Interactive analysis

EXPLORE THE GAME

Every shot, every lead change, every rotation — visualized.

Lead over time · win-probability overlay
LEAD TRACKER
LAC lead DAL lead Win %
Every shot · colored by difficulty
SHOT CHART
Click shooters to compare their shots on the court
DAL 2P — 3P —
LAC 2P — 3P —
Tough make Easy make Blown miss Tough miss 170 attempts

DAL DAL Shot-making Δ

Flagg 13/22 +2.6
Williams 5/14 -5.2
Thompson Hard 8/13 +9.4
Marshall 6/11 +2.0
Christie Hard 1/9 -6.3
Nembhard Hard 3/8 +0.9
Martin 0/5 -5.9
Powell Open 3/4 +1.4
Cisse Open 1/2 -0.3
Hardy 0/2 -2.0

LAC LAC Shot-making Δ

Leonard Hard 10/20 +5.6
Harden 5/17 -6.1
Zubac Open 8/12 +1.7
Collins 9/10 +8.3
Dunn 3/7 -1.7
Brown Hard 2/5 -0.4
Batum Hard 0/4 -4.1
Paul Hard 0/3 -2.5
Sanders Hard 0/2 -1.7
How the game was played
BY THE NUMBERS
DAL
LAC
40/90 Field Goals 37/80
44.4% Field Goal % 46.2%
11/39 3-Pointers 7/25
28.2% 3-Point % 28.0%
23/28 Free Throws 29/31
82.1% Free Throw % 93.5%
55.7% True Shooting % 58.7%
45 Total Rebounds 57
4 Offensive 5
33 Defensive 41
22 Assists 25
2.44 Assist/TO Ratio 1.39
8 Turnovers 18
15 Steals 5
2 Blocks 6
19 Fouls 21
50 Points in Paint 48
12 Fast Break Pts 15
20 Points off TOs 12
9 Second Chance Pts 6
41 Bench Points 5
5 Largest Lead 10
Biggest contributors
TOP NET IMPACT
1
Naji Marshall
18 PTS · 8 REB · 3 AST · 36.7 MIN
+23.23
2
Cooper Flagg
35 PTS · 8 REB · 2 AST · 38.0 MIN
+21.94
3
John Collins
21 PTS · 4 REB · 1 AST · 36.0 MIN
+21.08
4
Dwight Powell
9 PTS · 5 REB · 3 AST · 33.6 MIN
+20.18
5
Kawhi Leonard
30 PTS · 8 REB · 3 AST · 28.8 MIN
+19.82
6
Ivica Zubac
19 PTS · 11 REB · 4 AST · 37.9 MIN
+18.64
7
Klay Thompson
23 PTS · 3 REB · 1 AST · 25.9 MIN
+17.62
8
Brandon Williams
14 PTS · 1 REB · 7 AST · 25.8 MIN
+14.39
9
James Harden
29 PTS · 8 REB · 11 AST · 37.0 MIN
+11.63
10
Kris Dunn
6 PTS · 3 REB · 2 AST · 32.8 MIN
+5.55
Play-by-play (most recent first)
PLAY FEED
Q4 0:00 TEAM offensive REBOUND 114–110
Q4 0:00 LAC Heave 114–110
Q4 0:01 N. Marshall Free Throw 2 of 2 (18 PTS) 114–110
Q4 0:01 N. Marshall Free Throw 1 of 2 (17 PTS) 113–110
Q4 0:01 N. Batum take personal FOUL (4 PF) (Marshall 2 FT) 112–110
Q4 0:06 J. Harden Free Throw 3 of 3 (29 PTS) 112–110
Q4 0:06 J. Harden Free Throw 2 of 3 (28 PTS) 112–109
Q4 0:06 J. Harden Free Throw 1 of 3 (27 PTS) 112–108
Q4 0:06 K. Thompson shooting personal FOUL (2 PF) (Harden 3 FT) 112–107
Q4 0:09 C. Flagg Free Throw 2 of 2 (35 PTS) 112–107
Q4 0:09 C. Flagg Free Throw 1 of 2 (34 PTS) 111–107
Q4 0:09 N. Batum personal FOUL (3 PF) (Flagg 2 FT) 110–107
Q4 0:10 I. Zubac cutting DUNK (19 PTS) (J. Harden 11 AST) 110–107
Q4 0:16 J. Harden REBOUND (Off:0 Def:8) 110–105
Q4 0:18 MISS K. Thompson Free Throw 2 of 2 110–105

GAME ANALYSIS

KEEP READING

Create a free account and follow your team to get the full analysis every morning.

