UTA

2025-26 Season

JAREN JACKSON JR.

Utah Jazz | Forward-Center | 6-10
Jaren Jackson Jr.
19.4PPG
5.7RPG
2.0APG
30.3MPG
+7.0 Impact

Jr. produces at an elite rate for a 30-minute workload.

·
Embed this player card

Copy & paste this HTML into any page:

The widget updates automatically whenever our data does.

IMPACT BREAKDOWN
Every stat, every credit, every cost — per game average
+7.0
Scoring +17.5
Points Scored 19.4 PPG = +19.4
Missed Shots difficulty-adjusted = -6.2
Shot Making above expected FG% = +4.3
Creation +1.0
Assists & Self-Creation 2.0 AST/g + self-creation = +1.0
Turnovers -5.4
Turnovers 2.2/g (live + dead blend) = -5.4
Defense +0.4
Steals 1.1/g = +2.5
Blocks 1.4/g = +1.3
Fouls + context committed fouls, matchup adj = -3.4
Hustle & Effort +4.0
Rebounds 5.7 RPG (OREB + DREB) = +0.0
Contested Shots 9.1/g = +1.8
Deflections 2.2/g = +1.5
Charges Drawn 0.0/g = +0.1
Loose Balls 0.5/g = +0.3
Screen Assists 1.0/g = +0.3
Raw Impact +17.5
Baseline (game-average expected) −10.5
Net Impact
+7.0
83th pctl vs Forwards

PBP Credit: Every play is analyzed from play-by-play data. Scorers get difficulty-adjusted credit, assisters get creation value based on the shot opportunity they created, and turnovers are classified by type. Shot difficulty is derived from 1M+ shots across 4 seasons. Full methodology

SKILL DNA

Percentile rank vs 235 Forwards with 10+ games

Scoring 87th
19.4 PPG
Efficiency 60th
57.9% TS
Playmaking 62th
2.0 APG
Rebounding 77th
5.7 RPG
Defense 72th
+8.7/g
Hustle 69th
+14.3/g
Creation 76th
+3.34/g
Shot Making 83th
+8.50/g
TO Discipline 13th
0.07/min

THE SEASON SO FAR

Jaren Jackson Jr.'s opening stretch was defined by a bizarre tug-of-war between erratic offensive volume and unyielding defensive grit. Sometimes, his shot completely abandoned him. On 11/06 vs HOU, he scored just 9 points on a passive 2-for-6 from the floor. Yet, he still generated a +4.5 Impact by focusing his energy on the glass with six rebounds and strictly anchoring the interior rather than forcing bad looks. He swung to the absolute opposite extreme on 11/15 vs CLE. Jackson jacked up a staggering 23 shots to score 26 points, and despite shooting a dismal 6-for-23, his relentless aggression drew enough fouls to keep his overall value afloat with a +8.3 Impact. Empty scoring occasionally caught up with him, though, particularly on 11/12 vs NYK. He dropped an efficient 19 points on 7-for-14 shooting that night, but hidden costs like blown defensive assignments and poor weak-side positioning resulted in a disastrous -7.5 Impact.

This mid-season stretch for Jaren Jackson Jr. was defined by a wild pendulum swing between quiet offensive nights anchored entirely by his defense and sudden, hyper-efficient scoring explosions. When his jumper abandoned him, the results could be brutal, as seen on 12/03 vs SAS where he managed just 7 points on an ugly 3-for-9 shooting night. His dismal -13.7 Impact score in that contest stemmed directly from poor shot selection that derailed the team's offensive rhythm. Yet, Jackson frequently salvaged off-nights by leaning heavily into his physical tools. During the 12/23 vs OKC matchup, he scored a meager 11 points, but still ground out a +4.1 Impact score by generating immense non-scoring value through relentless defensive rotations and timely hustle plays. When his shot actually fell, he became an absolute terror. He utterly dismantled the opposition on 12/16 vs LAC, pouring in 31 points on 13-of-18 shooting to earn a towering +28.2 Impact score fueled by flawless shot selection and sheer two-way dominance.

