Chicago Bulls

Eastern Conference

Chicago
Bulls

31-51
L2

ROSTER — IMPACT RANKINGS

Nikola Vučević
Center Yr 14 48G (48S)
+11.1
16.9 pts
9.0 reb
3.8 ast
30.8 min

Nikola Vučević’s midseason stretch was defined by a stark demotion to the second unit and wildly erratic efficiency. Thriving initially in his new reserve role, he completely dismantled the opposition on 02/27 vs BKN. He poured in 28 points and grabbed 11 rebounds in just 25 minutes, earning a massive +34.1 Impact by pairing flawless 3-for-3 perimeter shooting with relentless interior finishing. Even when his scoring volume plummeted, the veteran big man occasionally found ways to anchor the bench. During his first game off the pine on 02/06 vs MIA, he managed only 11 points but secured 12 boards and dished four assists, generating a +16.5 Impact through crucial second-chance hustle plays and crisp offensive facilitation. Relying on him every night remained a serious gamble, however. His shot selection completely unraveled on 04/07 vs CHA. He bricked all five of his three-point attempts and shot a dismal 1-for-10 overall, dragging down the offense to the tune of a -8.1 Impact.

Tre Jones
Guard Yr 5 65G (41S)
+6.1
14.1 pts
3.1 reb
5.4 ast
27.0 min

This late-season stretch was defined by a blistering offensive hot streak that transformed Tre Jones from a steady floor general into a lethal scoring threat. He peaked during the 04/09 vs WAS matchup, pouring in 31 points on a crisp 9-for-14 shooting night to generate a massive +26.7 Impact score. That elite rating stemmed directly from his aggressive shot selection and relentless downhill drives that bent the defense. Yet, raw scoring didn't always translate to overwhelming value. Despite dropping 21 points on a near-perfect 10-for-11 from the floor on 03/13 vs LAC, he managed a surprisingly modest +5.8 Impact. His tunnel vision yielded just two assists and a single rebound, allowing hidden defensive costs to drag down his overall footprint. The consequences of one-dimensional play were even more severe during the 03/03 vs OKC game. He tallied 15 points on 50 percent shooting, but a sheer lack of playmaking and poor point-of-attack defense tanked his value to a -3.2 Impact.

Josh Giddey
Guard Yr 4 54G (51S)
+5.0
17.0 pts
8.3 reb
9.1 ast
32.1 min

This late-season stretch was defined by extreme volatility, oscillating wildly between masterful triple-double orchestration and disastrous shooting slumps. On 03/01 vs MIL, Giddey was an absolute force, logging 20 points, 14 rebounds, and 10 assists. His blistering 5-for-11 shooting from deep and relentless rebounding fueled a massive +25.2 Impact score, driving winning basketball through sheer offensive efficiency. Yet, his massive playmaking numbers often masked severe inefficiencies, as seen on 03/19 vs CLE. Despite dishing out a staggering 19 assists, he posted a brutal -11.0 Impact score because his erratic 4-for-11 shooting and poor shot selection actively dragged the offense down. The floor completely fell out on 03/28 vs OKC. He bricked all eight of his three-point attempts en route to a dismal 1-for-11 shooting night, resulting in a -14.0 Impact score that exposed his glaring limitations as a scorer. When his jumper fell, he looked like a dynamic engine, but his frequent clunkers made him a frustratingly unreliable offensive hub.

Collin Sexton
Guard Yr 7 26G (10S)
+4.9
17.5 pts
2.9 reb
2.5 ast
26.0 min

This late-season stretch was defined by a violent shift from an actively harmful chucker to a highly adaptable offensive engine. Early on, his poor shot selection was a glaring liability, perfectly captured on 02/26 vs POR when he posted a brutal -14.1 Impact score by forcing up nine shots to score just 10 empty points. The turning point arrived on 03/05 vs PHX, where Sexton erupted for 30 points and five assists. He generated a massive +25.2 Impact score in that matchup through hyper-efficient 11-for-19 shooting and smart distribution. Yet his most fascinating evolution occurred when his jumper completely abandoned him on 04/07 vs WAS. Despite clanking his way to a highly inefficient 15 points on an abysmal 5-for-16 shooting night, Sexton still managed a strong +10.8 Impact score. Instead of compounding his shooting woes, he salvaged his value on the margins by crashing the glass for nine rebounds and dishing out seven assists. It was a refreshing sign of maturity from a guard who previously bled value whenever his primary weapon misfired.