Create Free Account

Already have an account? Log in

PLAYER PERFORMANCE

LAC LA Clippers
S Ivica Zubac 37.9m
19
pts
11
reb
4
ast
Impact
+15.2

Commanded the glass and provided sturdy rim protection to anchor the paint effectively. Capitalizing on deep post positioning allowed him to overwhelm smaller matchups and steady the half-court offense.

Shooting
FG 8/12 (66.7%)
3PT 0/0
FT 3/3 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 71.3%
USG% 16.7%
Net Rtg +2.3
+/- +4
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 37.9m
Scoring +16.3
Creation +1.2
Shot Making +2.9
Hustle +12.0
Defense -2.4
Turnovers -4.7
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 8
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 1
BLK 1
TO 2
S James Harden 37.0m
29
pts
8
reb
11
ast
Impact
+8.3

A heavy diet of isolation misfires dragged his net value into the red despite a massive playmaking load. The sheer volume of empty offensive possessions ultimately outweighed his surprisingly stout defensive rotations against bigger forwards.

Shooting
FG 5/17 (29.4%)
3PT 2/6 (33.3%)
FT 17/19 (89.5%)
Advanced
TS% 57.2%
USG% 35.6%
Net Rtg -2.4
+/- -2
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 37.0m
Scoring +19.7
Creation +6.9
Shot Making +3.3
Hustle +2.4
Defense +0.2
Turnovers -16.6
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 20
FGM Against 8
Opp FG% 40.0%
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 7
S John Collins 36.0m
21
pts
4
reb
1
ast
Impact
+12.4

Elite finishing around the rim drove his positive value, continuing a highly efficient stretch of interior dominance. His gravity in the dunker spot forced constant defensive collapses, even if his own defensive metrics were merely average.

Shooting
FG 9/10 (90.0%)
3PT 1/2 (50.0%)
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 96.5%
USG% 13.3%
Net Rtg -0.2
+/- +1
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 36.0m
Scoring +20.2
Creation +0.4
Shot Making +3.8
Hustle +1.2
Defense -0.4
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 22
FGM Against 9
Opp FG% 40.9%
STL 0
BLK 3
TO 1
S Kris Dunn 32.8m
6
pts
3
reb
2
ast
Impact
-4.6

Suffocating point-of-attack defense and active hands were completely undone by severe offensive spacing issues. Missing all of his perimeter attempts allowed his matchup to sag off and aggressively dig into the post.

Shooting
FG 3/7 (42.9%)
3PT 0/4 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 42.9%
USG% 10.7%
Net Rtg +14.2
+/- +8
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 32.8m
Scoring +2.8
Creation +0.2
Shot Making +1.2
Hustle +0.9
Defense +2.9
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 10
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 2
BLK 0
TO 1
S Kawhi Leonard 28.8m
30
pts
8
reb
3
ast
Impact
+18.5

Surgical isolation execution combined with highly disruptive hustle anchored a dominant two-way performance. He systematically dismantled his primary defender while simultaneously blowing up passing lanes on the other end.

Shooting
FG 10/20 (50.0%)
3PT 3/4 (75.0%)
FT 7/7 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 65.0%
USG% 36.8%
Net Rtg +3.1
+/- +3
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 28.8m
Scoring +23.5
Creation +2.2
Shot Making +6.8
Hustle +2.4
Defense -3.4
Turnovers -4.7
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 13
FGM Against 7
Opp FG% 53.8%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 2
0
pts
4
reb
0
ast
Impact
-14.6

A complete inability to connect from the perimeter severely damaged the team's spacing and tanked his overall rating. Failing to punish closeouts allowed his matchup to freely roam and double-team the primary ball handlers, negating his decent rotational defense.

