CHI

2025-26 Season

TRE JONES

Chicago Bulls | Guard | 6-1
Tre Jones
14.1PPG
3.1RPG
5.4APG
27.0MPG
+6.1 Impact

Jones produces at an elite rate for a 27-minute workload.

·
Embed this player card

Copy & paste this HTML into any page:

The widget updates automatically whenever our data does.

IMPACT BREAKDOWN
Every stat, every credit, every cost — per game average
+6.1
Scoring +13.1
Points Scored 14.1 PPG = +14.1
Missed Shots difficulty-adjusted = -3.6
Shot Making above expected FG% = +2.6
Creation +1.5
Assists & Self-Creation 5.4 AST/g + self-creation = +1.5
Turnovers -3.3
Turnovers 1.4/g (live + dead blend) = -3.3
Defense +1.9
Steals 1.2/g = +2.8
Blocks 0.2/g = +0.2
Fouls + context committed fouls, matchup adj = -1.1
Hustle & Effort +2.1
Rebounds 3.1 RPG (OREB + DREB) = -0.4
Contested Shots 2.3/g = +0.5
Deflections 2.1/g = +1.4
Charges Drawn 0.1/g = +0.3
Loose Balls 0.3/g = +0.2
Screen Assists 0.3/g = +0.1
Raw Impact +15.3
Baseline (game-average expected) −9.2
Net Impact
+6.1
83th pctl vs Guards

PBP Credit: Every play is analyzed from play-by-play data. Scorers get difficulty-adjusted credit, assisters get creation value based on the shot opportunity they created, and turnovers are classified by type. Shot difficulty is derived from 1M+ shots across 4 seasons. Full methodology

SKILL DNA

Percentile rank vs 246 Guards with 10+ games

Scoring 73th
14.1 PPG
Efficiency 97th
62.8% TS
Playmaking 86th
5.4 APG
Rebounding 55th
3.1 RPG
Defense 85th
+10.8/g
Hustle 61th
+10.2/g
Creation 87th
+4.36/g
Shot Making 69th
+7.87/g
TO Discipline 55th
0.05/min

THE SEASON SO FAR

A mid-November demotion to the second unit defined Tre Jones's opening stretch of the 2025-26 campaign, forcing him to reinvent his value on the fly. Before the role change, he operated as a highly effective starter, peaking on 11/11 vs SAS with 20 points, seven rebounds, and seven assists to generate a massive +18.5 Impact score. Even when his touch from the floor vanished entirely, like during an 0-for-4 shooting night on 11/01 vs NYK, Jones still managed a +1.9 Impact by finding other ways to contribute through relentless defensive hustle and timely rebounding. The move to the bench initially rattled his rhythm. He posted a -1.1 Impact on 11/25 vs NOP despite dishing out 11 assists, as hidden costs like blown defensive rotations dragged down his overall effectiveness. He quickly adjusted to the reserve role, however, turning into a highly efficient spark plug. By 12/02 vs ORL, he was torching opposing backups for 20 points on 7-of-10 shooting, posting a +11.0 Impact score fueled by pristine shot selection.

Tre Jones spent this mid-season stretch riding a volatile rotational carousel, bouncing between the starting five and the bench. His promotion to the opening lineup initially sparked sheer offensive brilliance. This peaked perfectly during the 01/14 vs HOU matchup, where Jones erupted for 34 points and seven assists on 11-for-12 shooting. That flawless shot selection and scoring gravity earned him a massive +32.7 Impact score. But his lack of reliable perimeter shooting occasionally crippled the offense, which was glaringly obvious during the 01/08 vs DET contest. Despite dishing out 12 assists and grabbing seven boards, Jones posted a -5.7 Impact score because his abysmal 1-for-7 shooting allowed defenders to completely sag off him and clog the paint. He eventually found more stable footing upon returning to a reserve role. During the 01/19 vs BKN game, Jones scored just 10 points but generated a +5.4 Impact score because his crisp table-setting—yielding 10 assists—provided immense non-scoring value for the second unit.

This late-season stretch was defined by a blistering offensive hot streak that transformed Tre Jones from a steady floor general into a lethal scoring threat. He peaked during the 04/09 vs WAS matchup, pouring in 31 points on a crisp 9-for-14 shooting night to generate a massive +26.7 Impact score. That elite rating stemmed directly from his aggressive shot selection and relentless downhill drives that bent the defense. Yet, raw scoring didn't always translate to overwhelming value. Despite dropping 21 points on a near-perfect 10-for-11 from the floor on 03/13 vs LAC, he managed a surprisingly modest +5.8 Impact. His tunnel vision yielded just two assists and a single rebound, allowing hidden defensive costs to drag down his overall footprint. The consequences of one-dimensional play were even more severe during the 03/03 vs OKC game. He tallied 15 points on 50 percent shooting, but a sheer lack of playmaking and poor point-of-attack defense tanked his value to a -3.2 Impact.

IMPACT TIMELINE

Game-by-game performance vs average. Green = above average, red = below.

PATTERNS

Very consistent. Jones posts positive impact in 77% of games — you almost always get a productive night. Scoring varies by ~6 points, but the overall contribution stays positive.

Middle-of-the-road efficiency — shoots 45%+ from the field in 68% of games. Not automatic, but not a problem either.

Defensive difference-maker. Jones consistently forces tough shots and protects the rim — opponents shoot worse when he's guarding them.

Getting better as the season goes on. First-half impact: +4.2, second-half: +7.8. That's a significant jump — could be a role change, confidence, or development clicking.

Tends to go on runs. Longest hot streak: 12 games. Longest cold streak: 3 games.

MATCHUP HISTORY ⚠ Updated 46 days ago

Based on 66 games with tracking data. Shows who guarded this player on offense and who he guarded on defense, with their shooting stats in those matchups.

ON OFFENSE: WHO GUARDED HIM

His shooting stats against each primary defender this season

J. Brunson 71.9 poss
FG% 45.5%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.19
PTS 14
D. Jenkins 64.7 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.03
PTS 2
T. Maxey 45.1 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.18
PTS 8
R. Rollins 41.7 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.14
PTS 6
T. Young 41.2 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.17
PTS 7
B. Miller 40.2 poss
FG% 25.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.1
PTS 4
S. Merrill 39.0 poss
FG% 60.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.31
PTS 12
A. Black 38.9 poss
FG% 14.3%
3P% 33.3%
PPP 0.08
PTS 3
D. Fox 37.4 poss
FG% 60.0%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.32
PTS 12
J. Fears 37.4 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.19
PTS 7

ON DEFENSE: WHO HE GUARDED

How opponents shot when he was the primary defender. Lower FG% = better defense.

J. Brunson 81.5 poss
FG% 42.1%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.27
PTS 22
D. Jenkins 66.0 poss
FG% 60.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.09
PTS 6
T. Young 65.8 poss
FG% 42.9%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.29
PTS 19
R. Rollins 54.6 poss
FG% 60.0%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.13
PTS 7
J. Fears 52.5 poss
FG% 42.9%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.21
PTS 11
A. Black 46.9 poss
FG% 71.4%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.26
PTS 12
T. Maxey 46.1 poss
FG% 46.7%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.37
PTS 17
R. Sheppard 45.8 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.04
PTS 2
V. Edgecombe 45.3 poss
FG% 25.0%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.07
PTS 3
W. Clayton Jr. 39.3 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.1
PTS 4

SEASON STATS

65
Games
14.1
PPG
3.1
RPG
5.4
APG
1.2
SPG
0.2
BPG
55.3
FG%
31.5
3P%
84.1
FT%
27.0
MPG

GAME LOG

65 games played