This midseason stretch was defined by Jaren Jackson Jr. morphing into a two-way wrecking ball who learned to dominate the margins. Look no further than his 01/30 vs NOP performance, where he bricked his way to 16 points on a brutal 6-for-19 from the floor. He still generated a massive +11.0 Impact score in that contest because his relentless defensive rotations and nine crucial rebounds entirely controlled the paint. Conversely, the 01/22 vs ATL outing reveals the hidden costs of passive play. Despite scoring an efficient 17 points on 6-for-12 shooting, Jackson posted a dismal -6.5 Impact score due to sluggish rim protection and empty-calorie offensive production. When everything clicked, he was terrifying. During the 02/02 vs MIN matchup, Jackson erupted for 30 points and six boards, earning a staggering +18.9 Impact score by bullying defenders inside and hitting timely threes.

IMPACT TIMELINE

Game-by-game performance vs average. Green = above average, red = below.

PATTERNS

Very consistent. Jr. posts positive impact in 81% of games — you almost always get a productive night. Scoring varies by ~6 points, but the overall contribution stays positive.

Middle-of-the-road efficiency — shoots 45%+ from the field in 60% of games. Not automatic, but not a problem either.

Defensive difference-maker. Jr. consistently forces tough shots and protects the rim — opponents shoot worse when he's guarding them.

Getting better as the season goes on. First-half impact: +4.3, second-half: +9.7. That's a significant jump — could be a role change, confidence, or development clicking.

Hot right now — 8 straight games with positive impact. Longest positive run this season: 8 games.

MATCHUP HISTORY ⚠ Updated 46 days ago

Based on 46 games with tracking data. Shows who guarded this player on offense and who he guarded on defense, with their shooting stats in those matchups.

ON OFFENSE: WHO GUARDED HIM

His shooting stats against each primary defender this season

Z. Williamson 72.3 poss
FG% 54.5%
3P% 62.5%
PPP 0.4
PTS 29
H. Barnes 68.9 poss
FG% 38.5%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.15
PTS 10
W. Carter Jr. 57.0 poss
FG% 53.3%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.35
PTS 20
Y. Missi 56.2 poss
FG% 36.8%
3P% 25.0%
PPP 0.36
PTS 20
D. Queen 53.0 poss
FG% 38.1%
3P% 28.6%
PPP 0.4
PTS 21
J. Randle 51.5 poss
FG% 45.5%
3P% 33.3%
PPP 0.29
PTS 15
L. James 43.9 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.05
PTS 2
J. Sochan 40.2 poss
FG% 22.2%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.12
PTS 5
P. Banchero 40.2 poss
FG% 27.3%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.17
PTS 7
B. Adebayo 38.4 poss
FG% 53.8%
3P% 33.3%
PPP 0.39
PTS 15

ON DEFENSE: WHO HE GUARDED

How opponents shot when he was the primary defender. Lower FG% = better defense.

Z. Williamson 103.8 poss
FG% 55.2%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.4
PTS 42
P. Banchero 72.3 poss
FG% 47.1%
3P% 62.5%
PPP 0.3
PTS 22
J. Randle 63.5 poss
FG% 58.3%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.28
PTS 18
H. Barnes 59.3 poss
FG% 40.0%
3P% 28.6%
PPP 0.17
PTS 10
Y. Missi 58.6 poss
FG% 57.1%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.14
PTS 8
B. Adebayo 47.8 poss
FG% 15.4%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.08
PTS 4
A. Thompson 47.1 poss
FG% 30.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.13
PTS 6
L. Dort 46.5 poss
FG% 12.5%
3P% 16.7%
PPP 0.06
PTS 3
J. Collins 43.4 poss
FG% 9.1%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.05
PTS 2
I. Zubac 36.5 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.11
PTS 4

SEASON STATS

48
Games
19.4
PPG
5.7
RPG
2.0
APG
1.1
SPG
1.4
BPG
47.6
FG%
35.7
3P%
80.3
FT%
30.3
MPG

GAME LOG

48 games played