Matas Buzelis
Forward Yr 1 77G (77S)
+3.8
16.3 pts
5.8 reb
2.1 ast
29.2 min

This late-season stretch was defined by wild, high-variance scoring swings that revealed a young forward discovering his offensive ceiling while battling erratic shot selection. When his jumper fell, he looked absolutely unstoppable. He peaked during a marathon 45-minute effort on 03/10 vs GSW, pouring in 41 points on 16-of-28 shooting to generate a staggering +35.0 Impact. That massive rating stemmed directly from his willingness to aggressively attack the interior rather than settle, converting at a high clip inside the arc. Conversely, his cold nights were punishingly bad. On 02/19 vs TOR, he managed just 4 points on 2-of-10 shooting, yielding a dismal -17.7 Impact because his refusal to stop forcing contested perimeter looks actively killed offensive momentum. Yet, he slowly learned how to salvage his value when the touch vanished entirely. On 04/10 vs ORL, Buzelis missed all nine of his three-point attempts but still scraped out a +0.9 Impact by crashing the glass for 8 rebounds and relying on pure defensive hustle to stay afloat.

Ayo Dosunmu
Guard Yr 4 45G (10S)
+3.5
15.0 pts
3.0 reb
3.6 ast
26.4 min

A mid-March promotion to the starting lineup completely resurrected Ayo Dosunmu's season. While coming off the pine early in this stretch, he looked hesitant and actively dragged the second unit down on 02/20 vs DAL, forcing bad looks during a 5-point, 2-for-9 shooting night that yielded a brutal -12.8 impact score. Even when his jumper started falling, hidden costs ruined his overall value. He dropped a highly efficient 13 points on 6-of-8 shooting on 03/10 vs LAL, but a complete lack of playmaking and porous defense saddled him with a -3.7 impact. Everything flipped once he moved into the starting five. Given the keys to the offense, he exacted revenge on 03/30 vs DAL by orchestrating a brilliant triple-double with 18 points, 15 rebounds, and 12 assists. That monstrous +28.9 impact score stemmed directly from his relentless effort on the glass and unselfish passing, transforming him from a bench liability into a two-way engine.

Leonard Miller
Forward Yr 2 27G (12S)
+2.8
11.7 pts
5.8 reb
1.3 ast
23.1 min

Leonard Miller spent this fifteen-game stretch wrestling with his identity, bouncing between the starting lineup and the bench before finally forcing his way into heavy minutes. Even when his offensive volume dipped, his motor ran hot, perfectly illustrated on 03/16 vs MEM. Despite scoring just 10 points on five shot attempts, Miller generated a +9.8 impact score by focusing on relentless defensive effort, crashing the glass for seven rebounds, and refusing to force bad looks. He eventually found his scoring rhythm as a starter and unleashed a monster double-double on 04/09 vs WAS. Torching the Wizards for 26 points and 11 rebounds on 11-of-14 shooting, he posted a massive +21.0 impact score by combining hyper-efficient finishing with active interior presence. Yet, his final outing on 04/12 vs DAL revealed the lingering flaws in his game. He tallied a highly efficient 17 points on 8-of-12 shooting, but a -1.8 impact score exposed the hidden costs of his performance, stemming from quiet defensive breakdowns and missed rotations that bled points on the other end of the floor.

Jaden Ivey
Guard Yr 3 4G (3S)
+1.4
11.5 pts
4.8 reb
4.0 ast
28.9 min

Jaden Ivey spent this midseason stretch battling his own irrelevance, floating through empty-calorie bench minutes before a brief starting promotion forced him to actually engage. During a dismal reserve outing on 01/25 vs SAC, he tallied 11 points on an efficient 4-of-6 shooting, yet dragged his team down with a -6.5 Impact score. That stark negative rating stemmed from his complete tunnel vision and poor defensive effort, as he failed to record a single assist while giving up easy looks on the other end. The slump hit rock bottom on 01/29 vs PHX with a scoreless, seven-minute cameo that yielded an abysmal -9.2 Impact. Given a sudden lifeline in the starting lineup, Ivey finally flipped the script on 02/09 vs BKN. Despite shooting a lackluster 3-for-8 from the floor for 13 points, he posted a stellar +8.0 Impact by crashing the glass for six rebounds, distributing three assists, and locking in defensively to generate crucial value without the ball.

