TOR

2025-26 Season

SANDRO MAMUKELASHVILI

Toronto Raptors | Forward-Center | 6-9
Sandro Mamukelashvili
10.7PPG
4.9RPG
1.8APG
21.3MPG
+3.3 Impact

Mamukelashvili produces at an above average rate for a 21-minute workload.

·
Embed this player card

Copy & paste this HTML into any page:

The widget updates automatically whenever our data does.

IMPACT BREAKDOWN
Every stat, every credit, every cost — per game average
+3.3
Scoring +9.6
Points Scored 10.7 PPG = +10.7
Missed Shots difficulty-adjusted = -3.3
Shot Making above expected FG% = +2.2
Creation +0.7
Assists & Self-Creation 1.8 AST/g + self-creation = +0.7
Turnovers -1.9
Turnovers 0.8/g (live + dead blend) = -1.9
Defense +0.3
Steals 0.8/g = +1.8
Blocks 0.5/g = +0.5
Fouls + context committed fouls, matchup adj = -2.0
Hustle & Effort +4.3
Rebounds 4.9 RPG (OREB + DREB) = +1.8
Contested Shots 4.9/g = +1.0
Deflections 1.5/g = +1.0
Charges Drawn 0.0/g = +0.0
Loose Balls 0.3/g = +0.2
Screen Assists 0.9/g = +0.3
Raw Impact +13.0
Baseline (game-average expected) −9.7
Net Impact
+3.3
69th pctl vs Forwards

PBP Credit: Every play is analyzed from play-by-play data. Scorers get difficulty-adjusted credit, assisters get creation value based on the shot opportunity they created, and turnovers are classified by type. Shot difficulty is derived from 1M+ shots across 4 seasons. Full methodology

SKILL DNA

Percentile rank vs 235 Forwards with 10+ games

Scoring 60th
10.7 PPG
Efficiency 77th
60.2% TS
Playmaking 57th
1.8 APG
Rebounding 62th
4.9 RPG
Defense 89th
+10.5/g
Hustle 74th
+15.2/g
Creation 79th
+3.53/g
Shot Making 62th
+6.72/g
TO Discipline 73th
0.04/min

THE SEASON SO FAR

Sandro Mamukelashvili’s first 27 games were defined by sheer volatility, swinging wildly between invisible bench shifts and explosive offensive outbursts. When his shot was falling, he looked like a premier rotational weapon. He ripped through the defense on 11/22 vs WAS, dropping 23 points in just 21 minutes to earn a massive +20.7 impact score. Even when his jumper abandoned him, he occasionally salvaged his minutes through sheer grit. During a spot start on 12/05 vs LAL, he clanked his way to a 4-for-13 shooting night but still scraped out a +4.3 impact score by crashing the glass for eight rebounds and keeping the ball moving with five assists. Yet, his lack of physical resistance often held him back. On 10/29 vs HOU, an otherwise tidy 10-point scoring night resulted in a -3.4 impact score because he grabbed just a single rebound and bled value on the defensive end. He remains an erratic but fascinating puzzle.

Sandro Mamukelashvili spent this midseason stretch operating as the ultimate high-variance wild card, alternating between brilliant offensive hub and complete defensive liability. During the 01/04 vs ATL matchup, he posted a massive +22.2 impact score despite scoring a modest 13 points. That stellar rating stemmed entirely from his relentless hustle and unselfish playmaking, as he grabbed 12 rebounds and dished out 8 assists to create immense value without dominating the ball. He also flashed pure scoring punch off the bench on 01/19 vs LAL, pouring in 20 points on crisp 8-for-12 shooting to earn a +21.6 impact. Yet, his floor remains dangerously low. Even when he found the basket, hidden costs occasionally ruined his minutes. He dropped 14 points on 02/04 vs MIN, but sluggish defensive rotations and a lack of rebounding dragged his impact down to a -0.3. When his jumper falls and he crashes the glass, he is a premier rotation big, but those quiet nights quickly render him unplayable.