Shooting
FG 0/4 (0.0%)
3PT 0/4 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 8.1%
Net Rtg -9.7
+/- -4
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 28.3m
Scoring -3.1
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +5.1
Defense +0.2
Turnovers -5.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 10
FGM Against 6
Opp FG% 60.0%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 2
Kobe Brown 19.4m
5
pts
4
reb
0
ast
Impact
-11.1

Snapped a highly efficient streak with poor perimeter execution, leading to a noticeable drop in overall value. Settling for contested outside looks instead of leveraging his size advantage inside proved costly.

Shooting
FG 2/5 (40.0%)
3PT 1/4 (25.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 50.0%
USG% 14.3%
Net Rtg -35.3
+/- -13
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 19.4m
Scoring +2.5
Creation +0.1
Shot Making +1.4
Hustle +2.2
Defense -1.1
Turnovers -4.7
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 8
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 62.5%
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 2
Chris Paul 11.1m
0
pts
2
reb
3
ast
Impact
-10.9

Uncharacteristic passivity on offense made him a liability in half-court sets. While he organized the floor and competed defensively, failing to threaten the rim allowed his matchup to play free safety and clog passing lanes.

Shooting
FG 0/3 (0.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 11.1%
Net Rtg -12.3
+/- -2
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 11.1m
Scoring -1.9
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +0.6
Defense +0.5
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 2
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 0
0
pts
2
reb
1
ast
Impact
-16.6

Struggled to adjust to the game's pace, offering virtually zero resistance or hustle during his rotational minutes. His inability to generate any offensive gravity allowed his primary defender to aggressively trap the ball handler.

Shooting
FG 0/2 (0.0%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 12.0%
Net Rtg -83.5
+/- -15
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 8.8m
Scoring -1.4
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +0.6
Defense -1.6
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 4
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 75.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1
DAL Dallas Mavericks
S Cooper Flagg 38.0m
35
pts
8
reb
2
ast
Impact
+26.2

Relentless downhill attacking fueled a massive offensive rating, continuing his recent tear of high-efficiency performances. However, his overall impact was significantly muted by average defensive metrics and a failure to punish defenders who went under screens.

Shooting
FG 13/22 (59.1%)
3PT 0/3 (0.0%)
FT 9/11 (81.8%)
Advanced
TS% 65.2%
USG% 33.7%
Net Rtg -6.0
+/- -5
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 38.0m
Scoring +27.8
Creation +2.7
Shot Making +6.2
Hustle +8.2
Defense -3.4
Turnovers -7.1
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 12
FGM Against 7
Opp FG% 58.3%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 3
S Naji Marshall 36.7m
18
pts
8
reb
3
ast
Impact
+17.8

Elite two-way execution defined this stint, with suffocating perimeter defense driving his massive positive value. He provided vital secondary creation while consistently blowing up passing lanes to ignite transition opportunities.

Shooting
FG 6/11 (54.5%)
3PT 2/6 (33.3%)
FT 4/4 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 70.5%
USG% 15.1%
Net Rtg +18.8
+/- +13
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 36.7m
Scoring +13.6
Creation +1.1
Shot Making +3.8
Hustle +5.3
Defense +3.7
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 12
FGM Against 7
Opp FG% 58.3%
STL 3
BLK 0
TO 0
S Dwight Powell 33.6m
9
pts
5
reb
3
ast
Impact
+10.6

Anchored the interior with a masterclass in activity level, generating staggering defensive and hustle metrics that dwarfed his offensive output. His ability to disrupt pick-and-roll actions and contest at the rim completely shifted the game's momentum.

Shooting
FG 3/4 (75.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 3/4 (75.0%)
Advanced
TS% 78.1%
USG% 7.8%
Net Rtg +20.4
+/- +13
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 33.6m
Scoring +7.9
Creation +0.7
Shot Making +0.9
Hustle +5.4
Defense +9.4
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 23
FGM Against 10
Opp FG% 43.5%
STL 6
BLK 1
TO 1
S Ryan Nembhard 20.9m
8
pts
1
reb
3
ast
Impact
-12.5

Defensive bleeding at the point of attack entirely erased the value of his unexpected scoring surge. Opposing guards consistently blew past him in isolation, forcing rotations that compromised the entire defensive shell.