Jalen Smith
Forward-Center Yr 5 53G (21S)
+1.1
10.2 pts
6.7 reb
1.2 ast
20.7 min

Jalen Smith’s midseason stretch was defined by a volatile tug-of-war between his rebounding utility and his defensive inconsistency. He often found ways to tilt the floor without filling it up, like during the 02/19 vs TOR matchup where he managed just 9 points but generated a massive +7.7 impact. Despite the quiet scoring night, Smith dominated the glass with 10 rebounds and provided relentless hustle to anchor the interior. He pulled off a similar trick on 03/10 vs GSW, posting a +6.2 impact despite an ugly 3-for-13 shooting night. Rather than letting his broken jumper ruin his shift, he simply outworked everyone for 12 rebounds to keep possessions alive. Yet, his value could plummet just as quickly when he traded grit for empty calories. Look at the 03/23 vs HOU game, where an efficient 15-point scoring outburst was entirely negated by a -1.9 impact score. He knocked down shots effortlessly, but a complete lack of defensive resistance and passive rebounding allowed Houston to exploit him on the other end.

Coby White
Guard Yr 6 29G (26S)
+0.9
18.6 pts
3.7 reb
4.7 ast
29.1 min

Coby White spent this stretch operating as the ultimate boom-or-bust microwave off the bench. When his jumper was dialed in, he was an absolute terror. Look no further than the 03/24 vs SAC matchup, where he erupted for 27 points on a blistering 6-of-8 from beyond the arc. That hyper-efficient shot selection translated to a staggering +24.3 Impact score. However, his overall value plummeted when his game became entirely one-dimensional. During the 04/05 vs MIN contest, White dropped 17 points but still posted a -1.6 Impact because he failed to grab a single rebound and logged just one assist, rendering his buckets empty calories. Even when he stuffed the stat sheet on 03/21 vs MEM with eight rebounds and seven assists, his clunky 4-of-11 shooting dragged him to a -4.4 Impact, exposing the hidden costs of his volatile offensive diet.

Zach Collins
Forward-Center Yr 8 10G
+0.3
9.7 pts
5.6 reb
1.5 ast
18.4 min
Guerschon Yabusele
Forward Yr 3 26G (19S)
-0.1
10.0 pts
5.7 reb
1.7 ast
24.7 min

Guerschon Yabusele’s mid-season stretch was defined by maddening inconsistency and a wildly fluctuating role that saw him bounce between the starting five and the bench. During the 02/22 vs NYK matchup, he scored a modest 11 points but dominated the glass with 13 rebounds, driving a massive +12.1 Impact score through sheer physical rebounding and stout defensive effort. He reached his absolute peak shortly after on 03/03 vs OKC, pouring in 18 points on 7-of-14 shooting while grabbing 12 boards to generate a stellar +17.4 Impact. Yet, that momentum vanished almost immediately. Look at his 03/05 vs PHX performance, where he managed 16 points but posted a disappointing -1.1 Impact. His raw scoring totals in that Phoenix game masked the hidden costs of his erratic shot selection, as he needed 15 field goal attempts to get those 16 points while offering little resistance on the defensive end. When Yabusele commits to doing the dirty work in the paint, he is a genuine difference-maker. When he falls in love with inefficient jumpers, he becomes an active detriment to the lineup.

