Points off TOs 36
16 Second Chance Pts 8
66 Bench Points 57
0 Largest Lead 26
Biggest contributors
TOP NET IMPACT
1
Jordan Miller
19 PTS · 2 REB · 8 AST · 32.2 MIN
+26.18
2
Jeremiah Fears
28 PTS · 3 REB · 4 AST · 26.1 MIN
+18.19
3
Kris Dunn
9 PTS · 3 REB · 4 AST · 21.9 MIN
+16.94
4
Dejounte Murray
17 PTS · 5 REB · 5 AST · 21.9 MIN
+15.55
5
Kawhi Leonard
23 PTS · 3 REB · 5 AST · 29.4 MIN
+14.67
6
Derrick Jones Jr.
17 PTS · 2 REB · 0 AST · 28.2 MIN
+14.62
7
Brook Lopez
16 PTS · 7 REB · 3 AST · 25.7 MIN
+14.42
8
Derik Queen
19 PTS · 5 REB · 2 AST · 29.0 MIN
+14.29
9
Saddiq Bey
14 PTS · 6 REB · 2 AST · 29.4 MIN
+12.9
10
John Collins
15 PTS · 7 REB · 1 AST · 24.6 MIN
+12.58
Play-by-play (most recent first)
PLAY FEED
Q4 0:08 TEAM defensive REBOUND 117–137
Q4 0:08 MISS M. Peavy 7' driving bank Shot 117–137
Q4 0:26 I. Jackson cutting DUNK (2 PTS) (J. Miller 8 AST) 117–137
Q4 0:37 J. Fears Free Throw 1 of 1 (28 PTS) 117–135
Q4 0:37 I. Jackson shooting personal FOUL (2 PF) (Fears 1 FT) 116–135
Q4 0:37 J. Fears driving Layup (27 PTS) (D. Queen 2 AST) 116–135
Q4 0:42 C. Christie running DUNK (2 PTS) (K. Sanders 1 AST) 114–135
Q4 0:45 C. Christie STEAL (1 STL) 114–133
Q4 0:45 J. Fears bad pass TURNOVER (5 TO) 114–133
Q4 0:50 TEAM offensive REBOUND 114–133
Q4 0:50 I. Jackson BLOCK (1 BLK) 114–133
Q4 0:50 MISS Y. Missi driving reverse Layup - blocked 114–133
Q4 0:51 Y. Missi REBOUND (Off:4 Def:4) 114–133
Q4 0:54 MISS M. Peavy 24' 3PT 114–133
Q4 1:02 Y. Missi STEAL (1 STL) 114–133

GAME ANALYSIS

KEEP READING

Create a free account and follow your team to get the full analysis every morning.

Create Free Account

Already have an account? Log in

PLAYER PERFORMANCE

LAC LA Clippers
S Kawhi Leonard 29.4m
23
pts
3
reb
5
ast
Impact
+9.9

Settling for contested perimeter jumpers severely capped his offensive efficiency and flattened his overall impact. While his isolation defense remained stout against primary creators, the sheer volume of empty possessions balanced the scales to a neutral rating.

Shooting
FG 8/18 (44.4%)
3PT 1/7 (14.3%)
FT 6/7 (85.7%)
Advanced
TS% 54.6%
USG% 31.9%
Net Rtg +41.7
+/- +25
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 29.4m
Scoring +15.3
Creation +2.8
Shot Making +3.2
Hustle +0.9
Defense +0.8
Turnovers -4.7
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 9
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 55.6%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 2
17
pts
2
reb
0
ast
Impact
+7.9

Spectacular finishing in transition masked a tendency to get lost on back-door cuts in the half-court. His high-flying offensive efficiency was nearly entirely offset by late closeouts and defensive miscommunications.

Shooting
FG 6/9 (66.7%)
3PT 3/4 (75.0%)
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 86.0%
USG% 15.4%
Net Rtg +36.0
+/- +19
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 28.2m
Scoring +15.0
Creation +0.4
Shot Making +3.2
Hustle +2.5
Defense -3.1
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 16
FGM Against 8
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
S Brook Lopez 25.7m
16
pts
7
reb
3
ast
Impact
+8.4

Elite floor-spacing from the center position completely warped the opposing defensive shell. Combining that perimeter gravity with excellent verticality at the rim resulted in a dominant two-way shift.

