LAC

2025-26 Season

KOBE SANDERS

LA Clippers | Guard | 6-8
Kobe Sanders
7.2PPG
2.2RPG
1.6APG
19.7MPG
-6.4 Impact

Sanders produces at an poor rate for a 20-minute workload.

·
Embed this player card

Copy & paste this HTML into any page:

The widget updates automatically whenever our data does.

IMPACT BREAKDOWN
Every stat, every credit, every cost — per game average
-6.4
Scoring +6.6
Points Scored 7.2 PPG = +7.2
Missed Shots difficulty-adjusted = -2.3
Shot Making above expected FG% = +1.7
Creation +0.4
Assists & Self-Creation 1.6 AST/g + self-creation = +0.4
Turnovers -2.8
Turnovers 1.2/g (live + dead blend) = -2.8
Defense -0.4
Steals 0.7/g = +1.6
Blocks 0.1/g = +0.1
Fouls + context committed fouls, matchup adj = -2.1
Hustle & Effort +1.5
Rebounds 2.2 RPG (OREB + DREB) = -0.1
Contested Shots 2.6/g = +0.5
Deflections 1.2/g = +0.8
Charges Drawn 0.0/g = +0.0
Loose Balls 0.4/g = +0.2
Screen Assists 0.2/g = +0.1
Raw Impact +5.3
Baseline (game-average expected) −11.7
Net Impact
-6.4
12th pctl vs Guards

PBP Credit: Every play is analyzed from play-by-play data. Scorers get difficulty-adjusted credit, assisters get creation value based on the shot opportunity they created, and turnovers are classified by type. Shot difficulty is derived from 1M+ shots across 4 seasons. Full methodology

SKILL DNA

Percentile rank vs 246 Guards with 10+ games

Scoring 34th
7.5 PPG
Efficiency 76th
57.7% TS
Playmaking 27th
1.7 APG
Rebounding 31th
2.3 RPG
Defense 44th
+7.0/g
Hustle 34th
+7.6/g
Creation 60th
+3.11/g
Shot Making 33th
+5.31/g
TO Discipline 45th
0.06/min

THE SEASON SO FAR

Kobe Sanders spent the first stretch of the 2025-26 season caught in a brutal identity crisis, oscillating between an ineffective starter and a highly erratic bench scorer. When thrust into the starting lineup on 11/21 vs ORL, he logged a disastrous -21.3 impact score. That abysmal rating stemmed directly from poor shot selection and a total lack of playmaking, as he bricked six of his eight field goal attempts and recorded zero assists. He looked entirely different when operating within the flow of the offense on 12/04 vs ATL, generating a +9.7 impact score by hitting five of his six shots and keeping the ball moving with four assists. He even flashed genuine microwave ability on 12/24 vs HOU, drilling all three of his attempts from deep to post a +8.5 impact in just 13 minutes. Unfortunately, those efficient outbursts were the exception rather than the rule. Night after night, Sanders bled value during empty shifts like his 16 minutes on 12/29 vs DET, where a complete failure to score or rebound saddled him with a -16.5 impact.

Kobe Sanders spent this midseason stretch trapped in a brutal cycle of rotational whiplash, oscillating wildly between highly effective role-playing and completely invisible bench shifts. He opened the window looking like a perfect glue guy on 12/31 vs SAC. Despite scoring just 7 points, he recorded a +5.3 Impact score because his active rebounding and unselfish ball movement kept the offense humming. His absolute floor, however, was exposed on 01/04 vs BOS. Sanders posted a staggering -25.3 Impact score in that contest, contributing zero points and just one rebound in 15 minutes of aimless cardio. As the weeks wore on, his erratic shot selection began to heavily sabotage the second unit. Look no further than his 02/10 vs HOU meltdown. He bricked eight of his nine field goal attempts to earn a -14.0 Impact score, revealing the harsh reality that his forced jumpers actively bleed value from the rotation.

Kobe Sanders spent this stretch bouncing between the starting lineup and the bench, battling a maddening inconsistency that made him a liability on most nights. Even when his counting stats looked respectable, like his 11-point, six-rebound effort on 03/13 vs CHI, his actual floor presence remained a net negative. He posted a -4.6 Impact score that night, dragged down by empty-calorie production and costly hidden mistakes in the half-court offense. Things bottomed out completely a few days later on 03/18 vs NOP. A dismal 1-for-6 shooting performance yielded a brutal -15.9 Impact score, as his forced, erratic shot selection actively crippled the team's spacing. Yet, just when it seemed he was playing himself out of the rotation entirely, Sanders caught fire off the bench on 03/23 vs MIL. He poured in 19 points on blistering 8-of-10 shooting, generating a +10.2 Impact score by finally taking high-quality looks and finishing with ruthless efficiency.

IMPACT TIMELINE

Game-by-game performance vs average. Green = above average, red = below.

PATTERNS

Struggling. Sanders has posted negative impact in 78% of games this season. The production rarely outweighs the cost.

Middle-of-the-road efficiency — shoots 45%+ from the field in 54% of games. Not automatic, but not a problem either.

Average defender. Sanders doesn't hurt you defensively, but he's not making opponents uncomfortable either.

Slight upward trend. First-half impact: -7.8, second-half: -5.0. Modest improvement — possibly settling into a rhythm.

Tends to go on runs. Longest hot streak: 3 games. Longest cold streak: 7 games.

MATCHUP HISTORY ⚠ Updated 46 days ago

Based on 71 games with tracking data. Shows who guarded this player on offense and who he guarded on defense, with their shooting stats in those matchups.

ON OFFENSE: WHO GUARDED HIM

His shooting stats against each primary defender this season

V. Edgecombe 40.7 poss
FG% 62.5%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.34
PTS 14
C. Spencer 31.9 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.09
PTS 3
B. Ingram 31.6 poss
FG% 75.0%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.25
PTS 8
L. Dončić 31.4 poss
FG% 66.7%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.13
PTS 4
S. Curry 30.6 poss
FG% 42.9%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.23
PTS 7
K. Knueppel 28.9 poss
FG% 25.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.14
PTS 4
A. Dosunmu 25.8 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.12
PTS 3
J. Champagnie 25.3 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.16
PTS 4
W. Clayton Jr. 25.2 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 33.3%
PPP 0.12
PTS 3
K. George 24.8 poss
FG% 40.0%
3P% 33.3%
PPP 0.2
PTS 5

ON DEFENSE: WHO HE GUARDED

How opponents shot when he was the primary defender. Lower FG% = better defense.

A. Dosunmu 41.1 poss
FG% 66.7%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.12
PTS 5
V. Edgecombe 36.6 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.05
PTS 2
W. Clayton Jr. 36.4 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.11
PTS 4
K. Knueppel 34.6 poss
FG% 60.0%
3P% 33.3%
PPP 0.26
PTS 9
R. Sheppard 33.4 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.09
PTS 3
M. Buzelis 32.2 poss
FG% 40.0%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.16
PTS 5
J. Champagnie 30.9 poss
FG% 42.9%
3P% 75.0%
PPP 0.39
PTS 12
J. Murray 30.2 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
C. Spencer 30.1 poss
FG% 60.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.27
PTS 8
D. Bane 28.5 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.25
PTS 7

SEASON STATS

69
Games
7.2
PPG
2.2
RPG
1.6
APG
0.7
SPG
0.1
BPG
46.5
FG%
40.7
3P%
82.6
FT%
19.7
MPG

GAME LOG

69 games played