WAS

2025-26 Season

BUB CARRINGTON

Washington Wizards | Guard | 6-4
Bub Carrington
10.7PPG
3.4RPG
4.6APG
27.7MPG
-5.7 Impact

Carrington produces at an poor rate for a 28-minute workload.

·
Embed this player card

Copy & paste this HTML into any page:

The widget updates automatically whenever our data does.

IMPACT BREAKDOWN
Every stat, every credit, every cost — per game average
-5.7
Scoring +9.7
Points Scored 10.7 PPG = +10.7
Missed Shots difficulty-adjusted = -3.9
Shot Making above expected FG% = +2.9
Creation +1.0
Assists & Self-Creation 4.6 AST/g + self-creation = +1.0
Turnovers -5.4
Turnovers 2.3/g (live + dead blend) = -5.4
Defense -0.7
Steals 0.6/g = +1.4
Blocks 0.2/g = +0.2
Fouls + context committed fouls, matchup adj = -2.3
Hustle & Effort +1.8
Rebounds 3.4 RPG (OREB + DREB) = +0.0
Contested Shots 2.7/g = +0.5
Deflections 1.4/g = +0.9
Charges Drawn 0.0/g = +0.0
Loose Balls 0.5/g = +0.3
Screen Assists 0.3/g = +0.1
Raw Impact +6.4
Baseline (game-average expected) −12.1
Net Impact
-5.7
17th pctl vs Guards

PBP Credit: Every play is analyzed from play-by-play data. Scorers get difficulty-adjusted credit, assisters get creation value based on the shot opportunity they created, and turnovers are classified by type. Shot difficulty is derived from 1M+ shots across 4 seasons. Full methodology

SKILL DNA

Percentile rank vs 246 Guards with 10+ games

Scoring 58th
10.7 PPG
Efficiency 60th
55.4% TS
Playmaking 81th
4.6 APG
Rebounding 62th
3.4 RPG
Defense 22th
+5.0/g
Hustle 29th
+7.0/g
Creation 70th
+3.38/g
Shot Making 83th
+8.97/g
TO Discipline 18th
0.08/min

THE SEASON SO FAR

Bub Carrington’s first 28 games read like a tale of two entirely different rookies: a hesitant guard drowning in his minutes, followed by an aggressive starter finally finding his NBA legs. Early on, his offensive timidity was a glaring liability. He bottomed out in the 11/04 vs NYK matchup, posting a disastrous -22.5 Impact score after attempting just two shots and going scoreless in 25 minutes. He occasionally found ways to stay afloat without scoring, like in the 11/29 vs IND matchup where he scraped together a +1.0 Impact on just six points by crashing the glass for seven rebounds. But a mid-December promotion back to the starting five finally unlocked his true offensive ceiling. He exploded in the 12/13 vs CLE game, pouring in 27 points, eight assists, and six rebounds on 50 percent shooting from the floor to earn a stellar +7.6 Impact. The early growing pains were undeniably ugly, but Carrington is starting to look like a genuine building block.

Bub Carrington’s midseason stretch was defined by a rocky transition into the starting lineup, where increased minutes frequently exposed the hollow nature of his counting stats. Look no further than his 40-minute marathon on 01/08 vs PHI. He poured in 18 points and dished seven assists, yet his -9.2 Impact score reveals a guard who bled points defensively and stalled the offense with empty-calorie possessions. Ironically, Carrington was far more effective when he stopped forcing the issue. During a bench stint on 01/12 vs PHX, he managed just 9 points but generated a +2.0 Impact score by focusing on efficient distribution and relentless hustle plays. When his jumper completely abandoned him on 01/15 vs LAC, the results were disastrous. His 1-for-11 shooting night dragged him to a brutal -13.0 Impact score because he offered zero secondary value to offset the missed shots. Until he trims the fat from his shot selection, he will remain a net-negative masquerading as a productive starter.

