PHI

2025-26 Season

DALEN TERRY

Philadelphia 76ers | Forward | 6-6
Dalen Terry
3.7 PPG
1.8 RPG
1.4 APG
11.6 MPG
-0.8 Impact

Terry produces at an average rate for a 12-minute workload.

NET IMPACT BREAKDOWN
Every stat, every credit, every cost — per game average
-0.8
Scoring +1.8
Points 3.7 PPG × +1.00 = +3.7
Missed 2PT 1.0/g × -0.78 = -0.8
Missed 3PT 0.9/g × -0.87 = -0.8
Missed FT 0.3/g × -1.00 = -0.3
Creation +1.2
Assists 1.4/g × +0.50 = +0.7
Off. Rebounds 0.4/g × +1.26 = +0.5
Turnovers -1.2
Turnovers 0.6/g × -1.95 = -1.2
Defense +0.2
Steals 0.6/g × +2.30 = +1.4
Blocks 0.3/g × +0.90 = +0.3
Def. Rebounds 1.3/g × +0.30 = +0.4
Fouls Committed 2.5/g × -0.75 = -1.9
Hustle & Effort +1.5
Contested Shots 2.3/g × +0.20 = +0.5
Deflections 0.9/g × +0.65 = +0.6
Loose Balls 0.3/g × +0.60 = +0.2
Off. Fouls Drawn 0.1/g uncredited × +2.70 = +0.2
Raw Impact +3.5
Baseline (game-average expected) −4.3
Net Impact
-0.8
41st pctl vs Forwards

About this model: Net Impact can't measure floor spacing, help defense rotations, or playmaking gravity — so wings and guards are slightly undervalued vs bigs. How Net Impact works

SKILL DNA

Percentile rank vs 227 Forwards with 10+ games

Scoring 11th
4.5 PPG
Efficiency 9th
47.2% TS
Playmaking 57th
1.8 APG
Rebounding 10th
2.3 RPG
Rim Protection 80th
0.18/min
Hustle 81th
0.13/min
Shot Creation 50th
0% pullup
TO Discipline 45th
0.05/min

THE SEASON SO FAR

Dalen Terry's start to the season was defined by chaotic, high-variance energy that rarely translated into reliable rotation minutes. When his motor runs hot, he can completely hijack a game's tempo without filling up the scoring column, exactly as he did on 11/19 vs POR. Despite scoring just six points, his relentless point-of-attack defense and disruptive deflections drove a massive +10.5 impact score. However, that defensive value frequently evaporates when his erratic tendencies take over. Look at his outing on 01/03 vs CHA, where a seemingly efficient five points masked a damaging -4.8 impact score caused entirely by blown assignments and late closeouts. Furthermore, his complete offensive invisibility often allows opponents to roam freely, leading to disastrous overall value like his -9.8 impact mark on 11/21 vs MIA. Until he learns to limit his defensive mistakes and provide even a baseline threat with the ball in his hands, Terry will remain stuck on the absolute fringes of the roster.

A wildly erratic stretch defined Dalen Terry's midseason rotation minutes, oscillating between game-changing defensive havoc and outright offensive sabotage. When his chaotic energy was channeled correctly, he was a massive plus. He completely derailed the opposing offense during an explosive stint on 01/14 vs UTA, generating a massive +17.8 impact score while scoring just 11 points by wreaking absolute havoc on the defensive end. Yet, increased playing time often exposed his glaring limitations as a half-court spacer. During an extended 29-minute run on 01/30 vs MIA, he tallied 9 points and 7 assists but still dragged the team down to a -2.9 impact score because his lack of offensive polish ruined the floor spacing. Errant passing and poor spatial awareness similarly plagued him on 03/10 vs MEM, where a -6.6 impact score reflected how severely he damaged the overall offensive rhythm. He remains a fascinating defensive free safety, but his erratic decision-making makes him a terrifying gamble for any coaching staff.

IMPACT TIMELINE

Game-by-game performance vs average. Green = above average, red = below.

PATTERNS

Boom-or-bust player. Terry's impact swings wildly relative to his average — some nights dominant, others invisible. Scoring varies by ~3 points per game.

Middle-of-the-road efficiency — shoots 45%+ from the field in 57% of games. Not automatic, but not a problem either.

Good defender on his best nights, but it comes and goes. Some games Terry locks in defensively, others he gets picked apart.

Slight upward trend. First-half impact: -1.8, second-half: +0.1. Modest improvement — possibly settling into a rhythm.

Tends to go on runs. Longest hot streak: 2 games. Longest cold streak: 6 games.

MATCHUP HISTORY

Based on 60 games with tracking data. Shows who guarded this player on offense and who he guarded on defense, with their shooting stats in those matchups.

ON OFFENSE: WHO GUARDED HIM

His shooting stats against each primary defender this season

J. Jaquez Jr. 34.7 poss
FG% 66.7%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.12
PTS 4
P. Larsson 21.1 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
D. Robinson 20.2 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
S. Fontecchio 20.0 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.4
PTS 8
K. Jakučionis 19.8 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
J. McCain 19.7 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
D. Smith 14.9 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
A. Wiggins 14.4 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
T. Jones 14.2 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
B. Mathurin 14.1 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0

ON DEFENSE: WHO HE GUARDED

How opponents shot when he was the primary defender. Lower FG% = better defense.

J. Jaquez Jr. 46.5 poss
FG% 30.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.15
PTS 7
K. Jakučionis 23.8 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.08
PTS 2
D. Jenkins 22.5 poss
FG% 20.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.09
PTS 2
D. Smith 21.7 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.09
PTS 2
B. Saraf 18.2 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.11
PTS 2
A. Wiggins 17.5 poss
FG% 25.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.11
PTS 2
S. Fontecchio 15.5 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.26
PTS 4
C. Cunningham 15.2 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.39
PTS 6
T. Jones 14.2 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
D. Avdija 13.1 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.31
PTS 4

SEASON STATS

47
Games
3.7
PPG
1.8
RPG
1.4
APG
0.6
SPG
0.3
BPG
43.5
FG%
36.4
3P%
55.2
FT%
11.6
MPG

GAME LOG

47 games played