2025-26 Season
LEONARD MILLER
2025-26 Season
LEONARD MILLER
Miller produces at an average rate for a 13-minute workload.
About this model: Net Impact can't measure floor spacing, help defense rotations, or playmaking gravity — so wings and guards are slightly undervalued vs bigs. How Net Impact works
TEAM COMPARISON
of 20 teammates (10+ games, 10+ min)
SKILL DNA
Percentile rank vs 227 Forwards with 10+ games
THE SEASON SO FAR
Leonard Miller spent his first twenty games of the 2025-26 season trapped in the purgatory of deep-bench spot minutes, oscillating wildly between hyper-efficient bursts and completely aimless wandering. When engaged, he maximized his microscopic playing time by attacking the rim and utilizing his length. This peak was obvious on 01/06 vs MIA, where he posted a brilliant +6.6 impact score by pouring in 6 points in just 5 minutes and finishing flawlessly through contact. He even managed to tilt the math without registering a single counting stat on 02/07 vs DEN, earning a +1.8 impact mark simply by blowing up late-game actions as a defensive specialist. But far too often, Miller simply drifted. During a brutal -4.2 impact showing on 01/24 vs GSW, he failed to score while actively sabotaging his team's half-court offense by uselessly clogging the dunker spot. To permanently escape garbage time, he must stop fading into the background and start treating every fleeting rotation minute with absolute urgency.
This twenty-game stretch was a volatile rollercoaster for Leonard Miller, defined by erratic role changes and wildly fluctuating on-court value. Even when he found the bottom of the net, hidden costs often dragged down his effectiveness. Look at his start on 03/13 vs LAC, where he tallied 14 points but posted a -1.9 impact because he stubbornly forced contested perimeter shots and bricked all five of his three-point attempts. Conversely, he occasionally found ways to tilt the math in his team's favor without filling the scoring column. During an abbreviated start on 03/28 vs MEM, Miller managed just 5 points but earned a +2.9 impact by anchoring the unit with disciplined weak-side rim protection and active hands in the passing lanes. When he actually merged his elite physical tools with smart basketball, the results were devastating for opponents. He logged a massive +18.6 impact off the bench on 03/30 vs SAS, pouring in 21 points because he leaned into his athleticism and relied on relentless energy on the offensive glass.
IMPACT TIMELINE
Game-by-game performance vs average. Green = above average, red = below.
Boom-or-bust player. Miller's impact swings wildly relative to his average — some nights dominant, others invisible. Scoring varies by ~6 points per game.
Middle-of-the-road efficiency — shoots 45%+ from the field in 65% of games. Not automatic, but not a problem either.
Good defender on his best nights, but it comes and goes. Some games Miller locks in defensively, others he gets picked apart.
Slight upward trend. First-half impact: -0.2, second-half: +1.8. Modest improvement — possibly settling into a rhythm.
MATCHUP HISTORY
Based on 76 games with tracking data. Shows who guarded this player on offense and who he guarded on defense, with their shooting stats in those matchups.
ON OFFENSE: WHO GUARDED HIM
His shooting stats against each primary defender this season
ON DEFENSE: WHO HE GUARDED
How opponents shot when he was the primary defender. Lower FG% = better defense.
SEASON STATS
GAME LOG
41 games played