CHI

2025-26 Season

GUERSCHON YABUSELE

Chicago Bulls | Forward | 6-7
Guerschon Yabusele
5.5 PPG
3.3 RPG
0.9 APG
14.6 MPG
-1.3 Impact

Yabusele produces at an below average rate for a 15-minute workload.

NET IMPACT BREAKDOWN
Every stat, every credit, every cost — per game average
-1.3
Scoring +2.9
Points 5.5 PPG × +1.00 = +5.5
Missed 2PT 0.9/g × -0.78 = -0.7
Missed 3PT 1.8/g × -0.87 = -1.6
Missed FT 0.3/g × -1.00 = -0.3
Creation +1.5
Assists 0.9/g × +0.50 = +0.5
Off. Rebounds 0.8/g × +1.26 = +1.0
Turnovers -1.2
Turnovers 0.6/g × -1.95 = -1.2
Hustle & Effort +1.2
Contested Shots 2.2/g × +0.20 = +0.4
Deflections 0.8/g × +0.65 = +0.5
Loose Balls 0.3/g × +0.60 = +0.2
Screen Assists 0.5/g × +0.30 = +0.1
Raw Impact +4.4
Baseline (game-average expected) −5.7
Net Impact
-1.3
33th pctl vs Forwards

About this model: Net Impact can't measure floor spacing, help defense rotations, or playmaking gravity — so wings and guards are slightly undervalued vs bigs. How Net Impact works

SKILL DNA

Percentile rank vs 227 Forwards with 10+ games

Scoring 27th
6.4 PPG
Efficiency 22th
52.0% TS
Playmaking 25th
1.0 APG
Rebounding 41th
3.8 RPG
Rim Protection 53th
0.14/min
Hustle 26th
0.09/min
Shot Creation 50th
0% pullup
TO Discipline 64th
0.04/min

THE SEASON SO FAR

Offensive invisibility and an infuriating habit of settling for perimeter jumpers defined Guerschon Yabusele’s early season as a massive liability off the bench. During a disastrous 11/19 vs DAL appearance, he bricked all five of his three-point attempts, dragging his impact score down to a dismal -5.0 because his poor shot selection completely derailed the second unit's rhythm. The hidden costs of his floor time were even steeper on 11/26 vs CHA. He completely vanished as a scoring threat and failed to generate any rim pressure over twelve minutes, cratering to an abysmal -8.7 impact mark. Yet, when he actually embraced his wide frame, the results shifted dramatically. On 11/30 vs TOR, he bullied his way to seven points and four rebounds, utilizing hard screen-setting and physical drives to generate a +5.4 impact score. Unfortunately, those flashes of bruising interior play were rare exceptions in a stretch plagued by slow defensive rotations and alarming passivity.

Guerschon Yabusele’s midseason stretch was defined by maddening inconsistency, oscillating wildly between offensive vanishing acts and sudden bursts of brute physicality. Take the 12/29 vs NOP matchup, where he drilled three triples for nine points but still posted a -3.4 impact score because his perimeter success masked a series of costly missed defensive rotations. Conversely, he managed to carve out distinct value on nights when his scoring completely evaporated. On 01/17 vs PHX, Yabusele didn't attempt a single field goal, yet he scraped together a +1.6 impact score by relying entirely on his rebounding and sturdy defensive positioning. This feast-or-famine output on the fringes of the rotation left the second unit constantly guessing what version of the bruising forward would show up. He finally put all the pieces together in a massive breakout on 02/05 vs TOR. Logging a rare 33 minutes, Yabusele bullied his way to 15 points and 11 rebounds, earning a stellar +6.1 impact score through relentless hustle and highly efficient interior touches.

Guerschon Yabusele’s midseason stretch was defined by maddening inconsistency, oscillating violently between imposing physical dominance and complete offensive invisibility. When he fully engaged his massive frame, he was an absolute wrecking ball. Look no further than 03/01 vs MIL, where a masterclass in defensive positioning and sheer physicality anchored a staggering +17.1 impact score. Yet, he often sabotaged his own value by settling for terrible shots rather than using his size. During his 16-point outing on 03/05 vs PHX, a heavy volume of missed contested layups inside the arc dragged him down to a -5.7 impact score. He occasionally found ways to salvage his minutes without scoring, like on 03/18 vs TOR, where a meager 5 points still translated to a +5.8 impact score because he battered opponents with bruising screens. If he stops floating on the perimeter and commits to bully-ball, he can swing a game, but right now his fluctuating motor makes him a nightly gamble.

IMPACT TIMELINE

Game-by-game performance vs average. Green = above average, red = below.

PATTERNS

Boom-or-bust player. Yabusele's impact swings wildly relative to his average — some nights dominant, others invisible. Scoring varies by ~5 points per game.

Streaky shooter — only cracks 45% from the field in 39% of games. Efficiency is all over the place night-to-night.

Good defender on his best nights, but it comes and goes. Some games Yabusele locks in defensively, others he gets picked apart.

Flat trajectory all season — first-half impact -2.0, second-half -0.7. No major shifts, which fits with the overall steadiness.

Tends to go on runs. Longest hot streak: 3 games. Longest cold streak: 7 games.

MATCHUP HISTORY

Based on 72 games with tracking data. Shows who guarded this player on offense and who he guarded on defense, with their shooting stats in those matchups.

ON OFFENSE: WHO GUARDED HIM

His shooting stats against each primary defender this season

S. Mamukelashvili 51.6 poss
FG% 66.7%
3P% 60.0%
PPP 0.29
PTS 15
C. Murray-Boyles 45.6 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 33.3%
PPP 0.11
PTS 5
J. Hart 26.8 poss
FG% 66.7%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.19
PTS 5
M. Diabaté 26.2 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.11
PTS 3
M. Robinson 24.0 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
N. Vučević 23.5 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.43
PTS 10
C. Holmgren 23.4 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.17
PTS 4
V. Wembanyama 20.4 poss
FG% 66.7%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.34
PTS 7
N. Claxton 20.3 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
J. Isaac 20.1 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0

ON DEFENSE: WHO HE GUARDED

How opponents shot when he was the primary defender. Lower FG% = better defense.

S. Mamukelashvili 49.1 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.2
PTS 10
C. Murray-Boyles 48.0 poss
FG% 75.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.12
PTS 6
V. Wembanyama 36.9 poss
FG% 61.5%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.49
PTS 18
M. Robinson 30.2 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.33
PTS 10
M. Diabaté 30.1 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.13
PTS 4
O. Ighodaro 29.2 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.21
PTS 6
N. Claxton 28.6 poss
FG% 57.1%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.35
PTS 10
N. Jokić 25.8 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.31
PTS 8
J. Hart 23.8 poss
FG% 66.7%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.21
PTS 5
J. Isaac 23.4 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.13
PTS 3

SEASON STATS

64
Games
5.5
PPG
3.3
RPG
0.9
APG
0.4
SPG
0.2
BPG
40.3
FG%
35.7
3P%
74.3
FT%
14.6
MPG

GAME LOG

64 games played