ATL

2025-26 Season

GABE VINCENT

Atlanta Hawks | Guard | 6-2
Gabe Vincent
4.4 PPG
1.0 RPG
1.4 APG
16.8 MPG
-3.7 Impact

Vincent produces at an below average rate for a 17-minute workload.

NET IMPACT BREAKDOWN
Every stat, every credit, every cost — per game average
-3.7
Scoring +2.1
Points 4.4 PPG × +1.00 = +4.4
Missed 2PT 0.5/g × -0.78 = -0.4
Missed 3PT 2.2/g × -0.87 = -1.9
Missed FT 0.0/g × -1.00 = -0.0
Creation +1.0
Assists 1.4/g × +0.50 = +0.7
Off. Rebounds 0.2/g × +1.26 = +0.3
Turnovers -1.0
Turnovers 0.5/g × -1.95 = -1.0
Defense -0.5
Steals 0.5/g × +2.30 = +1.1
Blocks 0.1/g × +0.90 = +0.1
Def. Rebounds 0.8/g × +0.30 = +0.2
Fouls Committed 2.5/g × -0.75 = -1.9
Hustle & Effort +2.1
Contested Shots 2.2/g × +0.20 = +0.4
Deflections 1.3/g × +0.65 = +0.8
Charges Drawn 0.1/g × +2.70 = +0.3
Loose Balls 0.3/g × +0.60 = +0.2
Screen Assists 0.4/g × +0.30 = +0.1
Off. Fouls Drawn 0.1/g uncredited × +2.70 = +0.3
Raw Impact +3.7
Baseline (game-average expected) −7.4
Net Impact
-3.7
11th pctl vs Guards

About this model: Net Impact can't measure floor spacing, help defense rotations, or playmaking gravity — so wings and guards are slightly undervalued vs bigs. How Net Impact works

SKILL DNA

Percentile rank vs 235 Guards with 10+ games

Scoring 8th
4.4 PPG
Efficiency 21th
49.1% TS
Playmaking 22th
1.4 APG
Rebounding 1th
1.0 RPG
Rim Protection 12th
0.08/min
Hustle 73th
0.12/min
Shot Creation 50th
0% pullup
TO Discipline 91th
0.03/min

THE SEASON SO FAR

A brutal offensive slump and erratic shot selection defined Gabe Vincent’s first twenty games. He routinely killed momentum by forcing contested jumpers instead of facilitating the offense. This was painfully obvious on 01/15 vs CHA, where he bricked all seven of his attempts to post a catastrophic -15.9 impact score. Things somehow got worse on 01/17 vs POR. He managed just 3 points on 1-for-6 shooting, and his insistence on taking out-of-rhythm shots short-circuited the offense to the tune of a brutal -18.7 impact score. Yet, when he actually bought into a gritty defensive role, he found ways to create value without filling up the basket. During the 01/18 vs TOR matchup, Vincent recorded a +3.6 impact despite scoring only 5 points. His relentless point-of-attack pressure disrupted the opposing backcourt, generating an excellent +4.3 hustle score that completely shifted the game's energy.

A brutal offensive slump and glaring defensive inconsistencies defined Gabe Vincent's midseason stint as a deep-bench liability. Even when his jump shot occasionally fell, hidden costs routinely dragged down his overall value. During the 01/28 vs CLE matchup, he poured in 11 points on crisp 4-of-6 shooting, yet suffered a miserable -6.2 impact score because underlying defensive lapses bled points on the other end. He ran into similar issues during the 02/24 vs WAS game, where another 11-point outing resulted in a -2.2 impact score due to erratic chucking from beyond the arc. He only managed to flip the script when he simplified his approach and stopped forcing the issue. In a quiet 03/12 vs BKN appearance, Vincent tallied just 6 points but generated a +3.7 impact score by picking his spots perfectly within the offensive flow and knocking down timely perimeter looks. Unfortunately, those mistake-free flashes were too rare, leaving him stuck as a stagnant perimeter spacer who routinely bogged down the second unit.

IMPACT TIMELINE

Game-by-game performance vs average. Green = above average, red = below.

PATTERNS

Struggling. Vincent has posted negative impact in 76% of games this season. The production rarely outweighs the cost.

Streaky shooter — only cracks 45% from the field in 30% of games. Efficiency is all over the place night-to-night.

Average defender. Vincent doesn't hurt you defensively, but he's not making opponents uncomfortable either.

Getting better as the season goes on. First-half impact: -5.2, second-half: -2.1. That's a significant jump — could be a role change, confidence, or development clicking.

Tends to go on runs. Longest hot streak: 2 games. Longest cold streak: 10 games.

MATCHUP HISTORY

Based on 56 games with tracking data. Shows who guarded this player on offense and who he guarded on defense, with their shooting stats in those matchups.

ON OFFENSE: WHO GUARDED HIM

His shooting stats against each primary defender this season

P. Pritchard 52.0 poss
FG% 37.5%
3P% 42.9%
PPP 0.21
PTS 11
B. Williams 49.8 poss
FG% 57.1%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.22
PTS 11
C. Gillespie 36.5 poss
FG% 20.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.05
PTS 2
M. Monk 36.2 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
S. Curry 33.2 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
I. Quickley 27.4 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 66.7%
PPP 0.29
PTS 8
K. Thompson 23.9 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
B. Carrington 20.6 poss
FG% 60.0%
3P% 60.0%
PPP 0.44
PTS 9
D. DiVincenzo 20.3 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
S. Cooper 20.0 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0

ON DEFENSE: WHO HE GUARDED

How opponents shot when he was the primary defender. Lower FG% = better defense.

B. Williams 39.6 poss
FG% 60.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.23
PTS 9
K. Thompson 37.5 poss
FG% 55.6%
3P% 71.4%
PPP 0.4
PTS 15
C. Gillespie 37.0 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 66.7%
PPP 0.22
PTS 8
P. Pritchard 30.4 poss
FG% 28.6%
3P% 33.3%
PPP 0.16
PTS 5
B. Saraf 26.8 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
A. Edwards 26.7 poss
FG% 40.0%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.26
PTS 7
S. Curry 24.9 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 33.3%
PPP 0.2
PTS 5
B. Carrington 24.0 poss
FG% 60.0%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.29
PTS 7
M. Monk 23.4 poss
FG% 37.5%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.3
PTS 7
I. Quickley 21.9 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.14
PTS 3

SEASON STATS

50
Games
4.4
PPG
1.0
RPG
1.4
APG
0.5
SPG
0.1
BPG
34.4
FG%
33.1
3P%
95.0
FT%
16.8
MPG

GAME LOG

50 games played