Shooting
FG 6/9 (66.7%)
3PT 4/6 (66.7%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 88.9%
USG% 16.7%
Net Rtg +27.3
+/- +15
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 25.7m
Scoring +13.5
Creation +1.1
Shot Making +4.8
Hustle +2.1
Defense -0.1
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 13
FGM Against 6
Opp FG% 46.2%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 1
S John Collins 24.6m
15
pts
7
reb
1
ast
Impact
+8.9

Forcing action in the post led to a string of clunky misses that dragged down his offensive value. He managed to stay slightly in the green strictly through timely weak-side rim rotations that erased opponent layups.

Shooting
FG 5/14 (35.7%)
3PT 1/4 (25.0%)
FT 4/4 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 47.6%
USG% 28.8%
Net Rtg +41.1
+/- +20
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 24.6m
Scoring +7.8
Creation +3.3
Shot Making +1.7
Hustle +8.9
Defense +1.3
Turnovers -3.5
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 9
FGM Against 2
Opp FG% 22.2%
STL 2
BLK 0
TO 2
S Kris Dunn 21.9m
9
pts
3
reb
4
ast
Impact
+9.8

Absolute menace at the point of attack, completely blowing up opposing pick-and-roll actions. His defensive ball pressure generated live-ball turnovers that he ruthlessly converted into high-percentage transition looks.

Shooting
FG 4/5 (80.0%)
3PT 1/2 (50.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 90.0%
USG% 11.5%
Net Rtg +2.1
+/- +1
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 21.9m
Scoring +8.2
Creation +0.8
Shot Making +2.7
Hustle +3.8
Defense +7.1
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 12
FGM Against 8
Opp FG% 66.7%
STL 3
BLK 0
TO 1
19
pts
2
reb
8
ast
Impact
+19.8

Orchestrated a flawless offensive flow by making lightning-quick reads and punishing defensive mismatches. Combined with suffocating perimeter defense and constant hustle, he was the primary catalyst for the team's most dominant stretches.

Shooting
FG 5/6 (83.3%)
3PT 1/1 (100.0%)
FT 8/11 (72.7%)
Advanced
TS% 87.6%
USG% 14.5%
Net Rtg -4.8
+/- -2
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 32.2m
Scoring +17.0
Creation +3.6
Shot Making +2.7
Hustle +1.6
Defense +5.2
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 13
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 38.5%
STL 3
BLK 0
TO 0
9
pts
5
reb
1
ast
Impact
-3.9

Tunnel vision on drives resulted in a barrage of contested, low-percentage attempts at the rim. The offense stagnated heavily during his minutes as he repeatedly drove into multiple defenders instead of finding the open man.

Shooting
FG 4/13 (30.8%)
3PT 0/3 (0.0%)
FT 1/2 (50.0%)
Advanced
TS% 32.4%
USG% 25.9%
Net Rtg +26.0
+/- +16
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 25.0m
Scoring +2.0
Creation +0.5
Shot Making +1.9
Hustle +5.4
Defense -1.1
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 8
FGM Against 2
Opp FG% 25.0%
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 1
9
pts
3
reb
4
ast
Impact
-0.5

Functioned as the perfect connective tissue, keeping the ball moving and hitting timely corner triples. His veteran defensive positioning blew up multiple baseline out-of-bounds plays, securing a solid positive margin.

Shooting
FG 3/5 (60.0%)
3PT 3/5 (60.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 90.0%
USG% 10.0%
Net Rtg +11.1
+/- +5
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 20.4m
Scoring +7.4
Creation +0.1
Shot Making +2.8
Hustle +0.9
Defense -0.3
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 11
FGM Against 6
Opp FG% 54.5%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
7
pts
6
reb
0
ast
Impact
-6.5

Generated massive value through sheer physical exertion, keeping offensive possessions alive with relentless effort. His willingness to do the dirty work in the trenches provided a steadying presence for the second unit.

Shooting
FG 2/3 (66.7%)
3PT 0/0
FT 3/3 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 81.0%
USG% 8.3%
Net Rtg +18.7
+/- +10
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 19.9m
Scoring +6.5
Creation +0.7
Shot Making +0.8
Hustle +1.8
Defense -6.0
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 16
FGM Against 6
Opp FG% 37.5%
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 0
2
pts
0
reb
1
ast
Impact
-8.9

Maximized his brief cameo by locking down his assignment and offering solid weak-side help. He didn't force the issue offensively, letting the game come to him while keeping the defensive shell intact.

