TOR

2025-26 Season

GRADEY DICK

Toronto Raptors | Guard-Forward | 6-7
Gradey Dick
6.1 PPG
2.0 RPG
0.7 APG
14.6 MPG
-1.3 Impact

Dick produces at an below average rate for a 15-minute workload.

NET IMPACT BREAKDOWN
Every stat, every credit, every cost — per game average
-1.3
Scoring +3.4
Points 6.1 PPG × +1.00 = +6.1
Missed 2PT 1.2/g × -0.78 = -0.9
Missed 3PT 1.8/g × -0.87 = -1.6
Missed FT 0.2/g × -1.00 = -0.2
Creation +0.9
Assists 0.7/g × +0.50 = +0.3
Off. Rebounds 0.5/g × +1.26 = +0.6
Turnovers -1.2
Turnovers 0.6/g × -1.95 = -1.2
Defense +0.1
Steals 0.6/g × +2.30 = +1.4
Blocks 0.1/g × +0.90 = +0.1
Def. Rebounds 1.5/g × +0.30 = +0.5
Fouls Committed 2.5/g × -0.75 = -1.9
Hustle & Effort +1.4
Contested Shots 0.9/g × +0.20 = +0.2
Deflections 1.6/g × +0.65 = +1.0
Loose Balls 0.4/g × +0.60 = +0.2
Raw Impact +4.6
Baseline (game-average expected) −5.9
Net Impact
-1.3
51st pctl vs Guards

About this model: Net Impact can't measure floor spacing, help defense rotations, or playmaking gravity — so wings and guards are slightly undervalued vs bigs. How Net Impact works

SKILL DNA

Percentile rank vs 235 Guards with 10+ games

Scoring 25th
6.5 PPG
Efficiency 16th
47.0% TS
Playmaking 4th
0.7 APG
Rebounding 26th
2.2 RPG
Rim Protection 36th
0.10/min
Hustle 59th
0.11/min
Shot Creation 50th
0% pullup
TO Discipline 76th
0.04/min

THE SEASON SO FAR

Gradey Dick’s early season was defined by extreme volatility, oscillating wildly between lethal floor-spacing gravity and crippling shooting slumps. He opened the year looking like a premier off-ball weapon on 10/22 vs ATL. His 21 points and massive +13.3 impact score came directly from relentless movement that completely warped the opposing defense. Surprisingly, Dick also found ways to contribute when his jumper abandoned him. On 11/19 vs PHI, he scored just 4 points but still managed a +5.8 impact score by focusing entirely on high-effort hustle plays and securing critical loose balls. Unfortunately, those gritty performances were frequently erased by disastrous offensive outings. During a brutal 11/24 vs CLE tilt, he went completely scoreless on 0/5 shooting, yielding a catastrophic -11.1 impact score. When he fails to convert open looks, opponents simply sag off him, turning the young wing into a glaring offensive liability.

A crippling lack of offensive assertiveness and glaring defensive vulnerabilities defined this brutal midseason stretch for Gradey Dick. Even when his scoring ticked up, hidden costs at the other end of the floor frequently ruined his overall value. During a 9-point outing on 01/09 vs BOS, opposing guards relentlessly targeted him in isolation to saddle him with a -4.5 impact. Conversely, he occasionally found ways to survive without filling the box score, scratching out a +1.7 impact on 12/20 vs BOS despite scoring just 5 points. Timely off-ball movement and energetic hustle plays kept him marginally in the black that night. Otherwise, tentative trigger fingers and poor spatial awareness routinely sabotaged his shifts. Thankfully, this bleak run ended with a sudden awakening on 01/14 vs IND. Dick erupted for 21 points and 11 rebounds, driving a massive +10.4 impact as his supreme offensive confidence finally returned.

An infuriating inconsistency defined this 20-game stretch for Gradey Dick, as he bounced wildly between being a lethal floor-spacer and a complete offensive ghost. Sometimes, his scoring actually masked a net-negative performance. Take the 02/11 vs DET matchup, where he managed 10 points but posted a miserable -4.7 impact score because of glaring defensive fragility and a tendency to wander off the ball. Yet, he also provided immense value on quiet shooting nights. During the 02/08 vs IND contest, Dick tallied just 8 points but generated a stellar +5.7 impact rating simply through relentless off-ball movement that kept the defense scrambling. When everything clicked, he looked exactly like the sniper his team envisioned. He opened this stretch on 01/16 vs LAC by hunting transition trailing threes for 15 points and a massive +8.2 impact score. Still, those peaks were too often interrupted by stretches of empty minutes where his failure to generate gravity stalled the offense entirely.

IMPACT TIMELINE

Game-by-game performance vs average. Green = above average, red = below.

PATTERNS

Boom-or-bust player. Dick's impact swings wildly relative to his average — some nights dominant, others invisible. Scoring varies by ~5 points per game.

Middle-of-the-road efficiency — shoots 45%+ from the field in 42% of games. Not automatic, but not a problem either.

Average defender. Dick doesn't hurt you defensively, but he's not making opponents uncomfortable either.

Flat trajectory all season — first-half impact -1.8, second-half -0.9. No major shifts, which fits with the overall steadiness.

MATCHUP HISTORY

Based on 75 games with tracking data. Shows who guarded this player on offense and who he guarded on defense, with their shooting stats in those matchups.

ON OFFENSE: WHO GUARDED HIM

His shooting stats against each primary defender this season

L. Kennard 43.6 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.05
PTS 2
B. Sheppard 31.3 poss
FG% 60.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.19
PTS 6
V. Krejčí 24.8 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 66.7%
PPP 0.24
PTS 6
Q. Grimes 23.7 poss
FG% 25.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.17
PTS 4
L. McNeeley 23.3 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.17
PTS 4
A. Bailey 23.0 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
B. Miller 22.9 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.09
PTS 2
C. Anthony 22.3 poss
FG% 60.0%
3P% 66.7%
PPP 0.54
PTS 12
T. McConnell 22.0 poss
FG% 75.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.27
PTS 6
B. Sensabaugh 21.9 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 33.3%
PPP 0.32
PTS 7

ON DEFENSE: WHO HE GUARDED

How opponents shot when he was the primary defender. Lower FG% = better defense.

L. Kennard 40.4 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.12
PTS 5
B. Sheppard 32.2 poss
FG% 75.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.19
PTS 6
L. McNeeley 30.2 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.03
PTS 1
Z. Risacher 27.9 poss
FG% 14.3%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.07
PTS 2
Q. Grimes 27.4 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.44
PTS 12
G. Harris 23.1 poss
FG% 66.7%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.39
PTS 9
T. Prince 22.0 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
J. Clarkson 21.7 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 40.0%
PPP 0.37
PTS 8
C. Christie 20.3 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.54
PTS 11
K. Oubre Jr. 19.6 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0

SEASON STATS

70
Games
6.1
PPG
2.0
RPG
0.7
APG
0.6
SPG
0.1
BPG
41.6
FG%
29.5
3P%
87.1
FT%
14.6
MPG

GAME LOG

70 games played