Shooting
FG 3/8 (37.5%)
3PT 2/5 (40.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 50.0%
USG% 20.0%
Net Rtg -26.1
+/- -12
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 20.9m
Scoring +4.5
Creation +0.3
Shot Making +2.5
Hustle +0.3
Defense -4.7
Turnovers -4.7
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 11
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 36.4%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 2
S Max Christie 20.0m
3
pts
2
reb
1
ast
Impact
-11.8

A brutal perimeter shooting slump cratered his offensive value and allowed defenders to aggressively pack the paint. While his defensive effort remained steady, the sheer volume of clanked catch-and-shoot looks made him a severe liability in half-court sets.

Shooting
FG 1/9 (11.1%)
3PT 1/8 (12.5%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 16.7%
USG% 18.8%
Net Rtg -13.9
+/- -10
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 20.0m
Scoring -3.4
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +1.0
Hustle +0.6
Defense +0.0
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 9
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 55.6%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
14
pts
1
reb
7
ast
Impact
+5.4

Navigated screens beautifully to apply relentless defensive pressure, keeping his overall impact in the green. His playmaking gravity compensated for a complete inability to connect from beyond the arc against drop coverage.

Shooting
FG 5/14 (35.7%)
3PT 0/5 (0.0%)
FT 4/5 (80.0%)
Advanced
TS% 43.2%
USG% 28.3%
Net Rtg +26.9
+/- +17
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 25.9m
Scoring +6.6
Creation +2.1
Shot Making +2.0
Hustle +0.3
Defense +7.3
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 6
FGM Against 2
Opp FG% 33.3%
STL 3
BLK 1
TO 1
23
pts
3
reb
1
ast
Impact
+12.2

Vintage perimeter spacing punished defensive lapses and broke him out of a recent shooting slump. Minimal hustle and defensive contributions capped his overall ceiling, but the sheer gravity of his shot-making warped the opponent's scheme.

Shooting
FG 8/13 (61.5%)
3PT 6/10 (60.0%)
FT 1/2 (50.0%)
Advanced
TS% 82.9%
USG% 23.3%
Net Rtg +30.4
+/- +15
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 25.9m
Scoring +18.6
Creation +0.5
Shot Making +6.6
Hustle +0.9
Defense -3.1
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 9
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 33.3%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
Caleb Martin 21.4m
0
pts
7
reb
2
ast
Impact
-3.1

A textbook example of non-scoring impact, driven entirely by elite hustle and relentless defensive rotations. Despite offering zero offensive threat, his ability to generate extra possessions through sheer effort kept his team afloat.

Shooting
FG 0/5 (0.0%)
3PT 0/2 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 11.5%
Net Rtg -2.1
+/- -3
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 21.4m
Scoring -4.0
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +7.9
Defense +6.8
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 8
FGM Against 2
Opp FG% 25.0%
STL 3
BLK 0
TO 1
Moussa Cisse 14.3m
4
pts
2
reb
0
ast
Impact
-7.2

Largely invisible during his short stint, failing to generate meaningful defensive resistance or hustle metrics. Opposing bigs easily sealed him off in the paint, resulting in negative value across his minutes.

Shooting
FG 1/2 (50.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 69.4%
USG% 8.3%
Net Rtg -25.0
+/- -8
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 14.3m
Scoring +3.0
Creation +0.4
Shot Making +0.4
Hustle +0.6
Defense -1.6
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 5
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 80.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
0
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
-13.8

Failed to find the flow of the game during a brief cameo, registering zero hustle or defensive metrics. His inability to establish any rhythm resulted in empty minutes that snapped his recent streak of high-level production.

Shooting
FG 0/2 (0.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 22.2%
Net Rtg 0.0
+/- 0
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 3.5m
Scoring -1.4
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +0.0
Defense +0.0
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 1
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 100.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0