Shooting
FG 1/2 (50.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 50.0%
USG% 30.0%
Net Rtg -47.8
+/- -3
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 4.3m
Scoring +1.2
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.1
Hustle +0.0
Defense +2.4
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 1
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 100.0%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 1
2
pts
0
reb
1
ast
Impact
-10.8

Converted his only look at the rim but struggled slightly to anchor the paint defensively during a quick stint. His brief appearance was largely a wash, serving primarily to buy the starters a quick breather.

Shooting
FG 1/1 (100.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 100.0%
USG% 10.0%
Net Rtg -47.8
+/- -3
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 4.3m
Scoring +2.0
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.1
Hustle +0.0
Defense -2.6
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 2
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 0
9
pts
0
reb
1
ast
Impact
-0.5

Provided an instant microwave effect off the bench, torching the drop coverage with rapid-fire perimeter execution. The sheer density of his scoring burst completely flipped the momentum in a tiny window of playing time.

Shooting
FG 3/4 (75.0%)
3PT 3/4 (75.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 112.5%
USG% 40.0%
Net Rtg -47.8
+/- -3
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 4.3m
Scoring +8.2
Creation +0.8
Shot Making +2.8
Hustle +0.0
Defense -0.3
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 1
FGM Against 0
Opp FG% 0.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
NOP New Orleans Pelicans
S Trey Murphy III 31.2m
16
pts
2
reb
3
ast
Impact
+3.2

Heavy perimeter volume without the requisite efficiency cratered his offensive value. While his length provided excellent defensive disruption, settling for contested deep looks short-circuited too many half-court sets.

Shooting
FG 6/15 (40.0%)
3PT 4/10 (40.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 53.3%
USG% 24.0%
Net Rtg -31.0
+/- -18
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 31.2m
Scoring +8.4
Creation +0.8
Shot Making +4.8
Hustle +0.6
Defense +4.7
Turnovers -7.1
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 12
FGM Against 8
Opp FG% 66.7%
STL 2
BLK 0
TO 3
S Saddiq Bey 29.4m
14
pts
6
reb
2
ast
Impact
+9.8

Despite solid offensive production, his overall impact slipped into the red due to defensive rotational lapses and empty possessions. Missed field goals stalled momentum during key stretches, negating the value of his perimeter spacing.

Shooting
FG 5/12 (41.7%)
3PT 2/5 (40.0%)
FT 2/4 (50.0%)
Advanced
TS% 50.9%
USG% 19.4%
Net Rtg -21.3
+/- -13
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 29.4m
Scoring +7.8
Creation +0.5
Shot Making +3.2
Hustle +7.6
Defense +0.0
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 8
FGM Against 2
Opp FG% 25.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
S Dejounte Murray 21.9m
17
pts
5
reb
5
ast
Impact
+12.3

Breaking out of a recent shooting slump, he dictated the tempo with aggressive downhill drives. Excellent point-of-attack defense combined with highly efficient shot selection to drive a massive positive swing when he was on the floor.

Shooting
FG 6/10 (60.0%)
3PT 1/3 (33.3%)
FT 4/4 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 72.3%
USG% 25.5%
Net Rtg -34.3
+/- -14
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 21.9m
Scoring +14.3
Creation +1.8
Shot Making +3.0
Hustle +6.3
Defense +1.8
Turnovers -4.7
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 5
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 100.0%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 2
S Herbert Jones 21.4m
2
pts
4
reb
0
ast
Impact
-15.5

An uncharacteristically poor defensive showing compounded his offensive struggles, resulting in a massive negative swing. Bricking multiple open perimeter looks allowed the defense to pack the paint and stifle the primary actions.

Shooting
FG 1/6 (16.7%)
3PT 0/3 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 16.7%
USG% 11.5%
Net Rtg -29.7
+/- -15
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 21.4m
Scoring -1.8
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.5
Hustle +3.1
Defense -6.5
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 5
FGM Against 0
Opp FG% 0.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
S DeAndre Jordan 11.4m
2
pts
2
reb
1
ast
Impact
-8.8

Drop-coverage vulnerabilities were exposed during his brief rotation, allowing opponents to feast in the midrange. A lack of offensive involvement meant he couldn't offset the defensive bleeding on the other end.