Anfernee Simons
Guard Yr 7 6G (5S)
-0.8
15.2 pts
2.8 reb
3.0 ast
28.4 min

This midseason stretch was defined by a chaotic pendulum swing between brilliant bench scoring and inefficient struggles as a starter. Operating as a reserve on 01/16 vs MIA, Simons erupted for 39 points on 13-of-28 shooting. He generated a massive +28.2 Impact score that night simply by burying the defense under an avalanche of seven three-pointers. However, his aggressive shot selection frequently betrayed him. This flaw was glaringly obvious during a brutal 01/24 vs BKN matchup where he clanked his way to 10 points on 4-of-16 shooting, posting a dismal -12.1 Impact score due to his heavily wasted offensive possessions. A brief hot streak eventually earned him a starting nod in early February, though his overall efficiency immediately tanked against tougher defensive assignments. Yet, even when his scoring output dipped to a modest 15 points on a rough 5-of-15 shooting night on 02/07 vs DEN, he still managed to scrape out a +1.8 Impact score. Rather than forcing more bad looks, he kept the offense humming with six assists, creating enough non-scoring value as a distributor to completely offset his cold perimeter touch.

Nick Richards
Center Yr 5 20G (4S)
-1.0
9.3 pts
7.6 reb
0.4 ast
22.4 min

Nick Richards spent this fifteen-game stretch devolving from a highly effective bench bruiser into an overexposed spot-starter. Operating primarily as a reserve early on, he routinely dominated the glass to generate immense value without demanding offensive touches. During a gritty tilt vs PHX on 03/05, Richards scored just 9 points but still posted a +3.8 impact score by swallowing up 11 rebounds and doing the necessary dirty work inside. Unfortunately, his overall effectiveness cratered whenever his scoring volume increased at the expense of his rebounding. Look no further than his outing vs LAL on 03/12. He tallied 15 points on highly efficient shooting, yet registered a dismal -5.4 impact score because he grabbed a meager four boards and gave up easy baskets on the other end. By the time he was thrust into the starting lineup in late March, the physical toll was obvious. A brutal start vs PHI on 03/25 yielded just two points and a disastrous -13.9 impact score, forcing an early hook after a mere nine minutes of action.

Kevin Huerter
Guard-Forward Yr 7 44G (11S)
-1.3
10.9 pts
3.8 reb
2.6 ast
23.6 min

This late-season stretch was defined by maddening inconsistency, with Huerter oscillating wildly between detrimental bench stints and sudden bursts of offensive brilliance. His erratic shot selection often sank the second unit, a flaw glaringly evident during the 04/04 vs PHI matchup. Despite logging six assists in that contest, his abysmal 2-for-9 shooting and forced perimeter looks dragged his Impact down to a dismal -10.3. Yet, when he stopped settling for bad threes and attacked with purpose, his overall value skyrocketed. During the 03/19 vs WAS game, Huerter missed both of his deep attempts but shot an efficient 6-of-10 overall, pairing 14 points with active rebounding to post a massive +19.8 Impact. He even found a rhythm when thrust into the starting five. On 03/26 vs NOP, he exploded for 22 points on 9-of-14 shooting, generating a +11.7 Impact simply by catching fire and punishing sluggish defensive closeouts.

Isaac Okoro
Forward-Guard Yr 5 63G (62S)
-2.2
9.3 pts
2.7 reb
1.6 ast
26.9 min

This midseason stretch was defined by maddening offensive inconsistency that constantly swung Okoro's overall value. Look at the 03/03 vs OKC disaster, where he logged 32 minutes but managed just four points on a miserable 1-for-9 shooting night. That complete inability to space the floor or convert open looks resulted in a brutal -19.8 Impact score. Yet, when his shot actually fell, he looked like a completely different wing. During the 03/28 vs OKC rematch, Okoro poured in 20 points on 7-of-13 shooting, forcing defenders to respect him on the perimeter to drive a stellar +10.9 Impact score. He also found ways to be a net positive even when the jumper vanished entirely. In the 02/09 vs BKN matchup, his steady passing and rebounding earned him a +3.8 Impact despite taking only seven shots from the floor.

Jevon Carter
Guard Yr 7 23G
-5.1
5.4 pts
1.1 reb
0.8 ast
11.1 min

Jevon Carter's late-season stretch was defined by erratic offensive production that routinely sabotaged his team's momentum. When handed a rare starting nod on 03/23 vs IND, he completely flatlined. He managed just two points on 1-for-5 shooting across 24 minutes, resulting in a dismal -13.3 Impact score as his inability to space the floor bogged down the half-court offense. The bottom fell out entirely on 03/31 vs PHX. Chucking up five missed threes and finishing scoreless, Carter posted a brutal -14.1 Impact score because his rushed shot selection actively fueled opponent transition runs. He occasionally found his rhythm off the bench, notably serving as a flawless spark plug during the 04/08 vs MIN matchup. By hitting all four of his shots—including three triples—he generated a +5.1 Impact score, reminding everyone that his current NBA value hinges entirely on whether his perimeter jumper is actually falling.

