UTA

2025-26 Season

SVI MYKHAILIUK

Utah Jazz | Guard-Forward | 6-7
Svi Mykhailiuk
9.2PPG
2.5RPG
1.8APG
22.7MPG
-1.8 Impact

Mykhailiuk produces at an below average rate for a 23-minute workload.

·
Embed this player card

Copy & paste this HTML into any page:

The widget updates automatically whenever our data does.

IMPACT BREAKDOWN
Every stat, every credit, every cost — per game average
-1.8
Scoring +8.8
Points Scored 9.2 PPG = +9.2
Missed Shots difficulty-adjusted = -2.9
Shot Making above expected FG% = +2.5
Creation +0.4
Assists & Self-Creation 1.8 AST/g + self-creation = +0.4
Turnovers -1.9
Turnovers 0.8/g (live + dead blend) = -1.9
Hustle & Effort +1.8
Rebounds 2.5 RPG (OREB + DREB) = -0.2
Contested Shots 2.5/g = +0.5
Deflections 1.5/g = +1.0
Charges Drawn 0.0/g = +0.1
Loose Balls 0.5/g = +0.3
Screen Assists 0.3/g = +0.1
Raw Impact +9.1
Baseline (game-average expected) −10.9
Net Impact
-1.8
51st pctl vs Guards

PBP Credit: Every play is analyzed from play-by-play data. Scorers get difficulty-adjusted credit, assisters get creation value based on the shot opportunity they created, and turnovers are classified by type. Shot difficulty is derived from 1M+ shots across 4 seasons. Full methodology

SKILL DNA

Percentile rank vs 246 Guards with 10+ games

Scoring 50th
9.4 PPG
Efficiency 98th
64.8% TS
Playmaking 31th
1.9 APG
Rebounding 38th
2.5 RPG
Defense 51th
+7.3/g
Hustle 41th
+7.9/g
Creation 16th
+1.63/g
Shot Making 61th
+7.36/g
TO Discipline 80th
0.04/min

THE SEASON SO FAR

Svi Mykhailiuk's early season run as a starter was defined by an exhausting, boom-or-bust volatility. When his perimeter stroke caught fire, he looked like a brilliant offensive weapon. He buried six threes for 28 points on 11/06 vs DET, generating a massive +19.7 Impact by stretching the floor to its breaking point. He did occasionally find ways to contribute without filling it up, like on 10/27 vs PHX. Despite scoring just 11 points on eight shots, he posted a +5.3 Impact by moving the ball, grabbing timely rebounds, and hustling defensively over 37 grueling minutes. Conversely, empty calories plagued him on nights like 11/17 vs CHI. He scored a highly efficient 10 points on 4-of-6 shooting, yet dragged the lineup down to a -5.3 Impact due to a complete failure to grab a single rebound and poor defensive effort on the perimeter.

Svi Mykhailiuk's mid-winter stint in the starting lineup was defined by extreme volatility, oscillating wildly between sharp-shooting weapon and actively harmful floor-spacer. When his jumper abandoned him, his overall value plummeted. Look no further than the 11/25 vs GSW matchup, where a miserable 0-for-4 night from deep resulted in a catastrophic -16.3 Impact score driven by empty offensive possessions and poor shot selection. He briefly flipped the script during a 12/21 vs ORL shootout, pouring in 23 points on 5-of-8 from beyond the arc to generate a massive +18.3 Impact score by ruthlessly punishing late closeouts. Yet, his most fascinating performance came shortly after on 12/24 vs MEM. Despite bricking seven of his nine field goal attempts for a mere 9 points, Mykhailiuk scratched out a +1.8 Impact score by crashing the glass for four rebounds, keeping the offense flowing with three assists, and grinding out extra possessions with pure hustle. Ultimately, this stretch highlighted a specialist who desperately needs his outside stroke to survive, even if he occasionally manufactures value through sheer effort.

Moving from an overmatched starter to a lethal bench shooter completely salvaged this stretch of Mykhailiuk's season. When forced to run with the opening unit in January, his production often came with steep hidden costs. Take the 01/13 vs CLE matchup, where his 11 points masked a dismal -8.2 impact score because he dragged the lineup down with poor defensive rotations and empty box-score stats. The starting experiment crashed completely on 01/28 vs GSW. He managed just two points on 1-for-5 shooting that night, hemorrhaging value to the tune of a catastrophic -20.8 impact score. Relegated to the second unit just a few days later, Svi finally found his comfort zone as a pure, unburdened specialist. This microwave role peaked brilliantly on 03/29 vs PHX, where he erupted for 14 points and four triples in a mere nine minutes, generating a massive +10.4 impact score through sheer offensive efficiency.

IMPACT TIMELINE

Game-by-game performance vs average. Green = above average, red = below.

PATTERNS

Boom-or-bust player. Mykhailiuk's impact swings wildly relative to his average — some nights dominant, others invisible. Scoring varies by ~6 points per game.

Middle-of-the-road efficiency — shoots 45%+ from the field in 55% of games. Not automatic, but not a problem either.

Good defender on his best nights, but it comes and goes. Some games Mykhailiuk locks in defensively, others he gets picked apart.

Hot right now — 4 straight games with positive impact. Longest positive run this season: 4 games.

MATCHUP HISTORY ⚠ Updated 46 days ago

Based on 75 games with tracking data. Shows who guarded this player on offense and who he guarded on defense, with their shooting stats in those matchups.

ON OFFENSE: WHO GUARDED HIM

His shooting stats against each primary defender this season

D. DiVincenzo 60.2 poss
FG% 25.0%
3P% 28.6%
PPP 0.13
PTS 8
FG% 25.0%
3P% 14.3%
PPP 0.08
PTS 5
D. Robinson 55.8 poss
FG% 63.6%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.32
PTS 18
S. Curry 48.0 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
L. Dončić 47.9 poss
FG% 66.7%
3P% 66.7%
PPP 0.21
PTS 10
D. Booker 44.0 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 33.3%
PPP 0.18
PTS 8
Z. LaVine 42.0 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.05
PTS 2
G. Allen 41.9 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 33.3%
PPP 0.12
PTS 5
R. Sheppard 35.5 poss
FG% 66.7%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.25
PTS 9
C. Spencer 32.9 poss
FG% 25.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.12
PTS 4

ON DEFENSE: WHO HE GUARDED

How opponents shot when he was the primary defender. Lower FG% = better defense.

L. Dončić 60.0 poss
FG% 41.2%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.27
PTS 16
FG% 60.0%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.3
PTS 16
K. Durant 45.2 poss
FG% 69.2%
3P% 66.7%
PPP 0.44
PTS 20
G. Allen 44.7 poss
FG% 40.0%
3P% 66.7%
PPP 0.16
PTS 7
D. Booker 43.6 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 66.7%
PPP 0.39
PTS 17
D. Robinson 42.3 poss
FG% 66.7%
3P% 66.7%
PPP 0.14
PTS 6
Z. LaVine 41.9 poss
FG% 28.6%
3P% 20.0%
PPP 0.12
PTS 5
D. DiVincenzo 39.2 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
J. McDaniels 35.4 poss
FG% 25.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.06
PTS 2
J. Butler III 33.4 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.24
PTS 8

SEASON STATS

51
Games
9.2
PPG
2.5
RPG
1.8
APG
0.5
SPG
0.1
BPG
47.8
FG%
40.8
3P%
89.3
FT%
22.7
MPG

GAME LOG

51 games played