TOR

2025-26 Season

GRADEY DICK

Toronto Raptors | Guard-Forward | 6-7
Gradey Dick
5.8PPG
1.9RPG
0.6APG
13.6MPG
-5.6 Impact

Dick produces at an poor rate for a 14-minute workload.

·
Embed this player card

Copy & paste this HTML into any page:

The widget updates automatically whenever our data does.

IMPACT BREAKDOWN
Every stat, every credit, every cost — per game average
-5.6
Scoring +4.8
Points Scored 5.8 PPG = +5.8
Missed Shots difficulty-adjusted = -2.2
Shot Making above expected FG% = +1.2
Creation +0.4
Assists & Self-Creation 0.6 AST/g + self-creation = +0.4
Turnovers -1.3
Turnovers 0.5/g (live + dead blend) = -1.3
Defense -0.1
Steals 0.6/g = +1.4
Blocks 0.1/g = +0.1
Fouls + context committed fouls, matchup adj = -1.6
Hustle & Effort +1.6
Rebounds 1.9 RPG (OREB + DREB) = +0.2
Contested Shots 0.8/g = +0.2
Deflections 1.4/g = +0.9
Charges Drawn 0.0/g = +0.1
Loose Balls 0.3/g = +0.2
Screen Assists 0.1/g = +0.0
Raw Impact +5.4
Baseline (game-average expected) −11.0
Net Impact
-5.6
19th pctl vs Guards

PBP Credit: Every play is analyzed from play-by-play data. Scorers get difficulty-adjusted credit, assisters get creation value based on the shot opportunity they created, and turnovers are classified by type. Shot difficulty is derived from 1M+ shots across 4 seasons. Full methodology

SKILL DNA

Percentile rank vs 246 Guards with 10+ games

Scoring 24th
6.5 PPG
Efficiency 14th
47.5% TS
Playmaking 3th
0.7 APG
Rebounding 22th
2.1 RPG
Defense 47th
+7.1/g
Hustle 84th
+13.0/g
Creation 26th
+1.93/g
Shot Making 18th
+4.32/g
TO Discipline 77th
0.04/min

THE SEASON SO FAR

Gradey Dick's first 26 games were defined by a maddening inconsistency that kept him firmly anchored to the bench. He exploded out of the gates on 10/22 vs ATL, pouring in 21 points on efficient 6-for-10 shooting to post a massive +17.1 Impact score. But that early flash quickly faded into stretches of deeply damaging basketball, even when his jumper occasionally fell. Take his 12/05 vs LAL appearance, where he hit both of his three-point attempts for eight points but still dragged his squad down with a brutal -12.0 Impact score. That severe negative rating stems from his complete inability to generate stops, bleeding points on the defensive end while offering zero playmaking to offset the damage. He did manage to salvage a few rough shooting nights through sheer grit, notably on 11/16 vs IND. Despite bricking all four of his three-point attempts in that contest, he crashed the glass for six rebounds and applied enough physical defensive pressure to grind out a +3.2 Impact score. Until he stops oscillating between a perimeter threat and a defensive liability, his minutes will remain severely restricted.

Gradey Dick's mid-season stretch was defined by maddening inconsistency, oscillating between invisible cardio sessions and sudden flashes of two-way brilliance. When his jumper abandoned him, he often became an active detriment on the floor. Look at the 01/11 vs PHI disaster, where he managed just two points in 11 minutes and bled value to the tune of a -18.9 Impact score because he offered zero playmaking or defensive friction to compensate for his offensive invisibility. Yet, just four days later during the 01/15 vs IND matchup, he completely flipped the script. He poured in 21 points and grabbed 11 rebounds, posting a massive +20.3 Impact score by crashing the glass relentlessly and finishing efficiently inside the arc despite hitting just a single three-pointer. The highs rarely lasted, though, as seen on 01/22 vs SAC. He scored 11 points in that contest, but his brutal 1-for-6 shooting from deep and complete lack of passing dragged his Impact score down to a dismal -6.9. Until he learns to consistently affect winning when his perimeter shot isn't falling, he will remain a volatile bench gamble rather than a reliable rotation piece.

This stretch of the season was defined by a brutal crisis of confidence, as Gradey Dick bounced erratically between empty rotation minutes and the absolute end of the bench. Even when given a massive leash on 03/23 vs UTA, his 13 points and six assists masked a negative -0.6 Impact score. He bricked four of his five attempts from beyond the arc that night, eating up possessions with hollow volume rather than efficient execution. Conversely, his rare bright spots came when he stopped forcing the issue, like his quiet outing on 02/08 vs IND. He managed only eight points in 16 minutes, yet posted a +2.4 Impact by taking smarter shots and bringing enough defensive energy to survive his shift. Sadly, those moments of poise were buried under disastrous cameos where he simply chucked the basketball. Look no further than 03/25 vs LAC, where he hoisted four wild attempts in just four scoreless minutes to earn a catastrophic -13.7 Impact. He is pressing far too hard, turning brief opportunities into glaring liabilities.

IMPACT TIMELINE

Game-by-game performance vs average. Green = above average, red = below.

PATTERNS

Struggling. Dick has posted negative impact in 81% of games this season. The production rarely outweighs the cost.

Middle-of-the-road efficiency — shoots 45%+ from the field in 44% of games. Not automatic, but not a problem either.

Average defender. Dick doesn't hurt you defensively, but he's not making opponents uncomfortable either.

In a rough stretch — 14 straight games with negative impact. Longest cold streak this season: 14 games.

MATCHUP HISTORY ⚠ Updated 46 days ago

Based on 75 games with tracking data. Shows who guarded this player on offense and who he guarded on defense, with their shooting stats in those matchups.

ON OFFENSE: WHO GUARDED HIM

His shooting stats against each primary defender this season

L. Kennard 43.6 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.05
PTS 2
B. Sheppard 31.3 poss
FG% 60.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.19
PTS 6
V. Krejčí 24.8 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 66.7%
PPP 0.24
PTS 6
Q. Grimes 23.7 poss
FG% 25.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.17
PTS 4
L. McNeeley 23.3 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.17
PTS 4
A. Bailey 23.0 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
B. Miller 22.9 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.09
PTS 2
C. Anthony 22.3 poss
FG% 60.0%
3P% 66.7%
PPP 0.54
PTS 12
T. McConnell 22.0 poss
FG% 75.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.27
PTS 6
B. Sensabaugh 21.9 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 33.3%
PPP 0.32
PTS 7

ON DEFENSE: WHO HE GUARDED

How opponents shot when he was the primary defender. Lower FG% = better defense.

L. Kennard 40.4 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.12
PTS 5
B. Sheppard 32.2 poss
FG% 75.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.19
PTS 6
L. McNeeley 30.2 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.03
PTS 1
Z. Risacher 27.9 poss
FG% 14.3%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.07
PTS 2
Q. Grimes 27.4 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.44
PTS 12
G. Harris 23.1 poss
FG% 66.7%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.39
PTS 9
T. Prince 22.0 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
J. Clarkson 21.7 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 40.0%
PPP 0.37
PTS 8
C. Christie 20.3 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.54
PTS 11
K. Oubre Jr. 19.6 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0

SEASON STATS

79
Games
5.8
PPG
1.9
RPG
0.6
APG
0.6
SPG
0.1
BPG
41.9
FG%
30.1
3P%
87.5
FT%
13.6
MPG

GAME LOG

79 games played