Lachlan Olbrich
Center Yr 0 37G (2S)
-5.9
2.4 pts
3.0 reb
1.1 ast
9.3 min

Lachlan Olbrich’s late-season stretch shifted violently from irrelevant garbage-time minutes to a stunning playmaking breakout. Early on, he was bleeding value in brief cameos, hitting rock bottom on 03/30 vs SAS with a brutal -13.0 Impact score after posting zero points and a single rebound in just four minutes of action. However, a sudden promotion to the starting unit completely changed his utility. Thrust into a massive 32-minute role on 04/10 vs ORL, he managed a positive +0.6 Impact despite scoring just six points because his nine rebounds and five assists kept the offense flowing. Two nights later, he delivered an absolute masterpiece on 04/12 vs DAL. Olbrich racked up a 10-point, 15-rebound, 10-assist triple-double, generating a massive +15.4 Impact score by dominating the glass and picking the defense apart with his passing. It was a remarkable turnaround for a guy who could barely get off the bench two weeks prior.

Patrick Williams
Forward Yr 5 72G (6S)
-5.9
7.0 pts
3.0 reb
1.5 ast
20.5 min

This late-season stretch was defined by a maddening offensive slump that largely relegated Patrick Williams to a volatile bench role. Even when his shot occasionally fell, like his highly efficient 11-point outing on 02/24 vs CHA, his -4.9 Impact score betrayed a lack of defensive resistance and poor rotational awareness that actively hurt his team. The bottom completely fell out during a miserable spring run. He hit rock bottom on 04/01 vs IND, posting a catastrophic -26.2 Impact score after missing all four of his shots and looking utterly invisible in just 13 minutes of action. Yet, Williams still managed to occasionally salvage his minutes through sheer grit, grinding out a +2.5 Impact score on 03/18 vs TOR despite scoring just seven points on ugly 2-for-7 shooting because he crashed the glass and fought hard defensively. Out of nowhere, he erupted on 04/07 vs WAS for 20 points, seven rebounds, and six assists. That brilliant +16.4 Impact performance highlighted exactly what makes him so frustrating; when he actually attacks the rim and creates for others, he looks like a completely different player.

Dalen Terry
Forward Yr 3 34G
-6.3
3.5 pts
1.9 reb
1.3 ast
11.1 min

Dalen Terry spent this sixteen-game stretch fighting a losing battle for rotational stability, plummeting into a deep mid-season slump. He briefly flashed value as a connective bench piece on 02/01 vs MIA, where his modest eight points were elevated by six rebounds and three assists to generate a +3.5 Impact score. However, that peripheral hustle quickly vanished as the weeks dragged on. Even when he managed to find the basket, hidden costs ruined his shifts. He tallied eight points on 03/12 vs DET, but a lack of perimeter spacing and minimal playmaking across 23 minutes dragged him down to a dismal -7.0 Impact. Things completely bottomed out during a brutal, invisible stint on 03/19 vs SAC. In just four minutes of action, Terry missed both his shot attempts and recorded zero rebounds or assists, resulting in a staggering -13.3 Impact score. For a wing desperately needing to carve out an NBA niche, these empty-calorie shifts and frequent disappearing acts only pushed him further down the bench hierarchy.