Bub Carrington’s late-season run was defined by maddening inconsistency, swinging wildly between flamethrower scoring nights and stretches where he actively bled value on the floor. When his jumper caught fire, he was unstoppable. He torched the nets on 03/17 vs DET, pouring in 30 points on 12-of-16 shooting to generate a massive +21.5 impact score by simply outgunning the opposition. But raw point totals often masked his actual on-court value. Look at his 04/12 vs CLE outing; despite racking up 20 points and 9 assists, he posted a -1.0 impact score because of the hidden costs of poor shot selection—bricking 11 field goals—and killing offensive momentum with empty possessions. Conversely, he found ways to win on the margins during a 03/12 vs ORL matchup. He tallied a modest 12 points in that game, yet earned a +4.8 impact score because he dug in defensively, crashed the glass for 5 rebounds, and made the gritty hustle plays that actually contribute to winning. He clearly has the offensive tools, but Carrington desperately needs to figure out how to survive the nights when his shot isn't falling.

Bub Carrington’s late-season promotion to the starting lineup was defined by empty-calorie scoring and catastrophic defensive breakdowns. Look no further than the Mar 21 vs OKC matchup. His 19 points completely masked the defensive breakdowns and spacing issues that tanked his overall impact to a dismal -17.0. Even when he caught fire from deep during a 30-point eruption on Mar 17 vs DET, his defensive apathy (-3.3 defensive impact) kept his total score at a barely positive +0.2. Ironically, his most valuable contribution came off the bench on Mar 12 vs ORL. Despite scoring just 12 points, he generated a +5.8 impact score by relying on relentless energy and securing 50/50 balls rather than forcing bad shots. Too often, however, Carrington bogged down the offense with erratic shot selection and live-ball turnovers. Until he learns to apply pressure at the point of attack, his flashy box scores will continue to ring hollow.

IMPACT TIMELINE

Game-by-game performance vs average. Green = above average, red = below.

PATTERNS

Struggling. Carrington has posted negative impact in 79% of games this season. The production rarely outweighs the cost.

Streaky shooter — only cracks 45% from the field in 36% of games. Efficiency is all over the place night-to-night.

Defensive impact is minimal for a 28-minute player. Not generating enough contests, rim protection, or forced turnovers to move the needle.

Tends to go on runs. Longest hot streak: 2 games. Longest cold streak: 17 games.

MATCHUP HISTORY ⚠ Updated 46 days ago

Based on 74 games with tracking data. Shows who guarded this player on offense and who he guarded on defense, with their shooting stats in those matchups.

ON OFFENSE: WHO GUARDED HIM

His shooting stats against each primary defender this season

M. Bridges 60.5 poss
FG% 40.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.13
PTS 8
D. Mitchell 55.4 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.11
PTS 6
R. Rollins 52.0 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 60.0%
PPP 0.17
PTS 9
L. Ball 48.3 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.08
PTS 4
D. Daniels 47.8 poss
FG% 20.0%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.06
PTS 3
D. Fox 47.2 poss
FG% 80.0%
3P% 75.0%
PPP 0.23
PTS 11
A. Thompson 45.4 poss
FG% 44.4%
3P% 42.9%
PPP 0.24
PTS 11
T. Maxey 44.7 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.18
PTS 8
FG% 100.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.11
PTS 5
J. Murray 42.8 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 42.9%
PPP 0.26
PTS 11

ON DEFENSE: WHO HE GUARDED

How opponents shot when he was the primary defender. Lower FG% = better defense.

J. Murray 64.9 poss
FG% 64.3%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.35
PTS 23
R. Rollins 60.7 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.07
PTS 4
D. Mitchell 59.3 poss
FG% 42.9%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.1
PTS 6
FG% 66.7%
3P% 66.7%
PPP 0.29
PTS 16
T. Maxey 54.5 poss
FG% 57.1%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.44
PTS 24
R. Sheppard 51.8 poss
FG% 71.4%
3P% 75.0%
PPP 0.25
PTS 13
M. Bridges 49.6 poss
FG% 60.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.12
PTS 6
L. Ball 49.1 poss
FG% 60.0%
3P% 55.6%
PPP 0.47
PTS 23
D. Jenkins 48.7 poss
FG% 62.5%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.29
PTS 14
D. Garland 48.6 poss
FG% 25.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.08
PTS 4

SEASON STATS

82
Games
10.7
PPG
3.4
RPG
4.6
APG
0.6
SPG
0.2
BPG
42.4
FG%
40.8
3P%
73.0
FT%
27.7
MPG

GAME LOG

82 games played