CHI

2025-26 Season

LEONARD MILLER

Chicago Bulls | Forward | 6-10
Leonard Miller
7.8PPG
3.9RPG
0.9APG
15.6MPG
-1.1 Impact

Miller produces at an below average rate for a 16-minute workload.

·
Embed this player card

Copy & paste this HTML into any page:

The widget updates automatically whenever our data does.

IMPACT BREAKDOWN
Every stat, every credit, every cost — per game average
-1.1
Scoring +7.3
Points Scored 7.8 PPG = +7.8
Missed Shots difficulty-adjusted = -1.9
Shot Making above expected FG% = +1.4
Creation +0.4
Assists & Self-Creation 0.9 AST/g + self-creation = +0.4
Turnovers -1.8
Turnovers 0.8/g (live + dead blend) = -1.8
Defense -0.3
Steals 0.4/g = +0.9
Blocks 0.3/g = +0.3
Fouls + context committed fouls, matchup adj = -1.5
Hustle & Effort +3.7
Rebounds 3.9 RPG (OREB + DREB) = +2.5
Contested Shots 2.8/g = +0.6
Deflections 0.6/g = +0.4
Charges Drawn 0.0/g = +0.0
Loose Balls 0.2/g = +0.1
Screen Assists 0.5/g = +0.1
Raw Impact +9.3
Baseline (game-average expected) −10.4
Net Impact
-1.1
46th pctl vs Forwards

PBP Credit: Every play is analyzed from play-by-play data. Scorers get difficulty-adjusted credit, assisters get creation value based on the shot opportunity they created, and turnovers are classified by type. Shot difficulty is derived from 1M+ shots across 4 seasons. Full methodology

SKILL DNA

Percentile rank vs 235 Forwards with 10+ games

Scoring 62th
11.0 PPG
Efficiency 82th
61.4% TS
Playmaking 30th
1.2 APG
Rebounding 75th
5.5 RPG
Defense 8th
+3.9/g
Hustle 64th
+14.0/g
Creation 14th
+1.41/g
Shot Making 42th
+5.29/g
TO Discipline 42th
0.05/min

THE SEASON SO FAR

Leonard Miller spent the first 16 games of the 2025-26 season marooned in deep-bench obscurity, logging low-leverage minutes that rarely helped his team. On 12/31 vs ATL, he managed a season-high 7 points in just 8 minutes, yet still posted a negative -3.3 Impact score. Those buckets were essentially empty calories, dragged down by a complete lack of rebounding or playmaking that rendered his floor time a net negative. His longest stint of the stretch came on 11/18 vs DAL, where 10 minutes of action yielded zero points and a brutal -10.8 Impact. Clanking both of his outside shots and failing to score entirely made him a massive offensive liability that night. He finally found a fleeting bright spot on 01/07 vs MIA, generating a rare +1.3 Impact by hitting all three of his field goals for 6 points and grabbing 3 boards in just five minutes. Until he can consistently replicate that kind of efficient execution, Miller will remain firmly tethered to the end of the bench.

Leonard Miller’s mid-season stretch was defined by a drastic role change, evolving from a garbage-time afterthought into a heavy-minute starter. He finally broke out of his early-February funk on 03/01 vs MIL, logging 15 points and four assists off the bench. His stellar +12.5 Impact score in that contest stemmed from ruthless offensive efficiency, as he hit six of his eight shots and kept the ball moving. However, his promotion to the starting lineup hit a snag shortly after on 03/05 vs PHX. Despite grabbing nine rebounds, Miller posted a dismal -7.2 Impact because of brutal shot selection, bricking all five of his three-point attempts and dragging down the half-court offense. He quickly corrected course by putting together a massive double-double on 03/10 vs GSW. Pounding the glass for 11 rebounds and scoring 17 points over 38 grueling minutes, he generated a massive +16.3 Impact through relentless hustle and physical interior defense.

Leonard Miller spent this fifteen-game stretch wrestling with his identity, bouncing between the starting lineup and the bench before finally forcing his way into heavy minutes. Even when his offensive volume dipped, his motor ran hot, perfectly illustrated on 03/16 vs MEM. Despite scoring just 10 points on five shot attempts, Miller generated a +9.8 impact score by focusing on relentless defensive effort, crashing the glass for seven rebounds, and refusing to force bad looks. He eventually found his scoring rhythm as a starter and unleashed a monster double-double on 04/09 vs WAS. Torching the Wizards for 26 points and 11 rebounds on 11-of-14 shooting, he posted a massive +21.0 impact score by combining hyper-efficient finishing with active interior presence. Yet, his final outing on 04/12 vs DAL revealed the lingering flaws in his game. He tallied a highly efficient 17 points on 8-of-12 shooting, but a -1.8 impact score exposed the hidden costs of his performance, stemming from quiet defensive breakdowns and missed rotations that bled points on the other end of the floor.

IMPACT TIMELINE

Game-by-game performance vs average. Green = above average, red = below.

PATTERNS

Boom-or-bust player. Miller's impact swings wildly relative to his average — some nights dominant, others invisible. Scoring varies by ~7 points per game.

Reliable shooter — hits 45%+ from the field in 73% of games. You can count on efficient nights more often than not.

Good defender on his best nights, but it comes and goes. Some games Miller locks in defensively, others he gets picked apart.

Getting better as the season goes on. First-half impact: -6.6, second-half: +4.5. That's a significant jump — could be a role change, confidence, or development clicking.

Tends to go on runs. Longest hot streak: 7 games. Longest cold streak: 10 games.

MATCHUP HISTORY ⚠ Updated 46 days ago

Based on 76 games with tracking data. Shows who guarded this player on offense and who he guarded on defense, with their shooting stats in those matchups.

ON OFFENSE: WHO GUARDED HIM

His shooting stats against each primary defender this season

R. Rupert 29.4 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.1
PTS 3
J. Williams 27.4 poss
FG% 40.0%
3P% 40.0%
PPP 0.36
PTS 10
K. Leonard 22.1 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
V. Krejčí 22.1 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
L. Kornet 18.5 poss
FG% 66.7%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.27
PTS 5
V. Wembanyama 18.1 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.22
PTS 4
B. Portis 16.9 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
D. Ayton 16.9 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.12
PTS 2
B. Ingram 16.7 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
A. Sengun 16.0 poss
FG% 60.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.38
PTS 6

ON DEFENSE: WHO HE GUARDED

How opponents shot when he was the primary defender. Lower FG% = better defense.

R. Rupert 30.0 poss
FG% 42.9%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.27
PTS 8
J. Williams 26.7 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
B. Portis 25.9 poss
FG% 57.1%
3P% 60.0%
PPP 0.42
PTS 11
L. James 25.0 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
K. Leonard 23.2 poss
FG% 12.5%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.13
PTS 3
G. Santos 22.4 poss
FG% 42.9%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.27
PTS 6
J. Smith Jr. 18.6 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
V. Krejčí 16.2 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 33.3%
PPP 0.31
PTS 5
K. Johnson 16.0 poss
FG% 66.7%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.25
PTS 4
S. Barnes 15.0 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.13
PTS 2

SEASON STATS

46
Games
7.8
PPG
3.9
RPG
0.9
APG
0.4
SPG
0.3
BPG
55.3
FG%
32.3
3P%
73.6
FT%
15.6
MPG

GAME LOG

46 games played