Emanuel Miller
Forward Yr 1 5G
-6.3
3.0 pts
0.6 reb
0.8 ast
6.6 min
Julian Phillips
Forward Yr 2 35G (2S)
-6.9
2.8 pts
1.3 reb
0.2 ast
9.5 min

Julian Phillips spent this mid-to-late season stretch marooned at the end of the bench, battling severe inefficiency during his rare moments of extended run. His lone bright spot arrived on 02/01 vs MIA, where he managed a +2.0 Impact score despite an ugly 3-for-11 shooting night. He salvaged his overall value by flying around the floor, using raw defensive energy and hustle to compensate for a broken jumper. Outside of that anomaly, his fleeting appearances were actively harmful. He bottomed out entirely on 04/07 vs IND, posting a catastrophic -12.4 Impact score while running around for three scoreless minutes. Even when given a massive 26-minute leash on 04/12 vs NOP, the underlying metrics rejected his box score. Phillips poured in 16 points, yet his -4.8 Impact score exposed the illusion. A clunky 1-for-5 mark from deep and constant defensive lapses bled away any real value his scoring provided.

Yuki Kawamura
Guard Yr 1 18G
-7.4
3.4 pts
1.8 reb
2.6 ast
11.6 min
Mac McClung
Guard Yr 3 8G
-7.5
6.0 pts
0.8 reb
1.1 ast
12.7 min
Rob Dillingham
Guard Yr 1 30G
-8.1
9.6 pts
3.0 reb
2.8 ast
21.5 min

This brutal late-season stretch was defined by erratic shot selection and a catastrophic inability to positively influence the game. Even when his shots actually dropped, hidden costs routinely dragged down his overall value. Look at his performance on 03/19 vs CLE, where he scored 17 points but still posted a -1.8 Impact score because his tunnel vision—yielding just one assist—and defensive lapses bled points on the other end. He finally put together a complete game on 04/07 vs WAS, pouring in 26 points and grabbing seven rebounds to earn a rare +9.5 Impact score. The relief was fleeting. On 04/09 vs WAS, he immediately reverted to his worst habits, clanking his way to a 2-for-10 shooting performance that yielded a staggering -22.6 Impact score. For a bench guard expected to provide a reliable spark, these massive negative swings made him a severe liability to the second unit.

