WAS

2025-26 Season

JUSTIN CHAMPAGNIE

Washington Wizards | Guard-Forward | 6-6
Justin Champagnie
8.6 PPG
5.4 RPG
1.2 APG
19.7 MPG
+2.2 Impact

Champagnie produces at an above average rate for a 20-minute workload.

NET IMPACT BREAKDOWN
Every stat, every credit, every cost — per game average
+2.2
Scoring +5.7
Points 8.6 PPG × +1.00 = +8.6
Missed 2PT 1.6/g × -0.78 = -1.3
Missed 3PT 1.5/g × -0.87 = -1.3
Missed FT 0.3/g × -1.00 = -0.3
Creation +2.4
Assists 1.2/g × +0.50 = +0.6
Off. Rebounds 1.4/g × +1.26 = +1.8
Turnovers -1.2
Turnovers 0.6/g × -1.95 = -1.2
Defense +1.6
Steals 0.8/g × +2.30 = +1.8
Blocks 0.6/g × +0.90 = +0.5
Def. Rebounds 4.1/g × +0.30 = +1.2
Fouls Committed 2.5/g × -0.75 = -1.9
Hustle & Effort +2.3
Contested Shots 3.3/g × +0.20 = +0.7
Deflections 1.7/g × +0.65 = +1.1
Loose Balls 0.4/g × +0.60 = +0.2
Screen Assists 0.2/g × +0.30 = +0.1
Off. Fouls Drawn 0.1/g uncredited × +2.70 = +0.2
Raw Impact +10.8
Baseline (game-average expected) −8.6
Net Impact
+2.2
88th pctl vs Guards

About this model: Net Impact can't measure floor spacing, help defense rotations, or playmaking gravity — so wings and guards are slightly undervalued vs bigs. How Net Impact works

SKILL DNA

Percentile rank vs 235 Guards with 10+ games

Scoring 48th
9.1 PPG
Efficiency 61th
56.1% TS
Playmaking 14th
1.2 APG
Rebounding 96th
5.7 RPG
Rim Protection 90th
0.18/min
Hustle 64th
0.11/min
Shot Creation 50th
0% pullup
TO Discipline 83th
0.03/min

THE SEASON SO FAR

Justin Champagnie’s opening twenty games were defined by a chaotic tug-of-war between relentless hustle and crippling offensive invisibility. He frequently salvaged terrible shooting nights through pure effort on the glass. This dynamic was perfectly captured on 11/07 vs CLE, where he bricked five of his six shots for just six points but still posted a +4.5 impact by ripping down 11 rebounds. However, when that physical edge vanished, his lack of scoring gravity became a glaring liability. During a brutal start on 11/03 vs NYK, Champagnie floated aimlessly on the perimeter, managing just four points in 17 minutes to record a dismal -7.3 impact score. Yet, just when you write him off, he finds ways to thrive strictly off the ball. He generated a massive +12.5 impact on 12/01 vs MIL by abandoning outside jumpers entirely, instead feasting on baseline cuts and putbacks to score 10 highly efficient points. Ultimately, his value hinges entirely on whether his motor runs hot enough to mask his severe half-court limitations.

Extreme volatility defined Justin Champagnie's midseason stretch, with his value swinging wildly based on his offensive discipline and defensive focus. He looked like a premium role player on 01/02 vs BKN. By hunting high-percentage looks and cutting decisively, he poured in 20 points and generated a massive +11.3 impact score. He did not always need a scoring explosion to swing a game, as seen on 12/23 vs CHA. Despite tallying just 10 points, he drove a stellar +6.8 impact through relentless energy plays and hyper-efficient finishing at the rim. Yet, hidden defensive costs and sudden disappearing acts frequently derailed his momentum. Even while chipping in 9 points on 01/19 vs LAC, he posted a dismal -7.7 impact because opponents repeatedly targeted him in pick-and-roll switches to force breakdowns. The bottom completely fell out on 01/27 vs POR, where costly off-ball mistakes and zero offensive involvement resulted in a highly detrimental -16.1 impact.

Justin Champagnie’s mid-season stretch was defined by a volatile tug-of-war between disciplined hustle and maddening shot selection. When he embraced his role as a gritty utility forward, his value skyrocketed. Look no further than his 03/03 vs ORL performance, where relentless two-way energy and eight rebounds translated into a massive +18.0 impact score despite scoring just 13 points. Even when his offensive rhythm completely vanished, he found ways to contribute. During his 03/21 vs OKC outing, he managed a +2.4 impact on a measly three points because his rock-solid defensive metrics kept the rotation afloat. However, whenever Champagnie abandoned the dirty work to force his own offense, the results were disastrous. On 01/30 vs LAL, he posted a brutal -5.4 impact score by settling for contested perimeter jumpers early in the shot clock, completely short-circuiting the offensive flow. To survive in this league, he must realize that his true worth lies in crashing the glass and cutting hard, not playing hero ball.

IMPACT TIMELINE

Game-by-game performance vs average. Green = above average, red = below.

PATTERNS

Boom-or-bust player. Champagnie's impact swings wildly relative to his average — some nights dominant, others invisible. Scoring varies by ~6 points per game.

Reliable shooter — hits 45%+ from the field in 70% of games. You can count on efficient nights more often than not.

Defensive difference-maker. Champagnie consistently forces tough shots and protects the rim — opponents shoot worse when he's guarding them.

MATCHUP HISTORY

Based on 74 games with tracking data. Shows who guarded this player on offense and who he guarded on defense, with their shooting stats in those matchups.

ON OFFENSE: WHO GUARDED HIM

His shooting stats against each primary defender this season

J. Johnson 52.6 poss
FG% 60.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.11
PTS 6
N. Batum 35.1 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.09
PTS 3
D. Mitchell 34.1 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.09
PTS 3
P. Pritchard 29.0 poss
FG% 66.7%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.17
PTS 5
J. Jaquez Jr. 27.0 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.07
PTS 2
L. Ball 26.7 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.15
PTS 4
D. Barlow 26.2 poss
FG% 25.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.08
PTS 2
C. Kispert 25.7 poss
FG% 66.7%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.35
PTS 9
K. Kuzma 24.7 poss
FG% 25.0%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.12
PTS 3
D. Bane 24.7 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.16
PTS 4

ON DEFENSE: WHO HE GUARDED

How opponents shot when he was the primary defender. Lower FG% = better defense.

J. Johnson 43.3 poss
FG% 63.6%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.46
PTS 20
D. Barlow 42.0 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.1
PTS 4
N. Batum 34.3 poss
FG% 40.0%
3P% 40.0%
PPP 0.17
PTS 6
L. James 33.0 poss
FG% 75.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.24
PTS 8
K. Kuzma 31.2 poss
FG% 75.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.19
PTS 6
B. Portis 31.0 poss
FG% 57.1%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.29
PTS 9
D. Mitchell 30.7 poss
FG% 54.5%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.46
PTS 14
J. Jaquez Jr. 28.0 poss
FG% 20.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.07
PTS 2
N. Clowney 27.9 poss
FG% 20.0%
3P% 25.0%
PPP 0.11
PTS 3
D. Bane 27.6 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.14
PTS 4

SEASON STATS

65
Games
8.6
PPG
5.4
RPG
1.2
APG
0.8
SPG
0.6
BPG
51.6
FG%
32.4
3P%
77.8
FT%
19.7
MPG

GAME LOG

65 games played