LAL

2025-26 Season

RUI HACHIMURA

Los Angeles Lakers | Forward | 6-8
Rui Hachimura
11.1 PPG
3.2 RPG
0.8 APG
28.1 MPG
-3.8 Impact

Hachimura produces at an below average rate for a 28-minute workload.

NET IMPACT BREAKDOWN
Every stat, every credit, every cost — per game average
-3.8
Scoring +7.3
Points 11.1 PPG × +1.00 = +11.1
Missed 2PT 2.0/g × -0.78 = -1.6
Missed 3PT 2.2/g × -0.87 = -1.9
Missed FT 0.3/g × -1.00 = -0.3
Creation +1.4
Assists 0.8/g × +0.50 = +0.4
Off. Rebounds 0.8/g × +1.26 = +1.0
Turnovers -1.2
Turnovers 0.6/g × -1.95 = -1.2
Defense +0.2
Steals 0.5/g × +2.30 = +1.1
Blocks 0.3/g × +0.90 = +0.3
Def. Rebounds 2.4/g × +0.30 = +0.7
Fouls Committed 2.5/g × -0.75 = -1.9
Hustle & Effort +1.8
Contested Shots 3.5/g × +0.20 = +0.7
Deflections 1.2/g × +0.65 = +0.8
Loose Balls 0.3/g × +0.60 = +0.2
Screen Assists 0.4/g × +0.30 = +0.1
Raw Impact +9.5
Baseline (game-average expected) −13.3
Net Impact
-3.8
3th pctl vs Forwards

About this model: Net Impact can't measure floor spacing, help defense rotations, or playmaking gravity — so wings and guards are slightly undervalued vs bigs. How Net Impact works

SKILL DNA

Percentile rank vs 227 Forwards with 10+ games

Scoring 62th
11.1 PPG
Efficiency 69th
59.3% TS
Playmaking 12th
0.8 APG
Rebounding 28th
3.2 RPG
Rim Protection 11th
0.09/min
Hustle 2th
0.06/min
Shot Creation 50th
0% pullup
TO Discipline 95th
0.02/min

THE SEASON SO FAR

Rui Hachimura’s first twenty games of the 2025-26 campaign were defined by maddening inconsistency, where efficient shooting nights frequently masked deep defensive flaws. Empty scoring routinely sabotaged his overall value. On 10/27 vs POR, he dropped 16 points but recorded a dismal -14.6 impact score because constant defensive miscommunications in transition bled easy points on the other end. He occasionally found ways to contribute without dominating the ball, like on 11/12 vs OKC. Despite a modest 13-point outing, he managed a +3.1 impact because sharp weak-side defensive rotations kept his floor game afloat. The absolute nadir of this stretch arrived on 12/25 vs HOU. He posted zero points and a catastrophic -18.4 impact score, operating as an offensive black hole who bricked wide-open looks and stalled the entire half-court system.

A turbulent midseason demotion to the second unit defined this frustrating stretch for Rui Hachimura, exposing a player whose raw scoring totals frequently hid deeply damaging floor habits. Take his 12/04 vs TOR start as a prime example of this illusion. He found the bottom of the net efficiently for 12 points, yet his overall value plummeted to a -9.8 impact score due to costly defensive errors that surrendered easy baskets. Bizarrely, he found ways to be highly effective when his shot completely abandoned him, like on 01/20 vs DEN. Despite scoring only 9 points on a heavy diet of forced, late-clock jumpers, he generated a stellar +9.6 impact score because his massive +12.0 defensive rating successfully anchored the bench. Sadly, that engagement was painfully fleeting. He completely derailed the offense on 01/28 vs CLE, failing to convert a single attempt for zero points while bleeding a catastrophic -14.7 impact score through a string of empty possessions. For a forward with such obvious physical tools, this maddening inconsistency makes him a dangerous gamble on any given night.

A maddening inconsistency and glaring hidden costs defined this frustrating stretch for Rui Hachimura, who bounced between the starting lineup and the bench while bleeding value on the margins. The slide began immediately during 02/10 vs SAS, where a brutal shooting slump—including a 3-for-12 mark from the floor—cratered his overall value to a staggering -9.6 impact score. Even when his shot fell, his refusal to do the dirty work severely punished the team. During a 40-minute start on 03/12 vs CHI, he dropped a respectable 15 points but still posted a dismal -7.2 impact because a severe lack of rebounding and playmaking handicapped the half-court offense. Conversely, he occasionally found ways to tilt the floor without filling it up. Despite managing only 8 points on 03/27 vs BKN, physical on-ball defense anchored his value and generated a stellar +8.0 impact score. Ultimately, this twenty-game sample revealed a forward whose empty-calorie scoring too often masked a damaging passivity on the glass.

IMPACT TIMELINE

Game-by-game performance vs average. Green = above average, red = below.

PATTERNS

Inconsistent. Hachimura has clear good-night/bad-night splits, with scoring swinging ~6 points between games. You're never quite sure which version shows up.

Reliable shooter — hits 45%+ from the field in 72% of games. You can count on efficient nights more often than not.

Defensive difference-maker. Hachimura consistently forces tough shots and protects the rim — opponents shoot worse when he's guarding them.

Slight upward trend. First-half impact: -4.6, second-half: -2.9. Modest improvement — possibly settling into a rhythm.

Tends to go on runs. Longest hot streak: 2 games. Longest cold streak: 11 games.

MATCHUP HISTORY

Based on 65 games with tracking data. Shows who guarded this player on offense and who he guarded on defense, with their shooting stats in those matchups.

ON OFFENSE: WHO GUARDED HIM

His shooting stats against each primary defender this season

J. Randle 82.7 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 25.0%
PPP 0.11
PTS 9
S. Bey 66.6 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
D. DeRozan 63.7 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.08
PTS 5
H. Barnes 54.8 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.09
PTS 5
A. Bailey 54.7 poss
FG% 44.4%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.24
PTS 13
B. Ingram 51.9 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.08
PTS 4
J. Collins 50.5 poss
FG% 57.1%
3P% 25.0%
PPP 0.18
PTS 9
D. Vassell 47.9 poss
FG% 66.7%
3P% 66.7%
PPP 0.21
PTS 10
D. Avdija 47.9 poss
FG% 37.5%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.15
PTS 7
J. Smith Jr. 41.4 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.05
PTS 2

ON DEFENSE: WHO HE GUARDED

How opponents shot when he was the primary defender. Lower FG% = better defense.

J. Randle 68.9 poss
FG% 56.2%
3P% 75.0%
PPP 0.36
PTS 25
S. Bey 57.5 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.19
PTS 11
P. Washington 56.4 poss
FG% 57.1%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.14
PTS 8
D. DeRozan 47.7 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.25
PTS 12
D. Vassell 47.5 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.04
PTS 2
M. Bridges 44.2 poss
FG% 57.1%
3P% 75.0%
PPP 0.25
PTS 11
J. Collins 39.3 poss
FG% 80.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.2
PTS 8
V. Wembanyama 39.2 poss
FG% 40.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.23
PTS 9
J. Grant 39.2 poss
FG% 42.9%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.23
PTS 9
K. Durant 36.9 poss
FG% 57.1%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.22
PTS 8

SEASON STATS

63
Games
11.1
PPG
3.2
RPG
0.8
APG
0.5
SPG
0.3
BPG
50.6
FG%
43.0
3P%
73.3
FT%
28.1
MPG

GAME LOG

63 games played