L
@ DAL DAL
128 CHI DAL 149
DAL @ DAL
128 149
Sun, Apr 12
Analysis
-21
L
vs ORL ORL
127 ORL CHI 103
ORL vs ORL
103 127
Fri, Apr 10
Analysis
-24
W
@ WAS WAS
119 CHI WAS 108
WAS @ WAS
119 108
Thu, Apr 9
Analysis
+11
W
@ WAS WAS
129 CHI WAS 98
WAS @ WAS
129 98
Tue, Apr 7
Analysis
+31
L
vs PHX PHX
120 PHX CHI 110
PHX vs PHX
110 120
Sun, Apr 5
Analysis
-10
L
@ NYK NYK
96 CHI NYK 136
NYK @ NYK
96 136
Fri, Apr 3
Analysis
-40
L
vs IND IND
145 IND CHI 126
IND vs IND
126 145
Wed, Apr 1
Analysis
-19
L
@ SAS SAS
114 CHI SAS 129
SAS @ SAS
114 129
Mon, Mar 30
Analysis
-15
L
@ MEM MEM
124 CHI MEM 125
MEM @ MEM
124 125
Sun, Mar 29
Analysis
-1
L
@ OKC OKC
113 CHI OKC 131
OKC @ OKC
113 131
Sat, Mar 28
Analysis
-18
L
@ PHI PHI
137 CHI PHI 157
PHI @ PHI
137 157
Wed, Mar 25
Analysis
-20
W
vs HOU HOU
124 HOU CHI 132
HOU vs HOU
132 124
Mon, Mar 23
Analysis
+8
L
vs CLE CLE
115 CLE CHI 110
CLE vs CLE
110 115
Thu, Mar 19
Analysis
-5
L
vs TOR TOR
139 TOR CHI 109
TOR vs TOR
109 139
Wed, Mar 18
Analysis
-30
W
vs MEM MEM
107 MEM CHI 132
MEM vs MEM
132 107
Mon, Mar 16
Analysis
+25
L
@ LAC LAC
108 CHI LAC 119
LAC @ LAC
108 119
Fri, Mar 13
Analysis
-11
L
@ LAL LAL
130 CHI LAL 142
LAL @ LAL
130 142
Thu, Mar 12
Analysis
-12
W
@ GSW GSW
130 CHI GSW 124
GSW @ GSW
130 124
Tue, Mar 10
Analysis
+6
L
@ SAC SAC
110 CHI SAC 126
SAC @ SAC
110 126
Sun, Mar 8
Analysis
-16
W
@ PHX PHX
105 CHI PHX 103
PHX @ PHX
105 103
Thu, Mar 5
Analysis
+2
L
vs OKC OKC
116 OKC CHI 108
OKC vs OKC
108 116
Tue, Mar 3
Analysis
-8
W
vs MIL MIL
97 MIL CHI 120
MIL vs MIL
120 97
Sun, Mar 1
Analysis
+23
L
vs POR POR
121 POR CHI 112
POR vs POR
112 121
Thu, Feb 26
Analysis
-9
L
vs CHA CHA
131 CHA CHI 99
CHA vs CHA
99 131
Tue, Feb 24
Analysis
-32
L
vs NYK NYK
105 NYK CHI 99
NYK vs NYK
99 105
Sun, Feb 22
Analysis
-6
L
vs DET DET
126 DET CHI 110
DET vs DET
110 126
Sat, Feb 21
Analysis
-16
L
vs TOR TOR
110 TOR CHI 101
TOR vs TOR
101 110
Thu, Feb 19
Analysis
-9
L
@ BOS BOS
105 CHI BOS 124
BOS @ BOS
105 124
Wed, Feb 11
Analysis
-19
L
@ BKN BKN
115 CHI BKN 123
BKN @ BKN
115 123
Mon, Feb 9
Analysis
-8
L
vs DEN DEN
136 DEN CHI 120
DEN vs DEN
120 136
Sat, Feb 7
Analysis
-16
L
@ TOR TOR
107 CHI TOR 123
TOR @ TOR
107 123
Thu, Feb 5
Analysis
-16
L
@ MIL MIL
115 CHI MIL 131
MIL @ MIL
115 131
Tue, Feb 3
Analysis
-16
L
@ MIA MIA
91 CHI MIA 134
MIA @ MIA
91 134
Sun, Feb 1
Analysis
-43
W
@ MIA MIA
125 CHI MIA 118
MIA @ MIA
125 118
Sat, Jan 31
Analysis
+7
L
vs MIA MIA
116 MIA CHI 113
MIA vs MIA
113 116
Thu, Jan 29
Analysis
-3
L
@ IND IND
110 CHI IND 113
IND @ IND
110 113
Wed, Jan 28
Analysis
-3
L
vs LAL LAL
129 LAL CHI 118
LAL vs LAL
118 129
Tue, Jan 27
Analysis
-11
W
vs BOS BOS
111 BOS CHI 114
BOS vs BOS
114 111
Sun, Jan 25
Analysis
+3
W
@ MIN MIN
120 CHI MIN 115
MIN @ MIN
120 115
Fri, Jan 23
Analysis
+5
W
vs LAC LAC
110 LAC CHI 138
LAC vs LAC
138 110
Wed, Jan 21
Analysis
+28
W
vs BKN BKN
102 BKN CHI 124
BKN vs BKN
124 102
Mon, Jan 19
Analysis
+22
