CHI

2025-26 Season

ISAAC OKORO

Chicago Bulls | Forward-Guard | 6-4
Isaac Okoro
9.2PPG
2.7RPG
1.6APG
26.8MPG
-2.3 Impact

Okoro produces at an below average rate for a 27-minute workload.

·
Embed this player card

Copy & paste this HTML into any page:

The widget updates automatically whenever our data does.

IMPACT BREAKDOWN
Every stat, every credit, every cost — per game average
-2.3
Scoring +7.8
Points Scored 9.2 PPG = +9.2
Missed Shots difficulty-adjusted = -3.3
Shot Making above expected FG% = +1.9
Creation +0.6
Assists & Self-Creation 1.6 AST/g + self-creation = +0.6
Turnovers -1.8
Turnovers 0.7/g (live + dead blend) = -1.8
Defense -0.3
Steals 0.8/g = +1.8
Blocks 0.5/g = +0.5
Fouls + context committed fouls, matchup adj = -2.6
Hustle & Effort +2.5
Rebounds 2.7 RPG (OREB + DREB) = -0.3
Contested Shots 5.2/g = +1.0
Deflections 1.4/g = +0.9
Charges Drawn 0.2/g = +0.5
Loose Balls 0.5/g = +0.3
Screen Assists 0.5/g = +0.1
Raw Impact +8.8
Baseline (game-average expected) −11.1
Net Impact
-2.3
39th pctl vs Forwards

PBP Credit: Every play is analyzed from play-by-play data. Scorers get difficulty-adjusted credit, assisters get creation value based on the shot opportunity they created, and turnovers are classified by type. Shot difficulty is derived from 1M+ shots across 4 seasons. Full methodology

SKILL DNA

Percentile rank vs 235 Forwards with 10+ games

Scoring 52th
9.2 PPG
Efficiency 42th
55.3% TS
Playmaking 51th
1.6 APG
Rebounding 19th
2.7 RPG
Defense 56th
+7.6/g
Hustle 15th
+7.6/g
Creation 33th
+1.88/g
Shot Making 27th
+4.13/g
TO Discipline 93th
0.03/min

THE SEASON SO FAR

Isaac Okoro's first 22 games were defined by a maddening offensive invisibility that made it nearly impossible to justify his starting role. The absolute nadir arrived on 11/11 vs SAS. He posted a disastrous -20.8 impact score that night, missing all five of his shot attempts and finishing with a measly two points. Even when his jumper actually fell, like his 14-point outing on 11/03 vs NYK, he still hurt the team with a -6.8 impact score. His empty scoring in that game was dragged down by hidden costs, specifically a glaring lack of peripheral stats—just one rebound and zero assists—and poor defensive execution. He occasionally flipped the script, most notably on 11/13 vs DET. During that contest, he earned a +9.0 impact score by pairing 15 efficient points with relentless hustle that finally disrupted the opponent's rhythm. Unfortunately, those two-way flashes remain the exception rather than the rule.

Isaac Okoro's midseason stretch was defined by maddening volatility, oscillating wildly between essential two-way wing and complete offensive liability. He looked like a legitimate foundational piece on 01/01 vs NOP, pouring in 24 points on scorching 8-for-10 shooting to generate a massive +12.5 Impact score. Yet, even when he found the bottom of the net in subsequent matchups, hidden costs often ruined his overall effectiveness. Take his performance on 01/15 vs UTA, where he managed 12 points on 50 percent shooting but still posted a -5.6 Impact due to a severe lack of rebounding and bleeding points on the defensive end. Conversely, Okoro salvaged his value on nights when his scoring vanished completely. During a quiet six-point outing on 01/17 vs BKN, he earned a +2.5 Impact by shifting his focus to active playmaking, dishing out a season-high five assists and creating extra possessions through sheer hustle. Until he smooths out these wild fluctuations, his nightly value remains nothing more than a coin flip.

This midseason stretch was defined by maddening offensive inconsistency that constantly swung Okoro's overall value. Look at the 03/03 vs OKC disaster, where he logged 32 minutes but managed just four points on a miserable 1-for-9 shooting night. That complete inability to space the floor or convert open looks resulted in a brutal -19.8 Impact score. Yet, when his shot actually fell, he looked like a completely different wing. During the 03/28 vs OKC rematch, Okoro poured in 20 points on 7-of-13 shooting, forcing defenders to respect him on the perimeter to drive a stellar +10.9 Impact score. He also found ways to be a net positive even when the jumper vanished entirely. In the 02/09 vs BKN matchup, his steady passing and rebounding earned him a +3.8 Impact despite taking only seven shots from the floor.

IMPACT TIMELINE

Game-by-game performance vs average. Green = above average, red = below.

PATTERNS

Boom-or-bust player. Okoro's impact swings wildly relative to his average — some nights dominant, others invisible. Scoring varies by ~5 points per game.

Middle-of-the-road efficiency — shoots 45%+ from the field in 55% of games. Not automatic, but not a problem either.

Good defender on his best nights, but it comes and goes. Some games Okoro locks in defensively, others he gets picked apart.

Slight upward trend. First-half impact: -3.2, second-half: -1.5. Modest improvement — possibly settling into a rhythm.

Tends to go on runs. Longest hot streak: 4 games. Longest cold streak: 7 games.

MATCHUP HISTORY ⚠ Updated 46 days ago

Based on 66 games with tracking data. Shows who guarded this player on offense and who he guarded on defense, with their shooting stats in those matchups.

ON OFFENSE: WHO GUARDED HIM

His shooting stats against each primary defender this season

D. Robinson 91.7 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.02
PTS 2
J. Brunson 69.0 poss
FG% 37.5%
3P% 20.0%
PPP 0.12
PTS 8
T. Young 54.2 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.07
PTS 4
B. Ingram 50.5 poss
FG% 66.7%
3P% 33.3%
PPP 0.2
PTS 10
A. Green 45.0 poss
FG% 44.4%
3P% 33.3%
PPP 0.22
PTS 10
D. Bane 41.7 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.05
PTS 2
D. Mitchell 41.4 poss
FG% 66.7%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.19
PTS 8
J. Grant 38.7 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.03
PTS 1
L. Ball 38.4 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.1
PTS 4
D. Garland 38.3 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.05
PTS 2

ON DEFENSE: WHO HE GUARDED

How opponents shot when he was the primary defender. Lower FG% = better defense.

D. Robinson 79.7 poss
FG% 58.3%
3P% 77.8%
PPP 0.26
PTS 21
J. Brunson 67.9 poss
FG% 28.6%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.06
PTS 4
C. Cunningham 61.8 poss
FG% 30.0%
3P% 30.0%
PPP 0.28
PTS 17
T. Maxey 58.7 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.15
PTS 9
D. Mitchell 56.9 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 66.7%
PPP 0.23
PTS 13
J. Johnson 49.5 poss
FG% 53.8%
3P% 25.0%
PPP 0.38
PTS 19
Z. Williamson 47.8 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.23
PTS 11
J. Murray 47.0 poss
FG% 57.1%
3P% 40.0%
PPP 0.21
PTS 10
N. Clowney 47.0 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 33.3%
PPP 0.11
PTS 5
M. Porter Jr. 45.5 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.24
PTS 11

SEASON STATS

64
Games
9.2
PPG
2.7
RPG
1.6
APG
0.8
SPG
0.5
BPG
46.1
FG%
33.3
3P%
79.5
FT%
26.8
MPG

GAME LOG

64 games played