UTA

2025-26 Season

JAREN JACKSON JR.

Utah Jazz | Forward-Center | 6-10
Jaren Jackson Jr.
19.4 PPG
5.7 RPG
2.0 APG
30.3 MPG
+2.8 Impact

Jr. produces at an above average rate for a 30-minute workload. Elite defensive value (+3.2/game) is a major strength.

NET IMPACT BREAKDOWN
Every stat, every credit, every cost — per game average
+2.8
Scoring +12.2
Points 19.4 PPG × +1.00 = +19.4
Missed 2PT 4.7/g × -0.78 = -3.7
Missed 3PT 3.1/g × -0.87 = -2.7
Missed FT 0.8/g × -1.00 = -0.8
Creation +2.8
Assists 2.0/g × +0.50 = +1.0
Off. Rebounds 1.4/g × +1.26 = +1.8
Turnovers -4.3
Turnovers 2.2/g × -1.95 = -4.3
Defense +3.2
Steals 1.1/g × +2.30 = +2.5
Blocks 1.4/g × +0.90 = +1.3
Def. Rebounds 4.2/g × +0.30 = +1.3
Fouls Committed 2.5/g × -0.75 = -1.9
Hustle & Effort +3.8
Contested Shots 9.1/g × +0.20 = +1.8
Deflections 2.2/g × +0.65 = +1.4
Loose Balls 0.5/g × +0.60 = +0.3
Screen Assists 1.0/g × +0.30 = +0.3
Raw Impact +17.7
Baseline (game-average expected) −14.9
Net Impact
+2.8
81st pctl vs Forwards

About this model: Net Impact can't measure floor spacing, help defense rotations, or playmaking gravity — so wings and guards are slightly undervalued vs bigs. How Net Impact works

SKILL DNA

Percentile rank vs 227 Forwards with 10+ games

Scoring 87th
19.4 PPG
Efficiency 59th
57.9% TS
Playmaking 62th
2.0 APG
Rebounding 77th
5.7 RPG
Rim Protection 80th
0.18/min
Hustle 73th
0.12/min
Shot Creation 50th
0% pullup
TO Discipline 12th
0.07/min

THE SEASON SO FAR

Jaren Jackson Jr.'s opening stretch was defined by a maddening inconsistency, oscillating wildly between dominant interior anchoring and empty-calorie gunning. When his jumper failed him, he could still salvage his nightly value through sheer defensive intimidation. During the 11/05 vs HOU matchup, his offensive touch completely vanished en route to just 9 points, yet elite weak-side help kept his impact in the green at +1.5. Conversely, his highest-scoring nights often carried heavy hidden costs. Look no further than his 26-point outing on 11/15 vs CLE, where a disastrous 6-for-23 shooting performance fed directly into opponent transition attacks and dragged his impact down to -1.1. He even managed a dismal -6.9 impact score on 10/31 vs LAL despite an incredibly efficient 15 points, simply because a disastrous defensive showing erased all his offensive equity. To become a reliable franchise pillar, Jackson must stop letting forced perimeter shots and sporadic defensive lapses dictate his overall worth.

This stretch of the season was defined by a volatile tug-of-war between terrifying defensive dominance and maddening offensive inconsistency. Jackson frequently controlled games without actually shooting well. On 12/07 vs POR, he managed just 6 points but posted a +4.3 impact score because his relentless rim deterrence completely altered the geometry of the court. Conversely, his scoring volume sometimes actively hurt the team. During the 12/23 vs UTA matchup, he dropped 21 points but recorded a -0.7 impact score because hidden costs like live-ball turnovers dragged down his overall value. When he actually married offensive execution with his elite weak-side help, the results were devastating. Look no further than 12/26 vs MIL, where he tallied 24 points and a massive +14.8 impact score by utterly suffocating the opponent's interior attack.

IMPACT TIMELINE

Game-by-game performance vs average. Green = above average, red = below.

PATTERNS

Boom-or-bust player. Jr.'s impact swings wildly relative to his average — some nights dominant, others invisible. Scoring varies by ~6 points per game.

Middle-of-the-road efficiency — shoots 45%+ from the field in 60% of games. Not automatic, but not a problem either.

Defensive difference-maker. Jr. consistently forces tough shots and protects the rim — opponents shoot worse when he's guarding them.

Getting better as the season goes on. First-half impact: +1.1, second-half: +4.4. That's a significant jump — could be a role change, confidence, or development clicking.

Hot right now — 8 straight games with positive impact. Longest positive run this season: 8 games.

MATCHUP HISTORY

Based on 46 games with tracking data. Shows who guarded this player on offense and who he guarded on defense, with their shooting stats in those matchups.

ON OFFENSE: WHO GUARDED HIM

His shooting stats against each primary defender this season

Z. Williamson 72.3 poss
FG% 54.5%
3P% 62.5%
PPP 0.4
PTS 29
H. Barnes 68.9 poss
FG% 38.5%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.15
PTS 10
W. Carter Jr. 57.0 poss
FG% 53.3%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.35
PTS 20
Y. Missi 56.2 poss
FG% 36.8%
3P% 25.0%
PPP 0.36
PTS 20
D. Queen 53.0 poss
FG% 38.1%
3P% 28.6%
PPP 0.4
PTS 21
J. Randle 51.5 poss
FG% 45.5%
3P% 33.3%
PPP 0.29
PTS 15
L. James 43.9 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.05
PTS 2
J. Sochan 40.2 poss
FG% 22.2%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.12
PTS 5
P. Banchero 40.2 poss
FG% 27.3%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.17
PTS 7
B. Adebayo 38.4 poss
FG% 53.8%
3P% 33.3%
PPP 0.39
PTS 15

ON DEFENSE: WHO HE GUARDED

How opponents shot when he was the primary defender. Lower FG% = better defense.

Z. Williamson 103.8 poss
FG% 55.2%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.4
PTS 42
P. Banchero 72.3 poss
FG% 47.1%
3P% 62.5%
PPP 0.3
PTS 22
J. Randle 63.5 poss
FG% 58.3%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.28
PTS 18
H. Barnes 59.3 poss
FG% 40.0%
3P% 28.6%
PPP 0.17
PTS 10
Y. Missi 58.6 poss
FG% 57.1%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.14
PTS 8
B. Adebayo 47.8 poss
FG% 15.4%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.08
PTS 4
A. Thompson 47.1 poss
FG% 30.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.13
PTS 6
L. Dort 46.5 poss
FG% 12.5%
3P% 16.7%
PPP 0.06
PTS 3
J. Collins 43.4 poss
FG% 9.1%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.05
PTS 2
I. Zubac 36.5 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.11
PTS 4

SEASON STATS

48
Games
19.4
PPG
5.7
RPG
2.0
APG
1.1
SPG
1.4
BPG
47.6
FG%
35.7
3P%
80.3
FT%
30.3
MPG

GAME LOG

48 games played