Sandro Mamukelashvili flipped a switch in late March, transforming from an erratic reserve into a highly efficient offensive spark plug. Early in this stretch, poor shot selection completely sabotaged his minutes, bottoming out on 02/24 vs OKC where a brutal 1-for-7 shooting night dragged him to a dismal -8.5 impact score. Everything changed when he was thrust into the starting lineup on 03/23 vs UTA. He poured in 23 points on 9-for-14 shooting, generating a massive +22.9 impact score by blending perimeter spacing with decisive, hard-nosed cuts to the rim. He sustained that aggressive rhythm off the bench shortly after, dropping 18 points and grabbing 9 rebounds on 03/28 vs NOP for a stellar +19.8 impact. By the end of the season, he was finding ways to tilt the floor even when his jumper stopped falling. During the 04/18 vs CLE matchup, Mamukelashvili managed just 3 points but still posted a +3.4 impact score by battling for 8 crucial rebounds and keeping the offense humming with smart extra passes.

Sandro Mamukelashvili morphed into a highly disruptive, floor-stretching weapon during this late-season stretch. He consistently turned high-energy bench minutes into massive positive swings. He briefly lost his rhythm early on, posting a brutal -11.1 impact on Mar 11 vs NOP because he exclusively hunted three-pointers and abandoned his offensive versatility. He quickly recalibrated. Exploding in a spot start on Mar 23 vs UTA, the big man dropped 23 points to generate a staggering +21.0 impact score. Relentless activity on the margins and elite hustle metrics (+8.1) amplified his scoring that night. Even when his jumper vanished, he found ways to contribute. During an ugly five-point showing on Apr 09 vs MIA, elite defensive positioning (+5.0) and high-energy hustle plays (+2.3) kept his overall impact positive (+1.1) despite a severe drop in shooting efficiency.

IMPACT TIMELINE

Game-by-game performance vs average. Green = above average, red = below.

PATTERNS

Volatile for his role. Mamukelashvili has noticeable ups and downs, with scoring moving ~6 points between games.

Reliable shooter — hits 45%+ from the field in 71% of games. You can count on efficient nights more often than not.

Defensive difference-maker. Mamukelashvili consistently forces tough shots and protects the rim — opponents shoot worse when he's guarding them.

Tends to go on runs. Longest hot streak: 9 games. Longest cold streak: 4 games.

MATCHUP HISTORY ⚠ Updated 46 days ago

Based on 73 games with tracking data. Shows who guarded this player on offense and who he guarded on defense, with their shooting stats in those matchups.

ON OFFENSE: WHO GUARDED HIM

His shooting stats against each primary defender this season

O. Okongwu 72.3 poss
FG% 37.5%
3P% 33.3%
PPP 0.11
PTS 8
G. Yabusele 49.1 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.2
PTS 10
B. Portis 46.5 poss
FG% 75.0%
3P% 66.7%
PPP 0.34
PTS 16
K. Towns 43.9 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.09
PTS 4
N. Reid 37.9 poss
FG% 66.7%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.4
PTS 15
M. Diabaté 36.0 poss
FG% 42.9%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.19
PTS 7
J. Huff 35.9 poss
FG% 40.0%
3P% 40.0%
PPP 0.28
PTS 10
A. Sengun 35.2 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.23
PTS 8
K. Ware 34.2 poss
FG% 25.0%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.09
PTS 3
J. Sims 32.1 poss
FG% 57.1%
3P% 25.0%
PPP 0.28
PTS 9

ON DEFENSE: WHO HE GUARDED

How opponents shot when he was the primary defender. Lower FG% = better defense.

O. Okongwu 78.8 poss
FG% 45.5%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.13
PTS 10
G. Yabusele 51.6 poss
FG% 66.7%
3P% 60.0%
PPP 0.29
PTS 15
M. Diabaté 47.9 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.04
PTS 2
M. Turner 45.7 poss
FG% 62.5%
3P% 60.0%
PPP 0.28
PTS 13
A. Sengun 45.3 poss
FG% 30.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.2
PTS 9
D. Ayton 44.3 poss
FG% 60.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.14
PTS 6
J. Sims 43.7 poss
FG% 66.7%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.09
PTS 4
J. Huff 40.3 poss
FG% 20.0%
3P% 33.3%
PPP 0.07
PTS 3
N. Queta 40.2 poss
FG% 85.7%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.3
PTS 12
W. Carter Jr. 38.7 poss
FG% 66.7%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.28
PTS 11

SEASON STATS

87
Games
10.7
PPG
4.9
RPG
1.8
APG
0.8
SPG
0.5
BPG
51.7
FG%
38.4
3P%
73.3
FT%
21.3
MPG

GAME LOG

87 games played