Shooting
FG 1/1 (100.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 100.0%
USG% 7.4%
Net Rtg -43.5
+/- -10
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 11.4m
Scoring +2.0
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.5
Hustle +1.6
Defense -0.3
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 9
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 55.6%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1
Derik Queen 29.0m
19
pts
5
reb
2
ast
Impact
+13.7

Relentless activity on the glass and in passing lanes fueled a tremendous two-way performance. He consistently generated extra possessions through pure effort, masking some minor inefficiency on his interior touches.

Shooting
FG 6/13 (46.2%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 7/7 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 59.1%
USG% 25.0%
Net Rtg +4.6
+/- -1
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 29.0m
Scoring +14.5
Creation +1.9
Shot Making +3.0
Hustle +6.3
Defense +3.1
Turnovers -4.6
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 14
FGM Against 7
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 2
BLK 1
TO 3
6
pts
1
reb
2
ast
Impact
-14.4

Consistently losing his man off the ball led to a disastrous defensive rating that tanked his overall value. He failed to generate enough rim pressure on the other end to make up for the constant breakdowns on the perimeter.

Shooting
FG 2/5 (40.0%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 51.0%
USG% 10.4%
Net Rtg -33.1
+/- -20
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 26.4m
Scoring +3.3
Creation +0.4
Shot Making +0.6
Hustle +0.3
Defense -6.5
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 10
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1
28
pts
3
reb
4
ast
Impact
+9.4

Scorching perimeter execution broke the opposing zone and completely opened up the floor. His ability to hunt high-quality looks from deep translated directly into a dominant offensive rating during his minutes.

Shooting
FG 10/15 (66.7%)
3PT 5/6 (83.3%)
FT 3/3 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 85.8%
USG% 30.9%
Net Rtg -10.3
+/- -6
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 26.1m
Scoring +24.5
Creation +0.9
Shot Making +7.2
Hustle +0.9
Defense -0.6
Turnovers -11.8
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 15
FGM Against 7
Opp FG% 46.7%
STL 0
BLK 2
TO 5
Yves Missi 20.4m
9
pts
8
reb
0
ast
Impact
-1.6

Rim protection anchored his positive contribution, deterring multiple drives in the second half. However, fumbling a few interior finishes prevented his overall impact from climbing higher.

Shooting
FG 3/7 (42.9%)
3PT 0/0
FT 3/6 (50.0%)
Advanced
TS% 46.7%
USG% 18.6%
Net Rtg -1.4
+/- -2
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 20.4m
Scoring -0.8
Creation +1.0
Shot Making +0.7
Hustle +9.2
Defense -0.3
Turnovers -1.1
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 9
FGM Against 7
Opp FG% 77.8%
STL 1
BLK 1
TO 1
4
pts
5
reb
3
ast
Impact
-6.4

Value was entirely derived from setting bone-crushing screens and executing defensive rotations perfectly. Even without scoring a field goal, his positional discipline kept the second unit's structure intact.

Shooting
FG 0/2 (0.0%)
3PT 0/2 (0.0%)
FT 4/4 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 53.2%
USG% 12.5%
Net Rtg -25.0
+/- -7
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 14.2m
Scoring +2.4
Creation +0.9
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +4.4
Defense -3.1
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 9
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 44.4%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
0
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
-11.0

Struggled to find the rhythm of the game during a quick appearance, failing to create separation on his lone attempt. He was largely invisible in half-court sets, leading to a quick hook from the coaching staff.

Shooting
FG 0/1 (0.0%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 8.3%
Net Rtg +47.8
+/- +3
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 4.3m
Scoring -0.8
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +0.0
Defense +0.0
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 1
FGM Against 0
Opp FG% 0.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
0
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
-13.3

Forced two bad shots early in the shot clock during a brief rotation, immediately killing offensive momentum. The lack of any measurable defensive or hustle contributions made his short stint highly detrimental.

Shooting
FG 0/2 (0.0%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 16.7%
Net Rtg +47.8
+/- +3
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 4.3m
Scoring -1.5
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +0.0
Defense +0.0
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 1
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 100.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0