DAL

2025-26 Season

KLAY THOMPSON

Dallas Mavericks | Guard | 6-5
Klay Thompson
11.8 PPG
2.1 RPG
1.4 APG
21.9 MPG
-3.2 Impact

Thompson produces at an below average rate for a 22-minute workload.

NET IMPACT BREAKDOWN
Every stat, every credit, every cost — per game average
-3.2
Scoring +6.2
Points 11.8 PPG × +1.00 = +11.8
Missed 2PT 1.7/g × -0.78 = -1.3
Missed 3PT 4.7/g × -0.87 = -4.1
Missed FT 0.2/g × -1.00 = -0.2
Creation +1.3
Assists 1.4/g × +0.50 = +0.7
Off. Rebounds 0.5/g × +1.26 = +0.6
Turnovers -1.8
Turnovers 0.9/g × -1.95 = -1.8
Hustle & Effort +1.1
Contested Shots 2.1/g × +0.20 = +0.4
Deflections 0.6/g × +0.65 = +0.4
Loose Balls 0.2/g × +0.60 = +0.1
Screen Assists 0.3/g × +0.30 = +0.1
Off. Fouls Drawn 0.0/g uncredited × +2.70 = +0.1
Raw Impact +6.8
Baseline (game-average expected) −10.0
Net Impact
-3.2
22th pctl vs Guards

About this model: Net Impact can't measure floor spacing, help defense rotations, or playmaking gravity — so wings and guards are slightly undervalued vs bigs. How Net Impact works

SKILL DNA

Percentile rank vs 235 Guards with 10+ games

Scoring 61th
11.8 PPG
Efficiency 36th
52.8% TS
Playmaking 19th
1.4 APG
Rebounding 23th
2.1 RPG
Rim Protection 30th
0.10/min
Hustle 1th
0.05/min
Shot Creation 50th
0% pullup
TO Discipline 72th
0.04/min

THE SEASON SO FAR

A painful demotion to the bench and a brutal, self-inflicted shooting slump defined the opening chapter of Klay Thompson's season. The veteran guard simply refused to adapt his shot selection, settling for contested jumpers that routinely derailed the offense. This stubbornness peaked on 10/29 vs IND, where he posted a disastrous -11.9 impact score as a starter by jacking up heavily guarded perimeter looks early in the shot clock. Even when the ball actually went through the hoop, his one-dimensional play actively hurt the team. During the 11/12 vs PHX matchup, Thompson tallied 19 points but still registered a dismal -8.6 impact because he cratered the offensive flow by forcing an absurd sixteen attempts from deep. He occasionally flashed his vintage value in a reduced role, like on 11/16 vs POR. In that contest, his constant off-ball motion warped the opposing defense to yield a stellar +7.0 impact score, opening up crucial cutting lanes for his teammates.

This stretch of the season was defined by a maddening tug-of-war between vintage perimeter explosions and crippling shooting slumps. Even when his shot occasionally fell, terrible shot selection often plagued his overall effectiveness. Look no further than 01/08 vs UTA, where Thompson poured in 23 points with six triples, yet still posted a -1.5 impact score because his completely one-dimensional performance offered zero secondary value. At his absolute worst, he settled for heavily contested jumpers early in the shot clock, completely tanking the offense with a brutal -13.9 impact score during a 6-point dud on 01/06 vs SAC. However, you simply cannot ignore the sheer panic his off-ball movement still strikes into opposing defenses. During an ugly 9-point shooting night on 01/01 vs PHI, his mere gravitational pull warped the floor enough to generate a +4.0 impact score. The consistency of his prime is long gone, but the ghost of his jumper remains a potent tactical weapon.

A frustrating blend of forced shots and defensive limitations defined Klay Thompson's mid-season stint as a bench gunner. His shot selection hit rock bottom on 01/31 vs HOU, where he settled for heavily contested jumpers that stalled the offense and dragged his impact score down to a brutal -13.6. Time and again, an inability to separate from tight coverage or generate secondary actions short-circuited possessions. He still flashed vintage brilliance, catching fire on 03/05 vs ORL to hit seven triples for 24 points, generating a +4.9 impact by ruthlessly punishing defensive under-reactions. Yet even when the jumper fell flawlessly, hidden costs routinely sabotaged his overall value. On 03/21 vs LAC, Thompson drilled all four of his three-point attempts for 12 points, but glaring defensive liabilities entirely overshadowed his spacing, resulting in a -5.0 impact score. Relying solely on perimeter gravity without off-ball hustle simply cannot sustain winning basketball.

IMPACT TIMELINE

Game-by-game performance vs average. Green = above average, red = below.

PATTERNS

Inconsistent. Thompson has clear good-night/bad-night splits, with scoring swinging ~6 points between games. You're never quite sure which version shows up.

Streaky shooter — only cracks 45% from the field in 29% of games. Efficiency is all over the place night-to-night.

Good defender on his best nights, but it comes and goes. Some games Thompson locks in defensively, others he gets picked apart.

In a rough stretch — 6 straight games with negative impact. Longest cold streak this season: 7 games.

MATCHUP HISTORY

Based on 68 games with tracking data. Shows who guarded this player on offense and who he guarded on defense, with their shooting stats in those matchups.

ON OFFENSE: WHO GUARDED HIM

His shooting stats against each primary defender this season

T. Hardaway Jr. 64.4 poss
FG% 66.7%
3P% 66.7%
PPP 0.19
PTS 12
P. Pritchard 43.4 poss
FG% 25.0%
3P% 28.6%
PPP 0.14
PTS 6
N. Batum 40.1 poss
FG% 60.0%
3P% 57.1%
PPP 0.4
PTS 16
T. Murphy III 39.0 poss
FG% 57.1%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.26
PTS 10
G. Vincent 37.5 poss
FG% 55.6%
3P% 71.4%
PPP 0.4
PTS 15
FG% 33.3%
3P% 25.0%
PPP 0.14
PTS 5
D. Vassell 35.0 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.11
PTS 4
D. DiVincenzo 34.6 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
B. Podziemski 33.2 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
K. Dunn 32.9 poss
FG% 83.3%
3P% 83.3%
PPP 0.46
PTS 15

ON DEFENSE: WHO HE GUARDED

How opponents shot when he was the primary defender. Lower FG% = better defense.

T. Hardaway Jr. 39.8 poss
FG% 25.0%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.1
PTS 4
N. Batum 38.4 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
T. Murphy III 37.3 poss
FG% 42.9%
3P% 33.3%
PPP 0.19
PTS 7
D. DiVincenzo 32.5 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 33.3%
PPP 0.15
PTS 5
R. Hachimura 32.1 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.06
PTS 2
K. Ellis 29.6 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 33.3%
PPP 0.1
PTS 3
M. Moody 29.4 poss
FG% 25.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.07
PTS 2
A. Thompson 29.2 poss
FG% 66.7%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.14
PTS 4
FG% 50.0%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.1
PTS 3
J. Smith Jr. 28.8 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0

SEASON STATS

66
Games
11.8
PPG
2.1
RPG
1.4
APG
0.5
SPG
0.3
BPG
39.5
FG%
38.6
3P%
75.6
FT%
21.9
MPG

GAME LOG

66 games played