2025-26 Season
KOBE SANDERS
2025-26 Season
KOBE SANDERS
Sanders produces at an below average rate for a 20-minute workload.
About this model: Net Impact can't measure floor spacing, help defense rotations, or playmaking gravity — so wings and guards are slightly undervalued vs bigs. How Net Impact works
TEAM COMPARISON
of 18 teammates (10+ games, 10+ min)
SKILL DNA
Percentile rank vs 235 Guards with 10+ games
THE SEASON SO FAR
Extreme volatility and an inability to blend scoring with defensive reliability defined Kobe Sanders's chaotic opening stretch to the season. He toggled between the starting five and the second unit, often inflicting as much damage on his own team as the opposition. Look at 12/01 vs MIA, where he managed 10 points but posted an abysmal -10.0 impact score because a barrage of forced, missed perimeter shots completely crippled the offensive flow. Conversely, Sanders occasionally found ways to tilt the floor without scoring a single basket. During 10/22 vs UTA, he finished with 0 points but generated a +2.7 impact by applying relentless ball pressure to earn a +3.0 defensive score. When his shot selection actually tightened up, he became a lethal spark plug. He erupted for 13 points in just 13 minutes on 12/23 vs HOU, using blistering 3-for-3 shooting from beyond the arc to drive a massive +9.4 impact. Unfortunately, those flawless offensive nights remained the exception rather than the rule.
A suffocating slump defined Kobe Sanders's midseason stretch, as defensive lapses and erratic shot selection kept him firmly in the negative regardless of his role. Even when he found his rhythm offensively, hidden costs dragged him down. He poured in 20 points on 9-of-16 shooting during a start on 01/05 vs GSW. However, bleeding points on the defensive end completely negated that scoring burst, saddling him with a -4.4 impact score. When his shot stopped falling, his minutes became actively harmful. Look no further than 01/03 vs BOS, where complete offensive paralysis and an inability to stay in front of his man generated a catastrophic -18.1 impact score. Later on 01/25 vs BKN, a severe lack of off-ball defensive awareness allowed opponents to feast on open cuts, resulting in a brutal -14.5 impact score despite a decent 9-point output. Whether he was forcing low-percentage jumpers against set defenses or missing basic rotations, Sanders simply could not stop hemorrhaging value.
Kobe Sanders spent this twenty-game stretch oscillating wildly between erratic liability and sudden microwave scorer. Even when his shot was falling, hidden mistakes often eroded his overall value on the floor. Despite an efficient 11-point outing on 03/13 vs CHI, careless ball security and poorly timed fouls completely undermined his performance, dragging him to a -4.0 impact score. Conversely, Sanders occasionally found ways to salvage his minutes without filling up the stat sheet. He managed just 5 points on 03/19 vs NOP, but still generated a +3.0 impact because his high-level defensive rotations and active hands disrupted the opposing offense. When his decision-making finally aligned with his scoring touch, the ceiling was undeniable. He exploded for 19 points on 8-of-10 shooting on 03/23 vs MIL, utilizing decisive drives against tight coverage to post a stretch-high +8.4 impact score.
IMPACT TIMELINE
Game-by-game performance vs average. Green = above average, red = below.
Struggling. Sanders has posted negative impact in 79% of games this season. The production rarely outweighs the cost.
Middle-of-the-road efficiency — shoots 45%+ from the field in 51% of games. Not automatic, but not a problem either.
Good defender on his best nights, but it comes and goes. Some games Sanders locks in defensively, others he gets picked apart.
Slight upward trend. First-half impact: -4.7, second-half: -3.0. Modest improvement — possibly settling into a rhythm.
Tends to go on runs. Longest hot streak: 3 games. Longest cold streak: 22 games.
MATCHUP HISTORY
Based on 71 games with tracking data. Shows who guarded this player on offense and who he guarded on defense, with their shooting stats in those matchups.
ON OFFENSE: WHO GUARDED HIM
His shooting stats against each primary defender this season
ON DEFENSE: WHO HE GUARDED
How opponents shot when he was the primary defender. Lower FG% = better defense.
SEASON STATS
GAME LOG
63 games played