L
@ BKN BKN
109 CHI BKN 112
BKN @ BKN
109 112
Sat, Jan 17
Analysis
-3
W
vs UTA UTA
126 UTA CHI 128
UTA vs UTA
128 126
Thu, Jan 15
Analysis
+2
L
@ HOU HOU
113 CHI HOU 119
HOU @ HOU
113 119
Wed, Jan 14
Analysis
-6
W
vs DAL DAL
107 DAL CHI 125
DAL vs DAL
125 107
Sun, Jan 11
Analysis
+18
L
@ DET DET
93 CHI DET 108
DET @ DET
93 108
Thu, Jan 8
Analysis
-15
L
@ BOS BOS
101 CHI BOS 115
BOS @ BOS
101 115
Tue, Jan 6
Analysis
-14
L
vs CHA CHA
112 CHA CHI 99
CHA vs CHA
99 112
Sun, Jan 4
Analysis
-13
W
vs ORL ORL
114 ORL CHI 121
ORL vs ORL
121 114
Sat, Jan 3
Analysis
+7
W
vs NOP NOP
118 NOP CHI 134
NOP vs NOP
134 118
Thu, Jan 1
Analysis
+16
L
vs MIN MIN
136 MIN CHI 101
MIN vs MIN
101 136
Tue, Dec 30
Analysis
-35
L
vs MIL MIL
112 MIL CHI 103
MIL vs MIL
103 112
Sun, Dec 28
Analysis
-9
W
vs PHI PHI
102 PHI CHI 109
PHI vs PHI
109 102
Sat, Dec 27
Analysis
+7
W
@ ATL ATL
126 CHI ATL 123
ATL @ ATL
126 123
Wed, Dec 24
Analysis
+3
W
@ ATL ATL
152 CHI ATL 150
ATL @ ATL
152 150
Sun, Dec 21
Analysis
+2
W
@ CLE CLE
136 CHI CLE 125
CLE @ CLE
136 125
Sat, Dec 20
Analysis
+11
W
vs CLE CLE
111 CLE CHI 127
CLE vs CLE
127 111
Thu, Dec 18
Analysis
+16
L
vs NOP NOP
114 NOP CHI 104
NOP vs NOP
104 114
Mon, Dec 15
Analysis
-10
W
@ CHA CHA
129 CHI CHA 126
CHA @ CHA
129 126
Sat, Dec 13
Analysis
+3
L
vs GSW GSW
123 GSW CHI 91
GSW vs GSW
91 123
Mon, Dec 8
Analysis
-32
L
vs IND IND
120 IND CHI 105
IND vs IND
105 120
Sat, Dec 6
Analysis
-15
L
vs BKN BKN
113 BKN CHI 103
BKN vs BKN
103 113
Thu, Dec 4
Analysis
-10
L
@ ORL ORL
120 CHI ORL 125
ORL @ ORL
120 125
Tue, Dec 2
Analysis
-5
L
@ IND IND
101 CHI IND 103
IND @ IND
101 103
Sun, Nov 30
Analysis
-2
L
@ CHA CHA
116 CHI CHA 123
CHA @ CHA
116 123
Sat, Nov 29
Analysis
-7
L
@ NOP NOP
130 CHI NOP 143
NOP @ NOP
130 143
Tue, Nov 25
Analysis
-13
W
vs WAS WAS
120 WAS CHI 121
WAS vs WAS
121 120
Sun, Nov 23
Analysis
+1
L
vs MIA MIA
143 MIA CHI 107
MIA vs MIA
107 143
Sat, Nov 22
Analysis
-36
W
@ POR POR
122 CHI POR 121
POR @ POR
122 121
Thu, Nov 20
Analysis
+1
W
@ DEN DEN
130 CHI DEN 127
DEN @ DEN
130 127
Tue, Nov 18
Analysis
+3
L
@ UTA UTA
147 CHI UTA 150
UTA @ UTA
147 150
Mon, Nov 17
Analysis
-3
L
@ DET DET
113 CHI DET 124
DET @ DET
113 124
Thu, Nov 13
Analysis
-11
L
vs SAS SAS
121 SAS CHI 117
SAS vs SAS
117 121
Tue, Nov 11
Analysis
-4
L
@ CLE CLE
122 CHI CLE 128
CLE @ CLE
122 128
Sun, Nov 9
Analysis
-6
L
@ MIL MIL
110 CHI MIL 126
MIL @ MIL
110 126
Sat, Nov 8
Analysis
-16
W
vs PHI PHI
111 PHI CHI 113
PHI vs PHI
113 111
Wed, Nov 5
Analysis
+2
L
@ NYK NYK
116 CHI NYK 128
NYK @ NYK
116 128
Mon, Nov 3
Analysis
-12
W
vs NYK NYK
125 NYK CHI 135
NYK vs NYK
135 125
Sat, Nov 1
Analysis
+10
W
vs SAC SAC
113 SAC CHI 126
SAC vs SAC
126 113
Thu, Oct 30
Analysis
+13
W
vs ATL ATL
123 ATL CHI 128
ATL vs ATL
128 123
Mon, Oct 27
Analysis
+5
W
@ ORL ORL
110 CHI ORL 98
ORL @ ORL
110 98
Sat, Oct 25
Analysis
+12
W
vs DET DET
111 DET CHI 115
DET vs DET
115 111
Wed, Oct 22
Analysis
+4