TOR

2025-26 Season

SANDRO MAMUKELASHVILI

Toronto Raptors | Forward-Center | 6-9
Sandro Mamukelashvili
11.1 PPG
4.9 RPG
1.9 APG
21.9 MPG
+3.5 Impact

Mamukelashvili produces at an above average rate for a 22-minute workload.

NET IMPACT BREAKDOWN
Every stat, every credit, every cost — per game average
+3.5
Scoring +7.4
Points 11.1 PPG × +1.00 = +11.1
Missed 2PT 1.5/g × -0.78 = -1.2
Missed 3PT 2.3/g × -0.87 = -2.0
Missed FT 0.5/g × -1.00 = -0.5
Creation +2.4
Assists 1.9/g × +0.50 = +0.9
Off. Rebounds 1.2/g × +1.26 = +1.5
Turnovers -1.6
Turnovers 0.8/g × -1.95 = -1.6
Defense +1.5
Steals 0.8/g × +2.30 = +1.8
Blocks 0.6/g × +0.90 = +0.5
Def. Rebounds 3.7/g × +0.30 = +1.1
Fouls Committed 2.5/g × -0.75 = -1.9
Hustle & Effort +2.9
Contested Shots 5.8/g × +0.20 = +1.2
Deflections 1.8/g × +0.65 = +1.2
Loose Balls 0.4/g × +0.60 = +0.2
Screen Assists 1.0/g × +0.30 = +0.3
Raw Impact +12.6
Baseline (game-average expected) −9.1
Net Impact
+3.5
85th pctl vs Forwards

About this model: Net Impact can't measure floor spacing, help defense rotations, or playmaking gravity — so wings and guards are slightly undervalued vs bigs. How Net Impact works

SKILL DNA

Percentile rank vs 227 Forwards with 10+ games

Scoring 63th
11.1 PPG
Efficiency 82th
61.3% TS
Playmaking 60th
1.9 APG
Rebounding 61th
4.9 RPG
Rim Protection 76th
0.17/min
Hustle 69th
0.12/min
Shot Creation 50th
0% pullup
TO Discipline 76th
0.04/min

THE SEASON SO FAR

Sandro Mamukelashvili spent the first twenty games of the 2025-26 season morphing into a highly combustible offensive sparkplug off the bench. His peak arrived on 11/21 vs WAS. Relentless rim-running and confident floor spacing fueled a 23-point explosion that earned him a staggering +16.4 impact score. He also learned to influence winning even when his jumper abandoned him. On 11/30 vs NYK, he shot poorly but still generated a +3.1 impact score through phenomenal defensive positioning and consistent hustle on the glass. Conversely, his passive stretches carried hidden costs. On 10/27 vs SAS, a drastic drop in offensive involvement and zero rebounds dragged him to a -3.9 impact score despite perfect shooting efficiency. When he decisively attacks closeouts and stays engaged, he completely transforms the second unit.

This stretch was defined by wild volatility, with Mamukelashvili oscillating between a brilliant frontcourt connective hub and an offensive black hole. On 12/04 vs LAL, he stuffed the stat sheet with 13 points, eight rebounds, and five assists, but his icy 4-for-13 shooting dragged his overall impact down to a -1.6. He found ways to contribute without filling it up on 12/02 vs POR, managing a +0.5 impact on just six points by shifting his focus entirely to facilitating and defensive connectivity. Yet, when his jumper abandoned him, he became a glaring liability. During a brutal outing on 12/31 vs DEN, he rushed his mechanics and bricked all five of his shots, killing offensive momentum for a disastrous -9.7 impact mark. When he plays within himself as a floor-spacing release valve, he elevates his teammates. But the moment he forces bad perimeter looks, his on-court value evaporates instantly.

This twenty-game stretch was a wildly volatile ride for Sandro Mamukelashvili, alternating between lethal floor-spacing brilliance and frustrating shooting slumps. He looked like a legitimate offensive weapon early on, particularly on 01/23 vs POR, where his sizzling efficiency fueled 22 points and a +4.4 impact score. He later embraced a bench sniper role, peaking on 02/05 vs CHI with a massive +14.4 impact mark by stretching the floor beautifully and anchoring the defense. But scoring totals often masked hidden costs. On 02/04 vs MIN, he managed a respectable 14 points, but his tendency to bite on pump fakes and surrender cheap fouls dragged his overall impact down to a -0.6. Cold shooting nights were even worse. During a brutal outing on 02/11 vs DET, his awful perimeter shot selection derailed offensive momentum and fed opponent run-outs, resulting in a dismal -3.5 impact score. Mamukelashvili remains a potent frontcourt weapon when his feet are set, but his defensive lapses and erratic shot selection make him a gamble every time he checks in.

IMPACT TIMELINE

Game-by-game performance vs average. Green = above average, red = below.

PATTERNS

Typical consistency. Mamukelashvili is positive more often than not (66% of games) with scoring varying ~6 points from the average.

Reliable shooter — hits 45%+ from the field in 73% of games. You can count on efficient nights more often than not.

Defensive difference-maker. Mamukelashvili consistently forces tough shots and protects the rim — opponents shoot worse when he's guarding them.

Hot right now — 6 straight games with positive impact. Longest positive run this season: 6 games.

MATCHUP HISTORY

Based on 73 games with tracking data. Shows who guarded this player on offense and who he guarded on defense, with their shooting stats in those matchups.

ON OFFENSE: WHO GUARDED HIM

His shooting stats against each primary defender this season

O. Okongwu 72.3 poss
FG% 37.5%
3P% 33.3%
PPP 0.11
PTS 8
G. Yabusele 49.1 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.2
PTS 10
B. Portis 46.5 poss
FG% 75.0%
3P% 66.7%
PPP 0.34
PTS 16
K. Towns 43.9 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.09
PTS 4
N. Reid 37.9 poss
FG% 66.7%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.4
PTS 15
M. Diabaté 36.0 poss
FG% 42.9%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.19
PTS 7
J. Huff 35.9 poss
FG% 40.0%
3P% 40.0%
PPP 0.28
PTS 10
A. Sengun 35.2 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.23
PTS 8
K. Ware 34.2 poss
FG% 25.0%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.09
PTS 3
J. Sims 32.1 poss
FG% 57.1%
3P% 25.0%
PPP 0.28
PTS 9

ON DEFENSE: WHO HE GUARDED

How opponents shot when he was the primary defender. Lower FG% = better defense.

O. Okongwu 78.8 poss
FG% 45.5%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.13
PTS 10
G. Yabusele 51.6 poss
FG% 66.7%
3P% 60.0%
PPP 0.29
PTS 15
M. Diabaté 47.9 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.04
PTS 2
M. Turner 45.7 poss
FG% 62.5%
3P% 60.0%
PPP 0.28
PTS 13
A. Sengun 45.3 poss
FG% 30.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.2
PTS 9
D. Ayton 44.3 poss
FG% 60.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.14
PTS 6
J. Sims 43.7 poss
FG% 66.7%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.09
PTS 4
J. Huff 40.3 poss
FG% 20.0%
3P% 33.3%
PPP 0.07
PTS 3
N. Queta 40.2 poss
FG% 85.7%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.3
PTS 12
W. Carter Jr. 38.7 poss
FG% 66.7%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.28
PTS 11

SEASON STATS

74
Games
11.1
PPG
4.9
RPG
1.9
APG
0.8
SPG
0.6
BPG
52.1
FG%
38.1
3P%
74.5
FT%
21.9
MPG

GAME LOG

74 games played