PHI

2025-26 Season

DALEN TERRY

Philadelphia 76ers | Forward | 6-6
Dalen Terry
3.4PPG
1.6RPG
1.3APG
10.7MPG
-5.9 Impact

Terry produces at an poor rate for a 11-minute workload.

·
Embed this player card

Copy & paste this HTML into any page:

The widget updates automatically whenever our data does.

IMPACT BREAKDOWN
Every stat, every credit, every cost — per game average
-5.9
Scoring +2.9
Points Scored 3.4 PPG = +3.4
Missed Shots difficulty-adjusted = -1.3
Shot Making above expected FG% = +0.8
Creation +0.3
Assists & Self-Creation 1.3 AST/g + self-creation = +0.3
Turnovers -1.3
Turnovers 0.5/g (live + dead blend) = -1.3
Defense +0.5
Steals 0.6/g = +1.4
Blocks 0.3/g = +0.3
Fouls + context committed fouls, matchup adj = -1.2
Hustle & Effort +1.4
Rebounds 1.6 RPG (OREB + DREB) = +0.3
Contested Shots 1.9/g = +0.4
Deflections 0.8/g = +0.5
Charges Drawn 0.0/g = +0.1
Loose Balls 0.2/g = +0.1
Screen Assists 0.1/g = +0.0
Raw Impact +3.8
Baseline (game-average expected) −9.7
Net Impact
-5.9
10th pctl vs Forwards

PBP Credit: Every play is analyzed from play-by-play data. Scorers get difficulty-adjusted credit, assisters get creation value based on the shot opportunity they created, and turnovers are classified by type. Shot difficulty is derived from 1M+ shots across 4 seasons. Full methodology

SKILL DNA

Percentile rank vs 235 Forwards with 10+ games

Scoring 10th
4.5 PPG
Efficiency 6th
46.9% TS
Playmaking 58th
1.8 APG
Rebounding 8th
2.2 RPG
Defense 37th
+6.5/g
Hustle 15th
+7.6/g
Creation 60th
+2.64/g
Shot Making 18th
+3.29/g
TO Discipline 48th
0.05/min

THE SEASON SO FAR

Dalen Terry’s opening stretch of the 2025-26 campaign was defined by a desperate, often frustrating search for a reliable role at the end of the bench. He spent most nights oscillating between garbage-time cameos and erratic rotational minutes, struggling mightily to generate positive momentum. During a brutal 11/22 vs MIA outing, Terry posted a dismal -15.4 impact score while failing to score a single point in 13 minutes of action. His complete lack of offensive gravity and total inability to threaten the defense severely bogged down the second unit that night. Yet, the young wing occasionally found ways to tilt the math in his team's favor without filling the scoring column. On 12/08 vs GSW, he managed a +3.2 impact score despite scoring just four points. He earned that positive mark by acting as a connective playmaker, grabbing loose rebounds, and providing the necessary defensive hustle to keep the rotation afloat. He even flashed a rare scoring punch on 12/15 vs NOP, dropping nine points on 4-of-5 shooting to secure a +2.5 impact score, but those efficient nights remain the exception rather than the rule.

Dalen Terry's midseason stretch was defined by erratic bench minutes and an agonizing inability to consistently affect winning. He flashed brief, tantalizing upside on 01/15 vs UTA, pouring in 11 points and grabbing five rebounds in just 13 minutes. His red-hot perimeter shooting—hitting three of his four attempts from deep—and energetic rebounding translated to a stellar +10.1 impact score. Unfortunately, those efficient bursts were buried under a mountain of low-impact shifts where he simply floated around the court. Earlier on 01/03 vs ORL, he was completely invisible as a scoring threat, missing both his shots and registering a disastrous -13.9 impact score during 12 aimless minutes. Even when given a massive runway on 01/31 vs MIA, his production was a complete mirage. Despite logging 29 minutes and racking up nine points alongside seven assists, he posted a miserable -6.6 impact score. Those hollow counting stats were dragged into the negative by disjointed offensive execution and hidden defensive lapses that quietly bled points.

Dalen Terry spent this sixteen-game stretch fighting a losing battle for rotational stability, plummeting into a deep mid-season slump. He briefly flashed value as a connective bench piece on 02/01 vs MIA, where his modest eight points were elevated by six rebounds and three assists to generate a +3.5 Impact score. However, that peripheral hustle quickly vanished as the weeks dragged on. Even when he managed to find the basket, hidden costs ruined his shifts. He tallied eight points on 03/12 vs DET, but a lack of perimeter spacing and minimal playmaking across 23 minutes dragged him down to a dismal -7.0 Impact. Things completely bottomed out during a brutal, invisible stint on 03/19 vs SAC. In just four minutes of action, Terry missed both his shot attempts and recorded zero rebounds or assists, resulting in a staggering -13.3 Impact score. For a wing desperately needing to carve out an NBA niche, these empty-calorie shifts and frequent disappearing acts only pushed him further down the bench hierarchy.

IMPACT TIMELINE

Game-by-game performance vs average. Green = above average, red = below.

PATTERNS

Struggling. Terry has posted negative impact in 82% of games this season. The production rarely outweighs the cost.

Middle-of-the-road efficiency — shoots 45%+ from the field in 57% of games. Not automatic, but not a problem either.

Good defender on his best nights, but it comes and goes. Some games Terry locks in defensively, others he gets picked apart.

Slight upward trend. First-half impact: -7.3, second-half: -4.5. Modest improvement — possibly settling into a rhythm.

Tends to go on runs. Longest hot streak: 1 games. Longest cold streak: 15 games.

MATCHUP HISTORY ⚠ Updated 46 days ago

Based on 60 games with tracking data. Shows who guarded this player on offense and who he guarded on defense, with their shooting stats in those matchups.

ON OFFENSE: WHO GUARDED HIM

His shooting stats against each primary defender this season

J. Jaquez Jr. 34.7 poss
FG% 66.7%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.12
PTS 4
P. Larsson 21.1 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
D. Robinson 20.2 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
S. Fontecchio 20.0 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.4
PTS 8
K. Jakučionis 19.8 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
J. McCain 19.7 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
D. Smith 14.9 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
A. Wiggins 14.4 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
T. Jones 14.2 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
B. Mathurin 14.1 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0

ON DEFENSE: WHO HE GUARDED

How opponents shot when he was the primary defender. Lower FG% = better defense.

J. Jaquez Jr. 46.5 poss
FG% 30.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.15
PTS 7
K. Jakučionis 23.8 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.08
PTS 2
D. Jenkins 22.5 poss
FG% 20.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.09
PTS 2
D. Smith 21.7 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.09
PTS 2
B. Saraf 18.2 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.11
PTS 2
A. Wiggins 17.5 poss
FG% 25.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.11
PTS 2
S. Fontecchio 15.5 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.26
PTS 4
C. Cunningham 15.2 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.39
PTS 6
T. Jones 14.2 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
D. Avdija 13.1 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.31
PTS 4

SEASON STATS

55
Games
3.4
PPG
1.6
RPG
1.3
APG
0.6
SPG
0.3
BPG
42.9
FG%
36.6
3P%
51.4
FT%
10.7
MPG

GAME LOG

55 games played